Are ABO Blood Groups or Rh Antigen Perinatal Factors Affecting the Pass Rate of Transient Otoacoustic Emissions Screening Tests in Healthy Newborns during the First 48 h of Life?

ABO blood group and cochlear function: evidence from a large sample size study

OBJECTIVE

The present study investigated the effect of blood group on cochlear function in a large participant sample across different age groups. The study hypothesis was that participants with blood group O would show relatively reduced cochlear function as reflected in otoacoustic emission (OAE) measures.

DESIGN

Data were collected from transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE), distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE), DPOAE input/output (I/O) function, and spontaneous otoacoustic emission (SOAE) recordings.

STUDY SAMPLE

Four hundred and sixty-three normal hearing adults aged 20-59 years among the four ABO blood groups participated in the study.

RESULTS

TEOAE and DPOAE amplitudes did not reveal significant differences for participants with blood group O compared with participants with non-O blood groups. No significant differences in I/O function categories were found among participants with different blood groups. SOAE prevalence was also not significantly different across blood groups. However, previously reported age and gender differences for OAE variables were confirmed.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants with blood group O were not found to have significantly reduced cochlear function, based on OAE measures. Results from the current study do not support the hypothesis that normal hearing individuals with different ABO blood groups differ in level of cochlear function.

Influence of umbilical cord pH on the outcome of hearing screening with otoacoustic emissions in healthy newborns

The effect of hypoxia on the functioning of the outer hair cells of the cochlea, which are responsible for the response to otoemissions used in neonatal hearing screening, is well known. The aim of this study is to determine the influence of mild to moderate variations in umbilical cord pH at birth on the outcome of hearing screening with otoemissions in healthy newborns without hearing risk factors. The sample is composed of 4536 healthy infants. The results show no significant differences in the hearing screening outcome between the asphyctic (<7.20) and normal pH group. Nor is a figure below 7.20 detected in the sample that is related to an alteration in the screening. When broken down into subgroups with known factors of variation in the screening result, such as gender or lactation, no significant differences in response were detected. Apgar ≤7 is significantly related to pH<7.20. In conclusion, mild-moderate asphyxia associated with delivery of healthy newborns, without auditory risk factors, does not alter the outcome of otoemission screening.