1
|
Marone EM, Rinaldi LF, Brioschi C, Bracale UM, Modugno P, Maione M, Curci R, Filippi F, Piffaretti G, Gaggiano A, Palasciano G, Angiletta D, Michelagnoli S, Forliti E, Ercolini L, Pulli R. Endovascular Aortic Repair With the E-Tegra Device: Preliminary Outcomes From a Multicenter National Registry. J Endovasc Ther 2024:15266028241270861. [PMID: 39188184 DOI: 10.1177/15266028241270861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/28/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) is currently expanding its feasibility thanks to design innovations, but hostile proximal necks and narrow iliac arteries are still a constraint, as expressed by the Instructions for Use (IFU) of most devices. Our aim is to report the preliminary results of the E-Tegra endograft in infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) performed in 15 high-volume centers. MATERIALS AND METHODS The e-Tegra Italian endoGraft REgistry (TIGRE) is a prospectively maintained database of consecutive EVAR with the E-Tegra stent-graft across 15 participating centers between March 2021 and March 2023. The registry records baseline clinical data, anatomic measurements of the abdominal aorta, perioperative and postoperative outcomes, with a scheduled follow-up period of 3 years for all patients. This is a preliminary analysis of the first results updated to January 2024. The primary endpoints are technical and clinical success, perioperative mortality, freedom from endograft rupture, and aortic-related mortality. The secondary endpoints are freedom from reintervention, and any type of endoleak (EL). The results were analyzed in relation with the anatomic characteristics of the AAAs, namely, iliac axes tortuosity and proximal neck hostility. RESULTS The registry included 147 consecutive EVAR (138 elective and 9 in emergent setting), 7 of which were associated with an iliac branch implantation. Ninety patients had at least 1 criterion of anatomical hostility, and 25 were treated outside the device IFU. Primary technical success was achieved in 146 cases (99.3%) and assisted success in 147 (100%), with no perioperative mortality. After a median follow-up period of 20 months, no aneurysm-related mortality occurred. Reinterventions were 5: 2 for type IB EL and 3 for type II ELs with aneurysm sac increase. Five more type II ELs with aneurysm sac stability are under observation. No differences in terms of reinterventions were noted between aneurysms with standard and hostile anatomy. CONCLUSION The E-Tegra endograft is safe and effective in treating AAAs with standard and hostile anatomy, with a low rate of complications and reinterventions, although longer-term outcomes and larger numbers are needed to compare its performances related to specific anatomic criteria. CLINICAL IMPACT This multi-center nationwide Registry reports a real-world experience of EVAR performed with the E-Tegra abdominal endograft across 15 high-volume Centers, providing early- and mid-term device-specific results, which will help vascular surgeons in endograft selection. In particular, this study focuses on clinical results obtained in treating aneurysms with hostile anatomy, analyzing the performances of the E-Tegra endograft in cases of hostile proximal necks and narrow or tortuous iliac axes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrico Maria Marone
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic, and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Vascular Surgery Department, Ospedale Policlinico di Monza, Monza, Italy
| | | | - Chiara Brioschi
- Vascular Surgery Department, Ospedale Policlinico di Monza, Monza, Italy
| | - Umberto Marcello Bracale
- Vascular Surgery Unit, Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Pietro Modugno
- Vascular Surgery Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Massimo Maione
- Vascular Surgery Unit, Ospedale Santa Croce e Carle, Cuneo, Italy
| | | | | | - Gabriele Piffaretti
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria School of Medicine, Varese, Italy
| | | | - Giancarlo Palasciano
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Medical, Surgical Sciences and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Policlinico le Scotte, Siena, Italy
| | - Domenico Angiletta
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine, Area Jonica-(DiMePRe-J), University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
- Vascular Surgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico, Bari, Italy
| | | | - Enzo Forliti
- Vascular Surgery Unit, Ospedale di Biella, Biella, Italy
| | | | - Raffaele Pulli
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Firenze, Firenze, Italy
- Vascular Surgery Unit, University Hospital Careggi, Firenze, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ricci G, Gibelli F, Sirignano A, Taurino M, Sirignano P. Physician-Modified Endografts for Repair of Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Clinical Perspectives and Medico-Legal Profiles. J Pers Med 2024; 14:759. [PMID: 39064014 PMCID: PMC11278265 DOI: 10.3390/jpm14070759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2024] [Revised: 07/08/2024] [Accepted: 07/15/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Standard endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) has become the standard of care for treating infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) in patients with favorable anatomies, while patients with challenging AAA anatomies, and those with suprarenal or thoraco-abdominal aneurysms, still need alternative, more complex, solutions, including custom-made branched or fenestrated grafts, which are constrained by production delay and costs. To address urgent needs and complex cases, physicians have proposed modifying standard endografts by manually creating graft fenestrations. This allows for effective aneurysm exclusion and satisfactory patency of visceral vessels. Although physician-modified grafts (PMEGs) have demonstrated high technical success, standardized creation processes and long-term safety data are still lacking, necessitating further study to validate their clinical and legal standing. The aim of this article is to illustrate the state of the art with regard to this surgical technique, summarizing its origin, evolution, and the main clinical evidence supporting its effectiveness. The paper also aims to discuss the main medico-legal issues related to the use of PMEGs, with particular reference to the issue of safety related to the standardization of the surgical technique, medical liability profiles, and informed consent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanna Ricci
- Section of Legal Medicine, School of Law, University of Camerino, 62032 Camerino, Italy; (G.R.); (A.S.)
