1
|
Mitchell AM, Lensen S, Kamper SJ, Frawley H, Cheng C, Healey M, Chalmers KJ. The most impactful endometriosis symptom: An international, cross-sectional, two-round survey study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2024; 103:1736-1744. [PMID: 39041353 PMCID: PMC11324914 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2024] [Revised: 07/04/2024] [Accepted: 07/05/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is considerable variation in the types of symptoms experienced by people living with endometriosis, and it is unclear which symptoms impact people the most. This study aimed to identify the specific symptoms that are "most impactful" to people living with the condition. MATERIAL AND METHODS Two sequential online surveys were conducted. Women aged over 18 years with a diagnosis of endometriosis were eligible to participate. Participants first provided a free-text list of all the endometriosis symptoms they experienced (Survey 1, Australian only). Responses were condensed into a shorter list by grouping symptom types and selecting the top 20 most common and most impactful. Survey 2 (international) participants reviewed the list and selected all that they had experienced in the last 3 months, nominated one as their single "most impactful symptom", and rated its impact on one of five randomized scale types. RESULTS Survey 1 and Survey 2 had 195 and 983 responses, respectively. The mean age of respondents was 30.8 ± 7.9 years. There were 275 separate symptom descriptions from Survey 1, which were condensed into 104 groups, of which 25 met criteria for inclusion in Survey 2. The most commonly experienced symptoms were abdominal pain (93% of respondents), bloating (92%), and fatigue (90%), and the symptoms nominated as causing the most impact were pelvic pain (20%), abdominal pain (15%), and cramps (7%). Nearly everyone (99.7%) in Survey 2 reported experiencing at least one pain symptom. The symptoms that generated the highest impact scores were infertility (99.8/100), irregular menstrual cycles (95.3/100), and constipation (92/100). The average impact score was 87.5/100. CONCLUSIONS There was substantial variation in the symptom selected as causing the most impact, and the level of impact was high. A focus on measuring the "most impactful symptom" in future research may enable us to better capture and measure the true symptom experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice M Mitchell
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Newborn Health, Royal Women's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sarah Lensen
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Newborn Health, Royal Women's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Steven J Kamper
- School of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Helena Frawley
- School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Claudia Cheng
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Newborn Health, Royal Women's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Martin Healey
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Newborn Health, Royal Women's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Newlife IVF, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia
| | - K Jane Chalmers
- IIMPACT in Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rosenberger DC, Mennicken E, Schmieg I, Medkour T, Pechard M, Sachau J, Fuchtmann F, Birch J, Schnabel K, Vincent K, Baron R, Bouhassira D, Pogatzki-Zahn EM. A systematic literature review on patient-reported outcome domains and measures in nonsurgical efficacy trials related to chronic pain associated with endometriosis: an urgent call to action. Pain 2024:00006396-990000000-00641. [PMID: 38968394 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 07/07/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Endometriosis, a common cause for chronic pelvic pain, significantly affects quality of life, fertility, and overall productivity of those affected. Therapeutic options remain limited, and collating evidence on treatment efficacy is complicated. One reason could be the heterogeneity of assessed outcomes in nonsurgical clinical trials, impeding meaningful result comparisons. This systematic literature review examines outcome domains and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in clinical trials. Through comprehensive search of Embase, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL up until July 2022, we screened 1286 records, of which 191 were included in our analyses. Methodological quality (GRADE criteria), information about publication, patient population, and intervention were assessed, and domains as well as PROMs were extracted and analyzed. In accordance with IMMPACT domain framework, the domain pain was assessed in almost all studies (98.4%), followed by adverse events (73.8%). By contrast, assessment of physical functioning (29.8%), improvement and satisfaction (14.1%), and emotional functioning (6.8%) occurred less frequently. Studies of a better methodological quality tended to use more different domains. Nevertheless, combinations of more than 2 domains were rare, failing to comprehensively capture the bio-psycho-social aspects of endometriosis-associated pain. The PROMs used showed an even broader heterogeneity across all studies. Our findings underscore the large heterogeneity of assessed domains and PROMs in clinical pain-related endometriosis trials. This highlights the urgent need for a standardized approach to both, assessed domains and high-quality PROMs ideally realized through development and implementation of a core outcome set, encompassing the most pivotal domains and PROMs for both, stakeholders and patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Emilia Mennicken
