Impact of Weight on Clinical Outcomes of Edoxaban Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Included in the ETNA-AF-Europe Registry

Use of DOACs in frail elderly patients in light of class genericization

BACKGROUND

Frailty and comorbidity influence the therapeutic approach in everyday clinical practice. The DOACs genericization opens a reflection on their differences from a pharmacological and bioavailability point of view, particularly in elderly frail patients. The aim of this project was to create a national Delphi consensus on the topic of the use of DOACs for atrial fibrillation (AF) in such patients, in light of the genericization of the class.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The consensus dealt with 3 main topics: a) efficacy and safety of DOACs in elderly and/or frail patients; b) therapeutic choice in specific frailty scenarios; c) DOACs genericization. 56 cardiologists, two internists and two neurologists from Italy expressed their level of agreement on each statement by using a 5-point Likert scale (1: strongly disagree, 2: disagree, 3: uncertain, 4: agree, 5: strongly agree). A positive consensus was reached if the percentage of agreement (vote 1-2, positive consensus) or disagreement (votes 4-5, negative consensus) was >66%; otherwise, no consensus was reached. Results are displayed accordingly.

CONCLUSIONS

After 10 years of everyday clinical management of DOACs for AF, specific elements differentiating a molecule from another, either for efficacy or for safety, are consolidated. However, some uncertainties still exist in particular contexts, such as chronic kidney disease or cancer patients. Clinicians have an unsure attitude towards generic drugs, because clinical practice is lacking as well as a proper knowledge of the topic. Albeit being an alternative, the choice of the generic drug must remain the responsibility of the clinician.

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Low Body Weight Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) agents are established as the anticoagulation strategy of choice for a variety of clinical risks. Despite this, uncertainty still exists with regard to their efficacy and safety for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in some patient populations; most notably those with low body weight (LBW) (<60 kg or body mass index [BMI] <18 kg/m2). Currently, there is a paucity of trial and non-trial data to support a prescriptive recommendation for their use in these patient cohorts. We have carried out a pooled systematic review of the most up to date published data of patients stabilized on various DOAC analogs with the view to ascertaining the exact matrices of their efficacy and safety in these cohorts of patients.

METHODS

We initially carried out a comprehensive search of databases from inception to June 2023 for eligible studies exploring the efficacy and safety of various analogs of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation who had low body weight. Databases accessed include PubMed, EMBASE, the Science Citation Index, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness. We carried out a weighted comparison of derived pooled odd ratios (with their corresponding confidence intervals) of mortality outcomes between various DOACs using the random effects model.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies (n = 165,205 patients) were included in our meta-analysis. DOAC analogs were associated with increased stroke-related events, composite outcome, and mortality in low body weight patients compared to non-low body weight patients (odds ratio [OR] 1.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-1.92), (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.29-1.86), (OR 2.92, 95% CI 1.87-4.58), respectively. There was no significant difference in the safety outcome (major bleeding events) between the DOAC analogs (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.93-1.52).

DISCUSSION

In this meta-analytical review comprising both real-world and randomized controlled studies, the use of DOAC analogs in low body weight patients (body weight of <60 kg or BMI<18 kg/m2) with atrial fibrillation was associated with increased risks of stroke-related events, composite outcomes, and mortality compared to non-low body weight cohorts patients. At the same time, there was no significant difference in terms of major bleeding events. This finding has provided the first resolution of pervading uncertainty surrounding the use of DOAC analogs in these patient cohorts and suggests the need for follow-up confirmatory systematic studies in this group of patients.

Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants in patients at extremes of body weight: a review of pharmacological considerations and clinical implications

Patients at extremes of body weight are underrepresented in randomized controlled trials of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Therefore, their optimal anticoagulant treatment remains a topic of debate. The aim of this narrative review is to summarize the evidence on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of DOACs for treating patients at extremes of body weight in venous thromboembolism (VTE) and in the prevention of cardioembolic stroke in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). A literature search was conducted in the main bibliographic databases, and the most relevant reviews and original articles on the topic were selected. Although data in these patient groups are limited, apixaban and rivaroxaban show a favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile in obese VTE treatment and NVAF patients and, in the case of apixaban, also in underweight patients. In particular, these drugs demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety to standard therapy. Very few data were available for dabigatran and edoxaban; the latter drug was safer at a lower dose, mainly in underweight patients. Our findings are in line with the last International Society of Haemostasis and Thrombosis position paper and European Heart Rhythm Association 2021 practical guide, suggesting the use of apixaban and rivaroxaban in morbidly obese patients (>120 kg or body mass index ≥40 kg/m 2 ) and the reduced dosage of edoxaban in low-weight patients. Future studies should focus on large populations of patients at extremes of body weights to acquire more clinical and pharmacokinetic evidence on all available DOACs, especially those currently less investigated.

