1
|
Sekerak R, Lerner JBA, Garnett C, McEntegart M, Maehara A, Ali Z, Fall K, Mohan S, Ratner LE, Leon MB, Kirtane AJ, Moses J, Prasad M. Outcomes of ultra-low contrast percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2024. [PMID: 38932577 DOI: 10.1002/ccd.31128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2024] [Revised: 05/17/2024] [Accepted: 06/09/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with increased risk of contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) and requirement for renal replacement therapy (RRT). OBJECTIVES We aimed to evaluate our single center experience of ultra-low contrast PCI in patients with CKD and to characterize 1 year outcomes. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of ultra-low contrast PCI at our institution between 2016 and 2022. Patients with CKD3b-5 (eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73m2), not on RRT who underwent ultra-low contrast PCI ( < 30 mL of contrast during PCI) were included. Primary outcomes included change in eGFR post-procedurally, and death, RRT requirement, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 1 year follow-up. RESULTS One hundred patients were included in the study. The median age was 67 years old and 28% were female. The median baseline eGFR was 21.5 mL/min/1.73m2 (IQR 14.08-32.0 mL/min/1.73m2). A median of 8.0 mL (IQR 0-15 mL) of contrast was used during PCI. Median contrast use to eGFR ratio was 0.37 (IQR 0-0.59). There was no significant difference between pre-and postprocedure eGFR (p = 0.84). At 1 year, 8% of patients died, 11% required RRT and 33% experienced MACE. The average time of RRT initiation was 7 months post-PCI. Forty-four patients were undergoing renal transplant evaluation, of which 17 (39%) received a transplant. CONCLUSIONS In patients with advanced CKD, ultra-low contrast PCI is feasible and safe with minimal need for peri-procedural RRT. Moreover, ultra-low contrast PCI may allow for preservation of renal function in anticipation of renal transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Akiko Maehara
- Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ziad Ali
- St. Francis Hospital and Heart Center, Roslyn, New York, USA
| | - Khady Fall
- Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Lloyd E Ratner
- Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Martin B Leon
- Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ajay J Kirtane
- Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jeffrey Moses
- Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Megha Prasad
- Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sarwar M, Adedokun S, Narayanan MA. Role of intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography in intracoronary imaging for coronary artery disease: a systematic review. J Geriatr Cardiol 2024; 21:104-129. [PMID: 38440344 PMCID: PMC10908578 DOI: 10.26599/1671-5411.2024.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Coronary angiography has long been the standard for coronary imaging, but it has limitations in assessing vessel wall anatomy and guiding percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Intracoronary imaging techniques like intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) can overcome these limitations. IVUS uses ultrasound and OCT uses near-infrared light to visualize coronary pathology in unique ways due to differences in temporal and spatial resolution. These techniques have evolved to offer clinical utility in plaque characterization and vessel assessment during PCI. Meta-analyses and adjusted observational studies suggest that both IVUS and OCT-guided PCI correlate with reduced cardiovascular risks compared to angiographic guidance alone. While IVUS demonstrates consistent clinical outcome benefits, OCT evidence is less robust. IVUS has progressed from early motion detection to high-resolution systems, with smaller compatible catheters. OCT utilizes near infrared light to achieve unparalleled resolutions, but requires temporary blood clearance for optimal imaging. Enhanced visualization and guidance make IVUS and OCT well-suited for higher risk PCI in patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease by allowing detailed visualization of complex lesions and ensuring optimal stent deployment and positioning in PCI for patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease, improving outcomes. IVUS and recent advancements in zero- and low-contrast OCT techniques can reduce nephrotoxic contrast exposure, thus helping to minimize PCI complications in these high-risk patient groups. IVUS and OCT provide valuable insights into coronary pathophysiology and guide interventions precisely compared to angiography alone. Both have comparable clinical outcomes, emphasizing the need for tailored imaging choices based on clinical scenarios. Continued refinement and integration of intravascular imaging will likely play a pivotal role in optimizing coronary interventions and outcomes. This systematic review aims to delve into the nuances of IVUS and OCT, highlighting their strengths and limitations as PCI adjuncts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maruf Sarwar
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, White River Health, Batesville, AR, USA
| | - Stephen Adedokun
- Division of Cardiology, University of Tennessee at Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Mahesh Anantha Narayanan
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, White River Health, Batesville, AR, USA
