The Role of 2D and 3D Echo in Mitral Stenosis

Combining 2D Planimetry and Yeo's Index Can Help Accurately Identify Patients with Severe Rheumatic Mitral Stenosis-A Perspective from a 3D Assessment Using Transoesophageal Echocardiography

BACKGROUND

Yeo's index is a novel measure of the severity of rheumatic mitral valve stenosis (MS). It is derived from the product of the mitral leaflet separation index and dimensionless index. This study aims to validate Yeo's index using a transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) three-dimensional (3D) mitral valve area (MVA) as a comparator and to compare the concordance of existing echocardiographic measures of the MVA with TEE 3DMVA.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 111 patients with rheumatic MS who underwent both transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and a TEE assessment of MS severity. Yeo's index, the MVA determined by 2D planimetry, pressure half-time (PHT) and continuity equation (CE) measured on TTE were compared with the TEE 3DMVA. With a linear correlation, Yeo's index showed the best correlation with TEE 3DMVA (r2 = 0.775), followed by 2D planimetry (r2 = 0.687), CE (r2 = 0.598) and PHT (r2 = 0.363). Using TEE 3DMVA as comparator, Yeo's index (ρc = 0.739) demonstrated the best concordance, followed by 2D planimetry (ρc = 0.632), CE (ρc = 0.464) and PHT (ρc = 0.366). When both Yeo's index and 2D planimetry suggested significant MS, the positive predictive value was high (an AUC of 0.966 and a PPV of 100.00% for severe MS, and an AUC of 0.864 and a PPV of 85.71% for very severe MS). When both measures suggested the absence of significant MS, the negative predictive value was also high (an AUC of 0.940 and an NPV of 88.90% for severe MS, and an AUC of 0.831 and an NPV of 88.71% for very severe MS).

CONCLUSIONS

Yeo's index performed well in identifying severe MS when compared with TEE 3DMVA and may be a useful adjunct to existing methods of measuring MS severity. Combining it with 2D planimetry could further enhance its accuracy.

Mitral Annular Calcification-Related Valvular Disease: A Challenging Entity

Mitral valve annular calcification-related valvular disease is increasingly common due to the rising prevalence of age-related mitral annular calcifications. Mitral annular calcification alters the structure and function of the mitral valve annulus, which in turn causes mitral valve regurgitation, stenosis, or both. As it frequently coexists with comorbid conditions and overlapping symptoms, mitral annular calcification-related valvular disease poses significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. For instance, left ventricular diastolic dysfunction hinders the assessment of mitral valvular disease. Detection of mitral annular calcifications and assessment of related mitral valve disease hinge on two-dimensional echocardiography. Comprehensive assessment of mitral annular calcifications and related mitral valve disease may require multidetector computed tomography and three-dimensional echocardiography. Invasive hemodynamic testing with exercise helps identify the cause of symptoms in patients with comorbid conditions, and transcatheter interventions have emerged as a viable therapeutic option for older patients. After an outline of the normal mitral annulus, we examine how mitral annular calcifications lead to mitral valve disease and how to accurately assess mitral regurgitation and stenosis. Lastly, we review surgical and transcatheter approaches to the management of mitral annular calcification-related mitral valve regurgitation, stenosis, or both.