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Iris Schmieg
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Terkia Medkour
- INSERM U987, UVSQ-Paris-Saclay University, Ambroise Paré Hospital, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Marie Pechard
- INSERM U987, UVSQ-Paris-Saclay University, Ambroise Paré Hospital, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Juliane Sachau
- Division of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Fabian Fuchtmann
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Judy Birch
- Pelvic Pain Support Network, Poole, United Kingdom
| | - Kathrin Schnabel
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Katy Vincent
- Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headley Way, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Ralf Baron
- Division of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Didier Bouhassira
- INSERM U987, UVSQ-Paris-Saclay University, Ambroise Paré Hospital, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Esther Miriam Pogatzki-Zahn
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abbott J, Billow M, Gallant T, Hackett L, Kho RM, Knapman B, Russo MAL, Maheux-Lacroix S, Gonzalez AM, Ng C, Orlando MS, Sit A, Xu X. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Used in Randomized Controlled Trials Following Surgical Intervention for Endometriosis: A Structured Review from the AAGL Practice Guidelines Group. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2024; 31:71-83.e17. [PMID: 37931893 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2023.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2023] [Revised: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE No consensus currently exists regarding patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) instruments. This structured review was conducted to identify the PROMs used by randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated surgical treatment in patients with endometriosis. DATA SOURCES Two parallel searches were conducted by a medical librarian using Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and Cochrane Library for RCTs published from 2000 to July 2022. One search focused on studies reporting quality of life (QoL), and the second search focused on studies reporting pain and sexual, bowel, and bladder function. METHOD OF STUDY SELECTION During the title and abstract screening and reference check, 600 results were identified on PROMs relating to QoL and 465 studies on PROMs relating to pain and sexual, bowel, and/or bladder function and an evaluation of 17 and 12 studies conducted, respectively. The inclusion criteria involved selecting RCTs that focused on surgical intervention and assessing QoL, pain, and sexual, bowel, and/or bladder function using PROMs. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS Covidence software was used to organize and identify duplicate articles through screening. We developed a data extraction form to collect key information about each included study, as well as the pertinent PROMs used in the study. Assessment of the risk of bias of each study was also performed. A total of 19 studies were identified involving 2089 participants and a total of 16 PROMs used across the studies; 9 of 19 studies (47%) were rated as having a low risk of bias. There were no high-risk studies identified in this review. CONCLUSION This study identified a large number of RCTs in surgical treatment of endometriosis that used various PROMs to assess QoL, pain, and bladder, bowel, and sexual function. The PROMs used by high-quality RCTs for QoL include Endometriosis Health Profile-30, Endometriosis Health Profile-5, Short-Form 36, Short-Form 12, and EQ-5D; for bowel-related symptoms Knowles-Eccersley-Scott-Symptom Questionnaire, Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index, and Cleveland Clinic Fecal Incontinence Severity Scoring System/Wexner; for bladder-related function Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, International Prostate Symptom Score, Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire, and Urinary Symptom Profile; and finally for sexual function Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire and Sexual Activity Questionnaire. Unlike other domains, only one tool (visual analog scale) was the dominant PROM used for the assessment of pain. In addition, the use of more than one PROM in each study to assess different aspects of patient's health and pain symptoms did not become prevalent until after 2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Abbott
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Clinical Medicine, Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, NSW, Australia (Drs. Abbott, Knapman, Gonzalez, and Ng); Gynaecological Research and Clinical Evaluation Unit, Royal Hospital for Women, Randwick, NSW, Australia (Drs. Abbott, Knapman, Gonzalez, and Ng and Ms. Sit)
| | - Megan Billow
- Women's Health Institute (Drs. Billow, Gallant, and Luna Russo)
| | - Thomas Gallant
- Women's Health Institute (Drs. Billow, Gallant, and Luna Russo)
| | - Loren Hackett
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH (Dr. Hackett); AAGL Practice Guidelines Committee, in-house team (Drs. Hackett, Kho, and Xu)
| | - Rosanne M Kho
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Arizona Phoenix/Banner University Medical Center Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ (Dr. Kho); AAGL Practice Guidelines Committee, in-house team (Drs. Hackett, Kho, and Xu)..
