B-Cell-Depleting Therapy Improves Myocarditis in Seronegative Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis

Monocentric study of IL-5 monoclonal antibody induction therapy for eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis

OBJECTIVE

Although sporadic case reports have demonstrated successful management of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) by anti-IL-5 therapy, larger-scale monocentric studies for the efficacy of mepolizumab (MEP), an IL-5 monoclonal antibody, are still lacking in Taiwan.

METHODS

Hospitalized EGPA patients aged at least 18 years were enrolled from November 1998 to October 2023, and analyzed for demographic, clinical, laboratory, medication and outcome data, focusing on the efficacy and safety of biologics use, particularly induction therapy with MEP.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven EGPA patients aged 10-70 years (43 ± 15) at disease diagnosis were recruited with 21 under combined corticosteroids/cyclophosphamide induction therapy. Seventeen patients received biologics with 13 under MEP therapy. Ten patients aged 19-71 years (48 ± 15) completed 12-month induction therapy with a 100 mg quadri-weekly subcutaneous injection regimen indicated for active or relapse disease. There were reduced BVAS with complete remission in 6 and partial remission in 4 patients, lower CRP levels, decreased eosinophil counts with an inhibition of 92∼96 %, and tapered prednisolone dosages from 5 to 25 (13.0 ± 6.3) to 0-10 (3.3 ± 3.1) mg/day. Only one patient had an adverse event of injection site reactions. Nine patients received the same regimen for annual maintenance therapy. All had a persistent clinical remission. In these patients, 13-56 injections (41 ± 15) were prescribed with a follow-up period of 12∼52 months (38 ± 14).

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective study, induction therapy with a 12-month 100 mg MEP quadri-weekly subcutaneous injection regimen demonstrates the efficacy and safety for active and relapsing EGPA patients.

Current Treatment and Immunomodulation Strategies in Acute Myocarditis

ABSTRACT

Myocarditis is an inflammatory disease of the myocardium characterized by a great heterogeneity of presentation and evolution. Treatment of myocarditis is often supportive, and the evidence for immunosuppression is scarce and debated. Conventional treatment is based on clinical presentation, ranging from conservative to advanced mechanical assist devices. In this setting, immunosuppression and immunomodulation therapies are mostly reserved for patients presenting with major clinical syndromes. In this review, we will summarize the current evidence and strategies for conventional and immunosuppressive treatments for patients presenting with acute myocarditis.

Eosinophilic myocarditis: systematic review

OBJECTIVE

In clinical practice, patients with eosinophilic myocarditis (EM) may forgo the gold standard diagnostic procedure, endomyocardial biopsy (EMB), although it is highly recommended in guidelines. This systematic review aims to summarise current approaches in diagnosing and treating EM with a particular emphasis on the utilisation and value of alternative diagnostic methods.

METHODS

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement, we searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for all peer-reviewed articles using the keywords "eosinophilic myocarditis" from their inception to 10 September 2022.

RESULTS

We included 239 articles, including 8 observational studies and 274 cases, in this review. The median patient age was 45 years. Initial presentations were non-specific, including dyspnoea (50.0%) and chest pain (39.4%). The aetiologies of EM were variable with the most common being idiopathic (28.8%) and eosinophilic granulomatosis polyangiitis (19.3%); others included drug-induced (13.1%) and hypereosinophilic syndrome (12.8%). 82.4% received an EM diagnosis by EMB while 17.6% were diagnosed based on clinical reasoning and cardiac MRI (CMR). CMR-diagnosed patients exhibited a better risk profile at diagnosis, particularly higher left ventricular ejection fraction and less need for inotropic or mechanical circulatory supports. Glucocorticoids were the primary treatment with variability in dosages and regimens.

CONCLUSION

EMB is the mainstay for diagnostic testing for EM. CMR is potentially helpful for screening in appropriate clinical scenarios. Regarding treatment, there is no consensus regarding the optimal dosage of corticosteroids. Large clinical trials are warranted to further explore the utility of CMR in the diagnosis of EM and steroid regimen in treating EM.

Eosinophilic myocarditis: comprehensive update on pathophysiology, diagnosis, prognosis and management

Hypereosinophilic syndromes are a group of disorders secondary to the accumulation of eosinophils leading to the injury of one or more organs. Among them, eosinophilic myocarditis (EM) is a rare form of inflammatory cardiomyopathy characterized by eosinophilic infiltration into myocardial tissue and subsequent release of substances with cell membrane damage and cell destruction. The degree of infiltration is thought to depend on the underlying condition, as well as the degree and duration of eosinophil exposure and ranges from mild localized disease to diffuse multifocal infiltrates associated with myocardial necrosis, thrombotic complications and endomyocardial fibrosis. The main causes of EM are hypersensitivity reactions, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, hypereosinophilic syndrome variants, infections and cancer. Clinical presentation can be variable, ranging from asymptomatic forms to life-threatening conditions, to chronic heart failure due to progression to chronic restrictive cardiomyopathy. Marked eosinophilia in peripheral blood, elevated serum eosinophilic cationic protein concentration and multimodality imaging may suggest the etiology of EM, but in most cases an endomyocardial biopsy must be performed to establish a definitive diagnosis. Systemic treatment varies greatly depending on the underlying cause, however the evidence of an eosinophilic infiltrate allows initiation of immunosuppressive therapy, which is the mainstay of treatment in idiopathic and in most forms of EM. Patients with helminthic infection benefit from anti-parasitic therapy, those with myeloid clone often need a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, while anticoagulant therapy should be undertaken in case of possible thrombotic complications.

Autoimmune liver diseases in systemic rheumatic diseases

Systemic rheumatic diseases (SRDs) are chronic, inflammatory, autoimmune disorders with the presence of autoantibodies that may affect any organ or system. Liver dysfunction in SRDs can be associated with prescribed drugs, viral hepatitis, alternative hepatic comorbidities and coexisting autoimmune liver diseases (AILDs), requiring an exclusion of secondary conditions before considering liver involvement. The patterns of overlap diseases depend predominantly on genetic determinants with common susceptible loci widely distributing in both disorders. In AILDs, it is important to identify the overlapping SRDs at an early stage since such a coexistence may influence the disease course and prognosis. Commonly co-occurring SRDs in AILDs are Sjögren syndrome (SS), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), and SS, RA or systemic sclerosis in primary biliary cholangitis. Owing to different disease complications and therapies, it is imperative to differentiate between SLE liver involvement and SLE-AIH overlap disease. Therapeutic options can be personalized to control coexisting conditions of liver autoimmunity and rheumatic manifestations in AILD-SRD overlap diseases. The collaboration between hepatologists and rheumatologists can lead to significant advances in managing such a complex scenario. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview on coexisting AILDs in different SRDs and the therapeutic approach in managing these overlap diseases.