Effect of the Osteotomy Inclination Angle in the Sagittal Plane on the Posterior Tibial Slope of the Tibiofemoral Joint in Medial Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy: Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Analysis

Effect of the sagittal osteotomy inclination angle on the posterior tibial slope change in high tibial osteotomy: three-dimensional simulation study

In performing medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy, it is recommended not to alter the posterior tibial slope. However, it remains unclear whether the osteotomy inclination angle affects the posterior tibial slope in the sagittal plane. This study aimed to verify how anterior or posterior osteotomy inclination angle affects the tendency of change in the posterior tibial slope and to conduct quantitative analysis of the extent to which the posterior tibial slope changes according to the degree of the osteotomy inclination angle change in MOWHTO. Computed tomography images of 30 patients who underwent MOWHTO were collected. Three-dimensional models of preoperative original tibia were reconstructed, and virtual osteotomies were performed. The sagittal osteotomy inclination angles formed by the osteotomy line and the medial tibial plateau line were classified as positive in case of anteriorly inclined osteotomy and negative in case of posteriorly inclined osteotomy. Thirteen osteotomies were performed for each tibial model at intervals of 5° from - 30° to 30°. The posterior tibial slope was assessed, and the proportional relationship between the sagittal osteotomy inclination angle and the posterior tibial slope change was analyzed. The posterior tibial slope changed significantly after osteotomy (p < 0.001), except for the cases where the sagittal osteotomy inclination angles were 5°, 0°, and - 5°. Anteriorly and posteriorly inclined osteotomy caused increase and decrease in the posterior tibial slope, respectively. As the inclination angle increased by 1°, the posterior tibial slope increased by 0.079° in anterior inclination osteotomy, while in posterior inclination osteotomy, as the inclination angle decreased by 1°, the posterior tibial slope decreased by 0.067°. The osteotomy inclination angle in the sagittal plane significantly affected the posterior tibial slope. When there was an inclination angle occurred between the osteotomy line and the medial tibial plateau line in the sagittal plane, the posterior tibial slope changed after MOWHTO. The posterior tibial slope tended to increase in anteriorly inclined osteotomy and decrease in posteriorly inclined osteotomy. The change in the posterior tibial slope was proportionally related to the absolute value of the osteotomy inclination angle.

Preoperative joint line convergence angle correction is a key factor in optimising accuracy in varus knee correction osteotomy

PURPOSE

This study aimed to identify and prevent preoperative factors that can be influenced in preoperative planning to reduce postoperative malcorrections.

METHODS

The method used in this study was a retrospective two-centre analysis of 78 pre and postoperative fully weight-bearing radiographs of patients who underwent valgus osteotomy correction due to symptomatic medial compartment osteoarthritis. A computer software (TraumaCad^®) was used to aim for an intersection point of the mechanical tibiofemoral axis (mTFA) with the tibia plateau at 55-60% (medial = 0%, lateral = 100%). Postoperative divergence ± 5% of this point was defined as over- and undercorrection. Preoperative joint geometry factors were correlated with postoperative malcorrection. Planning was conducted using the established method described by Miniaci (Group A) and with additional correction of the joint line convergence angle (JLCA) using the formula JLCA-2/2 (Group B). Additionally, in a small clinical case series, planning was conducted with JLCA correction. Statistical analysis was performed using (multiple) linear regression analysis and analysis of variance (ANOVA) with p < 0.05 considered significant.

RESULTS

In 78 analysed cases, postoperative malcorrection was detected in 37.2% (5.1% undercorrection, 32.1% overcorrection). Linear regression analysis revealed preoperative body mass index (BMI, p = 0.04), JLCA (p = 0.0001), and osteotomy level divergence (p = 0.0005) as factors correlated with overcorrection. In a multiple regression analysis, JLCA and osteotomy level divergence remained significant factors. Preoperative JLCA correction reduced the planned osteotomy gap (A 9.7 ± 2.8 mm vs B 8.3 ± 2.4 mm; p > 0.05) and postoperative medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA: A 94.3 ± 2.1° vs B 92.3 ± 1.5°; p < .05) in patients with preoperative JLCA ≥ 4°. The results were validated using a virtual postoperative correction of cases with overcorrection. A case series (n = 8) with a preoperative JLCA > 4 revealed a postoperative accuracy using the JLCA correction of 3.4 ± 1.9%.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative JLCA ≥ 4° and tibial osteotomy level divergence were identified as risk factors for postoperative overcorrection. Preoperative JLCA correction using the formula JLCA-2/2 is proposed to better control ideal postoperative correction and reduce MPTA. The intraoperatively realised osteotomy level should be precisely in accordance with preoperative planning.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, cross-sectional study.