| | - Filippo Gibelli
- Section of Legal Medicine, School of Law, University of Camerino, 62032 Camerino, Italy; (G.R.); (A.S.)
| | - Ascanio Sirignano
- Section of Legal Medicine, School of Law, University of Camerino, 62032 Camerino, Italy; (G.R.); (A.S.)
| | - Maurizio Taurino
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Sant’Andrea Hospital of Rome, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy;
| | - Pasqualino Sirignano
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Sant’Andrea Hospital of Rome, Department of General and Specialistic Surgery, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sirignano P, Piffaretti G, Ceruti S, Orso M, Picozzi M, Ricci G, Sirignano A, Taurino M. Insight from an Italian Delphi Consensus on EVAR feasibility outside the instruction for use: the SAFE EVAR Study. THE JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY 2024; 65:273-279. [PMID: 38319647 DOI: 10.23736/s0021-9509.23.12906-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The SAfety and FEasibility of standard EVAR outside the instruction for use (SAFE-EVAR) Study was designed to define the attitude of Italian vascular surgeons towards the use of standard endovascular repair (EVAR) for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) outside the instruction for use (IFU) through a Delphi consensus endorsed by the Italian Society of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Vascolare ed Endovascolare - SICVE). METHODS A questionnaire consisting of 26 statements was developed, validated by an 18-member Advisory Board, and then sent to 600 Italian vascular surgeons. The Delphi process was structured in three subsequent rounds which took place between April and June 2023. In the first two rounds, respondents could indicate one of the following five degrees of agreement: 1) strongly agree; 2) partially agree; 3) neither agree nor disagree; 4) partially disagree; 5) strongly disagree; while in the third round only three different choices were proposed: 1) agree; 2) neither agree nor disagree; 3) disagree. We considered the consensus reached when ≥70% of respondents agreed on one of the options. After the conclusion of each round, a report describing the percentage distribution of the answers was sent to all the participants. RESULTS Two-hundred-forty-four (40.6%) Italian Vascular Surgeons agreed to participate the first round of the Delphi Consensus; the second and the third rounds of the Delphi collected 230 responders (94.3% of the first-round responders). Four statements (15.4%) reached a consensus in the first rounds. Among the 22 remaining statements, one more consensus (3.8%) was achieved in the second round. Finally, seven more statements (26.9%) reached a consensus in the simplified last round. Globally, a consensus was reached for almost half of the proposed statements (46.1%). CONCLUSIONS The relatively low consensus rate obtained in this Delphi seems to confirm the discrepancy between Guideline recommendations and daily clinical practice. The data collected could represent the source for a possible guidelines' revision and the proposal of specific Good Practice Points in all those aspects with only little evidence available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pasqualino Sirignano
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy -
- Department of General and Specialistic Surgery, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy -
| | - Gabriele Piffaretti
- Vascular Surgery, ASST Settelaghi University Teaching Hospital, Varese, Italy
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Silvia Ceruti
- Research Center for Clinical Ethics, Department of Biotechnologies and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Orso
- Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Umbria e delle Marche "Togo Rosati", Perugia, Italy
| | - Mario Picozzi
- Research Center for Clinical Ethics, Department of Biotechnologies and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Giovanna Ricci
- School of Civil Law, University of Camerino, Camerino, Macerata, Italy
| | - Ascanio Sirignano
- School of Civil Law, University of Camerino, Camerino, Macerata, Italy
| | - Maurizio Taurino
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhang L, Tang Y, Wang J, Liu X, Liu Y, Zeng W, He C. Selective aneurysmal sac neck-targeted embolization during endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm with hostile neck anatomy. J Cardiothorac Surg 2024; 19:57. [PMID: 38311778 PMCID: PMC10840254 DOI: 10.1186/s13019-024-02550-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/28/2024] [Indexed: 02/06/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of selective aneurysmal sac neck-targeted embolization in endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in patients with a hostile neck anatomy (HNA). MATERIALS AND METHODS Between October 2020 and June 2022, patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and HNA who underwent EVAR with a low-profile stent graft and a selective aneurysmal sac neck-targeted embolization technique were analysed. An HNA was defined by the presence of any of the following parameters: infrarenal neck angulation > 60°; neck length < 15 mm; conical neck; circumferential calcification ≥ 50%; or thrombus ≥ 50%. Before occluding the entire aneurysm during the procedure, a buddy wire was loaded prophylactically into the sac through the contralateral limb side. If a type