Delayed Recovery in Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

[Increase in the natural hearing threshold after treatment with cochlear implants]

More than 5% of the world's population suffers from disabling hearing loss. If the cause of hearing loss is unclear, it is referred to as idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL). After failure of standard treatment, the use of hearing aids or a cochlear implant is generally recommended. In this case, a 55-year-old patient was treated with cochlear implantation (CI) after ISSNHL and unsuccessful conservative therapy. Approximately 1 year after implantation and 7 years after the sudden hearing loss, subjective measurements revealed restoration of the hearing threshold.

Development of clinical predictive nomograms for prognosis of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss

BACKGROUND

The outcome of clinical treatment for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) is frequently the primary concern.

AIM

For the convenient prediction of reference prognosis outcomes in patients with ISSNHL.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients diagnosed with ISSNHL who were admitted to the otorhinolaryngology ward of Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from January 2020 to December 2023 were included. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were employed to identify independent prognostic factors for the treatment outcome of ISSNHL, which were subsequently used to develop nomograms. Discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility were assessed to evaluate the performance of the ISSNHL nomograms.

RESULTS

371 ISSNHL patients were enrolled in this study. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that history of deafness, aural fullness, time of onset, and age were independent prognostic factors for ISSNHL patients, with statistically significant regression coefficients. Predictive nomograms were developed with excellent discrimination, calibration, and clinical value.

CONCLUSIONS

Leveraging data from ISSNHL patients, we developed a predictive nomogram to assess prognostic factors upon admission. This nomogram facilitates clinicians in approximating the likelihood of favorable prognosis.

SIGNIFICANCE

By accumulating clinical data from ISSNHL patients, it's anticipated that the possibility of recovery following treatment can be determined.

Practice trends in pediatric sudden sensorineural hearing loss management: An unresolved diagnosis

PURPOSE

Assess practice patterns amongst pediatric otolaryngologist for the management of children with SSNHL.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional online survey of members of the American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology (ASPO) was performed; 135 responded. Patterns in treatment modalities, ancillary tests, and timing of treatment and follow-up were evaluated. These patterns were compared between respondents with different characteristics (number of years in practice, clinic location, and number of pediatric SSNHL cases within the last year) using ordered logistic regression, Kruskal-Wallis, Wilcoxon rank-sum, and Fisher's exact tests.

RESULTS

Mean time from onset of hearing loss to presentation to a pediatric otolaryngologist was 10 days (range 1-60 days). The most cited reasons for delay in care were 'patient not seeking any healthcare evaluation' (65 %) and 'lack of access to obtain an audiogram' (54 %). The most ordered blood work was complete blood count (14 %) and herpes simplex testing (15 %). Complete blood count was ordered more frequently by physicians in practice for >10 years compared with those in practice 1-10 years, P = 0.03. Most respondents reported treating with systemic steroids (86/92, 93 %), including intratympanic steroids (32/92, 35 %). Treatment with systemic steroids was more common in academic compared with private practice, P = 0.03. Antivirals were the most common additional agent prescribed (14/89, 16 %). Most patients were seen in follow-up 1-4 weeks after diagnosis (63/85, 74 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Most pediatric otolaryngologists treat SSNHL with systemic steroids. The remainder of the diagnostic and management paradigm varies significantly, highlighting the need to systematically define which treatment optimizes outcomes in this population.

Vulnerable frequency as an independent prognostic factor for sudden sensorineural hearing loss

Objectives

Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) is a common otology emergency in the practice. Its severe hearing impairment and prognosis impair the quality of life. Given that cochlear hair cell vulnerability is not consistent across frequencies, this study aims to investigate the impact of frequency-specific hearing loss on prognosis in SSNHL.

Methods

The study included 255 patients with full-frequency SSNHL. The baseline, clinical, and hearing characteristics, as well as possible cardiovascular predictors in blood, were collected for analysis.

Results

The 4,000 and 8,000 Hz hearing levels in the responder group were significantly lower than those in the non-responder group (p = 0.008, p < 0.001), while the average hearing was not (p = 0.081). Logistic regression showed that only vertigo (OR, 95% CI, 0.265, 0.102–0.684, p = 0.006) and 8,000 Hz hearing level (OR, 95% CI, 0.943, 0.916–0.971, p < 0.001) were strongly associated with treatment outcome.

Conclusions

Compared with other frequencies, 8,000 Hz hearing level was closely related to prognosis in SSNHL. In an adjusted model, our study did not find an effect of mean hearing on prognosis in SSNHL. However, further multicenter prospective studies are needed for validation.