Influence of Intraoperative Hemodynamic Parameters on Outcome in Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplant Recipients

Intraoperative Hemodynamic Parameters Associated With Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Transplant Patients

PURPOSE

Intraoperative hemodynamic instability was proven to be associated with delayed graft function (DGF) after kidney transplantation. This retrospective study aims to find the specific intraoperative hemodynamic parameters as an efficient predicting factor of DGF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent kidney transplantation between 2020 and 2022 were enrolled and classified into DGF and non-DGF groups. Pediatric and multiorgan recipients were excluded. Hemodynamic parameters such as central venous pressure, mean arterial pressure, cardiac output, and cardiac index (CI) at the timings of wound incision, graft reperfusion, and operation completion were recorded, respectively. A comparison of parameters between these 2 groups was analyzed.

RESULTS

We enrolled 42 recipients, with 26 in the DGF group and 16 in the non-DGF group. Compared with the DGF group, CI around graft reperfusion was significantly higher in the non-DGF group (3.97 vs 4.67 L/min/m², P = .043). Other hemodynamic variables revealed no statistical difference. In the results of multivariate analysis, the deceased donor source, the greater volume of blood loss, and the lower CI around graft reperfusion were considered independent risk factors for DGF. Using CI around graft reperfusion to conduct a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for DGF prediction, the area under the ROC curve achieved a value of 0.739 (95% confidence interval, 0.579-0.900), with the optimal cut-point value at CI = 4.245 L/min/m².

CONCLUSION

The cardiac index value around graft reperfusion was statistically associated with the incidence of DGF and might be used as a valid predicting factor.

Analysis of Volatile Anesthetic-Induced Organ Protection in Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Despite recent advances in surgical procedures and immunosuppressive regimes, early pancreatic graft dysfunction, mainly specified as ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI)-Remains a common cause of pancreas graft failure with potentially worse outcomes in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT). Anesthetic conditioning is a widely described strategy to attenuate IRI and facilitate graft protection. Here, we investigate the effects of different volatile anesthetics (VAs) on early IRI-associated posttransplant clinical outcomes as well as graft function and outcome in SPKT recipients.

METHODS

Medical data of 105 patients undergoing SPKT between 1998-2018 were retrospectively analyzed and stratified according to the used VAs. The primary study endpoint was the association and effect of VAs on pancreas allograft failure following SPKT; secondary endpoint analyses included "IRI- associated posttransplant clinical outcome" as well as long-term graft function and outcome. Additionally, peak serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and lipase during the first 72 h after SPKT were determined and used as further markers for "pancreatic IRI" and graft injury. Typical clinicopathological characteristics and postoperative outcomes such as early graft outcome and long-term function were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 105 included patients in this study three VAs were used: isoflurane (n = 58 patients; 55%), sevoflurane (n = 22 patients; 21%), and desflurane (n = 25 patients, 24%). Donor and recipient characteristics were comparable between both groups. Early graft loss within 3 months (24% versus 5% versus 8%, p = 0.04) as well as IRI-associated postoperative clinical complications (pancreatitis: 21% versus 5% versus 5%, p = 0.04; vascular thrombosis: 13% versus 0% versus 5%; p = 0.09) occurred more frequently in the Isoflurane group compared with the sevoflurane and desflurane groups. Anesthesia with sevoflurane resulted in the lowest serum peak levels of lipase and CRP during the first 3 days after transplantation, followed by desflurane and isoflurane (p = 0.039 and p = 0.001, respectively). There was no difference with regard to 10-year pancreas graft survival as well as endocrine/metabolic function among all three VA groups. Multivariate analysis revealed the choice of VAs as an independent prognostic factor for graft failure three months after SPKT (HR 0.38, 95%CI: 0.17-0.84; p = 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, sevoflurane and desflurane were associated with significantly increased early graft survival as well as decreased IRI-associated post-transplant clinical outcomes when compared with the isoflurane group and should be the focus of future clinical studies evaluating the positive effects of different VA agents in patients receiving SPKT.