The Prognostic Role of Early Skeletal Muscle Mass Depletion in Multimodality Management of Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer Treated with First Line Chemotherapy: A Pilot Experience from Modena Cancer Center

Systemic immunoinflammatory index and prognostic nutrition index for predicting pathologic responses of patients with advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant therapy for advanced gastric cancer

To investigate the value of prognostic nutrition index (PNI) and systemic immunoinflammatory index (SII) for predicting pathological responses of patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC) after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). The clinicopathological data of 326 patients with advanced GC who received NACT in Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University (The First People's Hospital of Changde City) from January 2017 to December 2021 were retrospectively collected. The SII and PNI of patients were calculated. The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was leveraged for getting the optimal cutoff values of SII and PNI. The pathological response of patients after NACT, as obtained from their postoperative pathological examinations, was evaluated based on the tumor regression grade (TRG) criteria. Multivariate regression analysis was employed for identifying factors that led to various pathological responses after NACT in advanced GC patients. The log-rank test was utilized for between-group comparison of patients' survival curves. The SII and PNI were 507.45 and 48.48 respectively, and their levels were divided into high and low groups. Pathological response (TRG 0-1) was observed in 66 cases (20.25%), while non-pathological response (TRG 2-3) was observed in 260 cases (79.75%). The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that tumor diameter < 5 cm, ypT T0-T2, ypN N0, chemotherapy regimen XELOX (capecitabine combined with oxaliplatin), SII < 507.45 (P=0.002), PNI > 48.48 were all independent factors affecting the pathological responses of advanced GC patients after NACT (all P < 0.05). With SII and PNI being included, the AUC was 0.821 (95% CI: 0.765-0.876), and the specificity was 87.90% and the sensitivity was 64.20%. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis showed that NACT patients with tumor diameter < 5 cm, ypT T0-T2, ypN N0, XELOX chemotherapy regimen, SII < 507.45 and SII ≥ 507.45 had a higher survival rate. (P < 0.001). Before treatment, tumor diameter < 5 cm, ypT T0-T2, ypN N0, chemotherapy regimen XELOX, SII < 507.45, PNI > 48.48 were all independent factors affecting the pathological response of advanced GC patients after NACT. Moreover, the inclusion of SII and PNI increased the accuracy of predicting the pathological response of patients after NACT.

Remodeling the immune microenvironment for gastric cancer therapy through antagonism of prostaglandin E2 receptor 4

Gastric cancer is highly prevalent among digestive tract tumors. Due to the intricate nature of the gastric cancer immune microenvironment, there is currently no effective treatment available for advanced gastric cancer. However, there is promising potential for immunotherapy targeting the prostaglandin E2 receptor subtype 4 (EP4) in gastric cancer. In our previous study, we identified a novel small molecule EP4 receptor antagonist called YY001. Treatment with YY001 alone demonstrated a significant reduction in gastric cancer growth and inhibited tumor metastasis to the lungs in a mouse model. Furthermore, administration of YY001 stimulated a robust immune response within the tumor microenvironment, characterized by increased infiltration of antigen-presenting cells, T cells, and M1 macrophages. Additionally, our research revealed that YY001 exhibited remarkable synergistic effects when combined with the PD-1 antibody and the clinically targeted drug apatinib, rather than fluorouracil. These findings suggest that YY001 holds great promise as a potential therapeutic strategy for gastric cancer, whether used as a standalone treatment or in combination with other drugs.

Optimizing the Continuum of Care in Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) still ranks as the fifth most common malignancy and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Despite the recent progress in the therapeutic algorithm of the advanced disease with the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and next-generation HER2-directed therapies, survival rates remain poor, with a median survival hardly exceeding 12 months. Furthermore, only 40% of patients remain eligible for second- and later-line treatments due to the aggressiveness of the disease and the rapid deterioration of performance status (PS). Thus, current research is focusing either on the identification of novel treatment options or the development of personalized strategies to optimize the continuum of care and ultimately improve patients' outcome. In this article, we provide an overview of the current treatment landscape for advanced GC with a particular emphasis on later-line treatments and outline novel perspectives on the horizon.

Call for standardization in assessment and reporting of muscle and adipose change using computed tomography analysis in oncology: A scoping review

