Recent Advances of Interventional Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography and Endoscopic Ultrasound for Patients with Surgically Altered Anatomy

Patient Radiation Exposure during Enteroscopy-Assisted Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Surgically Altered Anatomy (with Video)

BACKGROUND

Fluoroscopy must be used cautiously during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Radiation exposure data in patients with surgically altered anatomy undergoing enteroscopy-assisted ERCP (EA-ERCP) are scarce.

METHODS

34 consecutive EA-ERCP procedures were compared with 68 conventional ERCP (C-ERCP) procedures. Patient and procedure characteristics and radiation data were collected.

RESULTS

Surgical reconstructions were gastrojejunostomy, Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy, Roux-en-Y total gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and Whipple's duodenopancreatectomy. Procedures were restricted to biliary indications. Mean fluoroscopy time was comparable in both groups (370 ± 30 s EA-ERCP vs. 393 ± 40 s C-ERCP, p = 0.7074), whereas total mean radiation dose was lower in EA-ERCP (83 ± 6 mGy) compared to C-ERCP (110 ± 11 mGy, p = 0.0491) and dose area product (DAP) was higher in EA-ERCP (2216 ± 173 µGy*m2) compared to C-ERCP (1600 ± 117 µGy*m2, p = 0.0038), as was total procedure time (77 ± 5 min vs. 39 ± 3 min, p < 0.0001). Enteroscope insertion to reach the bile duct during EA-ERCP took 28 ± 4 min, ranging from 4 to 90 min. These results indicate that C-ERCP procedures are generally more complex, needing magnified fluoroscopy, whereas EA-ERCP procedures take more time for enteroscope insertion under wide field fluoroscopic guidance (increased DAP) with less complex ERCP manipulation (lower total radiation dose).

CONCLUSIONS

Radiation exposure during EA-ERCP in surgically altered anatomy is different as compared to C-ERCP. EA-ERCP takes longer with a higher DAP because of the enteroscope insertion, but with lower total radiation dose because these ERCP procedures are usually less complex.

Clinical Advances in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Biliary Tract Diseases

Although the biliary tract is a small organ, it is diverse in location (intrahepatic bile ducts, extrahepatic bile ducts, gallbladder, and ampulla) and disease (including benign and malignant), thus a multidisciplinary approach involving endoscopists, surgeons, oncologists, radiologists, and infectious disease specialists is often required to treat biliary tract disease [...]

Effectiveness of double-balloon enteroscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (DBE-ERCP): A multicenter real-world study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

To investigate the effectiveness of double-balloon enteroscope-assisted retrograde cholangiopancreatography (DBE-ERCP) in patients with gastrointestinal surgically altered anatomy (SAA).

METHODS

From May 2013 to October 2021, all consecutive patients undergoing DBE-ERCP in three gastroenterological referral centers in Northern Italy were enrolled in the study. Patients were assessed regarding their medical history, previous surgery, time from previous surgery to the DBE-ERCP procedure, and the success or failure of DBE-ERCP.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients (60% men, median age 65 (23-89) years) undergoing 67 DBE-ERCP procedures (1-3 DBE-ERCP per patient) were enrolled. Reasons for SAA included orthotopic liver transplantation (23%), ulcers (15%), malignancies (43%), difficult cholecystectomy (17%), and other causes (2%). Types of surgery included Roux-en-Y biliodigestive anastomosis (45%), Roux-en-Y gastrectomy (32%), pancreaticoduodenectomy (17%), and Billroth II gastrectomy (6%). The overall DBE-ERCP success rate was 86%. The type of surgery, indications, and the length of time between previous surgery and DBE-ERCP were not statistically associated with DBE-ERCP success. The DBE-ERCP success rate increased from 2018 to 2021.

CONCLUSIONS

DBE-ERCP is a successful procedure in challenging patients with SAA. The improvement in results over time indicates the necessity of adequate training and of centralizing patients in referral centers.

Role of endoscopic ultrasound in the evaluation of unexplained extrahepatic bile duct dilatation

OBJECTIVE

This study was performed to assess the diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in patients with extrahepatic bile duct (EBD) dilatation and develop a novel model incorporating EUS-based signature with clinical parameters for distinguishing the malignant dilation of EBD.

METHODS

The EUS data and clinical parameters of the patients were collected and analyzed retrospectively. First, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of EUS in detecting the cause of EBD dilatation. Then, we performed univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses based on clinical and EUS features. Finally, a nomogram was established to aid in distinguishing between malignant dilation and noncalculous benign dilatation of EBD in patients.

RESULTS

A total of 184 patients were enrolled. For the diagnosis of malignant dilation, EUS achieved an accuracy of 90.76%, sensitivity of 85.96%, and specificity of 92.91%. For the diagnosis of calculous dilation, EUS achieved an accuracy of 100%, sensitivity of 100%, and specificity of 100%. For the diagnosis of noncalculous benign dilatation, EUS achieved an accuracy of 90.76%, sensitivity of 90.90%, and specificity of 90.58%. Multivariable logistic regression analyses indicated that abnormal liver function test, elevated tumor markers, and EUS findings were the well-diagnostic factors of malignant EBD dilation. The nomogram established by these factors showed good calibration and discrimination.

CONCLUSION

EUS is a useful examinational modality in the work-up of EBD dilatation. In combination with abnormal liver function test and elevated tumor markers, EUS may provide additional information for the detection of malignant dilation of EBD and should be further investigated.

Role of endoscopic ultrasound in vascular interventions: Where are we now?

From a mere diagnostic tool to an imperative treatment modality, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has evolved and revolutionized safer efficient options for vascular interventions. Currently it is an alternative treatment option in the management of gastrointestinal bleeding, primarily variceal type bleeding. Conventional treatment option prior to EUS incorporation had limited efficiency and high adverse events. The characterization and detail provided by EUS gives a cutting edge towards a holistically successful management choice. Data indicates that EUS-guided combination therapy of coil embolization and glue injection has the higher efficacy for the treatment of varices. Conversely, similar treatment options that exist for esophageal and other ectopic variceal bleeding was also outlined. In conclusion, many studies refer that a combination therapy of coil and glue injection under EUS guidance provides higher technical success with fewer recurrence and adverse events, making its adaptation in the guideline extremely favorable. Endo-hepatology is a novel disciple with a promising future outlook, we reviewed topics regarding portal vein access, pressure gradient measurement, and thrombus biopsy that are crucial interventions as alternative of radiological procedures. The purpose of this review is to provide an update on the latest available evidence in the literature regarding the role of EUS in vascular interventions. We reviewed the role of EUS in variceal bleeding in recent studies, especially gastric varices and novel approaches aimed at the portal vein.