| | - Blake Knapman
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Clinical Medicine, Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, NSW, Australia (Drs. Abbott, Knapman, Gonzalez, and Ng); Gynaecological Research and Clinical Evaluation Unit, Royal Hospital for Women, Randwick, NSW, Australia (Drs. Abbott, Knapman, Gonzalez, and Ng and Ms. Sit)
| | | | | | - Adriana Meneses Gonzalez
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Clinical Medicine, Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, NSW, Australia (Drs. Abbott, Knapman, Gonzalez, and Ng); Gynaecological Research and Clinical Evaluation Unit, Royal Hospital for Women, Randwick, NSW, Australia (Drs. Abbott, Knapman, Gonzalez, and Ng and Ms. Sit)
| | - Cecilia Ng
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Clinical Medicine, Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, NSW, Australia (Drs. Abbott, Knapman, Gonzalez, and Ng); Gynaecological Research and Clinical Evaluation Unit, Royal Hospital for Women, Randwick, NSW, Australia (Drs. Abbott, Knapman, Gonzalez, and Ng and Ms. Sit)
| | - Megan S Orlando
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO (Dr. Orlando)
| | - Andrea Sit
- Gynaecological Research and Clinical Evaluation Unit, Royal Hospital for Women, Randwick, NSW, Australia (Drs. Abbott, Knapman, Gonzalez, and Ng and Ms. Sit)
| | - Xiao Xu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yale University, New Haven, CT (Dr. Xu); AAGL Practice Guidelines Committee, in-house team (Drs. Hackett, Kho, and Xu)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nicolas‐Boluda A, Le Roux E, Tavenet A, Bouaziz J, Vercellini P, Stratton P, Fauconnier A. Developing a set of patient-centered outcomes for routine use in endometriosis: An international Delphi study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2024; 103:138-152. [PMID: 37905359 PMCID: PMC10755132 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/30/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is large variation in individual patient care for endometriosis. A uniform approach to measure outcomes could be incorporated into routine clinical practice to personalize and monitor treatments and potentially improve the quality of care. The aim of this study is to identify a group of patient-centered outcomes for use in routine endometriosis care which are relevant to all patient profiles. MATERIAL AND METHODS By means of a modified two-round Delphi study with international representation including healthcare professionals, researchers and patient representatives (51 participants, 16 countries) we developed a set of patient-centered measurements. The participants evaluated 47 Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) and 30 Clinician Reported Outcome Measures (CROMs) regarding their feasibility and relevance for their use in routine endometriosis care. After the two rounds of quotation, meetings of the experts were convened to participate in a final discussion to finalize the consensus of the final set of included measures. RESULTS The final set of patient-centered outcomes includes six PROMs (measuring symptomatic impact, pain, work productivity and quality of life) and 10 CROMs (measuring clinical, imaging and surgical indicators). A supplementary list of outcomes was added to include important dimensions that were considered essential by the expert panel but are not relevant to all patients. In addition the need for development of specific tools (PROMs) measuring the psychological impact and the impact in sexual activity of endometriosis was highlighted. CONCLUSIONS We have developed a set of patient-centered outcomes measures in endometriosis care. The selected outcomes comprise the common features for all patients suffering from endometriosis. adapted for use in routine practice. The list of outcomes has been adapted for use in routine practice from which clinicians can chose, depending on their needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alba Nicolas‐Boluda
- One ClinicParisFrance
- European Association of Value‐Based Health CareBrusselsBelgium
| | - Enora Le Roux
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Hôpital Universitaire Robert DebréAP‐HP Nord‐Université de Paris, Inserm, CIC 1426ParisFrance
- ECEVE UMR 1123Université de Paris, InsermParisFrance
| | | | | | - Paolo Vercellini
- Gynecology UnitFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore PoliclinicoMilanItaly
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community HealthUniversity of MilanMilanItaly
