Clinical Outcomes of Early Endoscopic Transpapillary Biliary Drainage for Acute Cholangitis Associated with Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation

The Impact of Sleep Position Preferences on the Sleep Quality, Comfort and Catheter Care Quality in Patients After Endoscopic Nasobiliary Drainage: A Cross-Sectional Study

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the impact of sleep position preferences (SPP) on sleep quality, comfort and catheter care quality in patients after endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD).

DESIGN

This was an observational prospective study.

METHODS

This study included 167 participants with common bile duct stones (CBDS) who underwent ENBD from the gallstone ward of a hospital as a convenience sample. Data were collected between June 2022 and August 2023. The study utilised the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Athens Insomnia Scale, comfort level, medical device-related pressure injuries (MDRPI), catheter displacement, bile drainage volume and a self-designed questionnaire on demographic and clinical data for data collection. Data analysis included chi-square tests and one-way analysis of variance, with differences between two groups assessed using the LSD-t test. The STROBE checklist was followed.

RESULTS

The postoperative sleep quality of ENBD patients was rated at (8.65 ± 2.91) points. Significant variations in sleep quality were evident among ENBD patients with different SPPs (p < 0.01). Patients favouring left-side and supine positions demonstrated differences in sleep quality compared to those favouring the right-side position (t = 1.45, p < 0.05; t = 1.72, p < 0.01). However, when comparing patients favouring the supine position to those favouring the left-side position, the difference in sleep quality was not statistically significant (t = 0.26, p > 0.05). The postoperative comfort score of ENBD patients was recorded at (5.67 ± 1.54) points. Significant variances in comfort levels were observed among ENBD patients with different SPPs (p < 0.01). Patients favouring left-side and supine positions exhibited differences in comfort levels compared to those favouring the right-side position (t = 1.02, p < 0.05; t = 0.78, p < 0.01). Nevertheless, when comparing patients favouring the supine position to those favouring the left-side position, the difference in comfort level was not statistically significant (t = -0.24, p > 0.05). Among ENBD patients with different SPPs, there were no statistically significant differences in the occurrence of MDRPI, catheter displacement and 24-h bile drainage volume (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The sleep quality and comfort of patients following ENBD are suboptimal, warranting increased attention from healthcare providers. Nasobiliary tube conversion and fixation via the right nostril can negatively impact the sleep quality and comfort of patients with a preference for right-side sleeping. Preoperative training focusing on adjusting sleep positions is recommended, particularly for these patients. Alternatively, personalised modifications in the positioning and fixation of the nasal catheter could be made based on patients' sleeping position preferences. A multidisciplinary team, including nurses and surgeons, should collaboratively develop tailored nasobiliary drainage plans.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

This study highlights the importance of addressing sleep quality and comfort in patients undergoing nasobiliary drainage. It is recommended that patients with a preference for the right lateral sleeping position receive preoperative training to adjust their sleep posture. Alternatively, the nasobiliary tube's exit and fixation points should be customised based on individual sleep preferences. A multidisciplinary team, including nurses and surgeons, should collaborate to develop personalised nasobiliary drainage plans.

Clinical Advances in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Biliary Tract Diseases

Although the biliary tract is a small organ, it is diverse in location (intrahepatic bile ducts, extrahepatic bile ducts, gallbladder, and ampulla) and disease (including benign and malignant), thus a multidisciplinary approach involving endoscopists, surgeons, oncologists, radiologists, and infectious disease specialists is often required to treat biliary tract disease [...].

Retention Time of Endoscopic Nasobiliary Drainage and Symptomatic Choledocholithiasis Recurrence After Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Single-center, Retrospective Study in Fuyang, China

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) is usually retained for several days after choledocholithiasis is removed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). ENBD placement provides reliable biliary drainage and perfusion, prevents pancreatitis, and allows for cholangiography. However, it has not been established whether retention time of ENBD is associated with symptomatic choledocholithiasis recurrence after ERCP. For this reason, we estimated the effect of ENBD retention time on symptomatic choledocholithiasis recurrence after ERCP.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 1016 patients in whom choledocholithiasis had been diagnosed and ERCP had been performed to remove choledocholithiasis were retrospectively reviewed. Their ENBD retention time was 4.01±1.53 days. They were divided into group 1 (n=570) and group 2 (n=446) according to the mean value. Cumulative recurrence rates of symptomatic choledocholithiasis after ERCP were compared between the 2 groups. To identify independent factors associated with symptomatic choledocholithiasis recurrence, various likely predictors associated with the intergroup differences were also recorded.

RESULTS

There were 570 patients with ENBD retention time ≤4.01 days (group 1) and 446 patients with ENBD retention time >4.01 days (group 2). No statistically significant differences between the 2 groups were evident in terms of demographic factors and laboratory results, except for amylase (AMY) and opening diet time after ERCP. The median (interquartile range) follow-up was 23.7 (14.6, 32.13) months (range: 4.3 to 70 mo) in group 1 and 23.7 (14.6, 31.2) months (range: 4.2 to 69.4 mo) in group 2 (P=0.762). The cumulative recurrence rates of symptomatic choledocholithiasis were 3.1% (2.5% vs. 3.8%) at month 20, 6.7% (5.1% vs. 8.7%) at month 40, and 8.2% (6.7% vs. 10.1%) at month 60 for groups 1 and 2, respectively (P=0.048). By multivariate analysis, being in group 1 reduced symptomatic choledocholithiasis recurrence, with a hazard ratio of 0.641 (95% confidence interval: 0.416-0.987,P=0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

This preliminary study showed that symptomatic choledocholithiasis recurrence may be associated with ENBD retention time after ERCP, particularly for duration of ENBD more than 4.01 days.

Critically-Ill Patients with Biliary Obstruction and Cholangitis: Bedside Fluoroscopic-Free Endoscopic Drainage versus Percutaneous Drainage

Severe acute cholangitis is a life-threatening medical emergency. Endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD) or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) is usually used for biliary decompression. However, it can be risky to transport a critical patient to the radiology unit. We aimed to compare clinical outcomes between bedside, radiation-free EBD and fluoroscopic-guided PTBD in patients under critical care.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit with biliary obstruction and cholangitis from January 2011 to April 2020.

RESULTS

A total of 16 patients receiving EBD and 31 patients receiving PTBD due to severe acute cholangitis were analyzed. In the EBD group, biliary drainage was successfully conducted in 15 (93.8%) patients. Only one patient (6.25%) encountered post-procedure pancreatitis. The 30-day mortality rate was no difference between the 2 groups (32.72% vs. 31.25%, p = 0.96). Based on multivariate analysis, independent prognostic factors for the 30-day mortality were a medical history of malignancy other than pancreatobiliary origin (HR: 5.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-27.57) and emergent dialysis (HR: 7.30, 95% CI: 2.20-24.24).

CONCLUSIONS

Bedside EBD is safe and as effective as percutaneous drainage in critically ill patients. It provides lower risks in patient transportation but does require experienced endoscopists to perform the procedure.