Apheresis Efficacy and Tolerance in the Setting of HLA-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation

Anti-HLA Class II Antibodies Are the Most Resistant to Desensitization in Crossmatch-positive Living-donor Kidney Transplantations: A Patient Series

Background

In HLA-incompatible kidney transplantation, the efficacy of desensitization in terms of anti-HLA antibody kinetics is not well characterized. We present an overview of the course of anti-HLA antibodies throughout plasma exchange (PE) desensitization in a series of crossmatch-positive patients.

Methods

All consecutive candidates in the Dutch HLA-incompatible kidney transplantation program between November 2012 and January 2022 were included. The eligibility criteria were a positive crossmatch with a living kidney donor and no options for compatible transplantation. Desensitization consisted of 5-10 PE with low-dose IVIg.

Results

A total of 16 patient-donor pairs were included. Patients had median virtual panel-reactive antibody of 99.58%. Cumulative donor-specific anti-HLA antibody (cumDSA) mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was 31 399 median, and immunodominant DSA (iDSA) MFI was 18 677 for class I and 21 893 for class II. Median anti-HLA antibody MFI response to desensitization was worse in class II as compared with class I (P < 0.001), particularly for HLA-DQ. Class I cumDSA MFI decreased 68% after 4 PE versus 53% in class II. The decrease between the fifth and the 10th PE sessions was modest with 21% in class I versus 9% in class II. Antibody-mediated rejection occurred in 85% of patients, with the iDSA directed to the same mismatched HLA as before desensitization, except for 3 patients, of whom 2 had vigorous rebound of antibodies to repeated mismatches (RMMs). Rebound was highest (86%) in RMM-DSA with prior grafts removed (transplantectomy n = 7), lower (39%) in non-RMM-DSA (n = 30), and lowest (11%) for RMM-DSA with in situ grafts (n = 5; P = 0.018 for RMM-DSA transplantectomy versus RMM-DSA graft in situ). With a median follow-up of 59 mo, 1 patient had died resulting in a death-censored graft survival of 73%.

Conclusions

Patients with class II DSA, and particularly those directed against HLA-DQ locus, were difficult to desensitize.

European Consensus on the Management of Sensitized Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Delphi Study

An increasing number of sensitized patients awaiting transplantation face limited options, leading to fatalities during dialysis and higher costs. The absence of established evidence highlights the need for collaborative consensus. Donor-specific antibodies (DSA)-triggered antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) significantly contributes to kidney graft failure, especially in sensitized patients. The European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) launched the ENGAGE initiative, categorizing sensitized candidates by AMR risk to improve patient care. A systematic review assessed induction and maintenance regimens as well as antibody removal strategies, with statements subjected to the Delphi methodology. A Likert-scale survey was distributed to 53 European experts (Nephrologists, Transplant surgeons and Immunologists) with experience in kidney transplant recipient care. A rate ≥75% with the same answer was considered consensus. Consensus was achieved in 95.3% of statements. While most recommendations aligned, two statements related to complement inhibitors for AMR prophylaxis lacked consensus. The ENGAGE consensus presents contemporary recommendations for desensitization and immunomodulation strategies, grounded in predefined risk categories. The adoption of tailored, patient-specific measures is anticipated to streamline the care of sensitized recipients undergoing renal allografts. While this approach holds the promise of enhancing transplant accessibility and fostering long-term success in transplantation outcomes, its efficacy will need to be assessed through dedicated studies.

Therapeutic apheresis in renal transplantation: An update

Therapeutic apheresis (TA) plays a significant role in various aspects of renal transplantation. It has been a necessary preconditioning component in ABO incompatible kidney transplants and an important modality in the removal of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies both in the context of desensitization protocols that have been developed to allow highly sensitized kidney transplant candidates to be successfully transplanted and as treatment of antibody mediated rejection episodes post transplantation. In addition, TA has been used with various results for the management of recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. The purpose of this review is to examine the evidence supporting the application of TA as an adjunctive therapeutic option to immunosuppressive agents in protocols both before and after kidney transplantation.

