Double Balloon Catheter (Plus Oxytocin) versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert for Term Rupture of Membranes: A Randomized Controlled Trial (RUBAPRO)

A model to predict delivery time following induction of labor at term with a dinoprostone vaginal insert: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Dinoprostone vaginal insert is the most common pharmacological method for induction of labor (IOL); however, studies on assessing the time to vaginal delivery (DT) following dinoprostone administration are limited.

AIMS

We sought to identify the primary factors influencing DT in women from central China, at or beyond term, who underwent IOL with dinoprostone vaginal inserts.

METHODS

In this retrospective observational study, we analyzed the data of 1562 women at 37 weeks 0 days to 41 weeks 6 days of gestation who underwent dinoprostone-induced labor between January 1st, 2019, and December 31st, 2021. The outcomes of interest were vaginal or cesarean delivery and factors influencing DT, including maternal complications and neonatal characteristics.

RESULTS

Among the enrolled women, 71% (1109/1562) delivered vaginally, with median DT of 740.50 min (interquartile range 443.25 to 1264.50 min). Of the remaining 29% (453/1562), who delivered by cesarean section, 11.9% (54/453) were multiparous. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that multiparity, advanced maternal age, fetal macrosomia, premature rupture of membranes (PROM), and daytime insertion of dinoprostone were the factors that significantly influenced DT. Time to vaginal delivery increased with advanced maternal age and fetal macrosomia and decreased with multiparity, PROM, and daytime insertion of dinoprostone. A mathematical model was developed to integrate these factors for predicting DT: Y = 804.478 - 125.284 × multiparity + 765.637 × advanced maternal age + 411.511 × fetal macrosomia-593.358 × daytime insertion of dinoprostone - 125.284 × PROM.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings may help obstetricians estimate the DT before placing a dinoprostone insert, which may improve patient management in busy maternity wards and minimize potential risks.

[Prostaglandins or cervical balloon for the induction of labor for cervical ripening: A literature review]

OBJECTIVE

Induction of labor in France concerns one birth out of four with 70% of induction starting by cervical ripening, either with a pharmacological (prostaglandins) or a mechanical (balloon) method. This review aims to compare these two methods within current knowledge, using the PRISMA methodology.

METHODS

Trials comparing these two methods, published or unpublished up to July 2023, in French or English were searched for in the PubMed, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrial.govs datasets. Fifty articles including 10,689 women were selected. The outcomes of interest were those from the Core Outcome Set for trails on Induction of Labour (COSIOL) list: mode of delivery, time from induction-to-birth, maternal and neonatal morbidity, and maternal satisfaction.

RESULT

No differences were observed between the two methods for the mode of delivery or neonatal and maternal morbidity. The time from induction-to-birth was longer for mechanical methods. Those were also associated with a greater need for oxytocin, less uterine hyperstimulation and less instrumental deliveries. Maternal satisfaction was assessed in only nine trials using various scales which made the interpretation of maternal satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of these two induction methods is similar for vaginal delivery, but it remains to be seen which one best meets women's satisfaction criteria.

Comparison of the efficacy between controlled-release dinoprostone delivery system (PROPESS) and Cook's double balloon catheter plus oxytocin: A retrospective single-center study in Japan

AIMS

To compare the efficacy of the controlled-release dinoprostone delivery system (PROPESS) and Cook's double balloon catheter (DBC) plus oxytocin as induction treatment.

METHODS

A total of 197 term pregnant women with unfavorable cervix were admitted for scheduled induction and enrolled retrospectively (PROPESS, 113; Cook's DBC plus oxytocin, 84). The main birth outcomes were cervical ripening at the treatment-end and 24 h after the treatment-start, and rate of vaginal birth. Logistic regression and propensity score matching analyses were performed to evaluate the association between the outcomes and clinical characteristics including which treatment was selected.

RESULTS

The choice of PROPESS was associated with the success of cervical ripening at 24 h after (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-4.26, p = 0.024) and increased the rate of vaginal birth (adjusted OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.04-3.98, p = 0.039). Similar trends in the association between PROPESS and birth outcomes were maintained after adjusting for propensity scores (p = 0.072 and p = 0.163, respectively). However, some of the women with gestational age of early 39 weeks and low Bishop scores could achieve cervical ripening at 24 h after using Cook's DBC plus oxytocin, and none by PROPESS.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest the possibility of slight advantages of PROPESS for scheduled induction of labor. In women with early term and extremely low Bishop scores, Cook's DBC plus oxytocin may be a superior or alternative treatment to PROPESS. Therefore, the optimal choice of induction treatment should be managed on an individual basis.

Application of intrauterine balloons in cervical ripening

INTRODUCTION

At present, the double balloon represented by the COOK Cervix Ripening Balloon and the single balloon represented by the Foley catheter are the commonly used intrauterine balloons. The application of intrauterine balloons in cervical ripening has evolved over 100 years. Although intrauterine balloons have been widely used in cervical ripening, the effect of labor induction in clinical practice does not satisfy all clinicians, especially patients with poor cervical maturity.

AREAS COVERED

The research in this review is about intrauterine balloons and cervical ripening.

EXPERT OPINION

This article reviews the historical evolution and different application methods of intrauterine balloons in cervical ripening, such as application range, placement method and placement duration of intrauterine balloons, volume and temperature of the solution fillings, and whether to apply traction to the catheter. We aim to better understand the principle of intrauterine balloons in cervical ripening and make this method more effective.