1
|
Gupta R, Mahmoudi E, Behnoush AH, Malik AH, Mahajan P, Lin M, Bandyopadhyay D, Goel A, Chakraborty S, Aedma SK, Gupta HB, Vyas AV, Combs WG, Mathur M, Yakubov SJ, Patel NC. Clinical outcomes and the impact of valve morphology for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid aortic valves: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2023; 102:721-730. [PMID: 37605512 DOI: 10.1002/ccd.30808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Revised: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is present in approximately 0.5%-2% of the general population, causing significant aortic stenosis (AS) in 12%-37% of affected individuals. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is being considered the treatment of choice in patients with symptomatic AS across all risk spectra. AIM Aim Our study aims to compare TAVR outcomes in patients with BAV versus tricuspid aortic valves (TAV). METHODS A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane trials. Studies were included if they included BAV and TAV patients undergoing TAVR with quantitative data available for at least one of our predefined outcomes. Meta-analysis was performed by the random-effects model using Stata software. RESULTS Fifty studies of 203,288 patients were included. BAV patients had increased 30-day all-cause mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 1.23 [1.00-1.50], p = 0.05), in-hospital stroke (OR = 1.39 [1.01-1.93], p = 0.05), in-hospital and 30-day PPI (OR = 1.13 [1.00-1.27], p = 0.04; OR = 1.16 [1.04-1.13], p = 0.01) and in-hospital, 30-day and 1-year aortic regurgitation (AR) (OR = 1.48 [1.19-1.83], p < 0.01; OR = 1.79 [1.26-2.52], p < 0.01; OR = 1.64 [1.03-2.60], p = 0.04). Subgroup analysis on new-generation valves showed a reduced 1-year all-cause mortality (OR = 0.86 [CI = 0.75-0.98], p = 0.03), despite higher in-hospital and 30-day PPI (OR = 0.1.21 [1.04-1.41], p = 0.01; OR = 1.17 [1.05-1.31], p = 0.01) and in-hospital AR (OR = 1.62 [1.14-2.31], p = 0.01) in the BAV group. The quality of included studies was moderate-to-high, and only three analyses presented high heterogeneity. CONCLUSION TAVR is associated with comparable outcomes in patients with BAV and TAV. Careful selection of BAV cases by preprocedural assessment of valve anatomy and burden of calcification, pre- and post-procedural dilation, and implementing newer generations of valves may improve the safety and efficacy of TAVR in BAV patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahul Gupta
- Lehigh Valley Heart Institute, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Elham Mahmoudi
- Universal Scientific Education and Research Network, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Aaqib H Malik
- Department of Cardiology, Westchester Medical Center and New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA
| | - Pranav Mahajan
- Department of Medicine, Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, Illinois, USA
| | - Muling Lin
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Dhrubajyoti Bandyopadhyay
- Department of Cardiology, Westchester Medical Center and New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA
| | - Akshay Goel
- Department of Cardiology, Westchester Medical Center and New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA
| | - Sandipan Chakraborty
- Department of Cardiology, Westchester Medical Center and New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA
| | - Surya K Aedma
- Department of Medicine, Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, Illinois, USA
| | - Harsh Bala Gupta
- Guru Nanak Dev Hospital, Department of medicine, Government Medical College, Amritsar, Punjab, India
| | - Apurva V Vyas
- Lehigh Valley Heart Institute, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - William G Combs
- Lehigh Valley Heart Institute, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Moses Mathur
- Heart & Vascular Institute, Penn State Health, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Steven J Yakubov
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, Riverside Methodist-Ohio Health, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Nainesh C Patel
- Lehigh Valley Heart Institute, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang Y, Xiong TY, Li YM, Yao YJ, He JJ, Yang HR, Zhu ZK, Chen F, Ou Y, Wang X, Liu Q, Li X, Li YJ, Liao YB, Huang FY, Zhao ZG, Li Q, Wei X, Peng Y, He S, Wei JF, Zhou WX, Zheng MX, Bao Y, Zhou X, Tang H, Meng W, Feng Y, Chen M. Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:794850. [PMID: 35369357 PMCID: PMC8965870 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.794850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective We sought to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical adverse events in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) vs. tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) anatomy and the efficacy of balloon-expandable (BE) vs. self-expanding (SE) valves in the BAV population. Comparisons aforementioned will be made stratified into early- and new-generation devices. Differences of prosthetic geometry on CT between patients with BAV and TAV were presented. In addition, BAV morphological presentations in included studies were summarized. Method Observational studies and a randomized controlled trial of patients with BAV undergoing TAVR were included according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. Results A total of 43 studies were included in the final analysis. In patients undergoing TAVR, type 1 BAV was the most common phenotype and type 2 BAV accounted for the least. Significant higher risks of conversion to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), the need of a second valve, a moderate or severe paravalvular leakage (PVL), device failure, acute kidney injury (AKI), and stroke were observed in patients with BAV than in patients with TAV during hospitalization. BAV had a higher risk of new permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) both at hospitalization and a 30-day follow-up. Risk of 1-year mortality was significantly lower in patients with BAV than that with TAV [odds ratio (OR) = 0.85, 95% CI 0.75–0.97, p = 0.01]. BE transcatheter heart valves (THVs) had higher risks of annular rupture but a lower risk of the need of a second valve and a new PPI than SE THVs. Moreover, BE THV was less expanded and more elliptical in BAV than in TAV. In general, the rates of clinical adverse events were lower in new-generation THVs than in early-generation THVs in both BAV and TAV. Conclusions Despite higher risks of conversion to SAVR, the need of a second valve, moderate or severe PVL, device failure, AKI, stroke, and new PPI, TAVR seems to be a viable option for selected patients with severe bicuspid aortic stenosis (AS), which demonstrated a potential benefit of 1-year survival, especially among lower surgical risk population using new-generation devices. Larger randomized studies are needed to guide patient selection and verified the durable performance of THVs in the BAV population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Zhang
- Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Tian-Yuan Xiong
- Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yi-Ming Li
- Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yi-Jun Yao
- Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jing-Jing He
- Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Hao-Ran Yang
- Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Zhong-Kai Zhu
- Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Fei Chen
- Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yuanweixiang Ou
- Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xi Wang
- Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Qi Liu
- Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xi Li
- Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yi-Jian Li
- Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yan-Biao Liao
- Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Fang-Yang Huang
- Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Zhen-Gang Zhao
- Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Qiao Li
- Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xin Wei
- Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yong Peng
- Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Sen He
- Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jia-Fu Wei
- Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Wen-Xia Zhou
- Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ming-Xia Zheng
- Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yun Bao
- Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xuan Zhou
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Hong Tang
- Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Wei Meng
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yuan Feng
- Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Yuan Feng
| | - Mao Chen
- Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- *Correspondence: Mao Chen
| |
Collapse
|