Double filtration plasmapheresis combined with rituximab for donor-specific antibody desensitization in haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) are a major cause of engraftment failure in patients receiving haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Haplo-HSCT). Double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) avoids the unnecessary loss of plasma proteins and increases the efficiency of purification. To investigate the effectiveness of the desensitization protocol including DFPP and rituximab, we conducted a nested case-control study. Thirty-three patients who had positive DSA were desensitized by the protocol and 99 patients with negative DSA were randomly matched as control. The median DSA mean fluorescence intensity values before and after DFPP treatment were 7505.88 ± 4424.38 versus 2013.29 ± 4067.22 (p < 0.001). All patients in DSA group achieved haematopoietic reconstitution and the median neutrophils and platelets engraftment times were 13 (10-21) and 13 (10-29) days respectively. Although the cumulative incidence of II-IV aGVHD (41.4% vs. 28.1%) and 3-year moderate to severe cGVHD (16.8% vs. 7.2%) were higher in DSA cohort than in the control, no statistical significance was observed. The 3-year non-relapse mortality and the overall survival were 6.39% and 72.0%, respectively, in the DSA cohort, which were comparable to the negative control. In conclusion, DFPP and rituximab could be effectively used for desensitization and overcome the negative effects of DSA in Haplo-HSCT.

WITHDRAWN:Therapeutic apheresis in renal transplantation: An update

The Publisher regrets that this article is an accidental duplication of an article that has already been published, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transci.2023.103844 of original article. The duplicate article has therefore been withdrawn. This error bears no reflection on the article or its authors. The publisher apologizes to the authors and the readers for this unfortunate error. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies/article-withdrawal

Treatment with the combination of rituximab and intravenous γ globulin is effective in promoting engraftment in donor specific antibody positive patients receiving myeloablative conditioning haploidentical stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) are a major cause of engraftment failure in patients receiving haploidentical stem cell transplantation (HaploSCT). Effective procedures are needed for those who demand urgent transplantation and have no other donor options.

OBJECTIVE

We here retrospectively analyzed 13 patients with DSAs successfully treated with desensitization of rituximab and intravenous γ globulin prior to HaploSCT from March 2017 to July 2022.

STUDY DESIGN

All 13 patients were with DSA MFI >4000 of at least one loci before desensitization. Of the 13 patients, 10 patients were with the initial diagnosis of malignant hematological diseases, and 3 were diagnosed with aplastic anemia. Patients were treated with one (n=3) or two(n=10) doses of rituximab (375mg/m² for one dose). All patients receive the same total dose of 0.4g/kg of intravenous γ globulin (IVIg) within 72 hours before haploidentical stem cell administration to neutralize the remaining DSA.

RESULTS

All patients achieved neutrophil engraftment and 12 patients achieved primary platelet engraftment. The patient with primary platelet engraftment failure received purified CD34 positive stem cell infusion nearly 1 year after transplantation and achieved platelet engraftment thereafter. The estimated 3-year overall survival (OS) is 73.4%.

CONCLUSION

Although further studies on larger numbers of patients are needed, it is clear that the combination of IVIg and rituximab is an effective way to clear DSA and has a strong effect on promoting engraftment and survival for patients with DSA. It is a practical and adaptable combination of treatment options.

Desensitization in Crossmatch-positive Kidney Transplant Candidates

Access to kidney transplantation is limited by HLA-specific sensitization. Desensitization strategies enable crossmatch-positive kidney transplantation. In this review, we describe clinical experience gained over the last 20 y using desensitization strategies before kidney transplantation and describe the different tools used (both drugs and apheresis options), including IVIg, rituximab, apheresis techniques, interleukin-6 interference, proteasome inhibition, enzymatic degradation of HLA antibodies, complement inhibition, and B cytokine interference. Although access to transplantation for highly sensitized kidney transplantation candidates has been vastly improved by desensitization strategies, it remains, however, limited by the recurrence of HLA antibodies after transplantation and the occurrence of antibody-mediated rejection.

