The Effect of TNF and Non-TNF-Targeted Biologics on Body Composition in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs improve body composition in rheumatoid arthritis patients more than conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs: Results from the PRESENT study

INTRODUCTION

The effects of biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) and conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) on body composition and muscle function in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients requiring treatment enhancement were compared.

METHODS

This multicenter, prospective, observational study (PRESENT Study) divided RA patients non-randomly into a csDMARD group (n = 100) and a b/tsDMARD group (n = 100). Changes in body composition and muscle function were examined in 80 patients in each group followed for 52 weeks. The percentages of new-onset and improved sarcopenia over 1 year were investigated. Patients in the b/tsDMARD group were divided into three groups by drug type: TNF inhibitors (n = 30), non-TNF inhibitors (n = 23), and JAK inhibitors (n = 27).

RESULTS

Baseline median age and disease duration were 70.0 and 4.0 years, respectively. Changes in weight (24 and 52 weeks) and muscle mass (52 weeks) were significantly higher in the b/tsDMARD group (p = .035, p < .001, and p = .002, respectively). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, b/tsDMARD treatment (OR 3.21, p = .002), DAS28-ESR (OR 0.65 p = .011), and muscle mass (OR 0.90, p = .023) were independently associated with increased muscle mass at 52 weeks. The percentages of new-onset and improved sarcopenia were almost equal. There were no significant differences in the time-dependent changes (52 weeks) of clinical status, body composition, muscle function, and status of sarcopenia among TNF inhibitors, non-TNF inhibitors, and JAK inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

Weight and muscle mass increased significantly more with b/tsDMARD than with csDMARD treatment. There were no differences in body composition changes by mode of action with b/tsDMARDs.

Docosahexaenoic acid and etanercept could reduce functional and metabolic alterations during collagen-induced arthritis in rats without any synergistic effect

AIMS

Rheumatoid arthritis is an autoimmune disease which induces chronic inflammation and increases the risk for sarcopenia and metabolic abnormalities. Nutritional strategies using omega 3 polyunsaturated fatty acids could be proposed to alleviate inflammation and improve the maintenance of lean mass. Independently, pharmacological agents targeting key molecular regulators of the pathology such as TNF alpha could be proposed, but multiple therapies are frequently necessary increasing the risk for toxicity and adverse effects. The aim of the present study was to explore if the combination of an anti-TNF therapy (Etanercept) with dietary supplementation with omega 3 PUFA could prevent pain and metabolic effects of RA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

RA was induced using collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) in rats to explore of supplementation with docosahexaenoic acid, treatment with etanercept or their association could alleviate symptoms of RA (pain, dysmobility), sarcopenia and metabolic alterations.

KEY FINDINGS

We observed that Etanercept had major benefits on pain and RA scoring index. However, DHA could reduce the impact on body composition and metabolic alterations.

SIGNIFICANCE

This study revealed for the first time that nutritional supplementation with omega 3 fatty acid could reduce some symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis and be an effective preventive treatment in patients who do not need pharmacological therapy, but no sign of synergy with an anti-TNF agent was observed.

Effects of biologic and target synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs on sarcopenia in spondyloarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Sarcopenia is a syndrome defined by generalized and progressive loss of skeletal muscle mass, strength, and function. Besides affecting elderly population, it is actually common among inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) patients. We performed a systematic literature review with a meta-analysis to investigate the influence of biologic and target synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs/tsDMARDs) on sarcopenia in IRD. A systematic search has been performed on Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of science. Studies characteristics were collected. Assessment tools were body composition (total lean mass (TLM) and percentage, appendicular skeletal mass (ASM), fat-free mass and index (FFM and FFMI), skeletal mass index (SMI) and segmental lean mass (SLM)), and muscle strength and physical performance tests. Treatment effect defined the difference in change from baseline to the end of follow-up treatment was divided by the pooled SD of the difference. Twenty-two studies on 778 patients receiving bDMARDs/tsDMARDs and 157 controls were reviewed. They investigated rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (N = 14), spondyloarthritis (SpA) (N = 6), psoriatic arthritis (N = 1), and both RA and SpA (N = 1). tsDMARDs were used in one study with no effect on sarcopenia. Ten studies demonstrated that bDMARDs increased significantly muscle measures in 347 patients (44.6%) with a significant increase in TLM (6/15 studies; 57.4%), FFMI (4/6 studies; 59.9%), ASM (2/5 studies; 17.6%), SMI (2/5 studies; 18.1%), and SLM (2/2 studies; 3.6%). bDMARDs showed also a positive effect on handgrip strength in 1/3 of studies (45.2%) and on physical performance in 1/2 of studies (61%). In 1/5 of comparative studies, IRD patients on bDMARDs showed significantly higher increase of TLM in comparison to controls naïve bDMARDs. Regarding diagnosis, positive effect of bDMARDs was seen in 67.4% in SpA versus 49.3% in RA, with a significant increase of TLM, ASM and FFMI in 59.4%, 100%, and 65.2% in SpA versus 54.9%, 24.1%, and 54.8% in RA, respectively. Meta-analysis assessed the effect of bDMARD on TLM in 10 studies. There was no statistically significant difference [SMD - 0.10 (95% Confidence Interval - 0.26 - 0.06; tau² = 0). Heterogeneity across studies was null, and the 95% confidence interval (index of precision) was equal to the 95% predictive interval. The first systematic literature review showed that bDMARDs have a significant improve effect in nearly half of RA and SpA patients on muscle mass and muscle strength, assessed separately. However, the meta-analysis concluded that bDMARDs have no significant effect on TLM.

