Towards an Earlier Diagnosis of Acromegaly and Gigantism

[Acromegaly screening in patients with hyperprolactinemia and pituitary adenoma]

BACKGROUND

Hyperprolactinemia accompanies growth hormone hypersecretion in approximately 25-39% of cases. There is a recommendation to determine the level of prolactin in clinical guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acromegaly. However, there is no understanding of the necessity to investigate the IGF-1 level in patients with hyperprolactinemia and a pituitary adenoma.

AIM

Determining the proportion of patients with hyperprolactinemia and pituitary adenoma, who were examined for IGF-1 levels, and identifying the proportion of patients with acromegaly among this cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between December 2019 and December 2022 a single-center observational single-stage single-sample uncontrolled study was conducted. At the first stage of the study, the proportion of patients with pituitary adenoma and hyperprolactinemia with studied IGF-1 levels was determined, according to medical records. At the second stage of the study, patients without known indicators of IGF-1 were determined. The concentration of growth hormone was studied during the oral glucose load in the case of increased IGF-1 levels.

RESULTS

At the first stage, 105 patients were included in the study. The level of IGF-1 was determined in 41/105 (39%) cases. There were 22/41 (53.7%) cases in the subgroup with pituitary incidentalomas and 19/64 (29.7%) cases in the subgroup with hyperprolactinemia among them. At the second stage, the IGF-1 level was additionally determined in 53 patients with hyperprolactinemia and pituitary adenoma (total 94 patients). The level of IGF-1 was elevated in 11/94 patients, further acromegaly was confirmed in 3/94 patients (3.2%).

CONCLUSION

In real clinical practice the level of IGF-1 is studied only in 39% of cases in patients with pituitary adenoma and hyperprolactinemia. The disease was detected in 3 cases (3.2%) out of 94 people with hyperprolactinemia and pituitary adenoma without clinical manifestations of acromegaly. We consider the study of IGF-1 levels justified as a screening for acromegaly in patients with hyperprolactinemia and pituitary adenoma.

The socioeconomic burden of acromegaly

Acromegaly is a rare and insidious disease characterized by chronic excess growth hormone, leading to various morphological changes and systemic complications. Despite its low prevalence, acromegaly poses a significant socioeconomic burden on patients and healthcare systems. This review synthesizes the current state of knowledge on the psychosocial burden, disability, impact on daily life, and cost of acromegaly disease, focusing on the quality of life, partnership, medical care and treatment afflictions, participation in daily activities, professional and leisure impairment, and cost of treatment for acromegaly and its comorbidities. It also examines management strategies, coping mechanisms, and interventions aimed at alleviating this burden. A comprehensive understanding of the extent of the socioeconomic burden in acromegaly is crucial to develop effective strategies to improve treatment and care. Further research is warranted to explore the myriad factors contributing to this burden, as well as the efficacy of interventions to alleviate it, ultimately enhancing the quality of life for patients with acromegaly.

Delving into Acromegaly

Acromegaly is a rare and disabling disease with some distinct and striking clinical features that have fascinated (and frightened) laypeople and medical experts alike throughout history [...].

Impact of the diagnostic delay of acromegaly on bone health: data from a real life and long term follow-up experience

INTRODUCTION

Acromegaly is a chronic disease with systemic complications. Disease onset is insidious and consequently typically burdened by diagnostic delay. A longer diagnostic delay induces more frequently cardiovascular, respiratory, metabolic, neuropsychiatric and musculoskeletal comorbidities. No data are available on the effect of diagnostic delay on skeletal fragility. We aimed to evaluate the effect of diagnostic delay on the frequency of incident and prevalent of vertebral fractures (i-VFs and p-VFs) in a large cohort of acromegaly patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A longitudinal, retrospective and multicenter study was conducted on 172 acromegaly patients.

