Comparative Transcriptome Analysis of Two Root-Feeding Grape Phylloxera (D. vitifoliae) Lineages Feeding on a Rootstock and V. vinifera

Comparative study of neuropeptide signaling systems in Hemiptera

Numerous physiological processes in insects are tightly regulated by neuropeptides and their receptors. Although they form an ancient signaling system, there is still a great deal of variety in neuropeptides and their receptors among different species within the same order. Neuropeptides and their receptors have been documented in many hemipteran insects, but the differences among them have been poorly characterized. Commercial grapevines worldwide are plagued by the bug Daktulosphaira vitifoliae (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha). Here, 33 neuropeptide precursors and 48 putative neuropeptide G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) genes were identified in D. vitifoliae. Their expression profiles at the probe and feeding stages reflected potential regulatory roles in probe behavior. By comparison, we found that the Releasing Hormone-Related Peptides (GnRHs) system of Sternorrhyncha was differentiated from those of the other 2 suborders in Hemiptera. Independent secondary losses of the adipokinetic hormone/corazonin-related peptide receptor (ACP) and corazonin (CRZ) occurred during the evolution of Sternorrhyncha. Additionally, we discovered that the neuropeptide signaling systems of Sternorrhyncha were very different from those of Heteroptera and Auchenorrhyncha, which was consistent with Sternorrhyncha's phylogenetic position at the base of the order. This research provides more knowledge on neuropeptide systems and sets the groundwork for the creation of novel D. vitifoliae management strategies that specifically target these signaling pathways.

Detoxification gene families in Phylloxera: Endogenous functions and roles in response to the environment

Phylloxera, Daktulosphaira vitifoliae, is an agronomic pest that feeds monophagously on grapevine, Vitis spp. host plants. Phylloxera manipulates primary and secondary plant metabolism to establish either leaf or root galls. We manually annotated 198 detoxification genes potentially involved in plant host manipulation, including cytochrome P450 (66 CYPs), carboxylesterase (20 CCEs), glutathione-S-transferase (10 GSTs), uridine diphosphate-glycosyltransferase (35 UGTs) and ABC transporter (67 ABCs) families. Transcriptomic expression patterns of these detoxification genes were analyzed for root and leaf galls. In addition to these transcriptomic analyses, we reanalyzed recent data from L1 and L2-3 stages feeding on tolerant and resistant rootstock. Data from two agricultural pest aphids, the generalist Myzus persicae and the Fabaceae specialist Acyrthosiphon pisum, and from the true bug vector of Chagas disease, Rhodnius prolixus, were used to perform phylogenetic analyses for each detoxification gene family. We found expansions of several gene sub-families in the genome of D. vitifoliae. Phylogenetically close genes were found to be organized in clusters in the same genomic position and orientation suggesting recent successive duplications. These results highlight the roles of the phylloxera detoxification gene repertoire in insect physiology and in adaptation to plant secondary metabolites, and provide gene candidates for further functional analyses.

Grape Phylloxera Genetic Structure Reveals Root-Leaf Migration within Commercial Vineyards

Simple Summary

In most wine regions around the world, commercial vineyards are planted with Vitis vinifera scions grafted on grape phylloxera-tolerating rootstocks. Root-feeding phylloxera populations still thrive on such rootstocks and occasionally leaf-feeding phylloxera populations are observed. The cause for these foliar infestations is thought to reside at the thickets of abandoned rootstock vines that grow on the risers of vineyard terraces and constitute a different habitat with large leaf-feeding populations. Besides, it is unclear if root and leaf populations within commercial vineyards are genetically connected, which may indicate a process of adaption that could lead to large foliar phylloxera populations and better-adapted phylloxera biotypes. To shed light on these issues, phylloxera root- and leaf-feeding larvae from commercial vineyards and larvae from nearby thickets were genetically compared, focusing on population structure and genetic association. Our study showed that foliar populations in commercial vineyards not only originate from leaf-feeding populations on nearby abandoned rootstock vines, but also from root populations within the vineyard. The results suggest that sexual recombination is rare in the study area and that direct root–leaf migration creates population bottlenecks based on founder effects or host plant adaption.

Abstract

Depending on their life cycle, grape phylloxera (Daktulosphaira vitifoliae Fitch) leaf-feeding populations are initiated through asexually produced offspring or sexual recombination. The vine’s initial foliar larvae may originate from root-feeding phylloxera or wind-drifted foliar larvae from other habitats. Though some studies have reported phylloxera leaf-feeding in commercial vineyards, it is still unclear if they are genetically distinct from the population structure of these two sources. Using seven SSR-markers, this study analyzed the genetic structure of phylloxera populations in commercial vineyards with different natural infestation scenarios and that of single-plant insect systems that exclude infestation by wind-drifted larvae. We saw that during the vegetation period, phylloxera populations predominately go through their asexual life cycle to migrate from roots to leaves. We provided evidence that such migrations do not exclusively occur through wind-drifted foliar populations from rootstock vines in abandoned thickets, but that root populations within commercial vineyards also migrate to establish V. vinifera leaf populations. Whereas the former scenario generates foliar populations with high genotypic diversity, the latter produces population bottlenecks through founder effects or phylloxera biotype selection pressure. We finally compared these population structures with those of populations in their native habitat in North America, using four microsatellite markers.