Future Perspectives of Newborn Screening for Inborn Errors of Immunity

Diagnosis of Chronic Granulomatous Disease: Strengths and Challenges in the Genomic Era

Chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) is a group of rare primary inborn errors of immunity characterised by a defect in the phagocyte respiratory burst, which leads to severe and life-threatening infective and inflammatory complications. Despite recent advances in our understanding of the genetic and molecular pathophysiology of X-linked and autosomal recessive CGD, and growth in the availability of functional and genetic testing, there remain significant barriers to early and accurate diagnosis. In the current review, we provide an up-to-date summary of CGD pathophysiology, underpinning current methods of diagnostic testing for CGD and closely related disorders. We present an overview of the benefits of early diagnosis and when to suspect and test for CGD. We discuss current and historical methods for functional testing of NADPH oxidase activity, as well as assays for measuring protein expression of NADPH oxidase subunits. Lastly, we focus on genetic and genomic methods employed to diagnose CGD, including gene-targeted panels, comprehensive genomic testing and ancillary methods. Throughout, we highlight general limitations of testing, and caveats specific to interpretation of results in the context of CGD and related disorders, and provide an outlook for newborn screening and the future.

Quality considerations and major pitfalls for high throughput DNA-based newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency and spinal muscular atrophy

BACKGROUND

Many newborn screening programs worldwide have introduced screening for diseases using DNA extracted from dried blood spots (DBS). In Germany, DNA-based assays are currently used to screen for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID), spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), and sickle cell disease (SCD).

METHODS

This study analysed the impact of pre-analytic DNA carry-over in sample preparation on the outcome of DNA-based newborn screening for SCID and SMA and compared the efficacy of rapid extraction versus automated protocols. Additionally, the distribution of T cell receptor excision circles (TREC) on DBS cards, commonly used for routine newborn screening, was determined.

RESULTS

Contaminations from the punching procedure were detected in the SCID and SMA assays in all experimental setups tested. However, a careful evaluation of a cut-off allowed for a clear separation of true positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplifications. Our rapid in-house extraction protocol produced similar amounts compared to automated commercial systems. Therefore, it can be used for reliable DNA-based screening. Additionally, the amount of extracted DNA significantly differs depending on the location of punching within a DBS.

CONCLUSIONS

Newborn screening for SMA and SCID can be performed reliably. It is crucial to ensure that affected newborns are not overlooked. Therefore a carefully consideration of potential contaminating factors and the definition of appropriate cut-offs to minimise the risk of false results are of special concern. It is also important to note that the location of punching plays a pivotal role, and therefore an exact quantification of TREC numbers per μl may not be reliable and should therefore be avoided.

Newborn screening for inborn errors of immunity: The status worldwide

Background

Newborn screening (NBS) for the early detection of inborn errors of immunity (IEI) has been implemented in a few countries. The objective of this study was to verify the situation and define obstacles to the implementation of NBS worldwide.

Methods

A questionnaire was developed by the Inborn Errors of Immunity Committee of the World Allergy Organization (WAO) with 17 questions regarding NBS for IEI in the physician's workplace, NBS test type, problems hindering NBS implementation, reimbursement for IEI therapy, presence of a national IEI registry, referral centers, molecular diagnosis, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation centers, gene therapy, and immunoglobulin replacement therapy. The survey was sent by email once a week to doctors and others associated with WAO and the main immunology societies worldwide as a Google Form™ to be completed during September and October 2021.

