1
|
Müller S, Bühl L, Nüesch C, Pagenstert G, Mündermann A, Egloff C. Favorable Patient-Reported, Clinical, and Functional Outcomes 2 Years After ACL Repair and InternalBrace Augmentation Compared With ACL Reconstruction and Healthy Controls: Response. Am J Sports Med 2024; 52:NP16-NP18. [PMID: 38946457 DOI: 10.1177/03635465241247723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/02/2024]
|
2
|
Opoku M, Fang M, Lu W, Li Y, Xiao W. Acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture: can repair become an alternative to reconstruction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies. J Orthop Surg Res 2024; 19:331. [PMID: 38825707 PMCID: PMC11145936 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-04812-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/04/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To perform a meta-analysis to compare clinical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair and ACL reconstruction for acute ACL rupture. METHOD We searched Pubmed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases to seek relevant studies. Clinical outcomes included failure rate, hardware removal rate, anteroposterior (AP) knee laxity, and patient-reported outcomes. In addition, subgroup analysis was carried out according to repair techniques, rupture locations, and study designs. Funnel plots were used to detect publication bias. All statistical analysis was performed using STATA (version 14.2, StataCorp). RESULTS A total of 10 articles were included in this study, comprising 5 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 5 cohort studies, involving a total of 549 patients. We found no statistical differences between the ACL repair and ACL reconstruction in the following outcomes: failure rate, AP knee laxity, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome (KOOS) Score, and Tegner score. However, the ACL repair group had a higher hardware removal rate. Except for AP knee laxity results on different repair techniques, there was no statistical difference in other subgroup analyses. CONCLUSION Compared with ACL reconstruction, ACL repair shows similar results in clinical outcomes, and it is promising to be an effective alternative treatment for acute ACL rupture. Larger samples and higher-quality studies are needed to support our results and further explore the advantages of ACL repair in other aspects. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Opoku
- Department of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, China
| | - Mingqing Fang
- Department of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, China
- Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410083, China
| | - Wenhao Lu
- Department of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, China
| | - Yusheng Li
- Department of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, China.
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, China.
| | - Wenfeng Xiao
- Department of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, China.
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kunze KN, Pareek A, Nwachukwu BU, Ranawat AS, Pearle AD, Kelly BT, Allen AA, Williams RJ. Clinical Results of Primary Repair Versus Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Contemporary Trials. Orthop J Sports Med 2024; 12:23259671241253591. [PMID: 38867918 PMCID: PMC11168252 DOI: 10.1177/23259671241253591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 06/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair has gained renewed interest in select centers for patients with proximal or midsubstance ACL tears. Therefore, it is important to reassess contemporary clinical outcomes of ACL repair to determine whether a clinical benefit exists over the gold standard of ACL reconstruction (ACLR). Purpose To (1) perform a meta-analysis of comparative trials to determine whether differences in clinical outcomes and adverse events exist between ACL repair versus ACLR and (2) synthesize the midterm outcomes of available trials. Study Design Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3. Methods The PubMed, OVID/Medline, and Cochrane databases were queried in August 2023 for prospective and retrospective clinical trials comparing ACL repair and ACLR. Data pertaining to tear location, surgical technique, adverse events, and clinical outcome measures were recorded. DerSimonian-Laird random-effects models were constructed to quantitatively evaluate the association between ACL repair/ACLR, adverse events, and clinical outcomes. A subanalysis of minimum 5-year outcomes was performed. Results Twelve studies (893 patients; 464 ACLR and 429 ACL repair) were included. Random-effects models demonstrated a higher relative risk (RR) of recurrent instability/clinical failure (RR = 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-2.57; P = .032), revision ACLR (RR = 1.63; 95% CI, 1.03-2.59; P = .039), and hardware removal (RR = 4.94; 95% CI, 2.10-11.61; P = .0003) in patients who underwent primary ACL repair versus ACLR. The RR of reoperations and complications (knee-related) were not significantly different between groups. No significant differences were observed when comparing patient-reported outcome scores. In studies with minimum 5-year outcomes, no significant differences in adverse events or Lysholm scores were observed. Conclusion In contemporary comparative trials of ACL repair versus ACLR, the RR of clinical failure, revision surgery due to ACL rerupture, and hardware removal was greater for primary ACL repair compared with ACLR. There were no observed differences in patient-reported outcome scores, reoperations, or knee-related complications between approaches. In the limited literature reporting on minimum 5-year outcomes, significant differences in adverse events or the International Knee Documentation Committee score were not observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle N. Kunze
