Progressive Sarcopenia Correlates with Poor Response and Outcome to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy

The Effect of Body Mass Index on Melanoma Biology, Immunotherapy Efficacy, and Clinical Outcomes: A Narrative Review

Recent studies indicate that a higher body mass index (BMI) might correlate with improved responses to melanoma treatment, especially with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), despite the general association of obesity with an increased risk of cancer and higher mortality rates. This review examines the paradoxical relationship between BMI and clinical outcomes in melanoma patients by exploring molecular links, the efficacy of immunotherapy, and patient survival outcomes. Our comprehensive literature search across the PubMed and Embase databases revealed a consistent pattern: increased BMI is associated with a better prognosis in melanoma patients undergoing ICI treatment. This "obesity paradox" might be explained by the metabolic and immunological changes in obesity, which could enhance the effectiveness of immunotherapy in treating melanoma. The findings highlight the complexity of the interactions between obesity and melanoma, suggesting that adipose tissue may modulate the immune response and treatment sensitivity favorably. Our review highlights the need for personalized treatment strategies that consider the metabolic profiles of patients and calls for further research to validate BMI as a prognostic factor in clinical settings. This nuanced approach to the obesity paradox in melanoma could significantly impact treatment planning and patient management.

Body composition as a predictor of oncological outcome in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer receiving intravesical instillation after transurethral resection of bladder tumor

Introduction

Body status, categorized as sarcopenia or obesity and assessed using body mass index and body composition, affects the outcome of bladder cancer patients. However, studies comparing disease progression, recurrence, or overall survival in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) with different body compositions are lacking. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective study to identify the impact of body composition, sarcopenia, and obesity on the oncological prognosis of patients with NMIBC who underwent transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) with Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) intravesical instillation (IVI).

Methods

Patients with NMIBC who had undergone TURBT with adjuvant IVI with BCG from March 2005 to April 2021 were included. Body composition parameters were evaluated using computed tomography images of the third lumbar vertebrae and further categorized by sarcopenia and obesity. Oncological outcomes including recurrence-free survival (RFS), progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS) after treatment were analyzed.

Results

A total of 269 patients were enrolled. Subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) density was a significant predictor of RFS, whereas psoas muscle density was a significant predictor of OS in the multivariate analysis. Patients with sarcopenia but without obesity tolerated significantly fewer BCG IVIs than patients without sarcopenia or obesity. Patients with sarcopenia had poorer RFS and OS than those without sarcopenia. In contrast, patients with obesity had better OS than those without obesity.

Discussion

Body composition parameters, including SAT density and psoas muscle density, emerged as significant predictors of OS and RFS, respectively. Hence, our findings indicate that body composition is a helpful measurement to assess the oncological outcomes of patients with NMIBC.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and the Exposome: Host-Extrinsic Factors Determine Response, Survival, and Toxicity

Cancer immunotherapy, largely represented by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), has led to substantial changes in preclinical cancer research and clinical oncology practice over the past decade. However, the efficacy and toxicity profiles of ICIs remain highly variable among patients, with only a fraction achieving a significant benefit. New combination therapeutic strategies are being investigated, and the search for novel predictive biomarkers is ongoing, mainly focusing on tumor- and host-intrinsic components. Less attention has been directed to all the external, potentially modifiable factors that compose the exposome, including diet and lifestyle, infections, vaccinations, and concomitant medications, that could affect the immune system response and its activity against cancer cells. We hereby provide a review of the available clinical evidence elucidating the impact of host-extrinsic factors on ICI response and toxicity.

Survival and immunotoxicities in association with sex-specific body composition patterns of cancer patients undergoing immune-checkpoint inhibitor therapy - A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Imbalanced body composition is mechanistically connected to dysregulated immune activities. Whether overweight/obesity or sarcopenia has an impact on treatment results in cancer patients undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy is currently under debate. We aimed to answer if survival rates and occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were different in obese or sarcopenic patients.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase and CENTRAL for all records published until July 2022 using specific search terms for body composition in combination with terms for ICI regimens. Two authors screened independently. All studies that reported on body mass index or sarcopenia measures were selected for further analysis.

