Relationship between Prognostic Stage in Breast Cancer and Fluorine-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography

Joint EANM-SNMMI guideline on the role of 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT in no special type breast cancer : (endorsed by the ACR, ESSO, ESTRO, EUSOBI/ESR, and EUSOMA)

INTRODUCTION

There is much literature about the role of 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT in patients with breast cancer (BC). However, there exists no international guideline with involvement of the nuclear medicine societies about this subject.

PURPOSE

To provide an organized, international, state-of-the-art, and multidisciplinary guideline, led by experts of two nuclear medicine societies (EANM and SNMMI) and representation of important societies in the field of BC (ACR, ESSO, ESTRO, EUSOBI/ESR, and EUSOMA).

METHODS

Literature review and expert discussion were performed with the aim of collecting updated information regarding the role of 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT in patients with no special type (NST) BC and summarizing its indications according to scientific evidence. Recommendations were scored according to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) criteria.

RESULTS

Quantitative PET features (SUV, MTV, TLG) are valuable prognostic parameters. In baseline staging, 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT plays a role from stage IIB through stage IV. When assessing response to therapy, 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT should be performed on certified scanners, and reported either according to PERCIST, EORTC PET, or EANM immunotherapy response criteria, as appropriate. 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT may be useful to assess early metabolic response, particularly in non-metastatic triple-negative and HER2+ tumours. 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT is useful to detect the site and extent of recurrence when conventional imaging methods are equivocal and when there is clinical and/or laboratorial suspicion of relapse. Recent developments are promising.

CONCLUSION

2-[18F]FDG PET/CT is extremely useful in BC management, as supported by extensive evidence of its utility compared to other imaging modalities in several clinical scenarios.

Clinicopathological and molecular predictors of [18F]FDG-PET disease detection in HER2-positive early breast cancer: RESPONSE, a substudy of the randomized PHERGain trial

BACKGROUND

The PHERGain study (NCT03161353) is assessing early metabolic responses to neoadjuvant treatment with trastuzumab-pertuzumab and chemotherapy de-escalation using a [18Fluorine]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography ([18F]FDG-PET) and a pathological complete response-adapted strategy in HER2-positive (HER2+) early breast cancer (EBC). Herein, we present RESPONSE, a PHERGain substudy, where clinicopathological and molecular predictors of [18F]FDG-PET disease detection were evaluated.

METHODS

A total of 500 patients with HER2 + EBC screened in the PHERGain trial with a tumor size > 1.5 cm by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were included in the RESPONSE substudy. PET[-] criteria entailed the absence of  ≥ 1 breast lesion with maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) ≥ 1.5 × SUVmean liver + 2 standard deviation. Among 75 PET[-] patients screened, 21 with SUVmax levels < 2.5 were randomly selected and matched with 21 PET[+] patients with SUVmax levels ≥ 2.5 based on patient characteristics associated with [18F]FDG-PET status. The association between baseline SUVmax and [18F]FDG-PET status ([-] or [+]) with clinicopathological characteristics was assessed. In addition, evaluation of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) and gene expression analysis using PAM50 and Vantage 3D™ Cancer Metabolism Panel were specifically compared in a matched cohort of excluded and enrolled patients based on the [18F]FDG-PET eligibility criteria.

RESULTS

Median SUVmax at baseline was 7.2 (range, 1-39.3). Among all analyzed patients, a higher SUVmax was associated with a higher tumor stage, larger tumor size, lymph node involvement, hormone receptor-negative status, higher HER2 protein expression, increased Ki67 proliferation index, and higher histological grade (p < 0.05). [18F]FDG-PET [-] criteria patients had smaller tumor size (p = 0.014) along with the absence of lymph node involvement and lower histological grade than [18F]FDG-PET [+] patients (p < 0.01). Although no difference in the levels of sTILs was found among 42 matched [18F]FDG-PET [-]/[+] criteria patients (p = 0.73), [18F]FDG-PET [-] criteria patients showed a decreased risk of recurrence (ROR) and a lower proportion of PAM50 HER2-enriched subtype than [18F]FDG-PET[+] patients (p < 0.05). Differences in the expression of genes involved in cancer metabolism were observed between [18F]FDG-PET [-] and [18F]FDG-PET[+] criteria patients.

CONCLUSIONS

These results highlight the clinical, biological, and metabolic heterogeneity of HER2+ breast cancer, which may facilitate the selection of HER2+ EBC patients likely to benefit from [18F]FDG-PET imaging as a tool to guide therapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov; NCT03161353; registration date: May 15, 2017.

Deep Learning-Based Image Quality Improvement in Digital Positron Emission Tomography for Breast Cancer

We investigated whether ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography images restored via deep learning (DL) improved image quality and affected axillary lymph node (ALN) metastasis diagnosis in patients with breast cancer. Using a five-point scale, two readers compared the image quality of DL-PET and conventional PET (cPET) in 53 consecutive patients from September 2020 to October 2021. Visually analyzed ipsilateral ALNs were rated on a three-point scale. The standard uptake values SUV_max and SUV_peak were calculated for breast cancer regions of interest. For "depiction of primary lesion", reader 2 scored DL-PET significantly higher than cPET. For "noise", "clarity of mammary gland", and "overall image quality", both readers scored DL-PET significantly higher than cPET. The SUV_max and SUV_peak for primary lesions and normal breasts were significantly higher in DL-PET than in cPET (p < 0.001). Considering the ALN metastasis scores 1 and 2 as negative and 3 as positive, the McNemar test revealed no significant difference between cPET and DL-PET scores for either reader (p = 0.250, 0.625). DL-PET improved visual image quality for breast cancer compared with cPET. SUV_max and SUV_peak were significantly higher in DL-PET than in cPET. DL-PET and cPET exhibited comparable diagnostic abilities for ALN metastasis.

