1
|
Al Hussan M, Qiao S, Abuheit EMI, Abdun MA, Al Mahamid M, Guo H, Zheng F, Nobah AMAM. The Role of C-reactive Protein and Procalcitonin in Predicting the Occurrence of Pancreatic Fistula in Patients who Underwent Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a Retrospective Study. Zentralbl Chir 2023; 148:508-515. [PMID: 37798903 DOI: 10.1055/a-2157-7550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
The occurrence of postoperative pancreatic fistula following laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) is a significant concern, yet there is currently a lack of consensus on reliable predictive methods for this complication. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the clinical significance of C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) values and their reliability in early predicting the development of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (CRPF) following LPD.A retrospective analysis was conducted using data from 120 patients who had LPD between September 2019 and December 2021. Preoperative assessment data, standard patients' demographic and clinicopathological characteristics, intra- and postoperative evaluation, as well as postoperative laboratory values on postoperative days (PODs) 1, 3, and 7, including white blood cells (WBCs), CRP, and PCT, were prospectively recorded on a dedicated database. Two clinicians separately collected and cross-checked all of the data.Among 120 patients [77 men (64%), 43 women (36%], CRPF occurred in 15 patients (11 grade B and 4 grade C fistulas). The incidence rate of CRPF was 12.3%. A comparison of the median values of WBCs, PCT, and CRP across the two groups revealed that the CRPF group had higher values on most PODs than the non-CRPF group. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to calculate the area under the curve (AUC) and cutoff values. It was discovered that POD 3 has the most accurate and significant values for WBCs, CRP, and PCT. According to the ROC plots, the AUC for WBCs was 0.842, whereas the AUC for PCT was 0.909. As for CRP, the AUC was 0.941 (95% CI 0.899-0.983, p < 0.01) with a cutoff value of 203.45, indicating a sensitivity of 93.3% and specificity of 91.4%.Both CRP and PCT can be used to predict the early onset of CRPF following LPD, with CRP being slightly superior on POD 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maher Al Hussan
- Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou City, China
| | - Shishi Qiao
- Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou City, China
| | - Ezaldin M I Abuheit
- Cardiovascular Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Mohammed Awadh Abdun
- Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou City, China
| | - Mohamad Al Mahamid
- Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou City, China
| | - Huahu Guo
- Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou City, China
| | - Fengyu Zheng
- Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou City, China
| | - Ali Mansour Ali Mi Nobah
- Cardiovascular Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wu Z, Zong K, Zhou B, Yin K, Zhang A, Li M. Incidence and risk factors of postoperative acute pancreatitis after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Surg 2023; 10:1150053. [PMID: 37228763 PMCID: PMC10203505 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1150053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Postoperative acute pancreatitis (POAP) is a specific complication after pancreatectomy. The acute inflammatory response of the residual pancreas may affect the healing of pancreatoenteric anastomoses, leading to postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPFs), abdominal infections, and even progressive systemic reactions, conditions that negatively affect patients' prognoses and can cause death. However, to the best of our knowledge, no systematic reviews or meta-analytic studies have assessed the incidence and risk factors of POAP after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Method We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for relevant literature describing the outcomes of POAP after PD until November 25, 2022, and we used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale to assess the quality of the studies. Next, we pooled the incidence of POAP and the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the risk factors using a random-effect meta-analysis. I2 tests were used to assess heterogeneity between the studies. Results We analyzed data from 7,164 patients after PD from 23 articles that met the inclusion criteria for this study. The subgroup results of the meta-analysis by different POAP diagnostic criteria showed that the incidences of POAP were 15% (95% CI, 5-38) in the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery group, 51% (95% CI, 42-60) in the Connor group, 7% (95% CI, 2-24) in the Atlanta group, and 5% (95% CI, 2-14) in the unclear group. Being a woman [OR (1.37, 95% CI, 1.06-1.77)] or having a soft pancreatic texture [OR (2.56, 95% CI, 1.70-3.86)] were risk factors of POAP after PD. Conclusion The results showed that POAP was common after PD, and its incidence varied widely according to different definitions. Large-scale reports are still needed, and surgeons should remain aware of this complication. Systematic Review Registration identifier: CRD42022375124.
