Risk Factors and Outcomes Following Septostomy during Fetoscopic Surgery for Twin-to-Twin Transfusion Syndrome

Intertwin Membrane Perforation and Umbilical Cord Entanglement after Laser Surgery for Twin-Twin Transfusion Syndrome: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Outcome

INTRODUCTION

Perforation of the intertwin membrane can occur as a complication of fetoscopic laser surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS). Data on the occurrence and the risk of subsequent cord entanglement are limited. The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence, risk factors and outcome of intertwin membrane perforation, and cord entanglement after laser surgery for TTTS.

METHODS

In this multicenter retrospective study, we included all TTTS pregnancies treated with laser surgery in two fetal therapy centers, Shanghai (China) and Leiden (the Netherlands) between 2002 and 2020. We evaluated the occurrence of intertwin membrane perforation and cord entanglement after laser, based on routine fortnightly ultrasound examination and investigated the risk factors and the association with adverse short- and long-term outcomes.

RESULTS

Perforation of the intertwin membrane occurred in 118 (16%) of the 761 TTTS pregnancies treated with laser surgery and was followed by cord entanglement in 21% (25/118). Perforation of the intertwin membrane was associated with higher laser power settings, 45.8 Watt versus 42.2 Watt (p = 0.029) and a second fetal surgery procedure 17% versus 6% (p < 0.001). The group with intertwin membrane perforation had a higher rate of caesarean section (77% vs. 31%, p < 0.001) and a lower gestational age at birth (30.7 vs. 33.3 weeks of gestation, p < 0.001) compared to the group with an intact intertwin membrane. Severe cerebral injury occurred more often in the group with intertwin membrane perforation, 9% (17/185) versus 5% (42/930), respectively (p = 0.019). Neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years of age was similar between the groups with and without perforation of the intertwin membrane and between the subgroups with and without cord entanglement.

CONCLUSION

Perforation of the intertwin membrane after laser occurred in 16% of TTTS cases treated with laser and led to cord entanglement in at least 1 in 5 cases. Intertwin membrane perforation was associated with a lower gestational age at birth and a higher rate of severe cerebral injury in surviving neonates.

Quincke versus Diamond-Tip Needles for Entry in Placental Laser Surgery for Twin-to-Twin Transfusion Syndrome

INTRODUCTION

Chorioamniotic membrane separation (CAS), preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM), and preterm delivery (PTD) remain as major complications of fetoscopic laser photocoagulation (FLP) for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS). We sought to examine whether use of Quincke-tip needles for initial entry during FLP reduces the risk of these complications.

METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of prospectively collected data from patients that had FLP for TTTS at a single tertiary care center (2011-2021). We excluded patients for whom direct trocar entry was used. Patients for whom a Quincke-tip needle was used were compared to those for whom a diamond-tip needle was used during Seldinger entry. Demographics, ultrasound findings and operative characteristics were compared between groups. Postoperative outcomes and complications (including CAS, PPROM, and PTD) were also compared. Multivariate logistic regression models were fit to assess independent risk factors for complications.

RESULTS

386 patients met inclusion criteria; Quincke-tip needles were used in 81 (21.0%) cases, while diamond-tip needles were used in 305 (79.0%). Rates of CAS (11.1 vs. 9.5%, p = 0.67) and PPROM (44.4 vs. 41.0%, p = 0.57) were similar between groups. Patients in the Quincke-tip group delivered 1.5 weeks earlier than those in the diamond-tip group (30.5 vs. 32.0 weeks, p = 0.01). However, these patients were more likely to be delivered for maternal (35.9 vs. 19.0%) and fetal (23.1 vs. 15.3%) indications (p < 0.01). In multivariate analysis, needle type was not identified as an independent risk factor for PPROM. However, Quincke-tip needle use was associated with PTD less than 32 weeks (aOR 1.74, 95% CI: 1.02-2.97, p = 0.043).

CONCLUSION

Membrane complications following FLP were not associated with the needle type used for entry. Earlier delivery in the Quincke-tip group was likely attributable to higher rates of delivery for maternal and fetal indications, and not membrane complications. The needle chosen for entry is likely best determined by operator preference.

Anesthesia for fetal operative procedures: A systematic review

Objective

The anesthetic management of fetal operative procedures (FOP) is a highly debated topic. Literature on fetal pain perception and response to external stimuli is rapidly expanding. Nonetheless, there is no consensus on the fetal consciousness nor on the instruments to measure pain levels. As a result, no guidelines or clinical recommendations on anesthesia modality during FOP are available. This systematic literature review aimed to collect the available knowledge on the most common fetal interventions, and summarize the reported outcomes for each anesthetic approach. Additional aim was to provide an overall evaluation of the most commonly used anesthetic agents.

Methods

Two systematic literature searches were performed in Embase, Medline, Web of Science Core Collection and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to December 2021. To best cover the available evidence, one literature search was mostly focused on fetal surgical procedures; while anesthesia during FOP was the main target for the second search. The following fetal procedures were included: fetal transfusion, laser ablation of placental anastomosis, twin-reversed arterial perfusion treatment, fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion, thoraco-amniotic shunt, vesico-amniotic shunt, myelomeningocele repair, resection of sacrococcygeal teratoma, ligation of amniotic bands, balloon valvuloplasty/septoplasty, ex-utero intrapartum treatment, and ovarian cyst resection/aspiration. Yielded articles were screened against the same inclusion criteria. Studies reporting anesthesia details and procedures’ outcomes were considered. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed and findings were reported in a narrative manner.

Results

The literature searches yielded 1,679 articles, with 429 being selected for full-text evaluation. A total of 168 articles were included. Overall, no significant differences were found among procedures performed under maternal anesthesia or maternal-fetal anesthesia. Procedures requiring invasive fetal manipulation resulted to be more effective when performed under maternal anesthesia only. Based on the available data, a wide range of anesthetic agents are currently deployed and no consistency has been found neither between centers nor procedures.

Conclusions

This systematic review shows great variance in the anesthetic management during FOP. Further studies, systematically reporting intraoperative fetal monitoring and fetal hormonal responses to external stimuli, are necessary to identify the best anesthetic approach. Additional investigations on pain pathways and fetal pain perception are advisable.