Platelet-Derived Procoagulant Microvesicles Are Elevated in Patients with Retinal Vein Occlusion (RVO)

Potential Mechanism of Platelet GPIIb/IIIa and Fibrinogen on Retinal Vein Occlusion

PURPOSE

To explore the role of coagulation and fibrinolytic factors, and the potential mechanism of platelet aggregation in the pathogenesis of retinal vein occlusion.

METHODS

Coagulation and fibrinolytic parameters in patients with retinal vein occlusion were determined using hemagglutinin and HISCL-5000. Relationships between these elevated parameters and factors representing typical clinical manifestations of retinal vein occlusion were examined, and these parameters were analyzed using a STRING database to indicate the potential role of platelet aggregation. Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GPIIb/IIIa) levels were evaluated by flow cytometry after antiplatelet treatment in patients and mouse models. Furthermore, the GPIIb/IIIa ligand fibrinogen in peripheral blood and retina of mouse models was assessed by the turbidimetric method and real-time PCR, respectively.

RESULTS

In patients, significant increases in peripheral blood fibrinogen and GPIIb/IIIa levels were observed (p = 0.0040, p < 0.0001, respectively). A positive correlation was observed between macular thickness (MT) and both fibrinogen and GPIIb/IIIa (r = 0.4528, p = 0.0063; r = 0.3789, p = 0.0427, respectively). After intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs, a significant reduction in fibrinogen levels was observed (p = 0.0072). In addition, the use of antiplatelet drugs resulted in a significant decrease in GPIIb/IIIa (p < 0.0001). In a mouse model, antiplatelet therapy significantly reduced both peripheral blood and retina fibrinogen levels and the overall rate of vein occlusion 3 days after occlusion (p < 0.0005). In addition, the reduction in GPIIb/IIIa levels after antiplatelet therapy was remarkable.

CONCLUSION

Fibrinogen and GPIIb/IIIa may be involved in retinal vein occlusion and blocking platelet aggregation may be a new therapeutic approach for retinal vein occlusion.

Comparative analysis of the quality of platelet concentrates produced by apheresis procedures, platelet rich plasma, and buffy coat

BACKGROUND

Platelet concentrates (PCs) could be prepared using either whole-blood processes or apheresis instruments. During collection, processing and storage, some biochemical and functional changes occur, which may result in quality reduction. Quality evaluation of PCs may be helpful for the precise control of platelet (PLT) inventory to reduce the risk of refractoriness and adverse effects caused by platelet transfusion.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The study was aimed to evaluate the quality of PCs which were produced by five processes: apheresis (AP) procedures (using three different cell separators: Amicus, Trima Accel and MCS+ instruments), platelet rich plasma (PRP), and buffy coat (BC). A total of 100 PCs (20 of each group) were assessed in respect of routine quality control, morphology, size distribution, destroyed and activated platelets, and production of platelet-derived microparticles (PMPs).

RESULTS

All PCs have satisfied the recommended quality of volume, platelet count, residual WBC count, residual RBC count, pH, and sterility according to the Chinese Technical Manual. There was no difference among the 5 groups in morphology and size of PLT and PMPs. Dynamic light scattering test showed that apheresis PCs showed peaks around 10-20 nm, but not whole blood-derived PCs. PCs prepared by Amicus had the relatively high percentage of destroyed platelet, activated platelets and PMPs than other groups.

DISCUSSION

The data suggested high heterogeneity of PMPs, destroyed and activated platelets in PCs produced by different processes, which might be helpful to manage the platelet inventory for targeted use.

Assessment of systemic inflammatory response index and other inflammatory indicators in retinal vein occlusion

Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is the second most common retinal vascular disease after diabetic retinopathy. The study aimed to evaluate the association and the predictive value of inflammatory indicators in RVO. Sixty patients with RVO and 60 healthy individuals were enrolled in this retrospective study. Inflammatory indicators and other hematological parameters obtained from the peripheral venous sample were analyzed and compared among groups. White blood cell count (P = .003), neutrophil (P < .001), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (P < .001), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) (P < .001), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) (P = .014), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) (P < .001), and systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) (P < .001) were significantly higher; the lymphocyte count (P < .001) was significantly lower in patients with RVO. According to receiver operating characteristic analysis, NLR was significant at the good level (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.817, P < .001); SIRI, SII, and MLR were significant at the fair level (AUC = 0.774, P < .001; AUC = 0.733, P < .001, and AUC = 0.724, P < .001, respectively) and PLR (AUC = 0.630, P = .014) was significant at the weak level in terms of RVO prediction. SIRI was superior to other indicators, except NLR, to predict RVO. SIRI, NLR, SII, MLR, and PLR can be used as predictors for identifying the risk of RVO.