Collapse
|
3
|
Marchegiani G, Barreto SG, Bannone E, Sarr M, Vollmer CM, Connor S, Falconi M, Besselink MG, Salvia R, Wolfgang CL, Zyromski NJ, Yeo CJ, Adham M, Siriwardena AK, Takaori K, Hilal MA, Loos M, Probst P, Hackert T, Strobel O, Busch ORC, Lillemoe KD, Miao Y, Halloran CM, Werner J, Friess H, Izbicki JR, Bockhorn M, Vashist YK, Conlon K, Passas I, Gianotti L, Del Chiaro M, Schulick RD, Montorsi M, Oláh A, Fusai GK, Serrablo A, Zerbi A, Fingerhut A, Andersson R, Padbury R, Dervenis C, Neoptolemos JP, Bassi C, Büchler MW, Shrikhande SV. Postpancreatectomy Acute Pancreatitis (PPAP): Definition and Grading From the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Ann Surg 2022; 275:663-672. [PMID: 34596077 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The ISGPS aimed to develop a universally accepted definition for PPAP for standardized reporting and outcome comparison. BACKGROUND PPAP is an increasingly recognized complication after partial pancreatic resections, but its incidence and clinical impact, and even its existence are variable because an internationally accepted consensus definition and grading system are lacking. METHODS The ISGPS developed a consensus definition and grading of PPAP with its members after an evidence review and after a series of discussions and multiple revisions from April 2020 to May 2021. RESULTS We defined PPAP as an acute inflammatory condition of the pancreatic remnant beginning within the first 3 postoperative days after a partial pancreatic resection. The diagnosis requires (1) a sustained postoperative serum hyperamylasemia (POH) greater than the institutional upper limit of normal for at least the first 48 hours postoperatively, (2) associated with clinically relevant features, and (3) radiologic alterations consistent with PPAP. Three different PPAP grades were defined based on the clinical impact: (1) grade postoperative hyperamylasemia, biochemical changes only; (2) grade B, mild or moderate complications; and (3) grade C, severe life-threatening complications. DISCUSSIONS The present definition and grading scale of PPAP, based on biochemical, radiologic, and clinical criteria, are instrumental for a better understanding of PPAP and the spectrum of postoperative complications related to this emerging entity. The current terminology will serve as a reference point for standard assessment and lend itself to developing specific treatments and prevention strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Marchegiani
- Department of Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Savio George Barreto
- Division of Surgery and Perioperative Medicine, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Elisa Bannone
- Department of Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Michael Sarr
- Mayo Clinic Department of General Surgery, Rochester, NY
| | - Charles M Vollmer
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Saxon Connor
- Department of Surgery, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Massimo Falconi
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, "Vita-Salute" University, Milan, Italy
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roberto Salvia
- Department of Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Nicholas J Zyromski
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Charles J Yeo
- Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary and Related Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mustapha Adham
- Digestive Surgery Department, Lyon Civil Hospital, Lyon, France
| | | | - Kyoichi Takaori
- Department of Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | | | - Martin Loos
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Pascal Probst
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Strobel
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Olivier R C Busch
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Keith D Lillemoe
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Yi Miao
- Pancreas Center, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, PR China
| | - Christopher M Halloran
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Jens Werner
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Ludwig Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| | - Helmut Friess
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jakob R Izbicki
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Yogesh K Vashist
- Professorial Surgical Unit, University of Dublin, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Kevin Conlon
- Department of Surgery, AGIA OLGA Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Ioannis Passas
- School of Medicine and Surgery, Milano - Bicocca University, and Department of Surgery, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Luca Gianotti
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Marco Del Chiaro
- Department of Surgery, Humanitas University and Research Hospital IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Marco Montorsi
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant, Royal Free Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Attila Oláh
- Department of Surgery, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Paseo Isabel la Catolica, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | - Alejandro Serrablo
- Department of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Alessandro Zerbi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Abe Fingerhut
- Department of Gastrointestinal and HPB Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | | | - Robert Padbury
- Division of Surgery and Perioperative Medicine, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | | | - John P Neoptolemos
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Claudio Bassi
- Department of Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Markus W Büchler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Shailesh V Shrikhande
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chen G, Yi H, Zhang J. Diagnostic value of C-reactive protein and procalcitonin for postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gland Surg 2021; 10:3252-3263. [PMID: 35070885 PMCID: PMC8749087 DOI: 10.21037/gs-21-658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) have recently been used to diagnose and screen for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), but their reliability is still unclear. Our study aims to assess the efficacy of CRP and PCT in the diagnosis of POPF after PD. METHODS Electronic databases such as PubMed, Excerpta Medica (EMBASE), the Web of Science (WOS) and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were used to search for studies and full-text articles that assessed the diagnostic efficacy of CRP and PCT for POPF. Review Manager 5.4 and STATA 14.0 were used to estimate the pooled diagnostic value of CRP and PCT. Sensitivity analyses and Deeks' funnel plot tests were conducted on the selected studies. RESULTS Twenty studies that satisfied the established selection criteria were chosen. Both CRP and PCT were shown to be highly effective in diagnosing POPF, each with a high area under the curve (AUC). The AUC of CRP on postoperative day (POD) 4 had a value of 0.86, with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.85 and 0.69, respectively. The AUC of PCT on POD 5 had a value of 0.87, with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.84 and 0.74, respectively. DISCUSSION Our research supports the hypothesis that CRP and PCT are valuable diagnostic tools for predicting POPF, especially given the CRP levels on POD 4 and PCT levels on POD 5. Limited by the small number of the studies analyzed herein, we recommend that more randomized controlled trials be performed to verify our conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guoli Chen
- Department of General Surgery 1, Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical College, Chengde, China
| | - Haizhao Yi
- Department of General Surgery 1, Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical College, Chengde, China
| | - Jinguang Zhang
- Department of Surgery, Longhua County Hospital, Chengde, China
| |
Collapse
|