Multi-Center Comparison of Two Self-Expanding Transcatheter Heart Valves: A Propensity Matched Analysis

Valve Hemodynamics by Valve Size and 1-Year Survival Following Implantation of the Portico Valve in the Multicenter CONFIDENCE Registry

Background

The CONtrolled delivery For ImproveD outcomEs with cliNiCal Evidence registry was initiated to characterize the clinical safety and device performance from experienced transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) centers in Europe and Australia that use the Portico valve to treat patients with severe aortic stenosis. We herein report for the first time the valve performance at 30-day across all implanted valve sizes and the 1-year survival from this registry.

Methods

This was a prospective, multicenter, single-arm observational clinical investigation of patients clinically indicated for implantation of a Portico valve in experienced TAVI centers. Patients were treated with a commercially available valve (size 23, 25, 27, or 29 mm) using either the first-generation delivery system (DS) (n = 501) or the second-generation (FlexNav) DS (n = 500). Adverse events were adjudicated by an independent clinical events committee according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria. Echocardiographic outcomes were assessed at 30 days by an independent core laboratory, and a survival check was performed at 1 year.

Results

We enrolled 1001 patients (82.0 years, 62.5% female, 63.7% New York Heart Association functional class III/IV at baseline) from 27 clinical sites in 8 countries across Europe and one site in Australia. Implantation of a single valve was successful in 97.5% of subjects. Valve hemodynamics at 30 days were substantially improved relative to baseline, with large aortic valve areas and low mean gradients across all implanted valve sizes (aortic valve areas were 1.7 ± 0.4, 1.7 ± 0.5, 1.8 ± 0.5, and 2.0 ± 0.5 cm2, and mean gradients were 7.0 ± 2.7, 7.5 ± 4.7, 7.3 ± 3.3, and 6.4 ± 3.3 mmHg for 23, 25, 27, and 29 mm valve sizes, respectively). Across all implanted valve sizes, most patients (77.1%) had no patient-prosthesis mismatch. Death from any cause within 1 year occurred in 13.7% of the patients in the first-generation DS group as compared with 11.0% in the second-generation DS group (p = 0.2).

Conclusions

The Portico valve demonstrated excellent hemodynamic performance across all valve sizes in a large cohort of subjects implanted in experienced TAVI centers. One-year survival rates were favorable when using both the first-generation and second-generation (FlexNav) DSs in this high-risk cohort.

ClinicalTrialsgov Identifier

NCT03752866.

Procedural safety of transcatheter aortic valve replacement with Portico valve: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The Portico transcatheter aortic heart valve is a self-expandable, fully resheathable bioprosthetic valve with a nitinol frame and porcine pericardial sealing cuff. It has been used among symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) who are at high or extreme surgical risk. However, till date very few studies has been reported with inconclusive evidence for its postprocedure safety outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

The authors aim to evaluate the safety of the Portico transcatheter aortic valve replacement system among patients with AS.

METHODOLOGY

The authors conducted a systematic literature search on PubMed, Embase, and Scopus from inception till 10th April 2023 by using predefined MESH terms using 'AND' and 'OR'. The following search terms were used: 'Aortic Stenosis' AND 'Transcatheter aortic valve replacement' OR 'Portico valve'. Finally, descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data in this paper. The mean and SD were adopted to describe continuous variables, whereas frequencies and percentages were used for dichotomous data.

RESULTS

A total of 7 studies with 2782 patients were included in the analysis. The mean age of patients was 82.3 years, and 54.63% were female. The most common comorbidity was hypertension (65.21%) and diabetes mellitus (26.45%). Among patients of AS with Portico valve implants, postprocedural outcomes including 30-day mortality (2.32%), cardiovascular mortality (2.37%), stroke (2.23%), myocardial infarction (0.94%), major bleeding (3.97%), major vascular complications (4.91%), acute kidney injury (1.37%), and permanent pacemaker implantations in 15.73% patients were reported. Overall, device success was observed in 95.82% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the repositionable Portico valve, a new bioprosthesis, appears to have a low postprocedural mortality rate and other clinical outcomes in high-risk patients with severe AS.

Comparison of the New-Generation Self-Expanding NAVITOR Transcatheter Heart Valve with Its Predecessor, the PORTICO, in Severe Native Aortic Valve Stenosis

BACKGROUND

Third-generation transcatheter heart valves (THVs) are designed to improve outcomes. Data on the new intra-annular self-expanding NAVITOR are scarce.

AIMS

The aim of this analysis was to compare outcomes between the PORTICO and the NAVITOR systems.

METHODS

Data from 782 patients with severe native aortic stenosis treated with PORTICO (n = 645) or NAVITOR (n = 137) from 05/2012 to 09/2022 were evaluated. The clinical and hemodynamic outcomes of 276 patients (PORTICO, n = 139; NAVITOR, n = 137) were evaluated according to VARC-3 recommendations.

RESULTS

Rates of postprocedural more-than-mild paravalvular leakage (PVL) were significantly lower for NAVITOR than for PORTICO (7.2% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.041). In addition, severe bleeding rates (27.3% vs. 13.1%, p = 0.005) and major vascular complications (5.8% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.036) were lower in the NAVITOR group. The mean gradients (7 vs. 8 mmHg, p = 0.121) and calculated aortic valve areas (1.90 cm² vs. 1.99 cm², p = 0.235) were comparable. Rates of PPI were similarly high in both groups (15.3 vs. 21.6, p = 0.299).

CONCLUSIONS

The NAVITOR demonstrated favorable in-hospital procedural outcome data, with lower rates of relevant PVL, major vascular complications, and severe bleeding than its predecessor the PORTICO and preserved favorable hemodynamic outcomes.

Device Selection for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Twenty years after the first implantation by Alain Cribier and his team, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has demonstrated its efficacy and safety in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis with high, intermediate, and even low surgical risk [...].