Importance of In-Hospital Prospective Registry and Infectious Endocarditis Heart Team to Monitor and Improve Quality of Care in Patients with Infectious Endocarditis

Impact of multidisciplinary Endocarditis Team on management of infective endocarditis

Infective Endocarditis (IE) is a complex, life-threatening disease. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of the Endocarditis-Team on management of IE. This observational study conducted at a university hospital (2015‒22), included adult patients with IE. The study period was divided in two periods: before (pre-Endocarditis-Team; pre-ET) and after the establishment of the Endocarditis-Team (post-Endocarditis-Team; post-ET) on January 2018. Among 505 IE episodes (187 in pre-Endocarditis-Team, 318 in post-ET period), 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography was more commonly used in post-ET period (14 % vs. 28 %; p < 0.001). Overall, thirty-day and one-year mortality were 14 % and 27 %, respectively; no difference was observed between the two periods. In post-ET period, the administration of 4-weeks, rather than 6-weeks, of intravenous antimicrobial treatment was higher than in the post-ET period (15 % vs. 45 %; p < 0.001). Indication for surgery was present in 115 (61 %) patients in pre-ET and in 153 (48 %) in the post-ET period. In post-ET period, among patients with indication, valve surgery was more frequently performed (66 % vs. 78 %; p = 0.038). Such difference was due to a higher acceptance of operative indication by the cardiac surgeon (69 % vs. 94 %; p = 0.013). The observed increase in number of patients benefiting from cardiac surgery in the post-ET period led to a decrease of subsequent embolic events, since among patients with operative indication (n = 268), new embolic events after the establishment of the indication were more common in the pre-ET period compared to post-ET (23 % vs. 12 %; p = 0.033). After the implementation of the multidisciplinary Endocarditis-Team we observed several improvements in the general management of IE patients.

Is Infectious Endocarditis Evolving into a Time-Dependent Diagnosis in the Contemporary Epidemiological Era? Emphasis on the Role of Echocardiography as a First-Line Diagnostic Approach

Despite significant advances in understanding and outcomes in various domains of cardiology, the prognosis of infective endocarditis (IE) remains dismal. One of the main reasons may rely on an even more intricate diagnosis since epidemiology has shifted towards an aggressive infection, typically in older patients with the involvement of prosthetic valves and cardiovascular implantable electronic devices with earlier clinical presentation. In this novel setting, it is critical to avoid a delay in diagnosis that may delay subsequent adequate treatment, further complications, and ultimately poor clinical outcomes. Accordingly, based on the available data, we will examine the proper use of first-line echocardiography representing the first-line imaging method in patients with clinical suspicion of IE. We will focus on the following three crucial questions: (1) What is the threshold to start the echocardiographic diagnostic workup in stable patients? (2) Has infective endocarditis become a time-dependent diagnosis, even in stable patients? (3) What is the appropriate use of echocardiography in unstable patients? Finally, we propose a new mindset to improve the echocardiographic diagnostic workflow.

Multidisciplinary Teams for the Management of Infective Endocarditis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

The management of infective endocarditis (IE) is complex owing to a high burden of morbidity and mortality. Recent guidelines recommend dedicated multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) for the management of IE. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate and summarize the effect of MDT management on patient outcomes.

Methods

A systematic review was performed and, where feasible, results were meta-analyzed; otherwise, results were summarized narratively. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed in duplicate. Restricted maximum likelihood random effects models were used to calculate unadjusted risk ratios and 95% CIs.

Results

Screening of 2343 studies based on title and abstract yielded 60 full-text reviews; 18 studies were summarized narratively, of which 15 were included in a meta-analysis of short-term mortality. Meta-analysis resulted in a risk ratio of 0.61 (95% CI, .47-.78; I2 = 62%) for mortality in favor of a dedicated MDT as compared with usual care. Length of stay was variable, with 55% (10/18) of studies reporting an increased length of stay. Most studies (16/18, 88.9%) reported a decreased time to surgery and an increased rate of surgery (13/18, 73%). No studies reported on patient-reported outcomes.

Conclusions

This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the impact of MDT management on IE. The sum of evidence demonstrated a significant association between MDTs and improved short-term mortality. Further research is needed to evaluate benefits of virtual MDT care, cost-effectiveness, and the impact on patient-reported outcomes and long-term mortality.

Infective endocarditis treated in a secondary hospital: epidemiological, clinical, microbiological characteristics and prognosis, with special reference to patients transferred to a third level hospital

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the clinical and epidemiological characteristics and mortality-related factors of patients admitted to a secondary hospital with Infective Endocarditis (IE).

METHODS

Observational study of a cohort of patients who have been diagnosed with IE in a secondary hospital and evaluated in accordance with a pre-established protocol.

RESULTS

A total of 101 cases were evaluated (years 2000-2017), with an average age of 64 years and a male-to-female ratio of 2:1. 76% of the cases had an age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index of >6, with 21% having had a dental procedure and 36% with a history of heart valve disease. The most common microorganism was methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (36%), with bacterial focus of unknown origin in 54%. The diagnostic delay time was 12 days in patients who were transferred, compared to 8 days in patients who were not transferred (p=0.07); the median surgery indication delay time was 5 days (IQR 13.5). The in-hospital mortality rate was 34.6% and the prognostic factors independently associated with mortality were: cerebrovascular events (OR 98.7%, 95% CI, 70.9-164.4); heart failure (OR 27.3, 95% CI, 10.2-149.1); and unsuitable antibiotic treatment (OR 7.2, 95% CI, 1.5-10.5). The mortality rate of the patients who were transferred and who therefore underwent surgery was 20% (5/25).

CONCLUSIONS

The onset of cerebrovascular events, heart failure and unsuitable antibiotic treatment are independently and significantly associated with in-hospital mortality. The mortality rate was higher than the published average (35%); the diagnostic delay was greater in patients for whom surgery was indicated.