Prevalence of Sleep Disordered Breathing in Patients with Primary Mitral Regurgitation Undergoing Mitral Valve Surgery

Interventional management of mitral regurgitation and sleep disordered breathing: "Catching two birds with one stone"

Sleep disordered breathing (SDB), mostly constituting of obstructive and central sleep apnea (OSA and CSA, respectively), is highly prevalent in the general population, and even more among patients with cardiovascular disease, heart failure (HF) and valvular heart disease, such as mitral regurgitation (MR). The coexistence of HF, MR and SDB is associated with worse cardiovascular outcomes and increased morbidity and mortality. Pulmonary congestion, as a result of MR, can exaggerate and worsen the clinical status and symptoms of SDB, while OSA and CSA, through various mechanisms that impair left ventricular dynamics, can promote left ventricular remodelling, mitral annulus dilatation and consequently MR. Regarding treatment, positive airway pressure devices used to ameliorate symptoms in SDB also seem to result in a reduction of MR severity, MR jet fraction and an improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction. However, surgical and transcatheter interventions for MR, and especially transcatheter edge to edge mitral valve repair (TEER), seem to also have a positive effect on SDB, by reducing OSA and CSA-related severity indexes and improving symptom control. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the common pathophysiology between SDB and MR, as well as to discuss the available evidence regarding the effect of SDB treatment on MR and the effect of mitral valve surgery or transcatheter repair on both OSA and CSA.

Preoperative slow-wave sleep is associated with postoperative delirium after heart valve surgery: A prospective pilot study

Postoperative delirium (POD) is a very common neurological complication after valve surgery. Some studies have shown that preoperative sleep disorder is associated with POD, but the correlation between preoperative slow wave sleep (SWS) and POD remains unclear. Therefore, this study aims to identify the correlation between preoperative slow wave sleep and postoperative delirium in patients with heart valve disease. This was a prospective, observational study of elective valve surgery patients admitted to the Heart Medical Center between November 2021 and July 2022. Polysomnography (PSG) was used to monitor sleep architecture from 9:30 p.m. for 1 night before surgery to 6:30 a.m. on the day of surgery. Patients were assessed for postoperative delirium from postoperative day 1 to extubation or day 5 by using the Richmond Agitation/Sedation Scale (RASS) and the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU). A total of 60 elective valve surgery patients were enrolled in this study. Prolonged N1 (11.44%) and N2 (58.62%) sleep, decreased N3 sleep (8.75%) and REM sleep (18.24%) within normal limits were the overall sleep architecture. Compared with patients without POD, patients with POD had less slow wave sleep 1 night before surgery (5.77% vs 10.88%, p < 0.001). After adjusting for confounding factors, slow wave sleep (OR: 0.647, 95% CI 0.493-0.851, p = 0.002) was found to be a protective factor for postoperative delirium. The preoperative SWS is a predictive factor of the POD in patients undergoing valve surgery. But further studies with larger sample sizes are still needed to elucidate the relationship between preoperative slow wave sleep and postoperative delirium.

Impact of transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair on central sleep apnoea

Aims

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) and its subtype central sleep apnoea (CSA) are highly prevalent in patients with heart failure and associated with worse prognosis. Whereas pharmacological therapy of heart failure has been shown to ameliorate CSA, results from previous studies on the effect of mitral regurgitation therapy on SDB are contradicting. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TEER) on prevalence and severity of CSA.

Methods and results

We enrolled 47 patients undergoing TEER for symptomatic mitral regurgitation in a prospective study. Secondary mitral regurgitation and left ventricular ejection fraction < 50% were present in 79% and 68% of patients, respectively. Respiratory polygraphy was performed before TEER in a compensated condition and four weeks after the procedure. 34 patients completed the follow-up. At baseline, 19 (56%) patients showed moderate-to-severe SDB, of whom 13 (68%) were classified as CSA. Both apnoea-hypopnoea index and percentage of recorded time spent in Cheyne-Stokes respiration strongly decreased from baseline to follow-up (median [IQR] 16 [7–30] vs. 7 [4–15] /h, p = 0.007; 6 [0–34] vs. 0 [0–8] %, p = 0.008). Median relative reduction of central apnoea index was 75% (p = 0.023), while obstructive apnoea index did not change significantly. Increase in stroke volume after TEER and high systolic pulmonary artery pressure at baseline predicted a > 50% reduction of both Apnoea-hypopnoea index and Cheyne-Stokes respiration.

Conclusion

TEER is associated with a significant short-term reduction of CSA and Cheyne-Stokes respiration in high-risk patients, strengthening its value as an effective treatment option for advanced heart failure.

