The Burden of Vertebral Osteomyelitis—An Analysis of the Workforce before and after Treatment

Wide variability of the definitions used for native vertebral osteomyelitis: walking the path for a unified diagnostic framework with a meta-epidemiological approach

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Native Vertebral Osteomyelitis (NVO) has seen a rise in incidence, yet clinical outcomes remain poor with high relapse rates and significant long-term sequelae. The 2015 IDSA Clinical Practice Guidelines initiated a surge in scholarly activity on NVO, revealing a patchwork of definitions and numerous synonyms used interchangeably for this syndrome.

PURPOSE

To systematically summarize these definitions, evaluate their content, distribution over time, and thematic clustering.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Meta-epidemiological study with a systematic review of definitions.

PATIENTS SAMPLE

An extensive search of multiple databases was conducted, targeting trials and cohort studies dating from 2005 to present, providing a definition for NVO and its synonyms.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Analysis of the diagnostic criteria that composed the definitions and the breaking up of the definitions in the possible combinations of diagnostic criteria.

METHODS

We pursued a thematic synthesis of the published definitions with Boolean logic, yielding single or multiple definitions per included study. Using 8 predefined diagnostic criteria, we standardized definitions, focusing on the minimum necessary combinations used. Definition components were visualized using Sankey diagrams.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 8,460 references, leading to 171 studies reporting on 21,963 patients. Of these, 91.2% were retrospective, 7.6% prospective, and 1.2% RCTs. Most definitions originated from authors, with 29.2% referencing sources. We identified 92 unique combinations of diagnostic criteria across the literature. Thirteen main patterns emerged, with the most common being clinical features with imaging, followed by clinical features combined with imaging and microbiology, and lastly, imaging paired with microbiology.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings underscore the need for a collaborative effort to develop standardized diagnostic criteria. We advocate for a future Delphi consensus among experts to establish a unified diagnostic framework for NVO, emphasizing the core components of clinical features and MRI while incorporating microbiological and histopathological insights to improve both patient outcomes and research advancements.

Septic arthritis of the facet joint is also a severe vertebral infection: A multicenter retrospective study of 65 patients

OBJECTIVE

Septic arthritis of the Facet Joints (SAFJ) is a rare condition. Little data has been published on the subject. We aimed to describe the clinical, biological and imagery presentations, as well as the course of this rare infection.

METHODS

We included patients hospitalized between January 1st, 2016 and December 31th, 2019, in the Departments of Infectious Diseases or Rheumatology in 5 French centres in the CRIOGO network. We defined septic arthritis according to Newman's criteria and facet joint arthritis using imagery.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients were included, predominantly males (64.6%), with a mean age of 68.1 years. The mean time to diagnosis was 25.0 days. The principal symptoms at diagnosis were acute back pain (95.2%) and fever (76.9%). Neurological symptoms were present for 60.7% of the patients, including 16.4% motor deficit or cauda equina syndrome. SAFJ was located on the lumbosacral spine (73.4%) and was rarely multifocal (4.7%). Bacteriological identification was performed by blood cultures in 84.4% of the cases, and the pathogen was mainly Staphylococcus aureus (49.2%). Infective endocarditis was present for 26.9% of patients assessed by echocardiography. On MRI, soft tissue abscess or inflammation, epiduritis and epidural abscess were present in 87.1%, 66.7% and 33.9% of cases, and the pathogen was significantly more frequently Staphylococcus aureus. Mortality reached 9.2%, 18.5% and 23% at one, two, and three years respectively.

CONCLUSION

SAFJ is a rare but severe disease. Microbiological diagnosis is primarily made on blood cultures, and S. Aureus was the main pathogen. Our results highlight the fact that SAFJ is associated with high morbidity and mortality, and with infective endocarditis.

[Update bone infections]

Bone and joint infections are becoming of great concern in an elderly population with growing numbers of prosthetic joints and comorbidities. This paper summarizes recently published literature on periprosthetic joint infections, vertebral osteomyelitis and diabetic foot infections. According to a new study, in the presence of a hematogenous periprosthetic infection and other inserted joint prostheses that are unremarkable on clinical examination, further invasive or imaging diagnostics may not be necessary. Periprosthetic infections that occur late (> 3 months after joint installation) have a worse outcome. New studies tried to identify factors when prosthesis preservation might still be an option. A new randomized landmark trial from France failed to show non-inferiority for 6 versus 12 weeks of therapy length. Thus, it can be assumed that this will currently become the standard therapy length for all surgical modalities (retention or replacement). Vertebral osteomyelitis is a rather rare bone infection, but the incidence has continued to rise sharply in recent years. A retrospective study from Korea provides information on the distribution of pathogens in different age groups and with selected comorbidities; this could help in the selection of an empiric therapy when pathogen identification is not successful before starting the treatment. The guidelines by the "International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF)" have been updated with a slightly different classification. New practice recommendations of the German society of diabetology emphasize an early interdisciplinary interprofessional management. Empirical therapy continues to be based on the severity of the infection and other risk factors (such as previous therapies or ischemia). Microbiological diagnosis from tissue samples is described as superior to smears. According to a randomized pilot study, 3 weeks therapy length for osteomyelitis after debridement appears to be noninferior to 6 weeks.