RESULTS

48 studies reporting on overweight/obesity comprising of 19,767 patients, and 32 studies reporting on sarcopenia comprising of 3193 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In the entire cohort, overweight/obesity was significantly associated with better progression-free survival (PFS; p = 0.009) and overall survival (OS; p <0.00001). Subgroup analyses stratified by sex revealed that overweight/obese males had the strongest survival benefit (PFS: p = 0.05; OS: p = 0.0005), and overweight/obese female patients did not show any. However, overweight/obese patients of both sexes had a higher risk to develop irAEs grade ≥3 (p = 0.0009). Sarcopenic patients showed significantly shorter PFS (p <0.0001) and OS (p <0.0001). The frequency of irAEs did not differ between sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis suggests that body composition is associated in a sex-specific manner with survival and irAEs in cancer patients undergoing ICI treatment.

Contribution of skeletal muscle to cancer immunotherapy: A focus on muscle function, inflammation, and microbiota

Sarcopenia, characterized by degenerative and systemic loss of skeletal muscle mass and function, is a multifactorial syndrome commonly observed in individuals with cancer. Additionally, it represents a poor nutritional status and indicates possible presence of cancer cachexia. Recently, with the extensive application of cancer immunotherapy, the effects of sarcopenia/cachexia on cancer immunotherapy, have gained attention. The aim of this review was to summarize the influence of low muscle mass (sarcopenia/cachexia) on the response and immune-related adverse events to immunotherapy from the latest literature. It was revealed that low muscle mass (sarcopenia/cachexia) has detrimental effects on cancer immunotherapy in most cases, although there were results that were not consistent with this finding. This review also discussed potential causes of the paradox, such as different measure methods, research types, muscle indicators, time point, and cancer type. Mechanically, chronic inflammation, immune cells, and microbiota may be critically involved in regulating the efficacy of immunotherapy under the condition of low muscle mass (sarcopenia/cachexia). Thus, nutritional interventions will likely be promising ways for individuals with cancer to increase the efficacy of immunotherapy in the future, for low muscle mass (sarcopenia/cachexia) is an important prognostic factor for cancer immunotherapy.

Imaging to predict checkpoint inhibitor outcomes in cancer. A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Checkpoint inhibition has radically improved the perspective for patients with metastatic cancer, but predicting who will not respond with high certainty remains difficult. Imaging-derived biomarkers may be able to provide additional insights into the heterogeneity in tumour response between patients. In this systematic review, we aimed to summarise and qualitatively assess the current evidence on imaging biomarkers that predict response and survival in patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors in all cancer types.

METHODS

PubMed and Embase were searched from database inception to 29th November 2021. Articles eligible for inclusion described baseline imaging predictive factors, radiomics and/or imaging machine learning models for predicting response and survival in patients with any kind of malignancy treated with checkpoint inhibitors. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUIPS and PROBAST tools and data was extracted.

RESULTS

In total, 119 studies including 15,580 patients were selected. Of these studies, 73 investigated simple imaging factors. 45 studies investigated radiomic features or deep learning models. Predictors of worse survival were (i) higher tumour burden, (ii) presence of liver metastases, (iii) less subcutaneous adipose tissue, (iv) less dense muscle and (v) presence of symptomatic brain metastases. Hazard rate ratios did not exceed 2.00 for any predictor in the larger and higher quality studies. The added value of baseline fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography parameters in predicting response to treatment was limited. Pilot studies of radioactive drug tracer imaging showed promising results. Reports on radiomics were almost unanimously positive, but numerous methodological concerns exist.

CONCLUSIONS

There is well-supported evidence for several imaging biomarkers that can be used in clinical decision making. Further research, however, is needed into biomarkers that can more accurately identify which patients who will not benefit from checkpoint inhibition. Radiomics and radioactive drug labelling appear to be promising approaches for this purpose.

Bone Mineral Density Is a Predictor of Mortality in Female Patients with Cholangiocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Palliative Treatment

Background: Cholangiocellular adenocarcinoma (CCA) is a rare and aggressive malignancy originating from the bile ducts. Its general prognosis is poor as therapeutic options are limited. Many patients present with advanced stages of disease, and palliative chemotherapy remains the only treatment option. Prognostic markers to assess the outcome of chemotherapeutic treatment in CCA are limited. We therefore evaluated bone mineral density (BMD) as a prognostic tool in patients with advanced CCA. Patients and Methods: We included 75 patients with advanced CCA that were treated at our academic tumor center. Prior to treatment, bone mineral density was analyzed at the first lumbar vertebra using routine CT scans in the venous phase and the local PACS (IntelliSpace PACS, Philips, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Results: BMD was not significantly different between male and female patients but decreased with age. Patients with BMD above 167 HU have a significantly improved overall survival (474 days vs. 254 days; log-rank X²(1) = 6.090; p = 0.014). The prognostic value of BMD was confirmed using univariate (HR 2.313 (95%CI: 1.170–4.575); p = 0.016) and multivariate (HR 4.143 (95%CI: 1.197–14.343); p = 0.025) Cox regression analyses. Subgroup analysis revealed that the prognostic value of BMD was only present in female patients and not in male patients, suggesting sex-specific differences. Conclusions: Our data suggest that BMD is a valuable, easily accessible, and independent prognostic marker for overall survival in patients with advanced CCA. Furthermore, subgroup analysis showed the sex specificity of this marker, which demonstrated relevance only in female patients.