Graphical abstract

Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation to treat central sleep apnoea in patients with heart failure may improve sleep, quality of life, and symptoms

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Sleep disorder breathing is an important non-cardiovascular comorbidity in patients with heart failure (HF). However, central sleep apnoea (CSA) remains poorly diagnosed and treated. This post-hoc analysis examined symptoms and quality of life in patients with CSA and HF following 12 months of transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation (TPNS) therapy.

METHODS AND RESULT

: Patients enrolled in remedē System Pivotal trial were invited to complete self-reported questionnaires. Symptoms and responses to three validated questionnaires were examined. Percentage of patients noting an impairment was calculated at baseline. At 12 months, % of patients experiencing improvement, no change, or worsening was calculated. Shifts from symptom presence at baseline to absence at 12 months was assessed for those symptoms experienced by ≥50% of patients at baseline. Seventy-five patients were included. Most frequently reported symptoms were fatigue and daytime sleepiness. Following 12 months of TPNS, a variety of subjective improvements were observed; 45% of patients indicating cessation of daytime sleepiness, 44% cessation of fatigue/weakness, and 52% no longer having difficulty falling/staying asleep. Specific questions related to tiredness/fatigue, motivation, and chance of dozing provided an insight into potential areas of improvement. Furthermore, at least 60% of patients reported resolution of insomnia/fragmented sleep and snoring on therapy.

CONCLUSION

Adult patients with CSA and HF experience distressing symptoms and limitations. TPNS was found to improve many of these. Awareness of key symptoms or limitations patients experience can be used to inform the development of a CSA-specific patient questionnaire to identify CSA sooner and aid treatment decisions.

Impact of Sleep-Disordered Breathing Treatment on Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients with Heart Failure

Background: Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is a highly common comorbidity in patients with heart failure (HF), and a known risk factor for ventricular tachycardia (VT) development. However, little is known about the impact of SDB treatment on VT burden in HF patients to date. Therefore, this study investigated VT burden, as well as implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapies in HF patients with SDB treatment, in comparison to untreated SDB HF patients. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed VT burden, rate of antitachycardia pacing (ATP), and the number of shocks delivered in a propensity score-matched patient cohort of patients with SDB treatment or control. Patients had moderate or severe SDB (n = 73 per each group; standardized mean difference of 0.08) and were followed for a minimum of one year. In addition, survival over 4 years was assessed. Results: Mean patient age was 67.67 ± 10.78 and 67.2 ± 10.10, respectively, with 15.06% and 10.95% of the patients, respectively, being female. Regarding SDB subtypes in the control and SDB treatment group, central sleep apnea was present in 42.46% and 41.09% of the patients, respectively, and obstructive sleep apnea was present in 26.02% and 31.50% of the patients, respectively. Mixed type sleep disorder was present in 31.50% and 27.40% of cases. Among the SDB treatment group, a significantly lower number of VTs (28.8% vs. 68.5%; p = 0.01), ATP (21.9% vs. 50.7%; p = 0.02), as well as a lower shock rate (5.5% vs. 31.5%; p < 0.01), was observed compared to the control group. Furthermore, the VT burden was significantly lower in the SDB treatment group when compared to the time prior to SDB treatment (p = 0.02). Event-free survival was significantly higher in the SDB treatment group (Log-rank p < 0.01). Conclusion: SDB treatment in HF patients with ICD leads to significant improvements in VT burden, ATP and shock therapy, and may even affect survival. Thus, HF patients should be generously screened for SDB and treated appropriately.

Management of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Patients With Heart Failure

Sleep apnea is traditionally classified as obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), which occurs when the upper airway collapses due to the relaxation of oropharyngeal musculature, and central sleep apnea occurs when the brainstem cannot stimulate breathing. Most sleep apnea in patients with heart failure (HF) results from coexisting OSA and central sleep apnea (CSA), or complex sleep apnea syndrome. OSA and CSA are common in HF and can be involved in its progression by exposure to the heart to intermittent hypoxia, increased preload and afterload, activating sympathetic, and decreased vascular endothelial function. A majority of treatments have been investigated in patients with CSA and HF; however, less or short-term randomized trials demonstrated whether treating OSA in patients with HF could improve morbidity and mortality. OSA could directly influence the patient's recovery. This review will focus on past and present studies on the various therapies for OSA in patients with HF and summarize CSA treatment options for reasons of reference and completeness. More specifically, the treatment covered include surgical and non-surgical treatments and reported the positive and negative consequences for these treatment options, highlighting possible implications for clinical practice and future research directions.