1
|
Prokopienko AJ, Wang J, Yajnik V, Baratta M, Desai NK, Richmond CA, Suri A. Effect of Food on the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Budesonide Oral Suspension in Healthy Adult Participants: A Randomized Phase 1 Study. J Clin Pharmacol 2024. [PMID: 39263900 DOI: 10.1002/jcph.6131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 08/22/2024] [Indexed: 09/13/2024]
Abstract
Budesonide oral suspension (BOS) is a swallowed corticosteroid indicated for 12-week therapy in eosinophilic esophagitis with minimal systemic exposure following administration. We aimed to assess the relative bioavailability of a single dose of BOS administered under fasting and fed (high-fat/high-calorie meal) conditions. Healthy adult volunteers (N = 20) were enrolled in an open-label, single-center, crossover study and were randomized (1:1) to receive a single oral dose of BOS 2.0 mg under fasting or fed conditions, with a 48-h washout period before crossover to the alternative conditions. Serial plasma samples were collected before and up to 24 h after dosing. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated from plasma budesonide concentration-time profiles by noncompartmental analysis. The mean peak budesonide concentration (Cmax) was ∼13% lower under fed than under fasting conditions (604.1 vs 692.9 pg/mL). Areas under the concentration-time curves from dosing to the last measurable budesonide concentration and from dosing to infinity were ∼26% higher and ∼27% higher under fed than fasting conditions (3529 vs 2811 pg h/mL and 3892 vs 3075 pg h/mL, respectively). The median time to peak plasma budesonide concentration was significantly longer (∼1 h) under fed than fasting conditions (2.516 vs 1.286 h, P < .001). Safety and tolerability were also assessed throughout the study; all adverse events were mild or moderate in severity. Despite slight differences in budesonide PK parameters between fed and fasting conditions, the effect of food on systemic exposure to budesonide (BOS formulation) is not expected to be clinically meaningful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Junyao Wang
- Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Vijay Yajnik
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Lexington, MA, USA
| | - Mike Baratta
- Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Nirav K Desai
- Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | - Ajit Suri
- Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alsohaibani FI, Peedikayil MC, Alzahrani MA, Azzam NA, Almadi MA, Dellon ES, Al-Hussaini AA. Eosinophilic esophagitis: Current concepts in diagnosis and management. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2024; 30:210-227. [PMID: 38752302 PMCID: PMC11379248 DOI: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_50_24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/21/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024] Open
Abstract
ABSTRACT Eosinophilic esophagitis is an antigen-mediated chronic inflammatory disorder that has risen in incidence and prevalence over the past 2 decades. The clinical presentation is variable and consists of mainly esophageal symptoms such as dysphagia, heartburn, food impaction, and vomiting. Current management relies on dietary elimination, proton-pump inhibitors, and topical corticosteroids with different response rates and relapses after treatment discontinuation. With a better understanding of the underlying pathophysiology, many molecules emerged recently as targeted treatment including dupilumab (IL4/IL13 blocker), as the first FDA-approved biological treatment, which has changed the management paradigm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fahad I Alsohaibani
- Department of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Musthafa C Peedikayil
- Department of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Nahla A Azzam
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Majid A Almadi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Evan S Dellon
- Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, USA
| | - Abdulrahman A Al-Hussaini
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Children's Specialized Hospital, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lendner N, Minich NM, Malay S, Sferra TJ, Young DD. Comparison of budesonide vehicles in inducing histologic remission in pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2024; 79:92-99. [PMID: 38803200 DOI: 10.1002/jpn3.12273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Revised: 04/27/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Oral viscous budesonide (OVB) is a common medication used to treat eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). It is typically mixed with Splenda to produce a slurry, but other delivery vehicles have been used in clinical practice. We aimed to evaluate outcomes of pediatric EoE patients treated with OVB using different drug delivery vehicles. METHODS We performed a retrospective chart review of pediatric EoE patients treated with OVB. The primary aim was to evaluate rates of histologic remission (defined by <15 eosinophils per high power field in both mid and distal esophagus) after 6-12 weeks of OVB treatment for each delivery vehicle. Secondary aims were to evaluate histologic response and endoscopic response and remission of different delivery vehicles, and to compare the efficacy of different treatment regimens. RESULTS A total of 111 patients were included in the study. Median treatment duration was 3.4 months. Overall rate of histologic remission with OVB was 52.6%. There was no difference in rates of histologic remission (p = 0.313) or response (p = 0.195 and p = 0.681 in mid and distal esophagus, respectively) among the different vehicle types or treatment regimens. Similarly, there was no difference in endoscopic remission and response among the different vehicle types (p = 0.853 and p = 0.727) or treatment regimens (p = 0.244 and p = 0.157). Patients who achieve histologic remission were more likely to be non-Hispanic Caucasian. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest there is no difference in histologic and endoscopic outcomes with various delivery vehicles or combination therapy with OVB in the treatment of EoE. More palatable and cost-effective vehicles can be used to treat EoE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nuphar Lendner
- Pediatrix Gastroenterology of the Rocky Mountains, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Nori Mercuri Minich
- Biostastics and Bioinformatics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Sindhoosha Malay