Ia endoleak (ELIa) occurred and persisted despite adjunctive treatment such as balloon moulding or cuff extension, this preloaded wire could be utilized to enable a catheter to reach the space between the stent graft and sac neck to perform coil embolization. In the absence of ELIa, the wire was simply retracted. The primary outcome of this study was freedom from sac expansion and endoleak-related reintervention during the follow-up period; secondary outcomes included technical success and intraoperative and in-hospital postoperative complications. RESULTS Among the 28 patients with a hostile neck morphology, 11 (39.5%) who presented with ELIa underwent intraprocedural treatment involving sac neck-targeted detachable coil embolization. Seventeen individuals (60.7%) of the total patient population did not undergo coiling. All patients in the coiling group underwent balloon moulding, and 2 patients additionally underwent cuff extension. In the noncoiling group, 14 individuals underwent balloon moulding as a treatment for ELIa, while 3 patients did not exhibit ELIa during the procedure. The coiling group showed longer operating durations (81.27 ± 11.61 vs. 70.71 ± 7.17 min, P < 0.01) and greater contrast utilization than the noncoiling group (177.45 ± 52.41 vs. 108.24 ± 17.49 ml, P < 0.01). In the entire cohort, the technical success rate was 100%, and there were no procedure-related complications. At a mean follow-up of 18.6 ± 5.2 months (range 12-31), there were no cases of sac expansion (19 cases of sac regression, 67.86%; 9 cases of stability, 32.14%) or endoleak-related reintervention. CONCLUSIONS Selective aneurysmal sac neck-targeted embolization for the treatment of ELIa in AAA patients with an HNA undergoing EVAR is safe and may prevent type Ia endoleak and related sac expansion after EVAR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lifeng Zhang
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, 610072, Sichuan, China
| | - Yongjiang Tang
- Department of Vascular Disease, Panzhihua Municipal Central Hospital, Panzhihua, Sichuan, China
| | - Jiantao Wang
- Department of Interventional Radiology and Vascular Surgery, Xichang Municipal Pepole's Hospital, Xichang, Sichuan, China
| | - Xianjun Liu
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Leshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Leshan, Sichuan, China
| | - Yang Liu
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, 610072, Sichuan, China
| | - Wei Zeng
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, 610072, Sichuan, China
| | - Chunshui He
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, 610072, Sichuan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Arko FR, Pearce BJ, Henretta JP, Fugate MW, Torsello G, Panneton JM, Peng Y, Edward Garrett H. Five-year outcomes of endosuture aneurysm repair in patients with short neck abdominal aortic aneurysm from the ANCHOR registry. J Vasc Surg 2023; 78:1418-1425.e1. [PMID: 37558144 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.07.058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Revised: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/29/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Hostile aortic neck anatomies such as proximal short necks are known to put patients at an increased risk for type IA endoleaks, migration, and need for reinterventions. The Heli-FX EndoAnchor System was designed to improve seal of aortic stent grafts. Endosuture aneurysm repair (ESAR) using EndoAnchors with the Endurant stent graft has been shown to be safe and effective for the treatment of patients with short necks through one year. This study reports the 5-year patient outcomes of the Aneurysm Treatment using the Heli-FX EndoAnchor System Global Registry (ANCHOR) short neck regulatory cohort. METHODS The 70 patients from the ANCHOR Registry were cohort submitted to regulators for approval of the Endurant short neck indication. Patients had an infrarenal neck length of ≥ 4 mm and <10 mm. At 5 years, this short neck cohort had clinical and imaging follow-up compliance rates of 85% (28/33) and 70% (23/33), respectively. RESULTS The short neck cohort had a mean age of 71.3±8.1 years and was 27.1% (19/70) female. Kaplan Meier freedom from all-cause mortality was 68.5 ± 6.2%, freedom from aneurysm-related mortality was 90.1 ± 4.5%, freedom from any endovascular or surgical secondary procedure was 76.9 ± 7.2%, and freedom from rupture was 95.6 ± 3.2%. Eight patients had a total of nine type IA endoleaks detected through 5 years, of which three resolved spontaneously by the next follow-up visit. There were two patients with renal complications who did not undergo reintervention and there were no device migrations reported through 5 years. After 5 years, 68.2% of patients (15/22) had sac regression, 13.6% (3/22) had stable sacs, and 18.2% (4/22) had increased sac diameter as compared with their 1-month measurements. CONCLUSIONS After ESAR treatment using Heli-FX EndoAnchors with Endurant, the 5-year outcomes of the short neck cohort from the ANCHOR registry had encouraging results with regards to proximal neck-related complications, secondary procedures, and sac regression. This review of ESAR in patients with short proximal necks showed positive outcomes through 5 years although follow-up of a larger cohort is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank R Arko
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC.