Results

Two hundred twenty-nine questionnaires were completed, of which 216 (94.3%) were completed by physicians. One hundred seventy-six (76.8%) physicians were both allergists and immunologists. The agreement between allergists/immunologists and non-allergists/non-immunologists for the question "Is there NBS for IEI in the country you work in?" was good (κ = 0,64: 95% CI 0.55-0.69). Ninety-eight (42.8%) participants were from Latin America, 35 (15.3%) from North America, 29 (12.6%) from Europe, 18 (7.9%) from Africa, 44 (19.2%) from Asia, and 5 (2.2%) from Oceania. More than half the participants (n = 124, 54.2%) regularly treated patients with IEI, followed by occasional treatment (n = 77, 33.6%), or never (n = 28, 12.2%). Of the respondents, 14.8% reported that their countries performed NBS for IEI, whereas 42.2% reported their countries did not. T-cell receptor excision circles was the most widely used technique in some countries, with 75 (59.9%) for the diagnosis of NBS for IEI, followed by combined use with kappa deleting-recombination excision circles. Only 13 participants (10.3%) underwent neonatal exon screening in their respective countries. Financial and technical issues were among the major obstacles to the implementation of NBS for IEI.

Conclusions

This pilot study showed that few countries have implemented NBS for IEI, despite the presence of immunology referral centers and the availability of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and intravenous immunoglobulin replacement therapy. The findings highlight the difficulties, mainly financial and technical, hindering wide application of NBS. Sharing experiences, technologies, and resources at the international level can help overcome these difficulties.

Newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency and inborn errors of immunity

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Severe combined immune deficiency (SCID) is the most devastating genetic disease of the immune system with an unfavorable outcome unless diagnosed early in life. Newborn screening (NBS) programs play a crucial role in facilitating early diagnoses and timely interventions for affected infants.

RECENT FINDINGS

SCID marked the pioneering inborn error of immunity (IEI) to undergo NBS, a milestone achieved 15 years ago through the enumeration of T-cell receptor excision circles (TRECs) extracted from Guthrie cards. This breakthrough has revolutionized our approach to SCID, enabling not only presymptomatic identification and prompt treatments (including hematopoietic stem cell transplantation), but also enhancing our comprehension of the global epidemiology of SCID.

SUMMARY

NBS is continuing to evolve with the advent of novel diagnostic technologies and treatments. Following the successful implementation of SCID-NBS programs, a call for the early identification of additional IEIs is the next step, encompassing a broader spectrum of IEIs, facilitating early diagnoses, and preventing morbidity and mortality.

Clinical Validation of a Primary Antibody Deficiency Screening Algorithm for Primary Care

PURPOSE

The diagnostic delay of primary antibody deficiencies (PADs) is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Therefore, a screening algorithm was previously developed for the early detection of patients at risk of PAD in primary care. We aimed to clinically validate and optimize the PAD screening algorithm by applying it to a primary care database in the Netherlands.

METHODS

The algorithm was applied to a data set of 61,172 electronic health records (EHRs). Four hundred high-scoring EHRs were screened for exclusion criteria, and remaining patients were invited for serum immunoglobulin analysis and referred if clinically necessary.

RESULTS

Of the 104 patients eligible for inclusion, 16 were referred by their general practitioner for suspected PAD, of whom 10 had a PAD diagnosis. In patients selected by the screening algorithm and included for laboratory analysis, prevalence of PAD was ~ 1:10 versus 1:1700-1:25,000 in the general population. To optimize efficiency of the screening process, we refitted the algorithm with the subset of high-risk patients, which improved the area under the curve-receiver operating characteristics curve value to 0.80 (95% confidence interval 0.63-0.97). We propose a two-step screening process, first applying the original algorithm to distinguish high-risk from low-risk patients, then applying the optimized algorithm to select high-risk patients for serum immunoglobulin analysis.

CONCLUSION

Using the screening algorithm, we were able to identify 10 new PAD patients from a primary care population, thus reducing diagnostic delay. Future studies should address further validation in other populations and full cost-effectiveness analyses.

REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov record number NCT05310604, first submitted 25 March 2022.