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
- Sports Medicine Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ayoosh Pareek
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
- Sports Medicine Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Benedict U. Nwachukwu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
- Sports Medicine Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Anil S. Ranawat
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
- Sports Medicine Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Andrew D. Pearle
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
- Sports Medicine Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Bryan T. Kelly
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
- Sports Medicine Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Answorth A. Allen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
- Sports Medicine Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Riley J. Williams
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
- Sports Medicine Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ren Y, Wang J, Ji J, Zhang C, Meng Q. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Modern Augmented ACL Repair and Autograft ACL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Studies With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. Orthop J Sports Med 2024; 12:23259671231223743. [PMID: 38282789 PMCID: PMC10812109 DOI: 10.1177/23259671231223743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been the gold standard for primary ACL rupture since the 1990s. In the past decade, ACL repair has received renewed attention and increased research. Purpose To compare the clinical outcomes of modern augmented ACL repair versus autograft reconstruction for ACL ruptures. Study Design Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3. Methods A search of the PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases was conducted for prospective or retrospective comparative studies published between January 1, 2010, and January 3, 2023, with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Two independent reviewers performed data extraction and methodological quality assessment. Sensitivity analysis was performed to maintain the stability of results. Results Nine studies were included (minimum follow-up period, 24-60 months). The total sample size was 833 patients (augmented repair group: 358 patients; autograft ACL reconstruction group: 475 patients). There were 4 randomized controlled trials (level 1), 1 prospective comparative study (level 2), 2 retrospective comparative studies (level 3), and 2 case-control studies (level 3). The augmented ACL repair group attained significantly higher Lysholm score (weighted mean difference [WMD] = 1.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.14-3.01; P = .03) and hamstring strength (WMD = 36.69; 95% CI, 29.07-44.31; P < .01) but had higher rates of hardware removal (odds ratio [OR] = 6.30; 95% CI, 2.44-16.23; P = .0001), reoperation (OR = 1.87; 95% CI, 1.33-2.62; P = .0003), and failure (OR = 1.58; 95% CI, 1.03-2.43; P = .0003) compared with the autograft ACL reconstruction group. No significant differences were observed between the repair and reconstruction groups regarding postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee scores, Tegner scores, knee laxity, satisfaction, ACL revisions, complications, and reoperation rather than revision. Conclusion Augmented ACL repair was associated with higher rates of reoperation, hardware removal, and failure compared with autograft ACL reconstruction in studies with minimum 2-year follow-up data. However, augmented ACL repair had higher Lysholm scores and hamstring strength versus autograft ACL reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunong Ren
- Department of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Institute of Sports Medicine of Peking University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Sports Injuries, Beijing, China
- Medical College of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| | - Jia Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| | - Junjie Ji
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| | - Chao Zhang
- Medical College of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| | - Qingyang Meng
- Department of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Institute of Sports Medicine of Peking University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Sports Injuries, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bühl L, Müller S, Nüesch C, Boyer KA, Casto E, Mündermann A, Egloff C. Ambulatory knee biomechanics and muscle activity 2 years after ACL surgery: InternalBrace TM-augmented ACL repair versus ACL reconstruction versus healthy controls. