MR Imaging Biomarkers for Clinical Impairment and Disease Progression in Patients with Shoulder Adhesive Capsulitis: A Prospective Study

Can magnetic resonance imaging distinguish clinical stages of frozen shoulder? A state-of-the-art review

Background

Frozen shoulder (FS) is a common disorder causing shoulder pain and limited motion. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is expected to help diagnose FS and realize the disease stage if stage-specific features are present. We aimed to survey stage-related MRI findings of FS in the literature.

Methods

MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar databases were searched with search terms "frozen shoulder" or "adhesive capsulitis" combined with "magnetic resonance imaging." Studies that discussed MRI findings in relation to FS stages were retrieved. The course of FS was divided into stages 1 to 4 according to Hannafin and Chiaia.

Results

Two of the noncontrast-enhanced MRI findings were stage-related. T2 signal hyperintensity of the joint capsule was more frequent in stages 1 and 2. The axillary capsule thickness was greater in stages 1 and 2. However, these findings were also seen in the later stages to a lesser degree. Effusion around the long head of biceps, subcoracoid fat obliteration, and coracohumeral ligament thickening were common in FS but their relation to the stages was not evident. Signal enhancement on contrast-enhanced MRI was not consistently linked to stages.

Conclusion

T2 signal hyperintensity and axillary capsule thickening are characteristic of the early stages of FS, although MRI alone cannot completely define the disease stage.

What is the most predictive magnetic resonance imaging finding of rotator cuff tear concomitant with shoulder stiffness?

Background

Common magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in adhesive capsulitis are not often evident in rotator cuff tear concomitant with shoulder stiffness. This study aimed to determine the most predictive MRI finding of rotator cuff tear with shoulder stiffness to differentiate from that without stiffness.

Materials and methods

The data of patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair between January 2014 and October 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Stiffness was defined as forward flexion <120°, external rotation at side <30°, and internal rotation at back 

Results

Anterior capsular thickness, glenoid capsular thickness in the axillary recess, and anterior and axillary capsular hyperintensities were significantly more dominant in the stiff group (all P < .05) than in the control group. Anterior capsular thickness and anterior capsular abnormal hyperintensity could be used to differentiate between the stiff and control groups (P < .05). Anterior capsular thickness showed high diagnostic performance with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.993. The cut-off value for stiffness was 3.07 mm (sensitivity, 96.1%; specificity, 100%).

Conclusion

Anterior capsular thickening and abnormal hyperintensity were the most predictive MRI findings for stiffness in patients with rotator cuff tear and stiffness to differentiate from patients with rotator cuff tear without stiffness.

Collapse

Key Words

• Adhesive capsulitis
• Anterior capsular abnormal hyperintensity
• Anterior capsular thickness
• Magnetic resonance imaging
• Rotator cuff tear
• Stiff shoulder

Collapse

MESH Headings Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Ji Young Yoon Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Police Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
HeeSoo Han Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
Myoung Yeol Shin Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Police Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Hyeon Jang Jeong Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
Yusuhn Kang Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
Young Dae Jeon Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ulsan University College of Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan, Republic of Korea
Ji Un Kim Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Republic of Korea
Joo Han Oh Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea

Collapse

Evaluation of the Differences in the MRI Findings Related to Primary and Secondary Adhesive Capsulitis

Purpose: The aim of this study is to describe the radiological findings of adhesive capsulitis due to different etiological factors and reveal that different clues due to different etiological causes should be considered in the diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis. Methods: The study group comprised 24 primary and 22 supraspinatus tendon rupture-related adhesive capsulitis patients with 24 individuals without adhesive capsulitis and with normal shoulder magnetic resonance imaging. Independent samples t-test and one-way analysis of variance tests were used to compare the measurements between the groups. Paired sample t-test and Cohen's kappa statistic were used to determine inter-observer reliability. The chi-squared test was used to determine the relationships between groups and categorical variables. Study participants were evaluated both qualitatively and quantitatively. Quantitative measurements included the thickness of the humeral and glenoid segment of the joint capsule and the thickness of the anterior joint capsule and the fluid depth within the biceps tendon sheath. The qualitative assessments included the detection of any signal abnormality at the rotator interval, the grading of the humeral and glenoid segment of the joint capsule, and the detection of any signal abnormality in respect of the anterior joint capsule. Results: A statistically significant difference was found between the groups of patients with primary adhesive capsulitis and with supraspinatus tear-related adhesive capsulitis in terms of the thickness of the humeral segment of the joint capsule at the axillary recess level (AUC = .729) (P: .006). Furthermore, setting the cutoff value for the thickness of the humeral segment of the capsule to 4.6 mm allowed the differentiation of primary adhesive capsulitis and supraspinatus tear-related adhesive capsulitis with a sensitivity of 70.8% and a specificity of 87.3%. Conclusion: In conclusion, the humeral segment of the joint capsule thickness at the axillary recess was found to be affected by different degrees depending on whether it is a primary or supraspinatus tear-related adhesive capsulitis.