| | - Pamela Stratton
- Office of the Clinical Director, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institutes of HealthBethesdaMarylandUSA
| | - Arnaud Fauconnier
- Research Unit 7285 Clinical Risks and Safety in Women's Health and Perinatal Health (RISCQ), UVSQUniversité Paris‐SaclayMontigny‐le‐BretonneuxFrance
- Gynecology and Obstetrics DepartmentCentre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Poissy‐Saint‐Germain‐en‐LayePoissyFrance
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rashid R, Copelli S, Silverstein JC, Becich MJ. REDCap and the National Mesothelioma Virtual Bank-a scalable and sustainable model for rare disease biorepositories. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2023; 30:1634-1644. [PMID: 37487555 PMCID: PMC10531116 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocad132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Revised: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Rare disease research requires data sharing networks to power translational studies. We describe novel use of Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap), a web application for managing clinical data, by the National Mesothelioma Virtual Bank, a federated biospecimen, and data sharing network. MATERIALS AND METHODS National Mesothelioma Virtual Bank (NMVB) uses REDCap to integrate honest broker activities, enabling biospecimen and associated clinical data provisioning to investigators. A Web Portal Query tool was developed to source and visualize REDCap data in interactive, faceted search, enabling cohort discovery by public users. An AWS Lambda function behind an API calculates the counts visually presented, while protecting record level data. The user-friendly interface, quick responsiveness, automatic generation from REDCap, and flexibility to new data, was engineered to sustain the NMVB research community. RESULTS NMVB implementations enabled a network of 8 research institutions with over 2000 mesothelioma cases, including clinical annotations and biospecimens, and public users' cohort discovery and summary statistics. NMVB usage and impact is demonstrated by high website visits (>150 unique queries per month), resource use requests (>50 letter of interests), and citations (>900) to papers published using NMVB resources. DISCUSSION NMVB's REDCap implementation and query tool is a framework for implementing federated and integrated rare disease biobanks and registries. Advantages of this framework include being low-cost, modular, scalable, and efficient. Future advances to NVMB's implementations will include incorporation of -omics data and development of downstream analysis tools to advance mesothelioma and rare disease research. CONCLUSION NVMB presents a framework for integrating biobanks and patient registries to enable translational research for rare diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rumana Rashid
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Pittsburgh-Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Susan Copelli
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jonathan C Silverstein
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Michael J Becich
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Edgley K, Horne AW, Saunders PTK, Tsanas A. Symptom tracking in endometriosis using digital technologies: Knowns, unknowns, and future prospects. Cell Rep Med 2023; 4:101192. [PMID: 37729869 PMCID: PMC10518625 DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Revised: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
Endometriosis is a common chronic pain condition with no known cure and limited treatment options. Digital technologies, ranging from smartphone apps to wearable sensors, have shown potential toward facilitating chronic pain assessment and management; however, to date, many of these tools have not been specifically deployed or evaluated in patients with endometriosis-associated pain. Informed by previous studies in related chronic pain conditions, we discuss how digital technologies may be used in endometriosis to facilitate objective, continuous, and holistic symptom tracking. We postulate that these pervasive and increasingly affordable technologies present promising opportunities toward developing decision-support tools assisting healthcare professionals and empowering patients with endometriosis to make better-informed choices about symptom management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Edgley
- EXPPECT and MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4UU, Scotland, UK.
