Clinical Implications of the General Movement Optimality Score: Beyond the Classes of Rasch Analysis

The General Movement Optimality Score-Revised (GMOS-R) with Socioeconomically Stratified Percentile Ranks

Background: The general movement optimality score (GMOS) quantifies the details of general movements (GMs). We recently conducted psychometric analyses of the GMOS and developed a revised scoresheet. Consequently, the GMOS-Revised (GMOS-R) instrument necessitated validation using new percentile ranks. This study aimed to provide these percentile ranks for the GMOS-R and to investigate whether sex, preterm birth, or the infant's country of birth and residence affected the GMOS-R distribution. Methods: We applied the GMOS-R to an international sample of 1983 infants (32% female, 44% male, and 24% not disclosed), assessed in the extremely and very preterm period (10%), moderate (12%) and late (22%) preterm periods, at term (25%), and post-term age (31%). Data were grouped according to the World Bank's classification into lower- and upper-middle-income countries (LMICs and UMICs; 26%) or high-income countries (HICs; 74%), respectively. Results: We found that sex and preterm or term birth did not affect either GM classification or the GMOS-R, but the country of residence did. A lower median GMOS-R for infants with normal or poor-repertoire GMs from LMICs and UMICs compared with HICs suggests the use of specific percentile ranks for LMICs and UMICs vs. HICs. Conclusion: For clinical and scientific use, we provide a freely available GMOS-R scoring sheet, with percentile ranks reflecting socioeconomic stratification.

Mobile Solutions for Clinical Surveillance and Evaluation in Infancy-General Movement Apps

The Prechtl General Movements Assessment (GMA) has become a clinician and researcher toolbox for evaluating neurodevelopment in early infancy. Given that it involves the observation of infant movements from video recordings, utilising smartphone applications to obtain these recordings seems like the natural progression for the field. In this review, we look back on the development of apps for acquiring general movement videos, describe the application and research studies of available apps, and discuss future directions of mobile solutions and their usability in research and clinical practice. We emphasise the importance of understanding the background that has led to these developments while introducing new technologies, including the barriers and facilitators along the pathway. The GMApp and Baby Moves apps were the first ones developed to increase accessibility of the GMA, with two further apps, NeuroMotion and InMotion, designed since. The Baby Moves app has been applied most frequently. For the mobile future of GMA, we advocate collaboration to boost the field's progression and to reduce research waste. We propose future collaborative solutions, including standardisation of cross-site data collection, adaptation to local context and privacy laws, employment of user feedback, and sustainable IT structures enabling continuous software updating.

Association between the General Movement Optimality Score and clinical features in newborns during hospitalization: A cross-sectional study

AIMS

To describe the General Movements (GMs) of hospitalized newborns to verify if their global and detailed GMA are related and if their GMs are associated with clinical features.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study. Thirty-eight preterm and full-term newborns, who were hospitalized in the neonatal intermediate care unit of a reference hospital, were included. Prechtl's General Movement Assessment (GMA), including the General Movement Optimality Score (GMOS) list, was used as an assessment tool. Clinical variables, such as preterm birth, birthweight, length of hospitalization, Apgar scores, pregnancy problems, admission at neonatal intensive care unit, use of invasive mechanical ventilation, and brain imaging findings were also collected. Newborns were videoed at a single time for 3 min before discharge.

RESULTS

Most newborns presented GMs with normal or poor repertoire quality. GMOS ranged from 17 to 42 points. Scores were lower in abnormal GMs. Abnormal GMs were associated with preterm birth, length of hospital stay >30 days and birthweight <2500 g. Accordingly, lower GMOSs were also associated with preterm birth, a birthweight <2500 g and a hospital stay >30 days but also with the invasive mechanical ventilation application.

CONCLUSION

Preterm and full-term newborns presented normal or abnormal GMs during hospitalization. Preterm birth, low birthweight, longer hospital stay and a time period of invasive ventilation were associated with worse GM behaviors.

Technology-assisted quantification of movement to predict infants at high risk of motor disability: A systematic review

AIM

To systematically review the scientific literature to determine the predictive validity of technology-assisted measures of observable infant movement in infants less than six months of corrected age (CA) to identify high-risk of motor disability.

METHOD

A comprehensive search for randomised and non-randomised controlled trials, cohort studies and cross-comparison trials was performed on five electronic databases up to Feb 2021. Studies were included if they quantified infant movement before 6 months CA using some method of technology-assistance and compared the instrumented measure to a diagnostic clinical measure of neurodevelopment. Studies were excluded if they did not report a technology-assisted measure of infant movement. Methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Downs and Black scale.

RESULTS

23 studies met the full inclusion and exclusion criteria. Methodological quality of the included papers ranged from 9 to 24 (out of 26) on the Downs and Black scale. Infant movement assessments included the General Movements Assessment (GMA) and domains of the Hammersmith Infant Neurological Assessment (HINE). Studies used 2D video recordings, RGB-Depth recordings, accelerometry, and electromagnetic motion tracking technologies to quantify movement. Analytical approaches and movement features of interest were individual and varied. Technology assisted quantitative assessments identified cases of later diagnosed CP with sensitivity 44-100 %, specificity 59-95 %, Area under the ROC Curve 82-93 %; and typical development with sensitivity range 30-46 %, specificity 88-95 %, Area under the ROC Curve 68 %.

INTERPRETATION

Technology-assisted assessments of movement in infants less than 6 months CA using current technologies are feasible. Validation of measurement tools are limited. Although methods and results appear promising clinical uptake of technology-assisted assessments remains limited.