Coronary Flow, Left Ventricular Contractile and Heart Rate Reserve in Non-Ischemic Heart Failure

Echocardiographic functional determinants of survival in heart failure with abnormal ejection fraction

Background and Aims

Patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) have a heterogeneous prognosis, and assessment of coronary physiology with coronary flow velocity (CFV) and coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) may complement established predictors based on wall motion and EF.

Methods and results

In a prospective multicenter study design, we enrolled 1,408 HF patients (age 66 ± 12 years, 1,035 men), with EF <50%, 743 (53%) with coronary artery disease, and 665 (47%) with normal coronary arteries. Recruitment (years 2004-2022) involved 8 accredited laboratories, with inter-observer variability <10% for CFV measurement. Baseline CFV (abnormal value >31 cm/s) was obtained by pulsed-wave Doppler in mid-distal LAD. CFVR (abnormal value ≤2.0) was assessed with exercise (n = 99), dobutamine (n = 100), and vasodilator stress (dipyridamole in 1,149, adenosine in 60). Inducible myocardial ischemia was identified with wall motion score index (WMSI) stress > rest (cut-off Δ ≥ 0.12). LV contractile reserve (CR) was identified with WMSI stress < rest (cutoff Δ ≥ 0.25). Test response ranged from score 0 (EF > 30%, CFV ≥ 32 cm/s, CFVR > 2.0, LVCR present, ischemia absent) to score 5 (all steps abnormal). All-cause death was the only endpoint. Results. During a median follow-up of 990 days, 253 patients died. Independent predictors of death were EF (HR: 0.956, 95% CI: 0.943-0.968, p < 0.0001), CFV (HR: 2.407, 95% CI: 1.871-3.096, p < 0.001), CFVR (HR: 3.908, 95% CI: 2.903-5.260, p < 0.001), stress-induced ischemia (HR: 2.223, 95% CI: 1.642-3.009, p < 0.001), and LVCR (HR: 0.524, 95% CI: 0.324-.647, p = 0.008). The annual mortality rate was lowest (1.2%) in patients with a score of 0 (n = 61) and highest (31.9%) in patients with a score of 5 (n = 15, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

High resting CFV is associated with worse survival in ischemic and nonischemic HF with reduced EF. The value is independent and additive to resting EF, CFVR, LVCR, and inducible ischemia.

ABCDEG Stress Echocardiography in Aortic Stenosis

Rest and stress echocardiography (SE) plays a pivotal role in the evaluation of valvular heart disease. The use of SE is recommended in valvular heart disease when there is a mismatch between resting transthoracic echocardiography findings and symptoms. In aortic stenosis (AS), rest echocardiographic analysis is a stepwise approach that begins with the evaluation of aortic valve morphology and proceeds to the measurement of the transvalvular aortic gradient and aortic valve area (AVA) using continuity equations or planimetry. The presence of the following three criteria suggests severe AS: AVA < 1.0 cm2, a peak velocity > 4.0 m/s, or a mean gradient > 40 mmHg. However, in approximately one in three cases, we can observe a discordant AVA < 1 cm2 with a peak velocity < 4.0 m/s or a mean gradient <40 mmHg. This is due to reduced transvalvular flow associated with LV systolic dysfunction (LVEF < 50%) defined as "classical" low-flow low-gradient (LFLG) AS or normal LVEF "paradoxical" LFLG AS. SE has an established role in evaluating LV contractile reserve (CR) patients with reduced LVEF. In classical LFLG AS, LV CR distinguished pseudo-severe AS from truly severe AS. Some observational data suggest that long-term prognosis in asymptomatic severe AS may not be as favorable as previously thought, offering a window of opportunity for intervention prior to the onset of symptoms. Therefore, guidelines recommend evaluating asymptomatic AS with exercise stress in physically active patients, particularly those younger than 70 years, and symptomatic classical LFLG severe AS with low-dose dobutamine SE. A comprehensive SE assessment includes evaluating valve function (gradients), the global systolic function of the LV, and pulmonary congestion. This assessment integrates considerations of blood pressure response, chronotropic reserve, and symptoms. StressEcho 2030 is a prospective, large-scale study that employs a comprehensive protocol (ABCDEG) to analyze the clinical and echocardiographic phenotypes of AS, capturing various vulnerability sources which support stress echo-driven treatment strategies.