Comparison of the prognostic effect of sarcopenia on atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and lenvatinib therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma patients

Background and Aim

Sarcopenia has received much attention as a poor prognostic factor in various fields, and has also been reported to worsen prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with sorafenib or lenvatinib (LEN). Atezolizumab/bevacizumab (ATZ/BEV) is recommended as first‐line drug therapy for unresectable‐HCC, but the effect of sarcopenia on patients treated with ATZ/BEV is unknown.

Methods

We enrolled 98 patients treated with ATZ/BEV or LEN. Computed tomography performed before the initiation of drug therapy was used to diagnose sarcopenia in accordance with the criteria proposed by the Japanese Society of Hepatology. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of sarcopenia in each regimen, and patient characteristics, adverse events, and prognosis were compared.

Results

In ATZ/BEV therapy, 57.1% of patients had sarcopenia. The sarcopenia group had significantly more women (P = 0.0125) and more macroscopic vascular invasion (P = 0.0270). Sarcopenia had no significant effect on progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). In LEN therapy, 63.4% of patients had sarcopenia. The sarcopenia group was significantly older (P = 0.0064) and had a higher number of women (P = 0.0003), a higher neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (P = 0.0222), worse albumin–bilirubin grade (P = 0.0087), and worse best response (P = 0.0255). PFS (P = 0.0091) and OS (P = 0.0006) were worse in the sarcopenia group. In multivariate analysis, age (P = 0.0362), lymphocyte–monocyte ratio (P = 0.0365), and sarcopenia (P = 0.0268) were independent prognostic factors for OS.

Conclusion

In ATZ/BEV therapy, sarcopenia does not determine prognosis, and therapeutic efficacy can be expected even in cases of sarcopenia.

Prognostic impact of sarcopenia on immune-related adverse events in malignancies received immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Whether sarcopenia has an impact on immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients with malignant neoplasms receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is not consistent. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of sarcopenia on all grades of irAEs.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for related studies up to May 2021. Eligible studies were included according to the PICOS criteria. The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The odds ratio (OR), corresponding to the 95% confidence interval (CI) of all grades of irAEs, was collected and analyzed, and a further subgroup analysis of serious adverse events was conducted. All analyses were conducted using the RevMan 5.4 software downloaded from the Cochrane website. The heterogeneity and sensitivity of the study were assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 135 references identified, only 8 studies were analyzed, including 519 patients comprising 250 with sarcopenia and 269 without sarcopenia. No obvious bias was observed in the included studies. An increased incidence of irAEs was not observed in patients with sarcopenia at pre-immunotherapy compared to those without sarcopenia. The OR and corresponding 95% CI were 0.97 and 0.62-1.53, respectively (P=0.90), with low heterogeneity (P=0.17, I² =32%). Further, severe adverse events were analyzed in three studies, and the results showed that sarcopenia was not related to irAEs (P=0.97).

CONCLUSIONS

Malignancies with sarcopenia at pre-immunotherapy may not increase the incidence of irAEs, and sarcopenia may not be a predictive factor for irAEs.

Sarcopenia's Prognostic Impact on Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Although sarcopenia has been reported to predict survival in cancer patients, its impact on patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has not been thoroughly investigated. This systematic review aimed to assess the long-term oncologic impact of sarcopenia on patients who received ICIs.

METHODS

A systematic review of studies indexed in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases, up to April 1, 2021, was conducted. Studies that reported hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) based on sarcopenia in patients treated with ICIs were included. The inverse variance method was used with a random-effects model for data analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 1284 patients from 14 studies were included. Among the patients who received ICIs, patients with sarcopenia had a significant increase in overall mortality compared to patients without sarcopenia in univariate analyses (HR = 1.66, 95% CI = 1.20-2.29, p = 0.002) and in adjusted HRs (HR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.15-2.10, p = 0.004). The same results were obtained for PFS by both univariate analysis (HR = 1.75, 95% CI = 1.37-2.23, p < 0.001) and adjusted HRs (HR = 1.63, 95% CI 1.28-2.09, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Sarcopenia appears to be an effective biomarker for predicting long-term oncologic outcomes in patients receiving ICI therapy and hence plays an important role when making treatment decisions. However, the fundamental role of this association with survival should be further investigated in large cohorts and clinical trials.

