Time- and Gender-Dependent Alterations in Mice during the Aging Process

Do we understand sex-related differences governing dimorphic disease mechanisms in preclinical animal models of osteoarthritis?

Research conducted using murine preclinical models of osteoarthritis (OA) over the last three decades has brought forth many exciting developments showcasing mechanisms and pathways that drive disease pathogenesis. These models have identified therapeutic targets that can be modulated via innovative biologicals and pharmaceuticals. However, many of these approaches have failed to translate to humans and reach the clinic. This commentary aims to highlight some of the key hurdles in the translation of novel findings using preclinical OA models with a focus on sex-related differences and variations in chondrosenescence in these animal models. Notably, besides chondrosenescence, other signaling mechanisms have been shown to be affected by sexual dimorphism (i.e. TGFβ signaling, EGFR/integrin α1β1 and Trpv4). Preclinical models of OA mainly utilize male mice due to their capacity to manifest fast progressing OA structural phenotype compared to female mice. This experimental trend has overlooked and ignored the sex-related effects of numerous mechanisms affecting joint structure, that influence OA structural progression. Future work should focus on analyzing both sexes and understanding sex-related differences, which will enable us to gain a better understanding of the progression of OA based on sex-related mechanistic discrepancies, and potentially improve translatability.

Diverse Response to Local Pharmacological Blockade of Sirt1 Cleavage in Age-Induced versus Trauma-Induced Osteoarthritis Female Mice

Objective: Previous studies have shown that the cleavage of Sirt1 contributes to the development of osteoarthritis (OA). In fact, OA was effectively abrogated by the intra-articular (IA) administration of two compounds, one blocking Sirt1 cleavage (CA074me) and the other activating Sirt1 (SRT1720), using a post-traumatically induced model (PTOA) in young female mice. In this study, we attempted to understand if this local treatment is effective in preventing age-associated OA (AOA) progression and symptoms. Design: A group of 17-month-old female C57BL/6J mice were IA administered with CA074me and/or SRT1720 or their combination. Joint histopathological analysis and bone histomorphometry were carried out, with an assessment of knee mechanical hyperalgesia. A serum analysis for NT/CT Sirt1 was carried out along with immunohistochemistry for articular cartilage to detect p16INK4A or γH2A.X. Similarly, meniscal cartilage was monitored for Lef1 and Col1a1 deposition. The data were compared for young female mice subjected to post-traumatic OA (PTOA). Results: Similar to PTOA, combination-treated AOA exhibited improved knee hyperalgesia, yet structural improvements were undetected, corresponding to unchanged NT/CT Sirt1 serum levels. Both AOA and PTOA exhibited unchanged staining for nuclear p16INK4A or γH2A.X and lacked a correlation with OA severity. Contrarily to PTOA, the combination treatment with AOA did not exhibit a local reduction in the Lef1 and Col1 targets. Conclusions: When targeting Sirt1 cleavage, the PTOA and AOA models exhibited a similar pain response to the combination treatment; however, they displayed diverse structural outcomes for joint-related damage, related to Lef1-dependent signaling. Interestingly, nuclear p16INK4A was unaffected in both models, regardless of the treatment's effectiveness. Finally, these findings highlight the variations in the responses between two highly researched OA preclinical models, reflecting OA pathophysiology heterogeneity and variations in gender-related drug-response mechanisms.