| | - Benjamin J Pearce
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - John P Henretta
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mission Hospital, Asheville, NC
| | - Mark W Fugate
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Chattanooga Heart Institute Memorial Hospital, Chattanooga, TN
| | - Giovanni Torsello
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, St. Franziskus-Hospital, Münster, Germany
| | - Jean M Panneton
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA
| | - Yun Peng
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Medtronic Inc., Santa Rosa, CA
| | - H Edward Garrett
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Tennessee, Memphis, TN
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Please, Look Beyond. Comment on ''Chimney Versus Fenestrated Endovascular Versus Open Repair for Juxta/Pararenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of the Short-Term Results''. World J Surg 2023; 47:824-825. [PMID: 36474121 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-022-06850-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
7
|
Nana P, Spanos K, Kouvelos G, Arnaoutoglou E, Giannoukas A, Matsagkas M. Conical Aortic Neck as a Predictor of Outcome after Endovascular Aneurysm Exclusion: Midterm Results. Ann Vasc Surg 2023; 90:77-84. [PMID: 36460173 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2022] [Revised: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conical neck may affect endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) outcomes. The aim of this study was to present EVAR neck adverse events [endoleak type Ia (ET Ia) and graft migration], in patients with conical neck morphology compared to patients with non-conical necks. An additional analysis of the factors that may affect neck adverse events in patients with conical necks, during the first postoperative year, was executed. METHODS A retrospective analysis of prospective data was conducted, including patients that underwent elective EVAR, between 2017 and 2019. All patients completed the clinical and imaging follow-up of the initial 12 months. Regarding imaging, all cases underwent computed tomography angiography (CTA), preoperatively, at the 1st and 12th month of follow-up. Preoperative and postoperative aneurysm anatomic characteristics (supra-renal and infra-renal aortic diameters, aneurysm diameter, neck angle, thrombus, and calcification) were recorded. Proximal neck was defined as the infrarenal aortic segment, with a diameter less than 30 mm. Conical neck was any neck with a diameter increase ≥2 mm per cm of length (from outer-to-outer aortic wall). The proximal 15 mm of the neck length were considered the zone of endograft sealing. Migration was any ≥10 mm caudal movement of the endograft, relative to its position detected at the CTA of the first month. Neck adverse events were defined as the composite event of ET Ia and migration. RESULTS The cohort included 150 patients; 66 (44%) presented conical neck morphology. No significant difference was detected regarding the preoperative anatomic characteristics between the conical and non-conical groups. Only distal (15 mm) neck diameter was wider in the conical group (P < 0.001). Supra-renal active fixation was used in 63.3% of the total cohort; 59.5% in patients with non-conical necks and 68.2% in patients with conical morphology (P = 0.275). Graft oversizing was 18.2% and 18.7% in the non-conical and conical group, respectively (P = 0.248). Oversizing >20% was equal between groups [37.8% vs. 33.3%% (P = 0.608) while oversizing ≥30% was more common among patients with conical necks (3.5% vs. 10.6%, P < 0.001, 3.2 odds ratio, 95% confidence interval: 0.79, 12.91). Regarding ET Ia and migration, no difference was recorded between the groups. In a subanalysis among patients with conical necks, a lower graft migration rate was detected among patients with higher oversizing rate (P = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS EVAR may offer similarly good midterm outcomes in patients with conical and non-conical neck anatomy. An oversizing to the higher suggested rate may be preventive of graft migration during the first postoperative year in necks with conical morphology. Aggressive oversizing (>20%) do not offer any benefit regarding the prevention of adverse events among patients with conical necks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petroula Nana
- Vascular Surgery Department, Larissa University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece.
| | - Konstantinos Spanos
- Vascular Surgery Department, Larissa University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| | - George Kouvelos
- Vascular Surgery Department, Larissa University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| | - Eleni Arnaoutoglou
- Anesthesiology Department, Larissa University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| | - Athanasios Giannoukas
- Vascular Surgery Department, Larissa University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| | - Miltiadis Matsagkas
- Vascular Surgery Department, Larissa University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| |
Collapse
|