A Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Outcome and Predictive Factors for Responders with Knee Osteoarthritis to a Single Injection of Leukocyte-Poor Platelet-Rich Plasma

Prognostic Factors in Intra-articular Platelet-Rich Plasma Treatment for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Comparative Analysis of Responders and Nonresponders

BACKGROUND

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a chronic joint disease affecting activities of daily living (ADL) and quality of life due to pain and limited range of motion, afflicting a large number of patients worldwide. However, it is difficult to prevent the progression of the disease. Therapeutic strategies for KOA aim to maintain ADL and QOL by alleviating pain or managing locomotive function. Recently, intra-articular injection of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been gaining attention. In this study, the clinical results of PRP treatment in our institution were reported and compared between responders and non-responders using patient characteristics and imaging data assessed from plain X-rays and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

Participants in the study were KOA patients with varus deformity assessed as grade 2 or higher in the Kellgren-Lawrence classification who received PRP treatment from January 2022 to November 2023 and were followed up for at least three months. PRP was prepared with 27 mL of blood collected from the patient, and 2.7 mL of PRP was prepared using the PEAK©︎PRP System from DePuy Synthes (Raynham, MA). Intra-articular injections of PRP were performed under echo-guided procedures, and responders or non-responders were determined using the Osteoarthritis Research Society International Standing Committee for Clinical Trials Response Criteria Initiative (OMERACT-OARSI) criteria evaluated by the Japanese Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (J-KOOS) at three months after PRP injection. The clinical efficacy of PRP treatment for KOA was assessed in this study, and a dichotomous analysis was performed comparing the responder group and the non-responder group using patient characteristics and assessed data from plain X-ray images and MRI to determine prognostic factors for PRP treatment.

RESULTS

The study population included 36 knees with a mean age of 70.6. ± 9.2 years, comprising six knees in men and 30 knees in women. The responder group consisted of 16 knees (44.4%), and the non-responder group consisted of 20 knees (55.6%). J-KOOS subscores at pre-treatment elicited that each subscale in the R group was significantly lower than that in the NR group at pretreatment. A dichotomous analysis for the two groups revealed the distribution of sex and past medical history of hyperlipidemia to be significantly different between the two groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the coexistence of hyperlipidemia was the main prognostic factor for the efficacy of PRP therapy.

DISCUSSION

In this study, comparisons were conducted between responders and non-responders to estimate prognostic factors for the efficacy of PRP therapy. Surprisingly, responders to the treatment tended to show lower J-KOOS scores and to have hyperlipidemia. A literature review revealed conflicting reports on prognostic factors for PRP therapy in KOA, highlighting the need for further research.

Long term improvement of knee osteoarthritis after injection of single high/very high volume of very pure PRP: A retrospective analysis of patients optimally managed in dedicated centers

Introduction

PRP is gaining increasing interest for pain relief and improvement of joint function in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) but practices and results remain heterogeneous limiting its adoption as standard of care. Current international recommendations are to collect real-life evidence of efficacy with a systematic monitoring of PRP quality and patients' outcomes. We aimed to analyze the response of patients presenting KOA and treated with standardized PRP injection in routine care. We also investigated the potential contributing factors including patient's phenotype and PRP characteristics.

Methods

Patients with symptomatic KOA and that failed first-line therapy received a single injection of a qualified PRP prepared using medical devices allowing to recover a high/very high volume of very pure PRP. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score were recorded at baseline and during 18 months follow-up.

Results

431 patients had available follow-up data at 3 months, 291 at 6 months, 137 at 12 months and 44 at 18 months. PRP induced a significant decrease of WOMAC score at all follow up endpoints (29.2 ± 19.2 at 3 months, p < 0.001 and 25.9 ± 19.7 at 12 months, p < 0.01, compared to 39.7 ± 18.9 at baseline). Similar results were observed for pain VAS (38.9 ± 23.3 at 3 months, p < 0.001 and 35.3 ± 24.1 at 12 months, p < 0.05, compared to 56.0 ± 20.7 at baseline). Changes at 12 months were correlated to baseline scores and to the level of improvement at 3 months. The proportion of OMERACT OARSI responders reached 56.2 % for the total cohort and 60.4 % for severe patients at 6 months. Treatment failure occurred for 8.4 % of patients. Age, BMI or Kellgren-Lawrence grade did not impact on efficacy.

