Non-Achievement of Alanine Aminotransferase Normalization Associated with the Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma during Nucleos(t)ide Analogue Therapies: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Usefulness of the Fibrosis-4 index and alanine aminotransferase at 1 year of nucleos(t)ide analog treatment for prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis B patients

AIM

Nucleos(t)ide analogs do not completely prevent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in chronic hepatitis B virus infection. This study aimed to evaluate the dynamics of a non-invasive liver fibrosis marker, the Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index, for predicting HCC development.

METHODS

Among a total of 882 chronically hepatitis B virus infection-infected patients who were treated with nucleos(t)ide analogs, 472 patients without HCC history whose FIB-4 at baseline and 1 year of treatment was obtained were evaluated for the incidence of HCC.

RESULTS

The median FIB-4 was 2.00 at baseline and was significantly reduced to 1.58 at 1 year (P < 0.001), but the reduction was small at 2 years or later. When a receiver operating characteristic analysis of FIB-4 was performed to predict HCC within 5 years, the area under the curve of FIB-4 at 1 year was higher than that at baseline (0.676 vs. 0.599). The HCC incidence was significantly higher in patients with FIB-4 ≥1.58 than in those with FIB-4 <1.58 (14.8% vs. 3.6% at 10 years, P < 0.001). Additionally, an abnormal alanine aminotransferase (≥31 U/L) at 1 year was an independent risk for HCC. When a fibrosis and alanine aminotransferase-1 (FAL-1) score was evaluated as an applicable number of FIB-4 ≥1.58, and alanine aminotransferase ≥31 as 0, 1, and 2, the HCC risk in patients with score 2 was significantly higher than in those with score 1 or score 0 (24.1% vs. 9.8% vs. 0.7% at 10 years, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

FIB-4 ≥1.58 and alanine aminotransferase ≥31 at 1 year of nucleos(t)ide analog was an independent risk factor for HCC development, and a score using these factors stratified the risk of HCC.

Impact of l-Carnitine Supplementation on Liver Enzyme Normalization in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

The effectiveness of l-carnitine in chronic liver disease remains controversial. We conducted this meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of various forms of l-carnitine in the treatment of chronic liver disease. Methods: We searched the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, KMBASE, and Medline databases for all relevant studies published until April 2022 that examined the ability of l-carnitine or its derivatives to normalize liver enzymes in patients with chronic liver disease. We performed meta-analyses of the proportion of patients with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization and post-treatment serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and ALT levels. A random effects model was used for meta-analyses. Results: Fourteen randomized controlled trials (1217 patients) were included in this meta-analysis. The proportion of patients in whom ALT normalized was higher in the carnitine-orotate treatment group than in the control group (pooled odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval (CI) = 4.61 (1.48–14.39)). The proportion of patients in whom ALT normalized was also higher among those who received the carnitine-orotate complex, a combination of carnitine-orotate, biphenyl dimethyl dicarboxylate, and other minor supplementary compounds than in those who did not without significant heterogeneity (pooled OR (95% CI) = 18.88 (7.70–46.27); df = 1; p = 0.51; I² = 0%). l-carnitine supplementation effectively lowered serum ALT levels compared to controls (pooled mean difference (95% CI) = −11.99 (−22.48 to −1.49)). Conclusions: l-carnitine supplementation significantly lowered ALT and AST levels and normalized ALT levels in patients with chronic liver disease.