The effect of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs on skeletal muscle mass in rheumatoid arthritis patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease, characterized by chronic and systemic inflammation. Besides, it is known that RA patients may present several comorbidities, such as sarcopenia, a condition where patients present both muscle mass and muscle quality impairment. RA treatment is mostly pharmacological and consists in controlling systemic inflammation and disease activity. Despite that, the effect of pharmacological treatment on sarcopenia is not well characterized.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the effects of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) on skeletal muscle tissue in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.

METHODS

A systematic review of randomized clinical trials and observational studies was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. We selected studies with rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) that analyzed muscle mass parameters such as lean mass and appendicular lean mass. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were set. A meta-analysis of observational studies was performed using the R software, and we considered significant statistics when p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Nine studies were included in this systematic review. In the meta-analysis, DMARD treatment had no positive difference (p = 0.60) in lean mass. In the same way, in the appendicular lean mass parameter, our results showed that DMARDs did not have changes between baseline and post-treatment analysis (p = 0.93).

CONCLUSION

There is no evidence of a significant effect of DMARD therapy, either synthetic or biological, on muscle mass. However, this association should be investigated with more studies.

Effect of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs on body composition in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) generates an inflammatory profile that predisposes to total and visceral fatty accumulation and reduced fat free mass (FFM). This metabolic disorder contributes to poor functionality, increased cardiovascular risk and higher mortality. This study aimed to address a systematic review with meta-analysis to determine the effect of biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs and tsDMARDs) on body composition (BC) of patients with RA.

Methods

The search was conducted at the electronic databases PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Lilacs and grey literature. This investigation was carried until July 2021. Outcomes of interest were total weight, body mass index (BMI), fat mass (FM) and FFM. A meta-analysis comparing these outcomes in RA patients under bDMARD treatment versus controls was performed.

Results

Out of 137 studies reviewed, 18 were selected: fifteen prospective cohorts, two retrospective cohorts, and one cross-sectional study. The studies comprised 1221 patients, 778 on bDMARD treatment and 443 controls, which included RA patients under conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD). No study addressing BC analysis in patients using tsDMARD was found. The mean age and duration of the disease was 56.7 years and 6.77 years, respectively. Ten studies demonstrated a significant increase of total weight in 88.2% of patients and 42.3% for BMI. In studies that analyzed BC by double X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), the increase in total weight and BMI correlated positively to the increase in FFM. The meta-analysis carried out in five studies showed no significant difference of the mean difference for total weight 0.12 kg (95% CI − 5.58, 5.82), BMI 0.08 kg/m2 (95% CI − 1.76, 1.92), FM − 0.08 kg (95% IC − 5.31, 5.14), and FFM − 2.08 kg (95% CI − 7.37, 3.21).

Conclusion

This systematic review suggests a possible impact of bDMARDs on BC of RA patients, even though, the meta-analysis carried out in a small part of these studies was not able to confirm significant variation in BC components.

Trial registration: PROSPERO code: CRD42020206949.

Body composition in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a narrative literature review

There is growing interest in the alterations in body composition (BC) that accompany rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The purpose of this review is to (i) investigate how BC is currently measured in RA patients, (ii) describe alterations in body composition in RA patients and (iii) evaluate the effect on nutrition, physical training, and treatments; that is, corticosteroids and biologic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Disease (bDMARDs), on BC in RA patients. The primary-source literature for this review was acquired using PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane database searches for articles published up to March 2021. The Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms used were 'Arthritis, Rheumatoid', 'body composition', 'sarcopenia', 'obesity', 'cachexia', 'Absorptiometry, Photon' and 'Electric Impedance'. The titles and abstracts of all articles were reviewed for relevant subjects. Whole-BC measurements were usually performed using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to quantify lean- and fat-mass parameters. In RA patients, lean mass is lower and adiposity is higher than in healthy controls, both in men and women. The prevalence of abnormal BC conditions such as overfat, sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity is significantly higher in RA patients than in healthy controls; these alterations in BC are observed even at an early stage of the disease. Data on the effect treatments on BC in RA patients are scarce. In the few studies published, (a) creatine supplementation and progressive resistance training induce a slight and temporary increase in lean mass, (b) exposure to corticosteroids induces a gain in fat mass and (c) tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) inhibitors might be associated with a gain in fat mass, while tocilizumab might be associated with a gain in lean mass. The available data clearly demonstrate that alterations in BC occur in RA patients, but data on the effect of treatments, especially bDMARDs, are inconsistent and further studies are needed in this area.