- Biostastics and Bioinformatics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Thomas J Sferra
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, UH Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Denise D Young
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, UH Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Laserna‐Mendieta EJ, Navarro P, Casabona‐Francés S, Savarino EV, Amorena E, Pérez‐Martínez I, Guagnozzi D, Blas‐Jhon L, Betoré E, Guardiola‐Arévalo A, Pellegatta G, Krarup AL, Perello A, Barrio J, Gutiérrez‐Junquera C, Teruel Sánchez‐Vegazo C, Fernández‐Fernández S, Naves JE, Oliva S, Rodríguez‐Oballe JA, Carrión S, Espina S, Llorente Barrio M, Masiques‐Mas ML, Dainese R, Feo‐Ortega S, Martín‐Dominguez V, Fernández‐Pacheco J, Pérez‐Fernández MT, Ghisa M, Maniero D, Nantes‐Castillejo Ó, Nicolay‐Maneru J, Suárez A, Maray I, Llerena‐Castro R, Ortega‐Larrodé A, Alcedo J, Granja Navacerrada A, Racca F, Santander C, Arias Á, Lucendo AJ. Swallowed topical corticosteroids for eosinophilic esophagitis: Utilization and real-world efficacy from the EoE CONNECT registry. United European Gastroenterol J 2024; 12:585-595. [PMID: 38284792 PMCID: PMC11176909 DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.12533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/25/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Swallowed topical corticosteroids (tC) are common therapy for patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Widely heterogeneous results have occurred due to their active ingredients, formulations and doses. OBJECTIVE To assess the effectiveness of topical corticosteroid therapy for EoE in real-world practice. METHODS Cross-sectional study analysis of the multicentre EoE CONNECT registry. Clinical remission was defined as a decrease of ≥50% in dysphagia symptom scores; histological remission was defined as a peak eosinophil count below 15 per high-power field. The effectiveness in achieving clinico-histological remission (CHR) was compared for the main tC formulations. RESULTS Overall, data on 1456 prescriptions of tC in monotherapy used in 866 individual patients were assessed. Of those, 904 prescriptions with data on formulation were employed for the induction of remission; 234 reduced a previously effective dose for maintenance. Fluticasone propionate formulations dominated the first-line treatment, while budesonide was more common in later therapies. A swallowed nasal drop suspension was the most common formulation of fluticasone propionate. Doses ≥0.8 mg/day provided a 65% CHR rate and were superior to lower doses. Oral viscous solution prepared by a pharmacist was the most common prescription of budesonide; 4 mg/day provided no benefit over 2 mg/day (CHR rated being 72% and 80%, respectively). A multivariate analysis revealed budesonide orodispersible tablets as the most effective therapy (OR 18.9, p < 0.001); use of higher doses (OR 4.3, p = 0.03) and lower symptom scores (OR 0.9, p = 0.01) were also determinants of effectiveness. CONCLUSION Reduced symptom severity, use of high doses, and use of budesonide orodispersible tablets particularly were all independent predictors of tC effectiveness.
Collapse
|
5
|
Massironi S, Elvevi A, Panceri R, Mulinacci G, Colella G, Biondi A, Invernizzi P, Danese S, Vespa E. Eosinophilic esophagitis: does age matter? Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2024; 20:211-223. [PMID: 37870118 DOI: 10.1080/1744666x.2023.2274940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the esophagus with increasing prevalence worldwide. It is a multifactorial disease caused by a combination of immunologic, genetic, and environmental factors. The clinical presentation of EoE varies largely, especially between different age groups. While diagnostic criteria and therapeutic goals are similar in children and adults, there are differences in treatment, with a more cautious approach in children to avoid growth disturbances. In addition, close monitoring and follow-up are essential in children to ensure uninterrupted growth. AREAS COVERED A search in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases was conducted to identify relevant studies published between January 2010 and January 2023 to give an overview of the state-of-the-art of EoE epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment while focusing on similarities and differences between the adult and the pediatric population. EXPERT OPINION The current state of research indicates that while significant progress has been made in understanding and treating EoE, further research and advances are needed to optimize diagnostic strategies, tailored treatment approaches, monitoring, and follow-up, and improve long-term outcomes for patients. With further innovation, the management of EoE can become more precise and tailored, leading to better patient outcomes and improved quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Massironi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italia
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandra Elvevi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italia
| | - Roberto Panceri
- Department of Pediatrics, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italia
| | - Giacomo Mulinacci
- Division of Gastroenterology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italia
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Giacomo Colella
- Department of Pediatrics, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italia
| | - Andrea Biondi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- Department of Pediatrics, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italia
| | - Pietro Invernizzi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italia
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvio Danese
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy, and Vita-Salute, San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Edoardo Vespa
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy, and Vita-Salute, San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) is a chronic, immune-mediated or antigen-mediated esophageal disease. Treatment for patients with EE can be challenging with no previously approved medications. Current management strategies follow the four D’s paradigm of drugs, dietary elimination, dilation, and disease anxiety and hypervigilance therapy. On 20 May 2022, dupilumab was approved by FDA for EE. A dose of 300 mg dupilumab weekly significantly improved signs and symptoms of EE compared to placebo in a phase 3 trial. The approval of dupilumab will fulfill an unmet need for the increasing number of patients with EE.
Collapse
|