Proposal to Improve the Image Quality of Short-Acquisition Time-Dedicated Breast Positron Emission Tomography Using the Pix2pix Generative Adversarial Network

This study aimed to evaluate the ability of the pix2pix generative adversarial network (GAN) to improve the image quality of low-count dedicated breast positron emission tomography (dbPET). Pairs of full- and low-count dbPET images were collected from 49 breasts. An image synthesis model was constructed using pix2pix GAN for each acquisition time with training (3776 pairs from 16 breasts) and validation data (1652 pairs from 7 breasts). Test data included dbPET images synthesized by our model from 26 breasts with short acquisition times. Two breast radiologists visually compared the overall image quality of the original and synthesized images derived from the short-acquisition time data (scores of 1−5). Further quantitative evaluation was performed using a peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity (SSIM). In the visual evaluation, both readers revealed an average score of >3 for all images. The quantitative evaluation revealed significantly higher SSIM (p < 0.01) and PSNR (p < 0.01) for 26 s synthetic images and higher PSNR for 52 s images (p < 0.01) than for the original images. Our model improved the quality of low-count time dbPET synthetic images, with a more significant effect on images with lower counts.

Comparison of 18F-fluorothymidine Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Patients with Breast Cancer

The uptake of ¹⁸F-fluorothymidine (¹⁸F-FLT) depends on cells' proliferative rates. We compared the characteristics of ¹⁸F-FLT positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with those of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) PET/CT for breast cancer. We prospectively diagnosed patients with breast cancer who underwent ¹⁸F-FLT PET/CT and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT. Subsequently, significant differences and correlation coefficients of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in primary breast cancer and axillary lymph nodes were statistically evaluated. We enrolled eight patients with breast cancer. In six treatment-naive patients, the SUVmax for primary lesions showed a significant difference (mean, 2.1 vs. 4.1, p = 0.031) and a strong correlation (r = 0.969) between ¹⁸F-FLT and ¹⁸F-FDG. Further, although the SUVmax for the axillary lymph nodes did not show a significant difference between ¹⁸F-FLT and ¹⁸F-FDG (P = 0.246), there was a strong correlation between the two (r = 0.999). In a patient-by-patient study, there were cases in which only ¹⁸F-FDG uptake was observed in lymph nodes and normal breasts. Bone metastases demonstrated lower accumulation than bone marrow on the ¹⁸F-FLT PET/CT. In conclusion, a strong correlation was observed between the ¹⁸F-FLT PET/CT and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT uptake. Differences in the biochemical characteristics of ¹⁸F-FLT and ¹⁸F-FDG were reflected in the accumulation differences for breast cancer, metastatic lesions, and normal organs.

FDG-PET/CT for Primary Staging and Detection of Recurrence of Breast Cancer

Breast cancer is the most frequent cancer diagnosed in women worldwide. Accurate baseline staging is necessary to plan optimal breast cancer management. Early detection and staging of recurrence are also essential for optimal therapeutic management. Hybrid FDG-PET/CT imaging offers high sensitivity in detecting extra axillary lymph nodes and distant metastases. Although FDG-PET/CT has some limitations for low proliferative tumors, low-grade tumors and for well-differentiated luminal breast cancer, PET/CT is useful for the initial staging of breast cancer, regardless of tumor phenotype (luminal, triple negative, or HER2+) and of tumor grade. Although FDG-PET/CT performs better for invasive ductal carcinoma (invasive carcinoma of no specific subtype), it is also helpful for staging invasive lobular carcinomas. At initial staging, FDG-PET/CT becomes very useful for staging from clinical stage IIB (T2N1 or T3N0). FDG-PET/CT could be useful in patients with clinical stage IIA (T1N1 or T2N0), but there is not enough strong evidence to recommend routine use in this subgroup. For clinical stage I (T1N0) patients, FDG-PET/CT offers no added value. In patients with recurrent breast cancer, FDG-PET/CT is more effective than conventional imaging in detecting locoregional or distant recurrence, whether suspected by clinical examination, conventional imaging, or elevation of a tumor marker (CA 15.3 or CEA). PET/CT is effective even in the presence of normal tumor markers. PET/CT is also a powerful imaging modality for performing a whole-body workup of a known recurrence and for determining whether or not the recurrence is isolated.

Deep learning for image classification in dedicated breast positron emission tomography (dbPET)

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate and determine the best deep learning (DL) model to predict breast cancer (BC) with dedicated breast positron emission tomography (dbPET) images.

METHODS

Of the 1598 women who underwent dbPET examination between April 2015 and August 2020, a total of 618 breasts on 309 examinations for 284 women who were diagnosed with BC or non-BC were analyzed in this retrospective study. The Xception-based DL model was trained to predict BC or non-BC using dbPET images from 458 breasts of 109 BCs and 349 non-BCs, which consisted of mediallateral and craniocaudal maximum intensity projection images, respectively. It was tested using dbPET images from 160 breasts of 43 BC and 117 non-BC. Two expert radiologists and two radiology residents also interpreted them. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were calculated.

RESULTS

Our DL model had a sensitivity and specificity of 93% and 93%, respectively, while radiologists had a sensitivity and specificity of 77-89% and 79-100%, respectively. Diagnostic performance of our model (AUC = 0.937) tended to be superior to that of residents (AUC = 0.876 and 0.868, p = 0.073 and 0.073), although not significantly different. Moreover, no significant differences were found between the model and experts (AUC = 0.983 and 0.941, p = 0.095 and 0.907).

CONCLUSIONS

Our DL model could be applied to dbPET and achieve the same diagnostic ability as that of experts.