| | - Andrew W Horne
- EXPPECT and MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4UU, Scotland, UK
| | - Philippa T K Saunders
- Centre for Inflammation Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4UU, Scotland, UK
| | - Athanasios Tsanas
- Usher Institute, Edinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4UX, Scotland, UK; Alan Turing Institute, London NW1 2DB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Feenstra MM, Kidholm K, Rudnicki M. Use of patient reported outcome measures in daily clinical practice - A way to optimize treatment of patients? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2023; 102:404-405. [PMID: 36906816 PMCID: PMC10008266 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2022] [Revised: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 03/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Monberg Feenstra
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Faculty of Health Science, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Kristian Kidholm
- Centre of Innovative Medical Technology (CIMT), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Martin Rudnicki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Faculty of Health Science, Department of Clinical Research, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Scanferla E, de Bienassis K, Pachoud B, Gorwood P. How subjective well-being, patient-reported clinical improvement (PROMs) and experience of care (PREMs) relate in an acute psychiatric care setting? Eur Psychiatry 2023; 66:e26. [PMID: 36797203 PMCID: PMC10044307 DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) are increasingly acknowledged as critical tools for enhancing patient-centred, value-based care. However, research is lacking on the impact of using standardized patient-reported indicators in acute psychiatric care. The aim of this study was to explore whether subjective well-being indicators (generic PROMs) are relevant for evaluating the quality of hospital care, distinct from measures of symptom improvement (disease-specific PROMs) and from PREMs. METHODS Two hundred and forty-eight inpatients admitted to a psychiatric university hospital were included in the study between January and June 2021. Subjective well-being was assessed using standardized generic PROMs on well-being, symptom improvement was assessed using standardized disease-specific PROMs, and experience of care using PREMs. PROMs were completed at admission and discharge, PREMs were completed at discharge. Clinicians rated their experience of providing treatment using adapted PREMs items. RESULTS Change in subjective well-being (PROMs) at discharge was significantly (p < 0.001), but moderately (r2 = 28.5%), correlated to improvement in symptom outcomes, and weakly correlated to experience of care (PREMs) (r2 = 11.0%), the latter being weakly explained by symptom changes (r2 = 6.9%). Patients and clinicians assessed the experience of care differently. CONCLUSIONS This study supports the case for routinely measuring patients' subjective well-being to better capture the unmet needs of patients undergoing psychiatric hospital treatment, and the use of standardized patient-reported measures as key indicators of high quality of care across mental health services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabetta Scanferla
- CMME, GHU Paris Psychiatrie et Neurosciences, Hôpital Sainte-Anne, Paris, France.,Université Paris Cité, ED 450, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Philip Gorwood
- CMME, GHU Paris Psychiatrie et Neurosciences, Hôpital Sainte-Anne, Paris, France.,Université Paris Cité, INSERM, U1266 (Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris), Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Harrison NJ, Lopez AA, Shroder MM, Bachmann JM, Burnell E, Hopkins MB, Geiger TM, Hawkins AT. Collection and Utilization of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in a Colorectal Surgery Clinic. J Surg Res 2022; 280:515-525. [PMID: 36081311 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.07.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The routine collection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) promises to improve patient care. However, in colorectal surgery, PROMs are uncommonly collected outside of clinical research studies and rarely used in clinical care. We designed and implemented a quality improvement project with the goals of routinely collecting PROMs and increasing the frequency that PROMs are utilized by colorectal surgeons in clinical practice. METHODS This mixed-methods, quality improvement project was conducted in the colorectal surgery clinic of a tertiary academic medical center. Patients were administered up to five PROMs before each appointment. PROM completion rates were measured. Additionally, we performed two educational interventions to increase utilization of our electronic health record's PROM dashboard by colorectal surgeons. Utilization rates and attitudes toward the PROM dashboard were measured. RESULTS Overall, patients completed 3600 of 3977 (90.9%) administered PROMs during the study period. At baseline, colorectal surgeons reviewed 6.7% of completed PROMs. After two educational interventions, this increased to 39.3% (P = 0.004). Colorectal surgeons also felt that the PROM dashboard was easier to use. Barriers to greater PROM dashboard utilization included poor user interface/user experience and a perceived lack of knowledge, time, and relevance. CONCLUSIONS The collection of PROMs in colorectal surgery clinics is feasible and can result in high PROM completion rates. Educational interventions can improve the utilization of PROMs by colorectal surgeons in clinical practice. Our experience collecting PROMs through this quality improvement initiative can serve as a template for other colorectal surgery clinics interested in collecting and utilizing data from PROMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noah J Harrison
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Andrea A Lopez
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Megan M Shroder
- Division of General Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Section of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Justin M Bachmann
- Medicine Service, Veterans Affairs Tennessee Valley Healthcare System; Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Emily Burnell
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Population Health, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Michael B Hopkins
- Division of General Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Section of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Timothy M Geiger
- Division of General Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Section of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Alexander T Hawkins
- Division of General Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Section of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Nashville, Tennessee.
| |
Collapse
|