Anastomotic Leak Impact on Long-Term Survival after Right Colectomy for Cancer: A Propensity-Score-Matched Analysis

Cost and outcomes of side-to-side versus end-to-end anastomosis in right colectomy: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The optimal anastomotic configuration for right-sided colectomies remains controversial, with comparable postoperative outcomes across techniques. Thus, economic considerations may play a larger role in decision-making within cost-constrained healthcare settings.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study evaluated right-sided colectomies with ileocolic anastomosis at a Swiss tertiary center between 2016 and 2021. We compared costs and outcomes among three anastomotic techniques: end-to-end (EE), side-to-side stapled (SSS), and side-to-side hand-sewn (SSH).

RESULTS

Out of 468 patients (mean age 67.7 ± 16.2 years; 51.7% female), EE was used in 95 cases (20.3%), SSS in 191 (40.8%), and SSH in 182 (38.9%). The majority (72.0%) underwent elective surgery. Insurance coverage included basic (62.2%), semi-private (24.2%), and private (13.7%). Mean operation times were shortest for EE (173.6 ± 72.3 min), followed by SSS (188.0 ± 65.4 min) and SSH (195.1 ± 61.5 min). The median total costs were 26,449 €. The SSS group had the lowest median total costs, 2424 € less than SSH and 2095 € less than EE, with no significant differences (p = 0.1657). Significant differences were observed in operating room (OR) costs, with EE being the lowest and SSH the highest (p < 0.0001). Adjusted OR costs in SSH were 23% more than EE and 21% more than SSS. No significant difference was found between EE and SSS OR costs. For mean OR material costs, EE had the lowest, followed by SSS and SSH. Adjusted costs for EE were 52% lower than SSS (p = 0.0005) and 65% lower than SSH (p = 0.0191). Clavien-Dindo Grade ≥ III complication rates were 2.1% for EE, 1.9% for SSH, and 3.0% for SSS. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 12 cases (2.6%), and in-hospital mortality was 0.9% (no deaths in EE; two in SSS and SSH each).

CONCLUSIONS

EE anastomosis was associated with the lowest OR and material costs in this retrospective analysis while no disadvantages concerning postoperative outcomes could be identified.

Multicentric national Italian analysis of textbook outcome in colorectal cancer surgery: The ATOCCS Study protocol on behalf of the Italian Surgical Association (ACOI, Associazione Chirurghi Ospedalieri Italiani)

Background:

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Despite advancements in surgical techniques and perioperative care, patient outcomes vary significantly across healthcare institutions. Textbook outcome (TO), a composite metric representing an ideal postoperative course, has been proposed as a standard for assessing the quality of surgical care in CRC. However, its impact on patient outcomes remains underexplored, particularly across diverse clinical settings.

Objective:

This study aims to explore surgeons’ adherence to TO criteria and identify patient-specific and procedural risk factors associated with TO failure. The study will also evaluate TO as a quality metric in CRC surgery, examining its association with short-term and long-term clinical outcomes in a multicenter cohort.

Methods:

This multicenter, retrospective cohort study will include all adult patients undergoing CRC resection between 1 January 2022 and 31 December 2024 across multiple centers in Italy, on behalf of the Italian Surgical Association (ACOI, Associazione Chirurghi Ospedalieri Italiani). The study will collect and analyze demographic, clinical, and surgical data to determine TO incidence and its association with key outcomes, including radical resection, 30-day mortality, morbidity, no reintervention, no ostomy placement, and a hospital stay of 14 days or less.

Conclusions:

This study will offer valuable insights into the utility of TO as a metric for evaluating the quality of care in CRC surgery. These findings may inform future guidelines and policies aimed at improving CRC surgical outcomes.

Achieving Textbook Outcomes in Colorectal Cancer Surgery Is Associated with Improved Long-Term Survival: Results of the Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study