Case report: IKZF1-related early-onset CID is expected to be missed in TREC-based SCID screening but can be identified by determination of KREC levels

This report illustrates a case that would have been missed in the most common screening algorithms used worldwide in newborn screening (NBS) for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID). Our patient presented with a clinical picture that suggested a severe inborn error of immunity (IEI). The 6-month-old baby had normal T-cell receptor excision circle (TREC) levels but no measurable level of kappa-deleting recombination excision circles (KRECs) in the NBS sample. A de novo IKZF1-mutation (c.476A>G, p.Asn159Ser) was found. The clinical picture, immunologic workup, and genetic result were consistent with IKZF1-related combined immunodeficiency (CID). Our patient had symptomatic treatment and underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). IKZF1-related CID is a rare, serious, and early-onset disease; this case provides further insights into the phenotype, including KREC status.

Development of a primary care screening algorithm for the early detection of patients at risk of primary antibody deficiency

BACKGROUND

Primary antibody deficiencies (PAD) are characterized by a heterogeneous clinical presentation and low prevalence, contributing to a median diagnostic delay of 3-10 years. This increases the risk of morbidity and mortality from undiagnosed PAD, which may be prevented with adequate therapy. To reduce the diagnostic delay of PAD, we developed a screening algorithm using primary care electronic health record (EHR) data to identify patients at risk of PAD. This screening algorithm can be used as an aid to notify general practitioners when further laboratory evaluation of immunoglobulins should be considered, thereby facilitating a timely diagnosis of PAD.

METHODS

Candidate components for the algorithm were based on a broad range of presenting signs and symptoms of PAD that are available in primary care EHRs. The decision on inclusion and weight of the components in the algorithm was based on the prevalence of these components among PAD patients and control groups, as well as clinical rationale.

RESULTS

We analyzed the primary care EHRs of 30 PAD patients, 26 primary care immunodeficiency patients and 58,223 control patients. The median diagnostic delay of PAD patients was 9.5 years. Several candidate components showed a clear difference in prevalence between PAD patients and controls, most notably the mean number of antibiotic prescriptions in the 4 years prior to diagnosis (5.14 vs. 0.48). The final algorithm included antibiotic prescriptions, diagnostic codes for respiratory tract and other infections, gastro-intestinal complaints, auto-immune symptoms, malignancies and lymphoproliferative symptoms, as well as laboratory values and visits to the general practitioner.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we developed a screening algorithm based on a broad range of presenting signs and symptoms of PAD, which is suitable to implement in primary care. It has the potential to considerably reduce diagnostic delay in PAD, and will be validated in a prospective study. Trial registration The consecutive prospective study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov under NCT05310604.

Advances and Challenges of the Decade: The Ever-Changing Clinical and Genetic Landscape of Immunodeficiency

In the past 10 years, we have witnessed major advances in clinical immunology. Newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency has become universal in the United States and screening programs are being extended to severe combined immunodeficiency and other inborn errors of immunity globally. Early genetic testing is becoming the norm for many of our patients and allows for informed selection of targeted therapies including biologics repurposed from other specialties. During the COVID-19 pandemic, our understanding of essential immune responses expanded and the discovery of immune gene defects continued. Immunoglobulin products, the backbone of protection for antibody deficiency syndromes, came into use to minimize side effects. New polyclonal and monoclonal antibody products emerged with increasing options to manage respiratory viral agents such as SARS-CoV-2 and respiratory syncytial virus. Against these advances, we still face major challenges. Atypical is becoming typical as phenotypes of distinct genetic disease overlap whereas the clinical spectrum of the same genetic defect widens. Therefore, clinical judgment needs to be paired with repeated deep immune phenotyping and upfront genetic testing, as technologies rapidly evolve, and clinical disease often progresses with age. Managing patients with organ damage resulting from immune dysregulation poses a special major clinical challenge and management often lacks standardization, from autoimmune cytopenias, granulomatous interstitial lung disease, enteropathy, and liver disease to endocrine, rheumatologic, and neurologic complications. Clinical, translational, and basic science networks will continue to advance the field; however, cross-talk and education with practicing allergists/immunologists are essential to keep up with the ever-changing clinical and genetic landscape of inborn errors of immunity.

The Editor's Choice for Issue 4, Volume 7

Dear Readers: welcome to the Editor's Choice for Volume 7, Issue 4 of the International Journal for Newborn Screening [...].