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2023; 24:785. [PMID: 37794432 PMCID: PMC10548591 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06916-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about knee mechanics and muscle control after augmented ACL repair. Our aim was to compare knee biomechanics and leg muscle activity during walking between the legs of patients 2 years after InternalBraceTM-augmented anterior cruciate ligament repair (ACL-IB) and between patients after ACL-IB and ACL reconstruction (ACL-R), and controls. METHODS Twenty-nine ACL-IB, 27 sex- and age-matched ACL-R (hamstring tendon autograft) and 29 matched controls completed an instrumented gait analysis. Knee joint angles, moments, power, and leg muscle activity were compared between the involved and uninvolved leg in ACL-IB (paired t-tests), and between the involved legs in ACL patients and the non-dominant leg in controls (analysis of variance and posthoc Bonferroni tests) using statistical parametric mapping (SPM, P < 0.05). Means and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of differences in discrete parameters (DP; i.e., maximum/minimum) were calculated. RESULTS Significant differences were observed in ACL-IB only in minimum knee flexion angle (DP: 2.4°, CI [-4.4;-0.5]; involved > uninvolved) and maximum knee flexion moment during stance (-0.07Nm/kg, CI [-0.13;-0.00]; involved < uninvolved), and differences between ACL-IB and ACL-R only in maximum knee flexion during swing (DP: 3.6°, CI [0.5;7.0]; ACL-IB > ACL-R). Compared to controls, ACL-IB (SPM: 0-3%GC, P = 0.015; 98-100%, P = 0.016; DP: -6.3 mm, CI [-11.7;-0.8]) and ACL-R (DP: -6.0 mm, CI [-11.4;-0.2]) had lower (maximum) anterior tibia position around heel strike. ACL-R also had lower maximum knee extension moment (DP: -0.13Nm/kg, CI [-0.23;-0.02]) and internal knee rotation moment (SPM: 34-41%GC, P < 0.001; DP: -0.03Nm/kg, CI [-0.06;-0.00]) during stance, and greater maximum semitendinosus activity before heel strike (DP: 11.2%maximum voluntary contraction, CI [0.1;21.3]) than controls. CONCLUSION Our results suggest comparable ambulatory knee function 2 years after ACL-IB and ACL-R, with ACL-IB showing only small differences between legs. However, the differences between both ACL groups and controls suggest that function in the involved leg is not fully recovered and that ACL tear is not only a mechanical disruption but also affects the sensorimotor integrity, which may not be restored after surgery. The trend toward fewer abnormalities in knee moments and semitendinosus muscle function during walking after ACL-IB warrants further investigation and may underscore the importance of preserving the hamstring muscles as ACL agonists. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, case-control study. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04429165 (12/06/2020).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Bühl
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, Basel, 4031, Switzerland.
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Allschwil, 4123, Switzerland.
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, 4031, Switzerland.
| | - Sebastian Müller
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, Basel, 4031, Switzerland
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Allschwil, 4123, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, 4031, Switzerland
| | - Corina Nüesch
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, Basel, 4031, Switzerland
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Allschwil, 4123, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, 4031, Switzerland
- Department of Spine Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, 4031, Switzerland
| | - Katherine A Boyer
- Department of Kinesiology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA
- Department of Orthopedics and Physical Rehabilitation, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, 01655, USA
| | - Erica Casto
- Department of Kinesiology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA
| | - Annegret Mündermann
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, Basel, 4031, Switzerland
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Allschwil, 4123, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, 4031, Switzerland
- Department of Spine Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, 4031, Switzerland
| | - Christian Egloff
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, Basel, 4031, Switzerland
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Allschwil, 4123, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, 4031, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Müller S, Bühl L, Nüesch C, Pagenstert G, Mündermann A, Egloff C. Favorable Patient-Reported, Clinical, and Functional Outcomes 2 Years After ACL Repair and InternalBrace Augmentation Compared With ACL Reconstruction and Healthy Controls. Am J Sports Med 2023; 51:3131-3141. [PMID: 37675973 PMCID: PMC10543955 DOI: 10.1177/03635465231194784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recently, interest in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) preservation and repair after proximal ACL tears has been resurrected. Although good clinical outcomes have been reported in the literature with adequate patient selection, to date detailed scientific evidence for the functional benefit of primary ACL repair with ligament augmentation is scarce. PURPOSE To compare patient-reported, clinical, and functional outcomes in patients 2 years after ACL repair and InternalBrace augmentation (ACL-IB) with age- and sex-matched patients 2 years after ACL reconstruction (ACL-R) and with matched healthy controls. STUDY DESIGN Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS In total, 29 patients 2 years after ACL-IB, 27 sex- and age- matched patients 2 years after ACL-R (hamstring autografts), and 29 matched healthy controls were included. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the International Knee Documentation Committee score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, EQ-5D-5L, Tegner Activity Scale, and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sports after Injury scale. Surgery time was recorded. For clinical outcomes, range of motion and thigh and shank circumference were measured, and passive anterior translation was determined using the Rolimeter. Isokinetic muscle strength was measured using a Biodex dynamometer. The limb symmetry index (operated/contralateral or nondominant/dominant × 100), side-to-side differences (operated - contralateral, nondominant - dominant), and hamstring-quadriceps ratios were calculated for functional parameters. Failure and reoperation rates were not compared. RESULTS Two years after surgery, patients treated with ACL-IB showed good to excellent patient-reported outcomes comparable with those of patients after ACL-R. Surgery time, including concomitant surgeries, was significantly shorter in the ACL-IB group (mean, 81 minutes) compared with the ACL-R group (mean, 97 minutes) (P = .024). Isokinetic muscle strength was comparable between patient groups without significant differences in extensor and flexor strength or in hamstring-quadriceps ratios. CONCLUSION These results suggest that ACL-IB achieves comparable patient-reported, clinical, and functional outcomes with ACL-R at 2 years postoperatively and, after careful patient selection, should be considered as a valuable early treatment alternative for proximal ACL tears. REGISTRATION NCT04429165 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Müller
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Linda Bühl
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Corina Nüesch
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Spine Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Geert Pagenstert
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Clarahof Clinic of Orthopaedic Surgery, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Annegret Mündermann
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Christian Egloff
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bühl L, Müller S, Nüesch C, Pagenstert G, Mündermann A, Egloff C. Functional leg performance 2 years after ACL surgery: a comparison between InternalBrace™-augmented repair versus reconstruction versus healthy controls. J Orthop Traumatol 2023; 24:52. [PMID: 37735271 PMCID: PMC10513977 DOI: 10.1186/s10195-023-00723-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While clinical and patient-reported outcomes have been investigated in patients after InternalBrace™-augmented anterior cruciate ligament repair (ACL-IB), less is known regarding restoration of functional performance. We aimed to determine differences in functional performance within and between patients 2 years after ACL-IB, patients 2 years after ACL reconstruction (ACL-R), and healthy controls. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 29 ACL-IB, 27 ACL-R (hamstring autograft), and 29 controls performed single-leg hop (maximum forward distance hop, SLH; side hop > 40 cm in 30 s, SH), proprioception (knee joint position sense at 30° and 60° flexion), and dynamic postural balance (Y Balance) tests. Differences were calculated within groups (side-to-side difference) and between the involved leg of patients and the non-dominant leg of controls, and were evaluated to predefined statistical (P < 0.05), clinically relevant, and methodological (smallest detectable change) thresholds. The number of exceeded thresholds represented no (0), small (1), moderate (2), or strong (3) differences. In addition, the relative number of participants achieving leg symmetry (≥ 90%) and normal performance (≥ 90% of the average performance of the non-dominant leg of controls) were compared between groups (chi-squared tests, P < 0.05). RESULTS We observed no-to-moderate leg differences within ACL-IB (moderate difference in hops) and within ACL-R (moderate difference in knee proprioception), no leg differences between patient groups, no-to-small leg differences between ACL-IB and controls, and no leg differences between ACL-R and controls in functional performance. However, two patients in ACL-IB and ACL-R, respectively, passed the hop pretest only with their uninvolved leg, and fewer patients after ACL-IB and ACL-R than controls reached a leg symmetry and normal leg performance of controls in SLH (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Functional performance seems to be comparable 2 years postoperatively between ACL-IB and ACL-R for a specific subgroup of patients (i.e., proximal ACL tears, moderate activity level). However, the presumed advantage of comparable functional outcome with preserved knee structures after augmented ACL repair compared with ACL-R, and the tendency of both patient groups toward leg asymmetry and compromised single-leg hop performance in the involved legs, warrants further investigation. Level of Evidence Level III, case-control study. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04429165 (12/09/2020). Prospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04429165 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Bühl
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Sebastian Müller
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Corina Nüesch
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Spine Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Geert Pagenstert