Sarcopenia Predicts Cancer Mortality in Male but Not in Female Patients Undergoing Surgery for Cholangiocellular Carcinoma

Simple Summary

Cholangiocellular adenocarcinoma is the second most common primary liver tumor. If resectable, this is the therapeutic method of choice. Unfortunately, there are insufficient prognostic markers to determine which patients benefit most from surgery and which do not. The general condition of the patient, especially their muscle mass and quality, has become more and more the focus of recent research as a possible marker for therapeutic outcome. In our study we investigated how the preoperative muscle mass of patients with cholangiocellular adenocarcinoma affects postoperative overall survival. We showed that patients with a higher preoperative muscle mass had a significantly longer survival than patients with reduced muscle mass. Furthermore, we were able to show that this is particularly relevant in men and that in women preoperative muscle mass plays a significantly less important role in postoperative survival than in men.

Abstract

Introduction: Surgery represents the only curative treatment option for patients with cholangiocarcinoma. However, complete tumor resection requires extensive surgery in many patients, and it is still debated which patients represent the ideal candidates for such therapy in terms of overall survival. Sarcopenia has been associated with an adverse outcome for various malignancies, but its role in the context of patients undergoing tumor resection for cholangiocellular adenocarcinoma (CCA) is only poorly understood. Here, we evaluated the role of sarcopenia in the outcome of CCA patients undergoing radical tumor resection. Methods: Pre-operative CT scans were used to assess the skeletal muscle index (L3SMI) as well as the psoas muscle index (L3PMI) in n = 76 patients receiving curative intended surgery for CCA. L3SMI and L3PMI were correlated with clinical and laboratory markers. Results: Patients with a skeletal muscle index or psoas muscle index above an established ideal cut-off (54.26 and 1.685 cm²/m²) showed a significantly better overall survival in Kaplan–Meier Curve analyses (L3SMI: 1814 days (95% CI: 520–3108) vs. 467 days (95% CI: 225–709) days; log rank X²(1) = 7.18, p = 0.007; L3PMI: 608 days (95% CI: 297–919) vs. 87 days (95% CI: 33–141), log rank X²(1) = 18.71; p < 0.001). Notably, these findings, especially for L3PMI, were confirmed in univariate (L3SMI: HR 0.962 (0.936–0.989); p = 0.006; L3PMI: HR 0.529 (0.366–0.766); p ≤ 0.001) and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Further analyses revealed that the prognostic value of both L3SMI and L3PMI was restricted to male patients, while in female patients survival was independent of the individual muscle mass. Conclusion: Measurement of muscle mass from preoperative CT scans represents an easily obtainable tool to estimate patient prognosis following curative surgery. The prognostic value was restricted to male patients, while in female patients these parameters did not reflect the patient outcome.

Predictive impact of sarcopenia in solid cancers treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a meta-analysis

Sarcopenia, which is characterized by a decrease in muscle quantity or quality, is commonly observed in patients with cancer. Recent research has reported contradictory results on the association between sarcopenia and the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate this discrepancy. We systematically searched three electronic databases to identify articles reporting on the association between sarcopenia and treatment outcomes in patients with solid cancers who received ICIs. The outcomes assessed were hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and odds ratios (ORs) for objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and toxicity. Pooled estimates and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. A total of 2501 patients from 26 studies were analysed. Sarcopenia was observed in 44.7% (95% CI: 38.2-51.3) of the patients and was significantly associated with poor survival (HR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.32-1.82 for OS and HR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.35 to 1.93 for PFS). The HRs (95% CIs) for OS according to the diagnostic measures used were 1.97 (0.88-4.41) for psoas muscle index (PMI), 1.41 (0.87-2.28) for skeletal muscle density (SMD), and 1.43 (1.23-1.67) for skeletal mass index (SMI). The HRs (95% CIs) for PFS were 1.86 (1.08-3.21) for PMI, 1.27 (0.94-1.71) for SMD, and 1.38 (1.11-1.71) for SMI. Poor radiological response to ICI therapy was observed in patients with sarcopenia (OR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.34-0.80 for ORR and OR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.30-0.67 for DCR). The ORs for ORR (95% CIs) were 0.56 (0.15-2.05) for PMI and 0.78 (0.56-1.09) for SMI. The oncologic outcomes associated with melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were comparable with those observed overall (HR for OS = 2.02, 95% CI = 1.26-3.24 for melanoma and HR for OS = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.19-2.18 for NSCLC). In contrast, the occurrence of severe toxicity was not associated with sarcopenia (OR = 1.13, 95% CI = 0.51-2.52). Poor survival and poor response in patients with sarcopenia indicate a negative association between sarcopenia and efficacy of ICIs. Sarcopenia's predictive ability is consistent across various tumour types. For the selection of patients who may respond to ICIs pre-therapeutically, the presence of sarcopenia should be assessed in clinical practice.