The value of myocardial work in the estimation of left ventricular systolic function in patients with coronary microvascular disease: A study based on adenosine stress echocardiography

Background

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is associated with increased cardiovascular events in patients with angina with non-obstructive coronary (ANOCA), especially heart failure. Conventional echocardiography is difficult to identify early alterations in cardiac function due to CMD.

Methods

We recruited 78 ANOCA patients. All patients underwent conventional echocardiography examination, adenosine stress echocardiography and examination of coronary flow reserve (CFR) by transthoracic echocardiography. Based on the CFR results, patients were divided into the CMD group (CFR < 2.5) and the non-CMD group (CFVR ≥ 2.5). Demographic data, conventional echocardiographic parameters, two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography (2D-STE) parameters and myocardial work (MW) were compared between the two groups at rest and at stress. Logistic regression was used to analyze the factors associated with CMD.

Results

There was no significant difference in conventional echocardiography parameters, 2D-STE related indices or MW at rest between the two groups. Global work index (GWI), global contractive work (GCW), and global work efficiency (GWE) were lower in the CMD group than in the non-CMD group at stress (p = 0.040, 0.044, <0.001, respectively), but global waste work (GWW) and peak strain dispersion (PSD) were higher (both p < 0.001). GWI and GCW were associated with systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, product of heart rate and blood pressure, GLS and coronary flow velocity. While GWW was mainly correlated with PSD, GWE was correlated with PSD and GLS. In the non-CMD group, the responses to adenosine was mainly manifested as an increase in GWI, GCW and GWE (p = 0.001, 0.001, 0.009, respectively) and a decrease in PSD and GWW (p = 0.001, 0.015, respectively). In the CMD group, the response to adenosine was mainly manifested as an increase in GWW and a decrease in GWE (p = 0.002, and 0.006, respectively). In the multivariate regression analysis, we found that ΔGWW (difference in GWW before vs. after adenosine stress) and ΔPSD (difference in PSD before vs. after adenosine stress) were independent factors associated with CMD. The ROC curves showed that the composite prediction model consisting of ΔGWW and ΔPSD had excellent diagnostic value for CMD (area under the curve = 0.913).

Conclusion

In the present study, we found that CMD caused deterioration of myocardial work in ANOCA patients under adenosine stress, and that increased cardiac contraction asynchrony and wasted work may be the main changes caused by CMD.

Reduced coronary flow velocity reserve and blunted heart rate reserve identify a higher risk group in patients with chest pain and negative emergency department evaluation

To estimate the prognostic value of stress echo (SE) with the assessment of coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) and heart rate reserve (HRR) in patients admitted for chest pain with non-diagnostic EKG, negative troponin, and without inducible regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA). 658 patients (age 67 ± 12 years) admitted to our Emergency Department with chest pain, non-diagnostic EKG, and negative serial troponin underwent dipyridamole (0.84 mg/kg in 6') SE with simultaneous assessment of RWMA, CFVR in the left anterior descending artery, and HRR as peak/rest heart rate. The outcome measure was all-cause mortality. Of the 658 patients initially enrolled, 20 (3%) showed RWMA during SE and were referred to ischemia-driven revascularization. In the remaining 638, CFVR was abnormal (≤ 2.0) in 148 patients (23%). HRR was abnormal (≤ 1.22 in patients in sinus rhythm, or ≤ 1.17 in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation) in 196 patients (31%). During a follow-up of 7.3 ± 4.3 years, 151 (24%) patients died. Survival at 8 years was 93% in patients with normal CFVR and HRR, 76% in patients with abnormal CFVR only, 73% in patients with abnormal HRR only, and 38% in those with abnormal CFVR and HRR (p < 0.0001). At multivariable analysis, abnormal CFVR (HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.05-2.10, p = 0.02) and abnormal HRR (HR 2.01, 95% CI 1.43-2.84, p < 0.0001) were independent predictors of survival. In admitted patients with non-ischemic EKG, negative serial troponin, and without RWMA during dipyridamole SE, a reduced CFVR and blunted HRR independently identify a subset with worse survival in the long term. Upper panel: Color and pulsed-wave Doppler with the electrocardiographic lead tracing of Four different response patterns (from left to right): normal CFVR and HRR; normal CFVR, abnormal HRR; abnormal CFVR, normal HRR; abnormal CFVR and HRR. Lower panel: The annualized death rate for each of the four groups with negative SE for RWMA and stratified according to the presence of CFVR and HRR: none, one, or two abnormalities.