Background: The outcomes of patients with colorectal cancer greatly depend on the quality of their surgical care. However, relying solely on a single quality indicator does not adequately capture the multifaceted nature of modern perioperative care. A new tool-"Textbook Outcome" (TO)-has been suggested to provide a comprehensive evaluation of surgical quality. This study aims to examine how TO affects the long-term outcomes of colorectal cancer patients who are scheduled for surgery. Methods: The data of all patients undergoing elective colorectal cancer resection with primary anastomosis at two major cancer treatment centers in Lithuania-Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos and National Cancer Institute-between 2014 and 2018 were entered into the prospectively maintained database. The study defined TO as a composite quality indicator that incorporated seven parameters: R0 resection, retrieval of ≥12 lymph nodes, absence of postoperative complications during the intrahospital period, hospital stay duration of fewer than 14 days, no readmission within 90 days after surgery, no reinterventions within 30 days after surgery, and no 30-day mortality. Long-term outcomes between patients who achieved TO and those who did not were compared. Factors associated with failure to achieve TO were identified. Results: Of the 1524 patients included in the study, TO was achieved by 795 (52.2%). Patients with a higher ASA score (III-IV) were identified to have higher odds of failure to achieve TO (OR 1.497, 95% CI 1.203-1.863), while those who underwent minimally invasive surgery had lower odds for similar failure (OR 0.570, 95% CI 0.460-0.706). TO resulted in improved 5-year overall-(80.2% vs. 65.5%, p = 0.001) and disease-free survival (76.6% vs. 62.6%; p = 0.001) rates. Conclusions: Elective colorectal resections result in successful TO for 52.5% of patients. The likelihood of failure to achieve TO is increased in patients with a high ASA score, while minimally invasive surgery is associated with higher TO rates. Patients who fail to achieve successful surgical outcomes experience reduced long-term outcomes.

Right hemicolectomy for colon cancer: does the anastomotic configuration affect short-term outcomes?

OBJECTIVES

Right hemicolectomy is a common colorectal operation for resection of cancers of the right colon. The ileocolic anastomosis may be created using a stapled end-to-side, stapled side-to-side or handsewn technique. Anastomotic leak and post-operative bleeding are uncommon but serious causes of morbidity and mortality, while post-operative ileus contributes to prolonged length of stay. The aim of this study was to evaluate differences in short-term outcomes between different anastomotic configurations following right hemicolectomy for colon cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study using data from the Bowel Cancer Outcomes Registry (BCOR), including 94 hospitals across Australia and New Zealand, of all patients who underwent right hemicolectomy or extended right hemicolectomy for colon cancer with formation of a primary anastomosis between 2007 and 2021.

RESULTS

We included 8164 patients in the analysis. There was no significant difference in rates of anastomotic leak and anastomotic bleeding based on anastomotic technique. A stapled end-to-side anastomosis was associated with a lower rate of post-operative ileus than stapled side-to-side anastomosis (6.5% vs. 7.2%; P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Both handsewn and stapled anastomosis techniques may be utilized for oncologic right hemicolectomy, with comparable rates of anastomotic leak and post-operative bleeding. Stapled end-to-side anastomosis resulted in lower rates of prolonged ileus compared to stapled side-to-side anastomoses.

Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term prognosis after colorectal cancer surgery

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignancies in the world. Despite significant improvements in surgical technique, postoperative complications still occur in a fair percentage of patients undergoing colorectal surgery. The most feared complication is anastomotic leakage. It negatively affects short-term prognosis, with increased post-operative morbidity and mortality, higher hospitalization time and costs. Moreover, it may require further surgery with the creation of a permanent or temporary stoma. While there is no doubt about the negative impact of anastomotic dehiscence on the short-term prognosis of patients operated on for CRC, still under discussion is its impact on the long-term prognosis. Some authors have described an association between leakage and reduced overall survival, disease-free survival, and increased recurrence, while other Authors have found no real impact of dehiscence on long term prognosis. The purpose of this paper is to review all the literature about the impact of anastomotic dehiscence on long-term prognosis after CRC surgery. The main risk factors of leakage and early detection markers are also summarized.

Prehabilitation in Modern Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Comprehensive Review

Colorectal cancer remains the third most prevalent cancer worldwide, exceeding 1.9 million new cases annually. Surgery continues to be the gold standard treatment option. Unfortunately, colorectal cancer surgery carries significant postoperative morbidity and mortality. Moreover, most rectal cancer patients and some patients with locally advanced colon cancer require preoperative neoadjuvant therapy. It improves long-term outcomes but impairs patients' physical fitness and thus further increases surgical risk. Recently, prehabilitation has gained interest as a novel strategy to reduce treatment-related morbidity for patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. However, the concept is still in its infancy, and the role of prehabilitation remains controversial. In this comprehensive review, we sum up present evidence on prehabilitation before colorectal cancer surgery. Available studies are very heterogenous in interventions and investigated outcomes. Nonetheless, all trials show at least some positive effects of prehabilitation on patients' physical, nutritional, or psychological status or even reduced postoperative morbidity. Unfortunately, the optimal prehabilitation program remains undetermined; therefore, this concept cannot be widely implemented. Future studies investigating optimal prehabilitation regimens for patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer are necessary.