Conclusion

This real-life study evidences the clinical benefit of a standardized high or very high-volume injection of very pure PRP in patients with KOA, including those with a severe grade. It opens perspectives in the positioning of such strategy to delay arthroplasty and provide insights on factors able to anticipate long term efficacy.

Freeze-dried noncoagulating platelet-derived factor concentrate is a safe and effective treatment for early knee osteoarthritis

PURPOSE

While a wide variety of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) solutions has been developed, innovation continues. In this case, the freeze-dried platelet factor concentrate (PFC-FD) represents another step in PRP refinement. The preparation of PFC-FD at a central laboratory with freeze drying for shelf stabilization should provide additional quality improvements if clinical effectiveness can be demonstrated. Therefore, this study was undertaken to assess the safety and effectiveness of PFC-FD in a prospective open-label trial of patients suffering from knee osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

312 consecutive knee OA patients (67% female, mean age 63 ± 10 years), were prospectively recruited in an outpatient knee clinic in Japan. Of these, 10 (3.2%) were lost to follow-up at < 12 months and 17 (5.5%) sought additional knee therapy during the follow-up period. The primary outcome of interest was achievement of the OMERACT-OARSI responder criteria with secondary outcomes of adverse events and PROMs scores 1, 3, 6, 12 months following a single PFC-FD injection.

RESULTS

285 patients (91%) completed 12 month PROMs. The 17 who sought additional therapy were considered failures leaving an effective sample size of 302 for our primary outcome in which 62% of patients achieved OMERACT-OARSI responder status by 12 months. This varied by OA class with Kellgren-Lawrence grade 4 patients 3.6 times less likely to be responders than grade 1-2 patients. 6% of patients experienced a non-serious adverse event, primarily pain or swelling at the injection site.

CONCLUSIONS

PFC-FD provides an observable clinical improvement in 62% of knee OA patients at 12 months post-injection with very little risk of any clinically relevant adverse event. Of course, nearly 40% of patients did not experience an observable clinical improvement, primarily among those with worse KL grades.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, Level II.

Platelet-Rich Plasma for Knee Osteoarthritis: What Does the Evidence Say?

The utilization of platelet-rich-plasma as a therapeutic intervention for knee osteoarthritis has gained immense attention since 2008. The increase in the number of scientific publications dedicated to this area can be attributed to the majority of favorable results reported in clinical trials and basic science studies. However, despite the growing evidence, the use of platelet-rich plasma in clinical practice still poses controversial aspects. The potential mechanisms of action described for platelet-rich-plasma so far indicate that it could serve as a disease-modifying drug, acting to counteract important aspects of knee osteoarthritis pathophysiology (cartilage breakdown, inflammation, and bone remodeling). Nevertheless, its efficacy in slowing down the progression of knee osteoarthritis remains unproven. While inconsistencies have been noted, the majority of controlled clinical trials and meta-analyses advocate for the utilization of platelet-rich-plasma in treating knee osteoarthritis, as it has demonstrated greater efficacy than hyaluronic acid and placebo, with a follow-up of at least 1 year. Despite advancements made in certain areas, significant diversity persists regarding the formulations used, therapeutic regimen, extended follow-up periods, patient selection, and assessment of clinically relevant outcomes. Consequently, the leading clinical practice guidelines do not recommend its use. In light of the emerging evidence, this narrative review aims to provide an objective evaluation of the recent available scientific literature (last 5 years) focused on randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses to present a current overview of the topic.

A comparison of different physical stimulation combined with platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) contains various growth factors and inflammatory regulators, which can effectively reduce inflammation in joints and promote tissue repair. Multiple studies have proved its effectiveness in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) are non-invasive and safe physical therapy methods for KOA. This study is the first to propose the treatment of KOA with physical stimulation after PRP treatment, and to observe the clinical efficacy of the treatment method.

METHODS

This is a protocol paper that outlines a randomized controlled trial, patients will be assigned randomly to the PRP group, PRP+LIFU group, PRP+TENS group, and PRP+LIFU combined TENS group. The patients will be followed at 12-week and 24-week time points to evaluate the primary and secondary outcomes of the study. The primary outcome is the VAS pain score. Secondary outcomes include Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and International Knee Documentation Committee scores (IKDC). After baseline examination, all patients will sign a written informed consent for study participation after a full explanation of the treatment protocol. We have planned a total of 120 patients (30 patients per group).

DISCUSSION

The objective of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effect of different physical stimulation after PRP treatment for KOA. The data will be published after the completion of the study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study has been registered with the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2200065119 (registered date: 10/28/2022).