Pharmacokinetics and Dosing Regimens of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Morbidly Obese Patients: An Updated Literature Review

Data on the impact of morbid obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 40 kg/m²) on the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are relatively limited, making it difficult to design optimal dosing regimens in morbidly obese patients.To review literature on PK/PD profile, efficacy, and safety of DOACs in venous thromboembolism (VTE) and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with morbid obesity and make recommendations regarding optimal dosing regimens in these patient populations.A detailed literature search was conducted (from inception to June 22, 2022) for relevant articles involving PK/PD and clinical data on DOACs use in morbidly obese patients with VTE or AF, or healthy volunteers.A total of 28 studies were identified. DOAC-specific PK variations and clinical outcomes have been observed. Obesity may have a modest effect on PK/PD of dabigatran, apixaban, or rivaroxaban. Dabigatran was effective in AF patients with morbid obesity but might increase the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding. Standard dosing of apixaban or rivaroxaban is effective and safe for VTE and AF patients with morbid obesity. Trough edoxaban concentration and anti-Xa activity were similar in different BMI groups (18.5 to >40 kg/m²), and standard dosing of edoxaban may be effective and safe for AF patients.Current evidence suggests dabigatran should be used with caution in patients with AF as it might increase the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding; Standard dosing of apixaban or rivaroxaban can be used in VTE or AF patients; Standard dosing of edoxaban may be considered in AF patients.

Risks and benefits of oral anticoagulants for stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation according to body mass index: Nationwide cohort study of primary care records in England

BACKGROUND

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are effective and safe alternatives to warfarin for stroke prophylaxis for atrial fibrillation (AF). Whether this extends to patients at the extremes of body mass index (BMI) is unclear.

METHODS

Using linked primary and secondary data, Jan 1, 2010 to Nov 30, 2018, we included CHA₂DS₂-VAS_C score ≥3 in women and ≥2 in men with AF treated with oral anticoagulants (OACs). Outcomes were ischaemic stroke, major bleeding and all-cause mortality by World Health Organisation BMI classification. Patients who received warfarin were propensity score matched (1:1 ratio) with those who received DOACs and the association of time-varying OAC exposure on outcomes quantified using Cox proportional hazards models.

FINDINGS

We included 29,135 (22,818 warfarin, 6317 DOAC); 585 (2.0%) underweight, 8427 (28.9%) normal weight, 10,705 (36.7%) overweight, 5910 (20.3%) class I obesity and 3508 (12.0%) class II/III obesity. Patients treated with DOACs were older and more comorbid. After 3.7 (SD 2.5) years follow up, there was no difference in risk of ischaemic stroke and major bleeding by BMI category between DOACs and warfarin. Normal weight, overweight and obese class I patients had higher risk of all-cause mortality when treated with DOACs compared with warfarin (HR: 1.45 [95% CI 1.24-1.69], p < 0.001; 1.41 [95% CI 1.19-1.66], p < 0.001; and 1.90 [95% CI 1.50-2.39], p < 0.001), an effect not observed after DOACs became the most common OAC prescription. Amongst underweight patients OAC exposure was associated with greater harm from bleeding than benefit from stroke prevention (benefit to harm ratio, 0.35 [95% CI 0.26-0.44]).

INTERPRETATION

In patients with AF in each BMI classification we found no difference in ischaemic stroke and bleeding risk for DOACs compared with warfarin. Underweight patients experienced divergent risk-benefit patterns from oral anticoagulation compared with other BMI categories.

FUNDING

None.

Impact of anthropometric factors on outcomes in atrial fibrillation patients: analysis on 10 220 patients from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)-European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) EurObservational Research Programme on Atrial Fibrillation (EORP-AF) general long-term registry

AIM

To investigate the association of anthropometric parameters [height, weight, body mass index (BMI), body surface area (BSA), and lean body mass (LBM)] with outcomes in atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Ten-thousand two-hundred twenty patients were enrolled [40.3% females, median age 70 (62-77) years, followed for 728 (interquartile range 653-745) days]. Sex-specific tertiles were considered for the five anthropometric variables. At the end of follow-up, survival free from all-cause death was worse in the lowest tertiles for all the anthropometric variables analyzed. On multivariable Cox regression analysis, an independent association with all-cause death was found for the lowest vs. middle tertile when body weight (hazard ratio [HR] 1.66, 95%CI 1.23-2.23), BMI (HR 1.65, 95%CI 1.23-2.21), and BSA (HR 1.49, 95%CI 1.11-2.01) were analysed in female sex, as well as for body weight in male patients (HR 1.61, 95%CI 1.25-2.07). Conversely, the risk of MACE was lower for the highest tertile (vs. middle tertile) of BSA and LBM in males and for the highest tertile of weight and BSA in female patients. A higher occurrence of haemorrhagic events was found for female patients in the lowest tertile of height [odds ratio (OR) 1.90, 95%CI 1.23-2.94] and LBM (OR 2.13, 95%CI 1.40-3.26).

CONCLUSIONS

In AF patients height, weight, BMI, BSA, and LBM were associated with clinical outcomes, with all-cause death being higher for patients presenting lower values of these variables, i.e. in the lowest tertiles of distribution. The anthropometric variables independently associated with other outcomes were also different between male and female subjects.