Data-Independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometry Analysis of FFPE Rectal Cancer Samples Offers In-Depth Proteomics Characterization of the Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

Characterization and proteomic analysis of plasma-derived small extracellular vesicles in locally advanced rectal cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) stands as a pivotal therapeutic approach for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), yet the absence of a reliable biomarker to forecast its efficacy remains a challenge. Thus, this study aimed to assess whether the proteomic compositions of small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) might offer predictive insights into nCRT response among patients with LARC, while also delving into the proteomic alterations within sEVs post nCRT.

METHODS

Plasma samples were obtained from LARC patients both pre- and post-nCRT. Plasma-derived sEVs were isolated utilizing the TIO2-based method, followed by LC-MS/MS-based proteomic analysis. Subsequently, pathway enrichment analysis was performed to the Differentially Expressed Proteins (DEPs). Additionally, ROC curves were generated to evaluate the predictive potential of sEV proteins in determining nCRT response. Public databases were interrogated to identify sEV protein-associated genes that are correlated with the response to nCRT in LARC.

RESULTS

A total of 16 patients were enrolled. Among them, 8 patients achieved a pathological complete response (good responders, GR), while the remaining 8 did not achieve a complete response (poor responders, PR). Our analysis of pretreatment plasma-derived sEVs revealed 67 significantly up-regulated DEPs and 9 significantly down-regulated DEPs. Notably, PROC (AUC: 0.922), F7 (AUC: 0.953) and AZU1 (AUC: 0.906) demonstrated high AUC values and significant differences (P value < 0.05) in discriminating between GR and PR patients. Furthermore, a signature consisting of 5 sEV protein-associated genes (S100A6, ENO1, MIF, PRDX6 and MYL6) was capable of predicting the response to nCRT, yielding an AUC of 0.621(95% CI: 0.454-0.788). Besides, this 5-sEV protein-associated gene signature enabled stratification of patients into low- and high-risk group, with the low-risk group demonstrating a longer overall survival in the testing set (P = 0.048). Moreover, our investigation identified 11 significantly up-regulated DEPs and 31 significantly down-regulated DEPs when comparing pre- and post-nCRT proteomic profiles. GO analysis unveiled enrichment in the regulation of phospholipase A2 activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Differential expression of sEV proteins distinguishes between GR and PR patients and holds promise as predictive markers for nCRT response and prognosis in patients with LARC. Furthermore, our findings highlight substantial alterations in sEV protein composition following nCRT.

Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphic variants C677T and A1298C in rectal cancer in Slavic population: significance for cancer risk and response to chemoradiotherapy

Background: Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been suggested as risk, prognostic, and predictive factors for colorectal cancer in various populations, but have not been validated so far. The aim of this study was to examine the association of MTHFR C677T (rs1801133) and A1298C (rs1801131) single nucleotide polymorphisms with the risk of rectal cancer as well as the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) based on 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) in the locally advanced setting. Patients and methods: This case-control study included 119 healthy controls and 97 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). For MTHFR genotyping, restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis (PCR-RFLP) was employed. Results: In silico analysis highlighted that SNPs C677T and A1298T correlate with MTHFR gene expression, and that gene expression profile correlates with cancer risk and stage. Using dominant and recessive models, it was found that the MTHFR 677CC vs. 677CT+677TT have increased risk of cancer development (odds ratio (OR): 2.27; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.30-3.95, p = 0.002) as well as 677CC+677CT compared to 677TT (OR: 4.18, 95% CI: 1.16-14.99, p = 0.014). MTHFR 1298AA also shown increased risk for cancer development compared to 1298AC+1298CC (OR:2.0, 95% CI: 1.20-3.59, p = 0.035) Statistical analysis of combined genotypes highlighted the protective role of CT/AC combined genotype (OR: 3.15 95% CI: 1.576-6.279, p = 0.002) while the CC/AA genotype showed an increased risk for rectal cancer development (OR: 2.499, 95% CI: 1.246-5.081, p = 0.016) The carriers of the 677C/1298A haplotype had the highest risk for developing rectal cancer (OR: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.198-2.530, p = 0.002) while the 677T/1298C haplotype seems to provide a protective effect. (OR: 0.44; 95%CI 0.248-0.795, p = 0.003). No significant association with response to chemoradiotherapy was found. Conclusion: Our data point to MTHFR 667C allele and 1298A alleles as low-penetrance risk factors for rectal cancer in our population. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study of this type performed on the Slavic population in the Western Balkan, as various population-based factors might also be significant our findings can be used for future meta-analyses and the construction of genetic cancer risk prediction panels.