- University of Arkansas Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kwon W, Choi KH, Song YB, Park YH, Lee JM, Lee JY, Lee SJ, Lee SY, Kim SM, Yun KH, Cho JY, Kim CJ, Ahn HS, Nam CW, Yoon HJ, Lee WS, Jeong JO, Song PS, Doh JH, Jo SH, Yoon CH, Hong D, Park TK, Yang JH, Choi SH, Gwon HC, Hahn JY. Intravascular Imaging in Patients With Complex Coronary Lesions and Chronic Kidney Disease. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2345554. [PMID: 38019512 PMCID: PMC10687657 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.45554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance As patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are more likely to have complex coronary lesions, intravascular imaging guidance in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for this population could be potentially beneficial. Objectives To investigate whether the outcomes of intravascular imaging-guided procedural optimization would be different according to the presence of CKD. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a prespecified substudy of RENOVATE-COMPLEX-PCI, a recently published multicenter randomized clinical trial in Korea studying the benefits of intravascular imaging for complex coronary lesions. Patients with complex coronary lesions, with or without CKD, were enrolled between May 2018 and May 2021. Data were analyzed from January to June 2023. Interventions PCI in each group was done either under the guidance of intravascular imaging or angiography alone. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was target vessel failure (TVF) at the 3-year point, defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target vessel revascularization. Results A total of 1639 patients (1300 male [79.3%]) treated with PCI for complex coronary lesions were stratified into CKD (296 participants) and non-CKD (1343 participants) groups. The mean (SD) age of each group was 70.3 (9.4) and 64.5 (10.1) years, and mean (SD) estimated serum creatinine was 2.9 (5.3) and 0.8 (0.2) mg/dL for CKD and non-CKD groups, respectively. Intravascular imaging-guided revascularization was associated with significantly lower incidence of the primary end point compared with angiography-guided revascularization in both CKD (13.3% vs 23.3%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.51; 95% CI, 0.27-0.93; P = .03) and non-CKD (6.4% vs 9.9%; HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.44-0.99; P = .05) groups. The significantly lower incidence of the primary end point was mainly associated with the lower risk of cardiac death or target vessel-related myocardial infarction (9.4% vs 22.2%; HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.20-0.76; P = .006) in the CKD group and by target vessel revascularization (3.0% vs 5.5%; HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.30-0.99; P = .05) in the non-CKD group. Those with a glomerular filtration rate of at least 30 mL/min/1.73m2 and less than 60 ml/kg/1.73m2 showed the greatest benefit from imaging-guided complex PCI (8.8% vs 21.2%; HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.11-0.68; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance In this prespecified cohort substudy of the Randomized Controlled Trial of Intravascular Imaging Guidance versus Angiography-Guidance on Clinical Outcomes After Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention trial, intravascular imaging guidance showed clinical benefit over angiography guidance in reducing the risk of TVF, regardless of the presence of CKD. The greatest benefits of imaging-guided complex PCI were observed in stage 3 CKD. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03381872.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Woochan Kwon
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ki Hong Choi
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Bin Song
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yong Hwan Park
- Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon, Korea
| | - Joo Myung Lee
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong-Young Lee
- Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung-Jae Lee
- Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Yeub Lee
- Chungbuk National University Hospital, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Korea
- Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital, Gwangmyeong, Korea
| | - Sang Min Kim
- Chungbuk National University Hospital, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Korea
| | | | | | - Chan Joon Kim
- The Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu St Mary’s Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyo-Suk Ahn
- The Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu St Mary’s Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | | | | | - Wang Soo Lee
- Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin-Ok Jeong
- Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Pil Sang Song
- Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
| | | | - Sang-Ho Jo
- Cardiovascular Center, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Korea
| | - Chang-Hwan Yoon
- Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
| | - David Hong
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Taek Kyu Park
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong Hoon Yang
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung-Hyuk Choi
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyeon-Cheol Gwon
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joo-Yong Hahn
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Burlacu A, Covic A. Special Issue: "Cardiovascular Complications in Renal Diseases". J Clin Med 2023; 12:5307. [PMID: 37629349 PMCID: PMC10455386 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12165307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
The intricate interplay between cardiovascular (CV) pathology and chronic kidney disease (CKD) encompasses diagnostic protocols (both clinical and paraclinical), outcome assessments (such as mortality, morbidity, and costs), as well as advancements in new therapeutic approaches (including pharmacological, interventional, and surgical modalities) [...].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandru Burlacu
- Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases “Prof. Dr. George I.M. Georgescu”, 700503 Iasi, Romania
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T Popa”, 700115 Iasi, Romania;
| | - Adrian Covic
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T Popa”, 700115 Iasi, Romania;
- Nephrology Clinic, Dialysis, and Renal Transplant Center, “C.I. Parhon” University Hospital, 700503 Iasi, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sůva M, Kala P, Poloczek M, Kaňovský J, Štípal R, Radvan M, Hlasensky J, Hudec M, Brázdil V, Řehořová J. Contrast-induced acute kidney injury and its contemporary prevention. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:1073072. [PMID: 36561776 PMCID: PMC9763312 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1073072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The complexity and application range of interventional and diagnostic procedures using contrast media (CM) have recently increased. This allows more patients to undergo procedures that involve CM administration. However, the intrinsic CM toxicity leads to the risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI). At present, effective therapy of CI-AKI is rather limited. Effective prevention of CI-AKI therefore becomes crucially important. This review presents an in-depth discussion of CI-AKI incidence, pathogenesis, risk prediction, current preventive strategies, and novel treatment possibilities. The review also discusses the difference between CI-AKI incidence following intraarterial and intravenous CM administration. Factors contributing to the development of CI-AKI are considered in conjunction with the mechanism of acute kidney damage. The need for ultimate risk estimation and the prediction of CI-AKI is stressed. Possibilities of CI-AKI prevention is evaluated within the spectrum of existing preventive measures aimed at reducing kidney injury. In particular, the review discusses intravenous hydration regimes and pre-treatment with statins and N-acetylcysteine. The review further focuses on emerging alternative imaging technologies, alternative intravascular diagnostic and interventional procedures, and new methods for intravenous hydration guidance; it discusses the applicability of those techniques in complex procedures and their feasibility in current practise. We put emphasis on contemporary interventional cardiology imaging methods, with a brief discussion of CI-AKI in non-vascular and non-cardiologic imaging and interventional studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marek Sůva
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, University Hospital, Brno, Czechia,Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
| | - Petr Kala
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, University Hospital, Brno, Czechia,Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia,*Correspondence: Petr Kala,
| | - Martin Poloczek
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, University Hospital, Brno, Czechia,Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
| | - Jan Kaňovský
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, University Hospital, Brno, Czechia,Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
| | - Roman Štípal
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, University Hospital, Brno, Czechia,Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
| | - Martin Radvan
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, University Hospital, Brno, Czechia,Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
| | - Jiří Hlasensky
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, University Hospital, Brno, Czechia,Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
| | - Martin Hudec
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, University Hospital, Brno, Czechia,Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
| | - Vojtěch Brázdil
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, University Hospital, Brno, Czechia,Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
| | - Jitka Řehořová
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, University Hospital, Brno, Czechia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shibata K, Wakabayashi K, Ishinaga T, Morimura M, Aizawa N, Suzuki T, Furuya T, Sato C, Nishikura T, Ikeda N, Kikuchi M, Tanno K, Shinke T, Izumizaki M. Feasibility, Safety, and Long-Term Outcomes of Zero-Contrast Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease. Circ J 2022; 86:787-796. [DOI: 10.1253/circj.cj-21-0905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Keita Shibata
- Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, Showa University Koto-Toyosu Hospital
| | - Kohei Wakabayashi
- Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, Showa University Koto-Toyosu Hospital
| | - Tomoyuki Ishinaga
- Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, Showa University Koto-Toyosu Hospital
| | - Mitsuyuki Morimura
- Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, Showa University Koto-Toyosu Hospital
| | - Naoki Aizawa
- Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, Showa University Koto-Toyosu Hospital
| | - Toshiaki Suzuki
- Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, Showa University Koto-Toyosu Hospital
| | - Takahiro Furuya
- Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, Showa University Koto-Toyosu Hospital
| | - Chisato Sato
- Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, Showa University Koto-Toyosu Hospital
| | - Tenjin Nishikura
- Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, Showa University Koto-Toyosu Hospital
| | - Naoko Ikeda
- Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, Showa University Koto-Toyosu Hospital
| | - Miwa Kikuchi
- Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, Showa University Koto-Toyosu Hospital
| | - Kaoru Tanno
- Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, Showa University Koto-Toyosu Hospital
| | | | | |
Collapse
|