Endocrine Follow-Up of Men with Non-Obstructive Azoospermia Following Testicular Sperm Extraction

Clinical management of nonobstructive azoospermia: An update

Approximately 1% of the general male population has azoospermia, and nonobstructive azoospermia accounts for the majority of cases. The causes vary widely, including chromosomal and genetic abnormalities, varicocele, drug-induced causes, and gonadotropin deficiency; however, the cause is often unknown. In azoospermia caused by hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, gonadotropin replacement therapy can be expected to produce sperm in the ejaculate. In some cases, upfront varicocelectomy for nonobstructive azoospermia with varicocele may result in the appearance of ejaculated spermatozoa; however, the appropriate indication should be selected. Each guideline recommends microdissection testicular sperm extraction for nonobstructive azoospermia in terms of successful sperm retrieval and avoidance of complications. Sperm retrieval rates generally ranged from 20% to 70% but vary depending on the causative disease. Various attempts have been made to predict sperm retrieval and improve sperm retrieval rates; however, the evidence is insufficient. Further evidence accumulation is needed for salvage treatment in cases of failed sperm retrieval. In Japan, there is inadequate provision on the right to know the origin of children born from artificial insemination of donated sperm and the rights of sperm donors, as well as information on unrelated family members, and the development of these systems is challenging. In the future, it is hoped that the pathogenesis of nonobstructive azoospermia with an unknown cause will be elucidated and that technology for omics technologies, human spermatogenesis using pluripotent cells, and organ culture methods will be developed.

Male Infertility: A Review of Key Papers Appearing in the Reproductive Medicine and Andrology Section of the Journal of Clinical Medicine

Male infertility accounts for 30% of infertility cases and its prevalence in the general population approximately ranges between 9 and 15%, according to the available surveys [...].

The Challenges and Hopes in Treating Patients with NOA

Infertility due to the male factor occurs in no less than 50% of investigated couples [...]

Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction Versus Multiple Needle-pass Percutaneous Testicular Sperm Aspiration in Men with Nonobstructive Azoospermia: A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Surgical extraction of testicular spermatozoa is needed in men with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) who wish to become biological fathers. Based on available uncontrolled studies with unspecific patient selection, microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE), having a sperm retrieval rate (SRR) of 50%, is considered the most efficient sperm retrieval procedure. However, no randomized clinical trials for comparison of different sperm retrieval procedures exist. Testicular sperm aspiration (TESA) is simple and commonly used, and we hypothesized that this technique using multiple needle passes would give similar SRRs to mTESE.

OBJECTIVE

To compare mTESE and multiple needle-pass TESA in men with NOA.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A randomized clinical trial was performed between June 2017 and April 2021, with inclusion of 100 men with NOA from four centers in Denmark and Sweden. All participants received treatment at the same institution.

INTERVENTION

Participants were randomized to mTESE (n = 49) or multiple needle-pass TESA (n = 51). Patients with failed multiple needle-pass TESA proceeded directly to salvage mTESE.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The primary outcome was SRR. Secondary outcomes included complications and changes in reproductive hormones after surgery.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Spermatozoa were retrieved in 21/49 (43%) men after mTESE and in 11/51 (22%) men after multiple needle-pass TESA (rate difference -0.21; 95% confidence interval -0.39 to -0.03; p = 0.02). The combined SRR for multiple needle-pass TESA + salvage mTESE was 15/51 (29%). No complications occurred after multiple needle-pass TESA only, while 5/89 (6%) men having mTESE experienced a complication requiring surgical intervention. Overall, no statistically significant differences in reproductive hormones were observed between groups after 6 mo. Limitations include the low number of patients in secondary outcome data.

CONCLUSIONS

In direct comparison, SRR was higher in mTESE than in multiple needle-pass TESA.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Men with azoospermia need surgical extraction of spermatozoa to become biological fathers. In this randomized trial, we compared two surgeries (microdissection testicular sperm extraction [mTESE] and testicular sperm aspiration [TESA]) and found that mTESE gives a higher sperm retrieval rate than multiple needle-pass TESA.

For patients with non-obstructive azoospermia, the outcome of testicular sperm extraction correlates with self-esteem, sexual health and the quality of the couple's relationship

BACKGROUND

A very small number of studies have indicated that azoospermia or negative testicular sperm extraction (TESE) outcomes are linked to depression or erectile dysfunction. However, the data are often weak, conflicting and gathered with non-validated questionnaires. Hence, we performed a cross-sectional study of 44 men with non-obstructive azoospermia. Levels of self-esteem and the quality of the couple's sex life and overall relationship were assessed with validated questionnaires before and after the TESE procedure as a function of the TESE outcome.

RESULTS

A positive TESE outcome (n = 24) was associated with a statistically significant increase in self-esteem (particularly with regard to family aspects), sexual health and couples' adjustment quality. In contrast, a negative TESE outcome (n = 20) was associated with statistically significant decreases in self-esteem, erectile function, intercourse satisfaction, orgasmic function, couples' adjustment quality and all aspects of the couple's relationship (consensus, cohesion, satisfaction and affection).

CONCLUSION

For men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA), negative TESE outcomes may have a negative impact on self-esteem and the quality of the couple's sex life and overall relationship. This should be borne in mind when counselling men with NOA and their partners to (ideally) help them to cope with and decrease the harmful impacts of azoospermia and negative TESE.

Construction and external validation of a 5-gene random forest model to diagnose non-obstructive azoospermia based on the single-cell RNA sequencing of testicular tissue

Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) is among the most severe factors for male infertility, but our understandings of the latent biological mechanisms remain insufficient. The single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data of 432 testicular cells isolated from the patient with NOA was analyzed, and the cell samples were grouped into 5 cell clusters. A sum of 455 cell markers was identified and then included in the protein-protein interaction network. The Top 5 most critical genes in the network, including CCT8, CDC6, PSMD1, RPS4X, RPL36A, were selected for the diagnosis model construction through the random forest (RF). The RF model was a strong classifier for NOA and obstructive azoospermia (OA), which was validated in the training cohort (n = 58, AUC = 1) and external validation cohort (n = 20, AUC = 0.9). We collected the seminal plasma samples and testicular biopsy samples from 20 OA and 20 NOA cases from the local hospital, and the gene expression was detected via Real-Time quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR) and Immunohistochemistry. The RF model also exhibited high accuracy (AUC = 0.725) in the local cohort. In summary, a novel gene signature was developed and externally validated based on scRNA-seq analysis, providing some new biomarkers to uncover the underlying mechanisms and a promising clinical tool for diagnosis in NOA.