Sarcopenia and Myosteatosis as Prognostic Markers in Patients with Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma Undergoing Palliative Treatment

BACKGROUND

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) represents the second most common primary liver cancer and is characterized by a very poor outcome, but reliable prognostic markers are largely missing. Sarcopenia, the progressive loss of muscle mass and strength, as well as myosteatosis have been associated with an unfavorable outcome in several clinical conditions, including cancer. Here, we evaluated the prognostic relevance of sarcopenia and myosteatosis using routine abdominal CT (computed tomography) scans in advanced stage CCA patients undergoing palliative treatment.

METHODS

Routine abdominal CT scans were used to assess the skeletal muscle and the psoas muscle index (L3SMI/L3PMI) at the level of the third lumbar vertebra as radiological indices for sarcopenia as well as the mean skeletal muscle attenuation (MMA) as a surrogate for myosteatosis. Results were correlated with clinical data and outcomes.

RESULTS

Using a calculated optimal cut-off value of 71.95 mm²/cm, CCA patients with an L3SMI value below this cut-off showed a significantly reduced median overall survival (OS) of only 250 days compared to 450 days in patients with a higher L3SMI. Moreover, the median OS of CCA patients with an L3PMI above 6345 mm²/cm was 552 days compared to 252 days in patients with a lower L3PMI. Finally, CCA patients with an MMA above 30.51 Hounsfield Units survived significantly longer (median OS: 430 days) compared to patients with an MMA value below this ideal cut-off (median OS: 215 days). The prognostic relevance of L3SMI, L3PMI, and MMA was confirmed in uni- and multivariate Cox regression analyses.

CONCLUSION

Routine abdominal CT scans represent a unique opportunity to evaluate sarcopenia as well as myosteatosis in advanced CCA patients. We identified the L3SMI/L3PMI as well as the MMA as negative prognostic factors in CCA patients undergoing palliative therapy, arguing that the "opportunistic" evaluation of these parameters might yield important clinical information in daily routine.

Prognostic Impact of Sarcopenia on Clinical Outcomes in Malignancies Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

The effect of sarcopenia on the clinical outcomes of patients with malignant neoplasms receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect and survival of patients with malignancies and sarcopenia receiving ICIs.

Methods

We systematically searched related studies in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to March 2021 according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Information pertaining to the hazard ratio (HR) corresponding to 95% confidence interval (CI) of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) as determined by univariate and multivariate analyses; the odds ratio (OR) corresponding to the 95% CI of the disease control rate (DCR) and objective response rate (ORR); and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) was collected and analyzed using the RevMan 5.4 software. Study heterogeneity and sensitivity were also assessed.

Results

A total of 19 studies were finalized that included 1763patients with lung, gastrointestinal, and head and neck cancers as well as those with melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, pancreatic cancer, and soft tissue sarcoma. According to univariate and multivariate analyses, patients with sarcopenia at pre-immunotherapy had poorer PFS and OS than those without. HRs and the corresponding 95% CI of PFS were 1.91(1.55–2.34, p <0.00001) and 1.46 (1.20–1.78, p =0.0001), respectively, and HRs and the corresponding 95% CI of OS were 1.78 (1.47–2.14, p <0.00001) and 1.73 (1.36–2.19, p <0.0001), respectively. Patients with sarcopenia showed poor PFS and OS during treatment. In addition, patients with sarcopenia had worse ORR (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.28–0.74, p = 0.001) and DCR (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.31–0.64, p<0.0001); however, the incidence of irAEs of any grade and high-grade in patients with sarcopenia did not increase, OR and the corresponding 95% CI were 0.58(0.30–1.12, p = 0.10) and 0.46(0.19–1.09, p = 0.08). Further, we performed subgroup analysis, skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) and psoas muscle mass index (PMI) stratification. In the SMI group, patients with sarcopenia had poor ORR, DCR, PFS, and OS than those without. In the PMI group, sarcopenia had poor ORR,DCR, and was a poor prognostic factor for PFS and OS according to univariate analysis but had no effect on PFS and OS according to multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

Patients with malignancies and sarcopenia at pre-immunotherapy or follow-up visits had poorer clinical outcomes than those without, and sarcopenia was a poor predictive factor of ICI immunotherapy outcomes.

