Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in "Special" NSCLC Populations: A Viable Approach?

A novel investigation into the negative impact of opioid use on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have effectively improved the clinical outcome of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Opioids are commonly used for pain relief in cancer patients. This study aims to clarify the prognostic impact of opioid use in advanced NSCLC patients receiving ICI therapy.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was carried out using online databases before July 2023. The meta-analysis was used to clarify the correlation of opioid use with the overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) of ICI-treated NSCLC patients, both of which were determined using hazard ratios (HRs) coupled with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Then, an independent cohort enrolling 181 NSCLC patients was utilized for validation. Finally, a comprehensive bioinformatics analysis based on TCGA cohort was performed to investigate the prognostic significance of opioid target genes (OTGs) and their correlation with immune infiltration in NSCLC patients.

RESULTS

A total of 8 studies enrolling 1174 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Opioid use was negatively associated with worse PFS (HR = 2.16, 95 %CI: 1.26-3.71) and OS (HR = 2.02, 95 %CI: 1.54-2.63) in ICI-treated NSCLC patients. The retrospective validation confirmed the above result and identified opioid use as an independent unfavorable predictor for PFS and OS in both the entire cohort and ICI subgroup. The bioinformatic analysis identified 14 prognostic OTGs (CYP17A1, PDYN, PYCARD, FGA, NTSR1, FABP1, HPCA, PENK, PDGFB, LIN7A, FKBP5, TYMS, CACNA1H and LDHA), most of which were correlated with immune infiltration in NSCLC. A risk model was constructed based on 14 OTGs and found to effectively stratify the clinical outcome in both the training and validation set, independent of age, gender and TNM staging system. The model was also significantly correlated with infiltration of activated dendritic cells, neutrophils and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. Finally, a nomogram was constructed based on the model, age, gender and TNM stage, which could predict well the 1-, 3- and 5-year survival of NSCLC patients.

CONCLUSION

Opioid use is correlated with the poor clinical outcome in ICI-treated NSCLC patients. Precise pain management is highly advocated and opioids are recommended to be cautiously used in these patients. OTGs have the potential to be prognostic biomarkers for NSCLC patients and their role in tumor immunity needs to be further investigated.

Identification of C-PLAN index as a novel prognostic predictor for advanced lung cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors

Objective

Increasing studies have highlighted the potential utility of non-invasive prognostic biomarkers in advanced lung cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) based anti-cancer therapies. Here, a novel prognostic predictor named as C-PLAN integrating C-reactive protein (CRP), Performance status (PS), Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), Albumin (ALB), and derived Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) was identified and validated in a single-center retrospective cohort.

Methods

The clinical data of 192 ICI-treated lung cancer patients was retrospectively analyzed. The pretreatment levels of CRP, PS, LDH, ALB and dNLR were scored respectively and then their scores were added up to form C-PLAN index. The correlation of C-PLAN index with the progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) was analyzed by a Kaplan-Meier model. The multivariate analysis was used to identify whether C-PLAN index was an independent prognostic predictor.

Results

A total of 88 and 104 patients were included in the low and high C-PLAN index group respectively. High C-PLAN index was significantly correlated with worse PFS and OS in ICI-treated lung cancer patients (both p<0.001). The multivariate analysis revealed high C-PLAN index was an independent unfavorable factor affecting PFS (hazard ratio (HR)=1.821; 95%confidence interval (CI)=1.291-2.568) and OS (HR=2.058, 95%CI=1.431-2.959). The high C-PLAN index group had a significantly lower disease control rate than the low C-PLAN index group (p=0.024), while no significant difference was found for objective response rate (p=0.172). The subgroup analysis based on clinical features (pathological type, therapy strategy, TNM stage and age) confirmed the prognostic value of C-PLAN index, except for patients receiving ICI monotherapy or with age ranging from 18 to 65 years old. Finally, a nomogram was constructed based on C-PLAN index, age, gender, TNM stage and smoking status, which could predict well the 1-, 2- and 3-year survival of ICI-treated lung cancer patients.

Conclusion

The C-PLAN index has great potential to be utilized as a non-invasive, inexpensive and reliable prognostic predictor for advanced lung cancer patients receiving ICI-based anti-cancer therapies.

Immunotherapy for the elderly. Maybe the best option for lung cancer?

Lung cancer is usually diagnosed at advanced stage and systematic therapy is administered. New current diagnostic techniques such as the convex-endobronchial ultrasound, radial endobronchial ultrasound, cone beam ct, electromagnetic navigation and robotic bronchoscopy provide us with a high diagnostic yield. These techniques are minimal invasive and patients with comorbidities such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart failure can be diagnosed with minimal adverse effects. All these techniques provide sufficient sample for molecular investigation. Since immunotherapy was first administered, we have more and more information regarding the appropriate patient target group. Several published studies divided patients as elderly ≥75 and non-elderly ≤74 and investigated the adverse effects of different drugs and survival. In our current commentary we present information on patients receiving immunotherapy versus chemoimmunotherapy in two groups of elderly and non-elderly. Elderly patients can receive both combinations without differences between the two groups, however; more studies are needed to clarify certain aspects.