Tocilizumab Evaluation in HLA-Desensitization before Kidney Transplantation as an Add-On Therapy to Apheresis: The TETRA Study

BACKGROUND

Desensitization strategies improve access to transplantation in highly sensitized kidney transplant candidates. Tocilizumab could be a valuable addition to more traditional desensitization regimens. We investigated the effect of tocilizumab as an add-on therapy to our standard of care (SoC) desensitization strategy based on rituximab and apheresis.

METHODS

In this study, we prospectively included highly sensitized patients to receive monthly tocilizumab infusions for 6 months before our SoC regimen (Toci + SoC group). We compared the reductions in the mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) rebound at post-transplantation and kidney function at 1-year post-transplantation to patients treated by SoC (based on apheresis and two doses of rituximab).

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients were included in the SoC group; seven in the Toci + SoC group. Reductions in pre-transplantation MFI were similar between groups. At 1-year post-transplantation, there was no absolute difference in overall MFI rebounds, including donor-specific antibodies. Toci + SoC helped lower the rebound of antibodies with more elevated baseline MFIs. Graft function and survival rates were similar at one-year post-transplantation (median eGFR 62.8 vs. 65.6 mL/min/1.73 m² for SoC and Toci + SoC, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Tocilizumab as an add-on to SoC desensitization may help control the post-transplantation rebound of antibodies with elevated baseline MFIs. However, reductions in pre-transplantation MFIs were similar with or without tocilizumab. Further studies are needed to validate this pilot study.

Therapeutic apheresis in kidney diseases: an updated review

Besides conventional medical therapies, therapeutic apheresis has become an important adjunctive or alternative therapeutic option to immunosuppressive agents for primary or secondary kidney diseases and kidney transplantation. The available therapeutic apheresis techniques used in kidney diseases, including plasma exchange, double-filtration plasmapheresis, immunoadsorption, and low-density lipoprotein apheresis. Plasma exchange is still the leading extracorporeal therapy. Recently, growing evidence supports the potential benefits of double-filtration plasmapheresis and immunoadsorption for more specific and effective clearance of pathogenic antibodies with fewer side effects. However, more randomized controlled trials are still needed. Low-density lipoprotein apheresis is also an important supplementary therapy used in patients with recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. This review collects the latest evidence from recent studies, focuses on the specific advantages and disadvantages of these techniques, and compares the discrepancy among them to determine the optimal therapeutic regimens for certain kidney diseases.

[Improving access to kidney transplantation for highly sensitized patients: What place for IL-6 pathway blockade in desensitization protocols?]

BACKGROUND

Desensitization allows kidney transplantation for HLA highly sensitized subjects. Due to the central role of IL-6 in immunological response, tocilizumab (monoclonal antibody directed against IL-6 receptor) could probably improve desensitization efficacy.

METHODS

Pubmed systematic review by using MeSH terms: tocilizumab, clazakizumab, interleukin-6 blockade, kidney transplantation, kidney graft and desensitization.

STUDIES

IL-6 plays a role in humoral response (plasmocyte differentiation induced by lymphocyte T, IL-21 secretion) as well as in cellular response (differentiation of LT Th17 rather than T reg). In desensitization field, tocilizumab was first studied as second-line treatment after failing of standard-of-care (apheresis, rituximab ± IgIV). Recent study showed that tocilizumab as a monotherapy attenuated anti-HLA antibodies rates but was not sufficient to allow transplantation. However, lymphocyte immunophenotyping showed that tocilizumab hindered B cells maturation. Thereby, tocilizumab could improve long-term efficacy of desensitization, by limiting the anti-HLA rebound and so avoiding antibody-mediated rejection. This hypothesis is supported by a recent study which used clazakizumab (monoclonal antibody directed against IL-6) in association with standard-of-care. In that study, clazakizumab was continued after kidney transplantation. Results were encouraging because 9/10 patients were transplanted and there was no donor-specific antibody at 6 months post-transplantation.