RESULTS

Median diagnostic delay and duration of follow-up were respectively 10 years (IQR: 6) and 10 years (IQR: 8). P-VFs were observed in 18.6% and i-VFs occurred in 34.3% of patients. The median estimated diagnostic delay was longer in patients with i-VFs (median: 11 years, IQR: 3), in comparison to those without i-VFs (median: 8 years, IQR: 7; p = 0.02). Age at acromegaly diagnosis and at last follow-up were higher in patients with i-VFs, with respect to those without i-VFs. The age at acromegaly diagnosis was positively associated with the diagnostic delay (p < 0.001, r = 0.216). A longer history of active acromegaly was associated with a high frequency of i-VFs (p = 0.03). The logistic regression confirmed that patients with a diagnostic delay > 10 years had 1.5-folds increased risk of developing i-VFs (OR: 1.5; 95%CI: 1.1-2; p = 0.017).

CONCLUSION

Our data showed that the diagnostic delay in acromegaly has a significant impact on VF risk, further supporting the clinical relevance of an early acromegaly diagnosis.

Clinical Applicability of Patient- and Clinician-Reported Outcome Tools in the Management of Patients with Acromegaly

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess treatment outcomes and disease control status in patients with acromegaly by patient- and clinician-reported outcome tools and to analyse correlations among different components of both tools.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study included 72 patients from the national referral centre with a median follow up of 8 (5-12) years. Baseline SAGIT at the diagnosis was determined retrospectively, while the follow up SAGIT and AcroQoL results were assessed at the most recent visit and by additional telephone interviews.

RESULTS

All SAGIT subscores significantly lowered from baseline to follow up (global score from 14 to 4 (P<0.001)). SAGIT at baseline did not discriminate the current disease control status. However, higher baseline SAGIT score and subscore T were associated with uncontrolled disease after the first-line treatment. Diagnostic delay correlated with baseline S, A, G, and global SAGIT scores. At follow up, global SAGIT score discriminated between cured/controlled and uncontrolled groups (4 vs. 6 (P=0.007)). AcroQoL score was 69.3, with »Personal relations subscale« being the least and »Physical scale« the most affected. There was no difference in AcroQoL between patients classified as uncontrolled or cured/controlled. At baseline and follow up, there were significant negative correlations between S and A subscores and AcroQoL. Higher BMI, presence of swelling, joint symptoms, headaches, sleep apnea, and hypertension significantly impaired QoL.

CONCLUSION

Our results emphasised the complementary nature of patient- and clinician-reported outcome tools in acromegaly management. We identified modifiable signs, symptoms, and comorbidities as treatment targets that might help clinicians improve QoL in this population.

The role of the dentist and orthodontist in recognizing oro-facial manifestations of acromegaly: a questionnaire-based study

PURPOSE

Oro-facial manifestations of acromegaly are among the earliest signs of the disease and are reported by a significant number of patients at diagnosis. Despite this high prevalence of acromegaly oral manifestation, dentists do not play a pivotal role in acromegaly identification and diagnosis. The aim of our study was to evaluate the ability of dentists and orthodontists in the early recognition of the oro-facial manifestations of acromegaly.

METHODS

A telematic questionnaire was administered to dentists and orthodontists. The questionnaire included photos with facial and oral-dental details and lateral teleradiography of acromegaly patients (ACRO).

RESULTS

The study included 426 participants: 220 dentists and 206 orthodontists. Upon reviewing the photos, dentists most often observed mandibular prognathism and lips projection, while orthodontists also reported the impairment of relative soft tissue. Orthodontists, who usually use photos to document patients' oral-facial characteristics, paid more attention to oral-facial impairment than dentists. During dental assessment, 90% of the participants usually evaluated tongue size and appearance, diastemas presence, and signs of sleep impairment (mainly orthodontists). Orthodontists were also more able to identify sella turcica enlargement at teleradiography. A total of 10.8% of the participants had ACRO as patients and 11.3% referred at least one patient for acromegaly suspicion.

CONCLUSION

The study highlighted dentists' strategic role in identifying ACRO. Increasing dentists' awareness about acromegaly clinical issues may improve early diagnosis, potentially resulting in an increased quality of life and decreased mortality among ACRO.