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Clarahof Clinic of Orthopaedic Surgery, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Annegret Mündermann
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Spine Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Christian Egloff
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Itthipanichpong T, Tangboonnitiwong N, Limskul D, Tanpowpong T, Kuptniratsaikul S, Thamrongskulsiri N. Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Primary Repair With Synthetic Augmentation and Fixation With the Knotless Suture Anchor. Arthrosc Tech 2023; 12:e1009-e1013. [PMID: 37533897 PMCID: PMC10390709 DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2023.02.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2022] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023] Open
Abstract
An anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear is one of the most common ligament injuries in athletes. The arthroscopic ACL reconstruction procedure is the gold standard for treatment. However, the improvement in injury classification and suture materials has subsequently made arthroscopic ACL primary repair an alternative surgical treatment option. This Technical Note describes an arthroscopic ACL primary repair with synthetic augmentation made of several high-strength sutures and fixation with the knotless suture anchor. The reinforced synthetic material acts as a structural tie to support the ACL while it heals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thun Itthipanichpong
- Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Napol Tangboonnitiwong
- Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Danaithep Limskul
- Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Thanathep Tanpowpong
- Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Somsak Kuptniratsaikul
- Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Raja BS, Arora M, Gowda AKS, Maheshwari VK, Regmi A. Augmentation with Fibertape Leads to Biomechanically Superior but Similar Clinical Outcomes in ACL Surgeries: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Indian J Orthop 2023; 57:722-747. [PMID: 37128558 PMCID: PMC10147891 DOI: 10.1007/s43465-022-00805-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Purpose The current generation has witnessed significant progress in the field of knee arthroscopy. Suture tapes have gained immense popularity due to perceived improved biomechanical support to the graft while it heals. The purpose of the present systematic review is to analyze the biomechanical construct of suture tapes in ACL repairs and reconstructions along with clinical outcomes. Methods Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase were searched until December 2021. All Biomechanical Studies on animal or cadaver knees that compared construct characteristics of suture tape in ACL repair or reconstruction and clinical studies in English focusing on outcomes following suture tape augmentation in ACL repair or reconstruction were included. The quality of clinical studies using the Modified Coleman Methodology Score (MCMS). Results A total of 16 studies biomechanical and 23 clinical studies were included in qualitative synthesis, leaving nine biomechanical studies for final quantitative analyses. Suture tape revealed biomechanical superiority in terms of ultimate strength, stiffness, cyclic displacement, and elongation of graft, while comparing ACLR with internal brace to standard ACLR. No significant difference in retear rates was seen in clinical studies. Clinical score(IKDC score) was found similar in both augmented and non-augmented construct. Similar results were obtained in biomechanical studies. Conclusion The use of suture tape as a ligament augmentation in both ACL reconstruction and ACL repair offers more strength, less elongation or displacement, and is biomechanically stable and sound. There is a lack of data to comprehensively comment upon the clinical superiority of the use of internal augmentation. However, a meta-analysis of the retear rates and clinical outcome score revealed similar outcomes between suture tape augmented and nonaugmented groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Balgovind S. Raja
- Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India
| | - Manit Arora
- Department of Orthopaedics, Fortis Hospital, Mohali, Punjab India
| | - Aditya K. S. Gowda
- Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India
| | - Vikas K. Maheshwari
- Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India
| | - Anil Regmi
- Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Xu C, Liu T, Wang M, Liu C, Li B, Lian Q, Chen T, Chen F, Qiao S, Wang Z. Comparison of proprioception recovery following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using an artificial graft versus an autograft. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23:1056. [PMID: 36463165 PMCID: PMC9719127 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-06019-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To compare proprioception recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with a hamstring tendon autograft versus the artificial Ligament Advanced Reinforcement System (LARS). MATERIAL AND METHODS Forty patients (9 females, 31 males) with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture were enrolled in this prospective study. Patients were randomized to two groups, 1) ACLR using a hamstring tendon autograft (n = 20) or 2) ACLR using artificial LARS (n = 20). Proprioception was assessed with knee joint position sense (JPS) passive-passive test at 45° and 75° flexions, with the contralateral healthy knee as a control baseline to calculate the JPS error. Knee JPS absolute error was used as the main outcome variable and defined as the absolute difference between the reproduction and target angles. RESULTS JPS error in both groups at 3 months after ACLR was significantly higher than that at 12 months. However, no significant difference in JPS error was detected between the LARS and autograft groups at either 3 or 12 months after ACLR. Analyzing JPS data by grouping patients according to whether ACLR was performed more or less than 1 year following injury regardless of graft type showed a statistically significant difference between the groups at 3 months, but not at 12 months, after ACLR. Patients receiving the graft within 1 year of injury had a lower JPS error than those receiving the graft more than 1 year after injury at 3 months. No complications were associated with either ACLR method. CONCLUSION ACLR with a hamstring tendon autograft or LARS artificial graft is similarly safe and effective for recovering knee proprioception.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Changli Xu
- grid.73113.370000 0004 0369 1660Department of Orthopedics, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433 People’s Republic of China ,Department of Orthopedics, The Third Affiliated to the Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai, 201805 People’s Republic of China ,The fifth Outpatients Department, The 980th Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force, Shijiazhuang, 050083 People’s Republic of China
| | - Tianze Liu
- grid.73113.370000 0004 0369 1660Department of Orthopedics, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433 People’s Republic of China
| | - Miao Wang
- grid.73113.370000 0004 0369 1660Department of Orthopedics, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433 People’s Republic of China ,Department of Orthopedics, The Third Affiliated to the Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai, 201805 People’s Republic of China
| | - Chang Liu
- grid.73113.370000 0004 0369 1660Department of Orthopedics, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433 People’s Republic of China ,Department of Orthopedics, The 900th Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force, Fuzhou, Fujian Province 350025 People’s Republic of China
| | - Bo Li
- grid.73113.370000 0004 0369 1660Department of Orthopedics, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433 People’s Republic of China
| | - Qiujian Lian
- grid.73113.370000 0004 0369 1660Department of Orthopedics, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433 People’s Republic of China
| | - Tongjiang Chen
- grid.73113.370000 0004 0369 1660Department of Orthopedics, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433 People’s Republic of China
| | - Fengmei Chen
- Department of Orthopedics, The Third Affiliated to the Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai, 201805 People’s Republic of China
| | - Suchi Qiao
- Department of Orthopedics, The Third Affiliated to the Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai, 201805 People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhiwei Wang
- grid.73113.370000 0004 0369 1660Department of Orthopedics, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433 People’s Republic of China ,Department of Orthopedics, The Third Affiliated to the Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai, 201805 People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Primary repair with suture augmentation for proximal anterior cruciate ligament tears: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Knee 2022; 38:19-29. [PMID: 35870397 DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2022.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Revised: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the outcomes of arthroscopic primary repair of proximal anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears with suture augmentation in the literature. METHODS A systematic search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane for studies reporting on outcomes of primary repair of proximal ACL tears with suture augmentation between 2015 and 2021. Primary outcomes included failure and reoperation rates, whereas secondary outcomes consisted of functional outcomes. Proportion meta-analysis was performed to assess the overall incidence of failure rates. Outcomes of adults and adolescent were reported separately. RESULTS Thirteen studies with 418 patients were included in this study (mean age 32 years, mean follow-up 2.0 years, 49% male). There were no randomized studies and overall grade of recommendation was weak. Overall failure rate for primary repair with suture augmentation was 8% (95% CI 3.9-14.4), but this was higher for younger patients (17%; 95% CI 2.5-63.9) than for older patients (6%; 95% CI 3.8-8.9). The risk for additional reoperations, complications, or hardware removal was low (all <2%), while functional outcomes were good to excellent (all >80% of maximum score). CONCLUSION Current literature shows that primary repair with suture augmentation is a reliable treatment option for proximal ACL tears with a failure rate of 8% and good functional outcome scores at short-term follow-up. Although functional outcomes were good irrespective of age, failure rates were higher in young patients (17% vs 6%, respectively). There is a need for high-quality comparative studies with large group of patients to compare these outcomes with ACL reconstruction.
