IGNITE Status Epilepticus Survey: A Nationwide Interrogation about the Current Management of Status Epilepticus in Germany

ICU-Electroencephalogram Unit Improves Outcome in Status Epilepticus Patients: A Retrospective Before-After Study

OBJECTIVES

Continuous electroencephalogram (cEEG) monitoring is recommended for status epilepticus (SE) management in ICU but is still underused due to resource limitations and inconclusive evidence regarding its impact on outcome. Furthermore, the term "continuous monitoring" often implies continuous recording with variable intermittent review. The establishment of a dedicated ICU-electroencephalogram unit may fill this gap, allowing cEEG with nearly real-time review and multidisciplinary management collaboration. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of ICU-electroencephalogram unit establishing on SE outcome and management.

DESIGN

Single-center retrospective before-after study.

SETTING

Neuro-ICU of a Swiss academic tertiary medical care center.

PATIENTS

Adult patients treated for nonhypoxic SE between November 1, 2015, and December 31, 2023.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS

Data from all SE patients were assessed, comparing those treated before and after ICU-electroencephalogram unit introduction. Primary outcomes were return to premorbid neurologic function, ICU mortality, SE duration, and ICU SE management. Secondary outcomes were SE type and etiology. Two hundred seven SE patients were included, 149 (72%) before and 58 (38%) after ICU-electroencephalogram unit establishment. ICU-electroencephalogram unit introduction was associated with increased detection of nonconvulsive SE ( p = 0.003) and SE due to acute symptomatic etiology ( p = 0.019). Regression analysis considering age, comorbidities, SE etiology, and SE semeiology revealed a higher chance of returning to premorbid neurologic function ( p = 0.002), reduced SE duration ( p = 0.024), and a shift in SE management with increased use of antiseizure medications ( p = 0.007) after ICU-electroencephalogram unit introduction.

CONCLUSIONS

Integrating neurology expertise in the ICU setting through the establishment of an ICU-electroencephalogram unit with nearly real-time cEEG review, shortened SE duration, and increased likelihood of returning to premorbid neurologic function, with an increased number of antiseizure medications used. Further studies are warranted to validate these findings and assess long-term prognosis.

Why have status epilepticus trials failed: Wrong drugs or wrong trials?

Despite burgeoning interest in trials in status epilepticus over the last 20 years, outcomes have yet to improve and a number of high profile studies have failed to deliver for a range of reasons. The range of reasons a trial may fail to meet the intended outcomes are discussed. Recent well designed, adequately powered studies in established status epilepticus failed to meet primary endpoints, but are nonetheless influencing practice, reflecting the importance of interpreting results in the context of broader literature, safety and practical considerations. Studies in refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus have yet to do so, frequently failing to deliver as hoped despite huge financial and human cost. The importance of reviewing regulatory frameworks, and our approach to trial design to address important clinical questions is reviewed, reflecting on lessons from the COVID-19 RECOVERY trials, and other disease areas, together with the potential associated with the use artificial intelligence tools. This paper is based on a presentation made at the 9th London-Innsbruck Colloquium on Status Epilepticus and Acute Seizures in April 2024.

Survey of Pediatric Status Epilepticus Treatment Practices and Adherence to Management Guidelines (Pedi-SPECTRUM e-Survey)

Aim

Survey of treatment practices and adherence to pediatric status epilepticus (PSE) management guidelines in India.

Methods

This eSurvey was conducted over 35 days (15th October to 20th November 2023) and included questions related to hospital setting; antiseizure medications (ASMs); ancillary treatment; facilities available; etiology; and adherence to PSE management guidelines.

Results

A total of 170 respondents participated, majority of them were working in tertiary level hospitals (94.1%) as pediatric intensivists (56.5%) and pediatricians (19.4%), and were in clinical practice for 2-10 years (46.5%). Majority use intravenous (IV) midazolam and levetiracetam as first- and second-line ASMs (67.1 and 51.2%, respectively). In cases with refractory status epilepticus (RSE), the most commonly used ASM is midazolam infusion (92.4%). For super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE), the commonly used third-line ASMs include midazolam infusion (34.1%), thiopentone infusion (26.5%), high dose phenobarbitone (18.2%), and ketamine infusion (15.3%). Overall, in cases with SRSE, 44.7% respondents use ketamine infusion, 42.5% use add-on oral topiramate, and 34.7% use high-dose phenobarbitone (1-3 mg/kg/hour) infusion. Most respondents targeted both clinical and EEG seizure control (48.8%). Ancillary treatment used for SRSE included IV pyridoxine (57.1%), methylprednisolone (45.3%), IVIG (42.4%), ketogenic diet (40.6%), and second-line immunomodulation (33.5%). Most common causes were febrile SE, viral encephalitis, and febrile illness-related epilepsy syndrome (60.6%, 52.4%, and 37.1%, respectively). Facilities available included pediatric intensive care units (PICU) (97.1%), mechanical ventilation (98.2%), pediatric neurologist (68.8%), MRI brain (86.5%), EEG (69.4%), and viral PCR (58.2%). The compliance with guidelines for timing of initiation of ASM ranged from 63.5 to 88.8%.