Temporomandibular Joint Osteoarthritis: Pathogenic Mechanisms Involving the Cartilage and Subchondral Bone, and Potential Therapeutic Strategies for Joint Regeneration

The temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is a specialized synovial joint that is crucial for the movement and function of the jaw. TMJ osteoarthritis (TMJ OA) is the result of disc dislocation, trauma, functional overburden, and developmental anomalies. TMJ OA affects all joint structures, including the articular cartilage, synovium, subchondral bone, capsule, ligaments, periarticular muscles, and sensory nerves that innervate the tissues. The present review aimed to illustrate the main pathomechanisms involving cartilage and bone changes in TMJ OA and some therapeutic options that have shown potential restorative properties regarding these joint structures in vivo. Chondrocyte loss, extracellular matrix (ECM) degradation, and subchondral bone remodeling are important factors in TMJ OA. The subchondral bone actively participates in TMJ OA through an abnormal bone remodeling initially characterized by a loss of bone mass, followed by reparative mechanisms that lead to stiffness and thickening of the condylar osteochondral interface. In recent years, such therapies as intraarticular platelet-rich plasma (PRP), hyaluronic acid (HA), and mesenchymal stem cell-based treatment (MSCs) have shown promising results with respect to the regeneration of joint structures or the protection against further damage in TMJ OA. Nevertheless, PRP and MSCs are more frequently associated with cartilage and/or bone repair than HA. According to recent findings, the latter could enhance the restorative potential of other therapies (PRP, MSCs) when used in combination, rather than repair TMJ structures by itself. TMJ OA is a complex disease in which degenerative changes in the cartilage and bone develop through intricate mechanisms. The regenerative potential of such therapies as PRP, MSCs, and HA regarding the cartilage and subchondral bone (alone or in various combinations) in TMJ OA remains a matter of further research, with studies sometimes obtaining discrepant results.

Intra-Articular Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Review of Their Current Molecular Mechanisms of Action and Their Degree of Efficacy

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is estimated to affect more than 10% of the population, with a lifetime risk of 45%. Contemporary guidelines advise control of body weight, therapeutic physical exercise, drug treatment (oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, paracetamol, opioids), and mechanical aids (walking aids, braces, orthoses). Nevertheless, these treatments typically have only short-term benefits. Intra-articular corticosteroids are typically advised, but only for short-term pain alleviation, given that their benefits last only a few weeks. The efficacy of hyaluronic acid is controversial. When the aforesaid options fail, total knee arthroplasty is generally recommended as an efficacious treatment. However, it is costly and can involve medical and postoperative complications. Therefore, determining alternate safe and effective treatments for knee OA is paramount. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has lately been investigated for the treatment of knee OA. This article reviews recent knowledge concerning PRP’s molecular mechanisms of action. The effectiveness of intra-articular PRP injections in the knee joint remains controversial, although most recent publications show pain alleviation in the short term. Orthopedic surgeons treating people with knee OA are becoming increasingly interested in PRP, despite indecisive clinical data and basic science information. Further studies comparing PRP with placebo are required.

Efficacy of Intra-Articular Injection of Platelet-Rich Plasma Combined with Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study systematically evaluated the effect of intra-articular injection of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) on knee osteoarthritis (KOA).

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of PRP combined with MSC in the treatment of KOA were collected from PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Wiley online library, CNKI, and Wanfang databases from inception to July 30, 2022. Two researchers read and screened the literature to extract the data, respectively. After conducting a risk-of-bias assessment of included data, RevMan 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis. The Cochrane Handbook risk-of-bias assessment tool was used to evaluate the included literature.

RESULTS

A total of 9 papers with 480 KOA patients were included in this study. Significant differences in terms of visual analogue scale (VAS) score (MD = -1.10, 95% CI -1.91 to -0.29), P = 0.008) and knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) (MD = 4.56, 95% CI 0.54-8.58, P = 0.050) were noted between the 2 groups. Subgroup analysis found that MD = 1.66 in KOOS-pain-1 group (95% CI (0.10, 3.22), P = 0.040), which is significant. The MD for KOOS total score and IKDC scores between the two groups was MD = 6.31 (95% CI 2.73-9.88, P = 0.0005) and MD = 3.05 (95% CI -7.09-13.20, P = 0.56), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study provide a theoretical basis for the clinical treatment of KOA with PRP combined with MSC.