1
|
Dimanlig-Cruz S, Corsi DJ, Lanes A, Meng L, Miao Q, Walker M, Fell DB. Perinatal and pediatric outcomes associated with the use of fertility treatment: a population-based retrospective cohort study in Ontario, Canada. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2023; 23:121. [PMID: 36803122 PMCID: PMC9940338 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05446-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Around 2% of births in Ontario, Canada involve the use of assisted reproductive technology (ART), and it is rising due to the implementation of a publicly funded ART program in 2016. To better understand the impact of fertility treatments, we assessed perinatal and pediatric health outcomes associated with ART, hormonal treatments, and artificial insemination compared with spontaneously conceived births. METHODS This population-based retrospective cohort study was conducted using provincial birth registry data linked with fertility registry and health administrative databases in Ontario, Canada. Live births and stillbirths from January 2013 to July 2016 were included and followed to age one. The risks of adverse pregnancy, birth and infant health outcomes were assessed by conception method (spontaneous conception, ART - in vitro fertilization and non-ART - ovulation induction, intra-uterine or vaginal insemination) using risk ratios and incidence rate ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Propensity score weighting using a generalized boosted model was applied to adjust for confounding. RESULT(S) Of 177,901 births with a median gestation age of 39 weeks (IQR 38.0-40.0), 3,457 (1.9%) were conceived via ART, and 3,511 (2.0%) via non-ART treatments. There were increased risks (adjusted risk ratio [95% CI]) of cesarean delivery (ART: 1.44 [1.42-1.47]; non-ART: 1.09 [1.07-1.11]), preterm birth (ART: 2.06 [1.98-2.14]; non-ART: 1.85 [1.79-1.91]), very preterm birth (ART: 2.99 [2.75-3.25]; non-ART: 1.89 [1.67-2.13]), 5-min Apgar < 7 (ART: 1.28 [1.16-1.42]; non-ART: 1.62 [1.45-1.81]), and composite neonatal adverse outcome indicator (ART: 1.61 [1.55-1.68]; non-ART: 1.29 [1.25-1.34]). Infants born after fertility treatments had increased risk of admission to neonatal intensive care unit (ART: 1.98 [1.84-2.13]; non-ART: 1.59 [1.51-1.67]) and prolonged birth admission (≥ 3 days) (ART: 1.60 [1.54-1.65]; non-ART: 1.42 [1.39-1.45]). The rate of emergency and in-hospital health services use within the first year was significantly increased for both exposure groups and remained elevated when limiting analyses to term singletons. CONCLUSION(S) Fertility treatments were associated with increased risks of adverse outcomes; however, the overall magnitude of risks was lower for infants conceived via non-ART treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheryll Dimanlig-Cruz
- grid.414148.c0000 0000 9402 6172Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) Research Institute, Ottawa, ON Canada ,Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario, Ottawa, ON Canada ,grid.28046.380000 0001 2182 2255School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON Canada
| | - Daniel J. Corsi
- Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario, Ottawa, ON Canada ,grid.28046.380000 0001 2182 2255School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON Canada ,grid.412687.e0000 0000 9606 5108OMNI Research Group, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON Canada
| | - Andrea Lanes
- Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario, Ottawa, ON Canada
| | - Lynn Meng
- Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario, Ottawa, ON Canada
| | - Qun Miao
- grid.414148.c0000 0000 9402 6172Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) Research Institute, Ottawa, ON Canada ,Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario, Ottawa, ON Canada ,grid.28046.380000 0001 2182 2255School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON Canada
| | - Mark Walker
- Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario, Ottawa, ON Canada ,grid.28046.380000 0001 2182 2255School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON Canada ,grid.412687.e0000 0000 9606 5108OMNI Research Group, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON Canada ,grid.28046.380000 0001 2182 2255Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine, Ottawa, ON Canada
| | - Deshayne B. Fell
- grid.414148.c0000 0000 9402 6172Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) Research Institute, Ottawa, ON Canada ,grid.28046.380000 0001 2182 2255School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sargisian N, Lannering B, Petzold M, Opdahl S, Gissler M, Pinborg A, Henningsen AKA, Tiitinen A, Romundstad LB, Spangmose AL, Bergh C, Wennerholm UB. Cancer in children born after frozen-thawed embryo transfer: A cohort study. PLoS Med 2022; 19:e1004078. [PMID: 36048761 PMCID: PMC9436139 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim was to investigate whether children born after assisted reproduction technology (ART), particularly after frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET), are at higher risk of childhood cancer than children born after fresh embryo transfer and spontaneous conception. METHODS AND FINDINGS We performed a registry-based cohort study using data from the 4 Nordic countries: Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden. The study included 7,944,248 children, out of whom 171,774 children were born after use of ART (2.2%) and 7,772,474 children were born after spontaneous conception, representing all children born between the years 1994 to 2014 in Denmark, 1990 to 2014 in Finland, 1984 to 2015 in Norway, and 1985 to 2015 in Sweden. Rates for any cancer and specific cancer groups in children born after each conception method were determined by cross-linking national ART registry data with national cancer and health data registries and population registries. We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate the risk of any cancer, with age as the time scale. After a mean follow-up of 9.9 and 12.5 years, the incidence rate (IR) of cancer before age 18 years was 19.3/100,000 person-years for children born after ART (329 cases) and 16.7/100,000 person-years for children born after spontaneous conception (16,184 cases). Adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) was 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.96 to 1.21, p = 0.18. Adjustment was performed for sex, plurality, year of birth, country of birth, maternal age at birth, and parity. Children born after FET had a higher risk of cancer (48 cases; IR 30.1/100,000 person-years) compared to both fresh embryo transfer (IR 18.8/100,000 person-years), aHR 1.59, 95% CI 1.15 to 2.20, p = 0.005, and spontaneous conception, aHR 1.65, 95% CI 1.24 to 2.19, p = 0.001. Adjustment either for macrosomia, birth weight, or major birth defects attenuated the association marginally. Higher risks of epithelial tumors and melanoma after any assisted reproductive method and of leukemia after FET were observed. The main limitation of this study is the small number of children with cancer in the FET group. CONCLUSIONS Children born after FET had a higher risk of childhood cancer than children born after fresh embryo transfer and spontaneous conception. The results should be interpreted cautiously based on the small number of children with cancer, but the findings raise concerns considering the increasing use of FET, in particular freeze-all strategies without clear medical indications. TRIAL REGISTRATION Trial registration number: ISRCTN 11780826.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nona Sargisian
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Birgitta Lannering
- Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Max Petzold
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Signe Opdahl
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Mika Gissler
- THL Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Information Services Department, Helsinki, Finland
- Karolinska Institute, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Stockholm, Sweden and Region Stockholm, Academic Primary Health Care Center, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anja Pinborg
- The Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Aila Tiitinen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Finland
| | - Liv Bente Romundstad
- Center for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
- Spiren Fertility Clinic, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Anne Lærke Spangmose
- The Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christina Bergh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Ulla-Britt Wennerholm
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|