Conclusion

Intravenous midazolam bolus/es, levetiracetam, and midazolam infusion are commonly used first-, second-, and third-line ASMs, respectively. There were wide variations in use of ASMs for RSE and SRSE, ancillary treatment, and compliance to PSE management guidelines.

How to cite this article

Suthar R, Angurana SK, Nallasamy K, Bansal A, Muralidharan J. Survey of Pediatric Status Epilepticus Treatment Practices and Adherence to Management Guidelines (Pedi-SPECTRUM e-Survey). Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(5):504-510.

[Postoperative management following decompressive hemicraniectomy for malignant middle cerebral artery infarction-A German nationwide survey study]

BACKGROUND

Malignant middle cerebral artery infarction is a potentially life-threatening disease. Decompressive hemicraniectomy constitutes an evidence-based treatment practice, especially in patients under 60 years of age; however, recommendations with respect to postoperative management and particularly duration of postoperative sedation lack standardization.

OBJECTIVE

This survey study aimed to analyze the current situation of patients with malignant middle cerebral artery infarction following hemicraniectomy in the neurointensive care setting.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From 20 September 2021 to 31 October 2021, 43 members of the initiative of German neurointensive trial engagement (IGNITE) network were invited to participate in a standardized anonymous online survey. Descriptive data analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Out of 43 centers 29 (67.4%) participated in the survey, including 24 university hospitals. Of the hospitals 21 have their own neurological intensive care unit. While 23.1% favored a standardized approach regarding postoperative sedation, the majority utilized individual criteria (e.g., intracranial pressure increase, weaning parameters, complications) to assess the need and duration. The timing of targeted extubation varied widely between hospitals (≤ 24 h 19.2%, ≤ 3 days in 30.8%, ≤ 5 days in 19.2%, > 5 days in 15.4%). Early tracheotomy (≤ 7 days) is performed in 19.2% and 80.8% of the centers aim for tracheotomy within 14 days. Hyperosmolar treatment is used on a regular basis in 53.9% and 22 centers (84.6%) agreed to participate in a clinical trial addressing the duration of postoperative sedation and ventilation.

CONCLUSION

The results of this nationwide survey among neurointensive care units in Germany reflect a remarkable heterogeneity in the treatment practices of patients with malignant middle cerebral artery infarction undergoing hemicraniectomy, especially with respect to the duration of postoperative sedation and ventilation. A randomized trial in this matter seems warranted.

Prehospital Levetiracetam Use in Adults With Status Epilepticus: Results of a Multicenter Registry

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Status epilepticus (SE) is a neurological emergency due to prolonged seizure activity or multiple seizures without full recovery in between them. Prehospital SE management is crucial since its duration is correlated with higher morbidity and mortality rates. We examined the impact of different therapeutic strategies in the prehospital setting with a focus on levetiracetam.

METHODS

We initiated the Project for SE in Cologne, a scientific association of all neurological departments of Cologne, the fourth-largest city in Germany with around 1,000,000 inhabitants. All patients with an SE diagnosis were evaluated over 2 years (from March 2019 to February 2021) to determine whether prehospital levetiracetam use had a significant effect on SE parameters.

RESULTS

We identified 145 patients who received initial drug therapy in the prehospital setting by professional medical staff. Various benzodiazepine (BZD) derivatives were used as first-line treatments, which were mostly used in line with the recommended guidelines. Levetiracetam was regularly used (n=42) and mostly in combination with BZDs, but no significant additional effect was observed for intravenous levetiracetam. However, it appeared that the administered doses tended to be low.

CONCLUSIONS

Levetiracetam can be applied to adults with SE in prehospital settings with little effort. Nevertheless, the prehospital treatment regimen described here for the first time did not significantly improve the preclinical cessation rate of SE. Future therapy concepts should be based on this, and the effects of higher doses should in particular be reexamined.