Relation of hyperemic response during fractional flow reserve measurement to coronary flow reserve

BACKGROUND

Coronary flow reserve (CFR) represents entire coronary compensatory capacity, while fractional flow reserve (FFR) is a standard to evaluate functional severity of epicardial coronary artery disease (CAD). ΔFFR, a decrease in a ratio of mean distal coronary pressure to aortic pressure (Pd/Pa) at rest to FFR, is conceptually associated with coronary microvascular function. This study aimed to evaluate the relation of ΔFFR to CFR in patients with stable CAD.

METHODS

We performed resting Pd/Pa and FFR measurements in a total of 309 vessels with intermediate coronary artery stenosis in 242 patients. ΔFFR was defined as (resting Pd/Pa - FFR), and pressure bounded-CFR was calculated to estimate low CFR. Vessels were divided as the low CFR and non-low CFR groups.

RESULTS

Of 309 vessels, low CFR was observed in 101 (32.7 %). While FFR values were similar (0.78 ± 0.11 vs. 0.78 ± 0.09, p = 0.84), resting Pd/Pa (0.85 ± 0.08 vs. 0.93 ± 0.04, p < 0.001) and ΔFFR (0.07 ± 0.06 vs. 0.15 ± 0.06, p < 0.001) were significantly lower in the low CFR group than in the non-low CFR group. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that ΔFFR was predictive for low CFR (area under the curve 0.84, best cut-off value 0.08, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis identified lower ΔFFR, the left anterior descending coronary artery, and lower hemoglobin and higher brain natriuretic peptide levels as factors associated with low CFR.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with stable CAD, lower ΔFFR was significantly associated with low CFR in intermediate coronary stenosis in patients with stable CAD. ΔFFR may be a simple, practical, and useful surrogate to identify patients with impaired CFR.

Echocardiographic Normal Reference of Left Ventricular Contractile Reserve During Treadmill Exercise Stress Echocardiography in Healthy Chinese Adults - New Non-Sex-Specific Parameter for Left Ventricular Contractile Reserve Evaluation

Purpose

Left ventricular (LV) contractile reserve is commonly used for LV systolic function assessment, while data on normal LV contractile reserve to exercise and the effect of gender on it are contradictory and limited, especially in Chinese adults. The aims of the present study are to clarify echocardiographic normal reference of LV contractile reserve during treadmill exercise stress echocardiography in healthy Chinese adults and to evaluate the sex-specific impact on it.

Patients and Methods

The study population consisted of 157 healthy Chinese adults. All subjects underwent comprehensive echocardiographic assessment at rest and immediately after a symptom-limited treadmill stress test. The impact of gender on LV contractile reserve was analyzed.

Results

The study population consisted of 157 healthy Chinese adults. All subjects underwent comprehensive echocardiographic assessment at rest and immediately after a symptom-limited treadmill stress test. The impact of gender on LV contractile reserve was analyzed.

Conclusion

Traditional LV contractile reserve of men was much higher than that of women in a healthy Chinese population. The difference might be because of higher BSA in men. ΔGLS was less influenced by METs and CI at rest compared to ΔEF. ΔGLS, and especially the ΔGLS index, might be considered as a more preferable contractile reserve parameter for clinical cardiac function evaluation.