Investigators are increasingly measuring skeletal muscle (SM) and adipose tissue (AT) change during cancer treatment to understand impact on patient outcomes. Recent meta-analyses have reported high heterogeneity in this literature, representing uncertainty in the resulting estimates. Using the setting of palliative-intent chemotherapy as an exemplar, we aimed to systematically summarize the sources of variability among studies evaluating SM and AT change during cancer treatment and propose standards for future studies to enable reliable meta-analysis. Studies that measured computed tomography-defined SM and/or AT change in adult patients during palliative-intent chemotherapy for solid tumours were included, with no date or geographical limiters. Of 2496 publications screened by abstract/title, 83 were reviewed in full text and 38 included for extraction, representing 34 unique cohorts across 8 tumour sites. The timing of baseline measurement was frequently defined as prior to treatment, while endpoint timing ranged from 6 weeks after treatment start to time of progression. Fewer than 50% specified the actual time interval between measurements. Measurement error was infrequently discussed (8/34). A single metric (cm2 /m2 , cm2 or %) was used to describe SM change in 18/34 cohorts, while multiple metrics were presented for 10/34 and no descriptive metrics for 6/34. AT change metrics and sex-specific reporting were available for 10/34 cohorts. Associations between SM loss and overall survival were evaluated in 24 publications, with classification of SM loss ranging from any loss to >14% loss over variable time intervals. Age and sex were the most common covariates, with disease response in 50% of models. Despite a wealth of data and effort, heterogeneity in study design, reporting and statistical analysis hinders evidence synthesis regarding the severity and outcomes of SM and AT change during cancer treatment. Proposed standards for study design include selection of homogenous cohorts, clear definition of baseline/endpoint timing and attention to measurement error. Standard reporting should include baseline SM and AT by sex, actual scan interval, SM and AT change using multiple metrics and visualization of the range of change observed. Reporting by sex would advance understanding of sexual dimorphism in SM and AT change. Evaluating the impact of tissue change on outcomes requires adjustment for relevant covariates and concurrent disease response. Adoption of these standards by researchers and publishers would alter the current paradigm to enable meta-analysis of future studies and move the field towards meaningful application of SM and AT change to clinical care.

Exercise and Nutritional Interventions in Patients with Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

The quality of life and survival of patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer can be improved. Positive effects of exercise and nutritional interventions on quality of life and potential effects on cancer outcomes are found in gastroesophageal cancer in the curative setting, as well as in other cancer types. We therefore systematically reviewed the current literature on the effect of exercise and nutritional interventions on various outcomes in patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer.

METHODS

We searched on the 11th of June 2021 in Pubmed, Embase and the Cochrane library for publications of randomized trials and observational studies on exercise and nutritional interventions (either combined or as separate intervention) in patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer. The outcomes of interest were overall survival, progression free survival, quality of life, chemotherapy toxicity, and chemotherapy adherence.

RESULTS

We screened 1,764 records for eligibility and included one study in our analysis. The other 1,763 were excluded for various reasons, most frequently an incorrect study population (e.g. both curable and incurable patients) or an incorrect intervention. One retrospective cohort study of 40 patients with advanced gastric cancer who received first line chemotherapy was included. It was stated that 'no significant differences in terms of overall and progression free survival were reported between the two groups of patients.' No absolute numbers were provided.

CONCLUSION

Our systematic review did not identify any high quality studies on exercise and nutritional interventions in advanced gastroesophageal cancer. We deem a randomized clinical trial on this topic to be highly needed.

Clinical applications of body composition and functional status tools for nutrition assessment of hospitalized adults: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

No global consensus exists on diagnostic criteria for malnutrition. Muscular deficits and functional impairments are major components of available malnutrition diagnostic frameworks because these facets of nutrition status significantly impact outcomes. The purpose of this review is to explore which body composition assessment (BCA) and functional status assessment (FSA) tools are being used for nutrition assessment (NA) and monitoring the response to nutrition interventions (RNIs) in adult inpatients.

METHODS

A literature search of Embase, Medline (Ovid), Web of Science, and Cochrane Central was performed to identify studies that used BCA and/or FSA tools for NA (along with an accepted NA diagnostic framework) and/or for monitoring RNI in adult inpatients.

RESULTS

The search yielded 3667 articles; 94 were included in the review. The number of studies using BCA and/or FSA tools for NA was 47 and also 47 for monitoring RNI. Seventy-nine percent of studies used bioimpedance for BCA, and 97% that included FSA utilized handgrip strength. When compared against sets of diagnostic criteria, many of the BCA and FSA tools showed promising associations with nutrition status.

CONCLUSION

Bioimpedance methods are the most widely used bedside BCA tools, and handgrip strength is the most widely used FSA tool; however, these methods are being used with a variety of protocols, algorithms, and interpretation practices in heterogeneous populations. To create a standardized nutrition status assessment process there is a need for validation studies on bedside methods and the development of globally standardized assessment protocols in clinical inpatient settings.

Prognostic role of pretreatment skeletal muscle index in gastric cancer patients: A meta-analysis

Background: The association between pretreatment skeletal muscle index (SMI) and long-term survival of gastric cancer patients remains unclear up to now. The aim of this meta-analysis was to identify the prognostic value of pretreatment SMI in gastric cancer. Methods: The PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science electronic databases were searched up to 5 June 2022 for relevant studies. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and the second outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). The hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were combined to assess the relationship between pretreatment SMI and survival of gastric cancer patients. All statistical analyses were conducted by STATA 15.0 software. Results: A total of 31 retrospective studies involving 12,434 patients were enrolled in this meta-analysis. The pooled results demonstrated that lower pretreatment was significantly associated with poorer OS (HR = 1.53, p < 0.001). Besides, lower pretreatment SMI was also related with worse DFS (HR = 1.39, p < 0.001) and CSS (HR = 1.96, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Pretreatment SMI was significantly associated with prognosis of gastric cancer patients and lower SMI predicted worse survival. However, more prospective high-quality studies are still needed to verify our findings.