Implementation of the Treat-to-Target Concept in Evaluation of Psoriatic Arthritis Patients

A prospective survey on therapeutic inertia in psoriatic arthritis (OPTI'PsA)

OBJECTIVES

Clinical inertia, or therapeutic inertia (TI), is the medical behaviour of not initiating or intensifying treatment when recommended by clinical recommendations. To our knowledge, our survey is the first to assess TI around psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

METHODS

Eight hundred and twenty-five French rheumatologists were contacted via email between January and March 2021 and invited to complete an online questionnaire consisting of seven clinical vignettes: five cases ('oligoarthritis', 'enthesitis', 'polyarthritis', 'neoplastic history', 'cardiovascular risk') requiring treatment OPTImization, and two 'control' cases (distal interphalangeal arthritis, atypical axial involvement) not requiring any change of treatment-according to the most recent PsA recommendations. Rheumatologists were also questioned about their routine practice, continuing medical education and perception of PsA.

RESULTS

One hundred and one rheumatologists completed this OPTI'PsA survey. Almost half the respondents (47%) demonstrated TI on at least one of the five vignettes that warranted treatment optimization. The complex profiles inducing the most TI were 'oligoarthritis' and 'enthesitis' with 20% and 19% of respondents not modifying treatment, respectively. Conversely, clinical profiles for which there was the least uncertainty ('polyarthritis in relapse', 'neoplastic history' and 'cardiovascular risk') generated less TI with 11%, 8% and 6% of respondents, respectively, choosing not to change the current treatment.

CONCLUSION

The rate of TI we observed for PsA is similar to published data for other chronic diseases such as diabetes, hypertension, gout or multiple sclerosis. Our study is the first to show marked clinical inertia in PsA, and further research is warranted to ascertain the reasons behind this inertia.

Implementation of the Treat-to-Target Approach in Psoriatic Arthritis and Its Outcomes in Routine Clinical Practice

Background Measuring disease activity in psoriatic arthritis using validated tools and treating to a target (T2T) is advocated. It improves quality of life and delays radiographic progression. In clinical practice, it guides therapy escalation to achieve better disease control. This study aimed to assess the real-life implementation of the T2T concept in daily clinical practice and the proportion of patients achieving the target of low disease activity or remission. Methodology In this study, a retrospective review of patients diagnosed with psoriatic arthritis having clinical visits from January 2020 to February 2023 was done. The proportion of patients in whom disease activity was monitored using the Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) 28 and Physician Global Assessment (PGA) and those achieving the target was calculated using SPSS version 21 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results A total of 89 patients were included in the study after fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Overall, 56.2% (50) of patients were males and 43.8% (39) were females, with a mean age of 43.5 ± 14.5 years, mean disease duration of 6.6 ± 3.8 years, and mean follow-up duration of 2.8 ± 1.6 years. Of the study population, 43.8% (39) had axial involvement, 23.6% (21) had dactylitis, and 12.4% (11) had enthesitis. Skin psoriasis was present in 84.3% (75), 11.2% (10) had a family history of psoriasis, 19.1% (17) had nail changes, 1.1% (1) had uveitis, and in 94.8% (73) of patients skin psoriasis presented before arthritis. Overall, 97.7% (85) of patients were on conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs), with the most common being methotrexate in 77%, followed by leflunomide in 8%. Further, 34.8% (31) were using biological DMARDs (bDMARDs), with the most common being tofacitinib (33.7%), infliximab (28.1%), and secukinumab (24.7%) being other choices. Overall, 21.1% (18) of patients experienced adverse events with csDMARDs and 3.2% (1) with biological DMARDs. DAPSA28 was recorded in 44.9% (40), Psoriasis Area and Severity Index in 16.8% (15), and PGA in 100% of patients. Target of low disease activity (LDA)/remission was achieved in 50.6% (45) patients, as assessed by PGA or DAPSA28 cutoff. The LDA/remission target was achieved in 51.2% of patients taking csDMARDs, and 74.2% in those who were on bDMARDs. Conclusions It is crucial to measure the disease activity using validated tools and treat the patient to target for achieving better disease control and improved quality of life. Despite the evidence that T2T improves outcomes, it is not widely practiced in routine clinical practice.

Management of psoriatic arthritis: a consensus opinion by expert rheumatologists

Background

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory musculoskeletal disease involving several articular and extra-articular structures. Despite the important progresses recently made in all of the aspects of this disease, its management is still burdened by unresolved issues. The aim of this exercise was to provide a set of statements that may be helpful for the management of PsA.

Methods

A group of 38 Italian rheumatologists with recognized expertise in PsA selected and addressed the following four topics: "early PsA," "axial-PsA," "extra-articular manifestations and comorbidities," "therapeutic goals." Relevant articles from the literature (2016-2022) were selected by the experts based on a PubMed search. A number of statements for each topic were elaborated.

Results

Ninety-four articles were selected and evaluated, 68 out of the 1,114 yielded by the literature search and 26 added by the Authors. Each of the four topic was subdivided in themes as follows: transition from psoriasis to PsA, imaging vs. CASPAR criteria in early diagnosis, early treatment for "early PsA"; axial-PsA vs. axialspondyloarthritis, diagnosis, clinical evaluation, treatment, standard radiography vs. magnetic resonance imaging for "axial PsA"; influence of inflammatory bowel disease on the therapeutic choice, cardiovascular comorbidity, bone damage, risk of infection for "comorbidities and extra-articular manifestations"; target and tools, treat-to-target strategy, role of imaging for "therapeutic goals." The final document consisted of 49 statements.

Discussion

The final product of this exercise is a set of statements concerning the main issues of PsA management offering an expert opinion for some unmet needs of this complex disease.

Is the C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio the most remarkable simple inflammatory marker showing active disease in patients with axial spondyloarthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis?

OBJECTIVE

To learn which of the simple inflammation markers obtained from routine laboratory tests showed active disease best.

METHODS

The study included 256 patients (102 patients with axial spondyloarthritis [axSpA], 54 with psoriatic arthritis [PsA], and 100 with rheumatoid arthritis [RA]). The results of the routine laboratory tests requested during the outpatient clinic visits of the patients were noted. Inflammation-related ratio/indices were then calculated from these laboratory tests. Active and inactive diseases were defined according to the disease activity scores for each disease. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to determine the best laboratory marker(s) showing active disease and its cutoff value for all three diseases.

RESULTS

C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR) was significantly higher in patients with active axSpA, PsA, and RA diseases than those with inactive diseases (p < 0.001, p = 0.006, and p < 0.001, respectively). In the logistic regression analysis, the CAR was the most important predictor of active disease in patients with axSpA, PsA, and RA. CAR had also showed the active disease at an acceptable level in axSpA and PsA and very well in RA. The cutoff values for active disease in axSpA, PsA, and RA were 0.75, 0.92, and 0.89, respectively.

CONCLUSION

CAR may be a promising simple laboratory marker to distinguish active disease in patients with axSpA, PsA, and RA. Key Points • Acute phase reactants and circulating blood cells have become an important target because of the search for a disease activity marker that can be used cheaply and quickly in the daily outpatient routine. • One or more of these simple markers have been previously discussed in various studies with different hypotheses. • We aimed to determine which of the inflammation markers obtained from routine laboratory tests showed active disease and to determine a cutoff value for this/these marker(s). • CAR was the most important simple laboratory marker to distinguish active disease in patients with axSpA, PsA, and RA. In addition, CAR showed the active disease at an acceptable level in axSpA and PsA, and very well in RA.