CONCLUSION

IL-6 pathway blockade as a monotherapy fails to desensitize HLA highly sensitized kidney transplant candidates. In association with standard-of-care, it does not seem to significatively improve kidney allograft access (short-term efficacy) vs. standard-of-care only. However, it could improve long-term prognosis of HLA incompatible transplantation by orienting the response towards a tolerogenic profile, by hindering B-cell maturation and, thereby, avoiding DSA rebounds after transplantation. This hypothesis needs to be proven by further studies.

Emerging strategies for antibody-mediated rejection

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is the leading cause of kidney graft loss. Very few treatment options are available to the clinician to counter this disease process. In this review we describe the available therapeutics and the novel approaches that are being currently developed.

RECENT FINDINGS

AMR treatment requires a multidrug approach. Imlifidase, a new immunoglobulin G cleaving agent, may prove to be the perfect replacement of apheresis. New complement blockers other than eculizumab are in development in order to block acute kidney damage in the delicate phase following antibody removal. Plasma cell depletion is being explored in chronic AMR: studies are in progress with daratumumab and felzartamab. Interleukin 6 inhibition is generating enthusiasm in the chronic setting with preliminary encouraging results.

SUMMARY

In acute AMR, the clinicians will have to remove the antibodies, avoid rebound and block specific damage effectors. In chronic AMR they will need to reduce the inflammatory response induced by donor specific antibodies. New drugs are available and transplant physicians are starting to develop effective multidrug strategies to counter the complex disease mechanisms. Safety of these drugs needs to be further explored especially when used together with other potent immunosuppressive drugs.

Donor specific HLA antibody in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Implications for donor selection

Advances in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) have led to changes in the approach to donor selection. Many of these new approaches result in greater HLA loci mismatching, either through the selection of haploidentical donors or permissive HLA mismatches. Although these approaches increase the potential of transplant for many patients by expanding the number of acceptable donor HLA genotypes, they add the potential barrier of donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA). DSA presents a unique challenge in HSCT, as it can limit engraftment and lead to graft failure. However, transient reduction of HLA antibodies through desensitization treatments can limit the risk of graft failure and facilitate engraftment. Thus, the consideration of DSA in donor selection and the management of DSA prior to transplant are playing an increasingly important role in HSCT. In this review, we will discuss studies addressing the role of HLA antibodies in HSCT, the reported impact of desensitization on DSA levels, and the implications for selecting donors for patients with DSA. We found that there is a clear consensus that moderate strength DSA should be avoided, while desensitization strategies are reported to be effective in most cases at reducing DSA to amenable levels. There is limited information regarding the impact of specific characteristics of DSA, such as HLA loci or overall level of sensitization, which could further aid in donor selection for sensitized HSCT candidates.

Tocilizumab Trough Levels Variability in Kidney-Transplant Candidates Undergoing Desensitization

