Oocyte Vitrification for Fertility Preservation in Women with Benign Gynecologic Disease: French Clinical Practice Guidelines Developed by a Modified Delphi Consensus Process

Feasibility and efficiency of delayed ovarian stimulation and metaphase II oocyte banking for fertility preservation and childbearing desire after fertility-impairing treatment

The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficiency of delayed ovarian stimulation and metaphase II oocyte banking for fertility preservation after fertility-impairing treatment regardless of the initial disease. We conducted a cohort study based on population of women < 40 years of age with diminished ovarian reserve caused by fertility-impairing treatment (n = 129). Three groups of women were compared according to the type of initial disease: hematological malignancies, solid tumors, and benign diseases. The primary endpoint was the number of metaphase II oocytes collected per woman. We studied the cumulative live-birth rate per cycle with fertilized metaphase II oocyte, for women who wanted to conceive. We studied 245 delayed controlled ovarian stimulation cycles in 129 women: 201 for fertility preservation and 44 for in vitro fertilization and fresh embryo transfers. The number of metaphase II oocytes collected per woman after banking was similar in the three groups, with a mean of 10.7 ± 4.6, 12.3 ± 9.1, and 10.1 ± 7.6 metaphase II oocytes (p = 0.46), respectively. In the subgroup of women who wanted to conceive, the cumulative live birth rate per woman was 38%, with 8 live births for these 21 women. After fertility-impairing treatment, practitioners should discuss a fertility preservation procedure for banking metaphase II oocytes.

Oocyte Cryopreservation in Patients with Endometriosis: Current Knowledge and Number Needed to Treat

The rise of oocytes cryopreservation (OOC) in assisted reproductive techniques allows fertility preservation (FP) in an increasing number of indications. Endometriosis, a highly prevalent disease, potentially impairing ovarian reserve, seems, therefore, an interesting indication for it. The purpose of this study is to summarize the available evidence concerning FP by OOC in women with endometriosis and to calculate the number needed to treat (NNT). In total, 272 articles related to this topic were identified in PubMed. Eight studies were eligible for the review. In order to shed some light, a SWOT analysis was performed and the argument pros and cons were developed. The NNT calculated of OOC was 16, meaning that 16 women need to perform an OOC for one of them to have a child that she would not have had without this technique. In conclusion, OOC must be discussed with patients who suffer from endometriosis since it is an effective technique of FP, which can allow these patients to succeed a pregnancy that they otherwise would not have achieved. Nevertheless, it should not be performed in all patients as there is still a lack of robust socio-economic and risk–benefit data.

[French clinical practice guidelines developed by a modified Delphi consensus process for oocyte vitrification in women with benign gynecologic disease]

OBJECTIVES

To provide clinical practice guidelines about fertility preservation (FP) for women with benign gynecologic disease (BGD) developed by a modified Delphi consensus process for oocyte vitrification in women with benign gynecologic disease.

METHODS

A steering committee composed of 14 healthcare professionals and a patient representative with lived experience of endometriosis identified 42 potential practices related to FP for BGD. Then 114 key stakeholders including various healthcare professionals (n=108) and patient representatives (n=6) were asked to participate in a modified Delphi process via two online survey rounds from February to September 2020 and a final meeting. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, this final meeting to reach consensus was held as a videoconference in November 2020.

RESULTS

Survey response of stakeholders was 75 % (86/114) for round 1 and 87 % (75/86) for round 2. Consensus was reached for the recommendations for 28 items, that have been distributed into five general categories: (i) Information to provide to women of reproductive age with a BGD, (ii) Technical aspects of FP for BGD, (iii) Indications for FP in endometriosis, (iv) Indications for FP for non-endometriosis BGD, (v) Indications for FP after a fortuitous diagnosis of an idiopathic diminished ovarian reserve.

CONCLUSION

These guidelines provide some practice advice to help health professionals better inform women about the possibilities of cryopreserving their oocytes prior to the management of a BGD that may affect their ovarian reserve and fertility.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

The CNGOF (Collège National des Gynécologues Obstétriciens Français) funded the implementation of the Delphi process.

Assessment of female fertility preservation in Auvergne 3 years after implementation of the PREFERA platform (PREservation FERtilité Auvergne)

INTRODUCTION

Fertility preservation (FP) in patients with cancer or pathology at risk of gonadotoxicity is now according to legislation, an integral part of the treatment protocol. for this reason, clinical-biological platforms have emerged with the aim of developing and improving this practice, such as the PREFERA platform (PREservation FERtilité Auvergne) MATERIAL ET METHOD: This is an observational cohort study to evaluate female fertility preservation activity in Auvergne at the AMP-CECOS center of the Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital from March 2013 to March 2019. This period covering 3 years before and after the creation of PREFERA in 2015.

RESULTS

205 patients were referred for fertility preservation consultations, including 77 before the platform was set up and 128 after, corresponding to an increase of 66%. 190 patients (92.7%) referred were eligible for FP, of whom 169 (88.9%) received treatment. Thirty-nine patients underwent oocyte vitrification before the platform was set up and 74 after (+89.7%), twenty patients underwent ovarian cortex freezing before the platform was set up and 27 after (+35%). Only 54 patients (26.2%) were seen for follow-up with an increased number of consultations following the implementation of PREFERA. (8% vs 33%, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Creation of the PREFERA platform facilitated patient access and management of fertility preservation procedures. However, at the regional level, it is necessary to continue to raise awareness of fertility issues, particularly in the context of post-cancer follow-up, both among patients and health professionals.