Telomere Shortening in Peripheral Leukocytes Is Associated With Poor Survival in Cancer Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy represents a new standard of care for an increasing number of malignancies. Nevertheless, response rates and outcome of ICI treatment vary between individuals and the identification of predictive markers or hints towards immune cell exhaustion during therapy has remained a major challenge. Leukocyte telomere length is an established predictive biomarker of replicative aging and cellular proliferative potential in various hematological diseases. However, its relevance in the context of ICI therapy has not been investigated to date. Here, we analyze the age-adapted delta telomere length (ΔTL) of peripheral leukocytes as a potential predictive and prognostic marker in patients undergoing ICI therapy.

Methods

Age-adapted delta telomere length (ΔTL) of 84 patients treated with ICIs for solid malignancies was measured via quantitative real-time PCR. ΔTL was correlated with outcome and clinical data.

Results

ΔTL was not significantly altered between patients with different tumor entities or tumor stages and did not predict tumor response to ICI therapy. However, ΔTLs at initiation of treatment were a prognostic marker for overall survival (OS). When using a calculated ideal cut-off value, the median OS in patients with shorter ΔTL was 5.7 months compared to 18.0 months in patients showing longer ΔTL. The prognostic role of age-adapted ΔTL was further confirmed by uni- and multivariate Cox-regression analyses.

Conclusion

In the present study, we demonstrate that shorter telomere lengths in peripheral blood leukocytes are associated with a significantly impaired outcome in patients receiving ICI therapy across different malignancies. We explain our findings by hypothesizing an older replicative age in peripheral leukocytes of patients with an impaired overall survival, reflected by a premature TL shortening. Whether this association is ICI-specific remains unknown. Further follow-up studies are needed to provide insights about the exact mechanism of how shortened telomeres eventually affect OS and could help guiding therapeutic decisions in future.

Combined Assessment of Preoperative Frailty and Sarcopenia Allows the Prediction of Overall Survival in Patients with Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and Surgically Treated Brain Metastasis

Simple Summary

Patients with brain metastasis are at a severe stage of cancer, and brain surgery can prevent neurological morbidity. However, the success of brain surgery might require a patient’s physical integrity prior to the operation. In the present study, we asked whether a preoperative physical decline affects survival in patients with brain metastasis from lung cancer. In order to measure the physical condition, we used a commonly-known index—the so-called frailty index—and additionally measured the thickness of a particular masticatory muscle as muscle loss correlates to physical decline. We found that a decreased muscle thickness was accompanied by worsened survival for patients < 65 years and an increased frailty index correlated to worsened survival for patients ≥ 65 years. These results encourage to use of the frailty index and muscle thickness as easily available parameters in order to more sufficiently estimate individual treatment success in patients with metastatic lung cancer.

Abstract

Neurosurgical resection represents an important therapeutic pillar in patients with brain metastasis (BM). Such extended treatment modalities require preoperative assessment of patients’ physical status to estimate individual treatment success. The aim of the present study was to analyze the predictive value of frailty and sarcopenia as assessment tools for physiological integrity in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had undergone surgery for BM. Between 2013 and 2018, 141 patients were surgically treated for BM from NSCLC at the authors’ institution. The preoperative physical condition was assessed by the temporal muscle thickness (TMT) as a surrogate parameter for sarcopenia and the modified frailty index (mFI). For the ≥65 aged group, median overall survival (mOS) significantly differed between patients classified as ‘frail’ (mFI ≥ 0.27) and ‘least and moderately frail’ (mFI < 0.27) (15 months versus 11 months (p = 0.02)). Sarcopenia revealed significant differences in mOS for the <65 aged group (10 versus 18 months for patients with and without sarcopenia (p = 0.036)). The present study confirms a predictive value of preoperative frailty and sarcopenia with respect to OS in patients with NSCLC and surgically treated BM. A combined assessment of mFI and TMT allows the prediction of OS across all age groups.