Collapse
|
12
|
Hong CK, Liu ZW, Hsu KL, Kuan FC, Yang JF, Su WR. A novel home-based rehabilitative knee brace system is a viable option for postoperative rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a report of 15 cases. J Exp Orthop 2022; 9:96. [PMID: 36149519 PMCID: PMC9508297 DOI: 10.1186/s40634-022-00538-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To investigate the functional outcomes for patients who used a novel home-based rehabilitative system during the postoperative period after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions. Methods Patients undergoing ACL reconstruction surgeries were prospectively enrolled. A home-based rehabilitation system, which is composed of a knee brace with a motion tracker, a mobile app, and a web portal, was applied. Patients could complete the rehabilitation exercise through the audio guidance and the real-time tracking system which displayed the achieved motions on the user interface of the app. Feedbacks from the patients, including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, were collected and uploaded to the web portal. Each patient would meet a specialized physical therapist face-to-face once a month. At postoperative 6 months, every patient received a GNRB arthrometer examination and a Cybex isokinetic dynamometer examination. Results A total of 15 patients (10 males and 5 females) were enrolled and followed for at least 6 months. The mean time of return to full knee extension was 1.5 months. The mean difference in laxity measured by GNRB arthrometer at 134 N significantly improved at postoperative 6 months (1.8 ± 1.6 mm) compared to that measured preoperatively (3.4 ± 1.9 mm) (p = 0.024). The peak torques of flexor and extensor muscles measured by Cybex isokinetic dynamometer remained unchanged at postoperative 6 months (p = 0.733 and 0.394, respectively). The patients’ IKDC score became smaller at postoperative 1 month (p = 0.011) and significantly improved at postoperative 6 months (p = 0.002). Conclusion Using a home-based rehabilitative knee brace system after ACL reconstruction is a viable option as patients maintained their knee muscle strengths maintained their muscle strength and achieve similar or better knee range of motion six months postoperatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chih-Kai Hong
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, No.138, Sheng-Li Road, Tainan City, 70428, Taiwan.,Skeleton Materials and Bio-Compatibility Core Lab, Research Center of Clinical Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Zhao-Wei Liu
- Physical Therapy Center, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Kai-Lan Hsu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, No.138, Sheng-Li Road, Tainan City, 70428, Taiwan.,Skeleton Materials and Bio-Compatibility Core Lab, Research Center of Clinical Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Fa-Chuan Kuan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, No.138, Sheng-Li Road, Tainan City, 70428, Taiwan.,Skeleton Materials and Bio-Compatibility Core Lab, Research Center of Clinical Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Jeng-Feng Yang
- Physical Therapy Center, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.,Department of Physical Therapy, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Ren Su
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, No.138, Sheng-Li Road, Tainan City, 70428, Taiwan. .,Skeleton Materials and Bio-Compatibility Core Lab, Research Center of Clinical Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan. .,Musculoskeletal Research Center, Innovation Headquarter, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Pang L, Li P, Li T, Li Y, Zhu J, Tang X. Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Versus Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies. Front Surg 2022; 9:887522. [PMID: 35521430 PMCID: PMC9066561 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.887522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair and autograft ACL reconstruction for ACL ruptures. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science and The Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies from 1 January 1990 to 21 March 2022. Two evaluators independently screened the literature, extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of the enrolled studies. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software. Results Ten studies with mean follow-up periods from 12 to 36 months were included. For 638 patients with ACL ruptures, arthroscopic ACL repair showed statistically comparable outcomes of failure (p = 0.18), complications (p = 0.29), reoperation other than revision (p = 0.78), Lysholm score (p = 0.78), Tegner score (p = 0.70), and satisfaction (p = 0.45) when compared with autograft ACL reconstruction. A significantly higher rate of hardware removal (p = 0.0008) but greater International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score (p = 0.009) were found in the ACL repair group. The heterogeneity of the side-to-side difference of anterior tibial translation (ΔATT) was high (I 2 = 80%). After the sensitivity analysis, the I 2 decreased dramatically (I 2 = 32%), and the knees with ACL repair showed significantly greater ΔATT (P = 0.04). Conclusion For proximal ACL ruptures, arthroscopic ACL repair showed similar clinical outcomes, and even better functional performance when compared to autograft ACL reconstruction. ACL repair has a higher rate of hardware removal, and might be related to greater asymptomatic knee laxity. More high-quality prospective trials are needed to confirm our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Long Pang
- Department of Orthopedics, Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Pengcheng Li
- Department of Orthopedics, Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Tao Li
- Department of Orthopedics, Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yinghao Li
- Department of Orthopedics, Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jing Zhu
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xin Tang
- Department of Orthopedics, Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|