The presence of anti-HLA antibodies is an increasing challenge in kidney transplantation. Tocilizumab (TCZ), a monoclonal antibody targeting the interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R), has been proposed to complement conventional desensitization therapy. We aimed to describe TCZ plasma trough concentrations and their variability and to investigate the link between TCZ concentration and the evolution of anti-HLA antibodies. Sensitized kidney-transplant candidates treated monthly with TCZ (8 mg/kg) for desensitization were retrospectively included. TCZ concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Seventy-four TCZ concentrations from 10 patients were analyzed. The TCZ trough concentration ranged from <1.0 to 52.5 mg·L−1, with a median of 25.6 mg·L−1 [25th–75th percentiles: 13.2–35.3 mg·L−1). The inter- and intra-individual coefficients of variation were 55.0% and 33.0%, respectively. The TCZ trough concentration was not related to IL-6 (rho = −0.46, p = 0.792), soluble IL-6R (rho = −0.81, p = 0.65) concentrations or reduction of anti-HLA antibodies (mixed-effects model adjusting, effect of TCZ trough concentration: rho = −0.004, p = 0.26). The individual median TCZ concentration tended to be associated with the number of antibodies, with an initial MFI > 3000 that dropped to <3000 after TCZ treatment (rho = 0.397, p = 0.083). TCZ trough concentrations in kidney-transplant candidates treated for desensitization were highly variable. Further studies on larger cohorts are needed to study the possible link between TCZ concentrations and the reduction of anti-HLA antibodies.

Tocilizumab and Desensitization in Kidney Transplant Candidates: Personal Experience and Literature Review

Desensitization (DES) allows kidney transplantation for highly HLA-sensitized subjects. Due to the central role of IL-6 in the immunological response, tocilizumab may improve DES efficacy. Thus, we conducted a PubMed systematic review using the MeSH terms tocilizumab, interleukin-6, kidney transplantation, and desensitization. Tocilizumab (TCZ) was first studied for DES as the second-line treatment after failure of a standard DES protocol (SP) (apheresis, rituximab +/- IVIg). Although TCZ (as a monotherapy) attenuated anti-HLA antibody rates, it did not permit transplantation. However, lymphocyte immuno-phenotyping has shown that TCZ hinders B-cell maturation and thus could improve the long-term efficacy of DES by limiting anti-HLA rebound and so avoid antibody-mediated rejection. This hypothesis is supported by a recent study where clazakizumab, a monoclonal antibody directed against IL-6, was continued after kidney transplantation in association with an SP. Nine out of ten patients were then eligible for transplantation, and there were no donor-specific antibodies at 6 months post-transplantation. In association with an SP, tocilizumab does not seem to significantly improve kidney-allograft access (short-term efficacy) vs. a SP only. However, it could improve the long-term prognosis of HLA-incompatible transplantation by hindering B-cell maturation and, thereby, avoiding donor-specific antibody rebounds post-transplantation.

How to improve clotting factors depletion in double-filtration plasmapheresis

BACKGROUND

Double-filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP), a selective therapeutic apheresis, can deplete pathogenic antibodies/substances, but also important coagulation factors.

AIM

To determine if the use of a separator filter with different characteristics (CascadefloEC-50 W) as compared to the reference filter (PlasmafloOP-08 W) is as efficient in terms of immunoglobulin loss, but can reduce coagulation factor losses and have similar tolerability.

PATIENTS/METHODS

This is a single-center prospective study including 14 patients divided into two groups (7 each): that is, group1 = CascadefloEC-50 W and group2 = PlasmafloOP-08 W. We measured immunoglobulins, lipid profiles, blood-cell counts, hemostasis (prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time), coagulation factors, and natural anticoagulants at before and after the first DFPP-session.

RESULTS

In group 1, the loss of coagulation factors was significantly reduced as compared to group 2 for proteins with a molecular weight of >150 kDa: there was, respectively, an average decrease of 70% vs 31% for fibrinogen (P = 0.004), 66% vs 21% for factor V (P = 2.16e-07), 60% vs 32% for factor XI (P = 6.96e-06), 75% vs 17% for XIII-antigen (P = 0.0002), and 47% vs 0% for VWF-antigen(P = 0.02). The decrease in post-session IgG was, on average, 45% in group 1 and 50% in group 2 (P = 0.13). Those results remained significant even when adjusted to the treated-plasma volume and the pre-DFPP factor values.

CONCLUSION

DFPP, using a CascadefloEC-50W as a first-filter, reduces efficiently IgGs similarly to PlasmafloOP-08W but spares clotting factors.