Increased intraocular inflammation in retinal vein occlusion is independent of circulating immune mediators and is involved in retinal oedema

We aim to understand the link between systemic and intraocular levels of inflammatory mediators in treatment-naïve retinal vein occlusion (RVO) patients, and the relationship between inflammatory mediators and retinal pathologies. Twenty inflammatory mediators were measured in this study, including IL-17E, Flt-3 L, IL-3, IL-8, IL-33, MIP-3β, MIP-1α, GRO β, PD-L1, CD40L, IFN-β, G-CSF, Granzyme B, TRAIL, EGF, PDGF-AA, PDGF-AB/BB, TGF-α, VEGF, and FGFβ. RVO patients had significantly higher levels of Flt-3 L, IL-8, MIP-3β, GROβ, and VEGF, but lower levels of EGF in the aqueous humor than cataract controls. The levels of Flt-3 L, IL-3, IL-33, MIP-1α, PD-L1, CD40 L, G-CSF, TRAIL, PDGF-AB/BB, TGF-α, and VEGF were significantly higher in CRVO than in BRVO. KEGG pathway enrichment revealed that these mediators affected the PI3K-Akt, Ras, MAPK, and Jak/STAT signaling pathways. Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) analysis showed that VEGF is the upstream cytokine that influences IL-8, G-CSF, and IL-33 in RVO. In the plasma, the level of GROβ was lower in RVO than in controls and no alterations were observed in other mediators. Retinal thickness [including central retinal thickness (CRT) and inner limiting membrane to inner plexiform layer (ILM-IPL)] positively correlated with the intraocular levels of Flt-3 L, IL-33, GROβ, PD-L1, G-CSF, and TGF-α. The size of the foveal avascular zone positively correlated with systemic factors, including the plasma levels of IL-17E, IL-33, INF-β, GROβ, Granzyme B, and FGFβ and circulating high/low-density lipids and total cholesterols. Our results suggest that intraocular inflammation in RVO is driven primarily by local factors but not circulating immune mediators. Intraocular inflammation may promote macular oedema through the PI3K-Akt, Ras, MAPK, and Jak/STAT signaling pathways in RVO. Systemic factors, including cytokines and lipid levels may be involved in retinal microvascular remodeling.

ApoB, non-HDL-C, and LDL-C Are More Prominent in Retinal Artery Occlusion Compared to Retinal Vein Occlusion

PURPOSE

To evaluate and compare the blood lipid profile in retinal artery occlusion (RAO) and retinal vein occlusion (RVO).

METHODS

We included 82 RAO patients and 95 RVO patients in this retrospective case-control study. Controls were matched to RAO or RVO patients at a 1:1 ratio, respectively. Associated lipid variates were analyzed in multivariable logistic regression models.

RESULTS

LDL-C (OR = 1.69), non-HDL-C (OR = 1.87), and ApoB (OR = 11.72) individually significantly increased the risk of RAO. ApoA1 was associated with RVO (OR = 0.02), and with 75.8% sensitivity and 67.4% specificity. TG (OR = 1.61), LDL-C (OR = 1.69), non-HDL-C (OR = 1.91), and ApoB (OR = 12.12) each significantly increased the risk of RAO when compared with RVO.

CONCLUSIONS

ApoB, non-HDL-C, and LDL-C may be potential biomarkers in RAO patients. Low ApoA1 is an independent risk factor for the development of RVO.

High mobility group box 1 derived mainly from platelet microparticles exacerbates microvascular obstruction in no reflow

INTRODUCTION

No reflow manifests coronary microvascular injury caused by continuous severe myocardial ischemia and reperfusion. Microvascular obstruction (MVO) has emerged as one fundamental mechanism of no reflow. However, the underlying pathophysiology remains incompletely defined. Herein, we explore the contribution of high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), derived mainly from platelet microparticles exacerbating MVO in no reflow.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

44 STEMI patients undergoing successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were included in our study. Plasma HMGB1 levels in both the peripheral artery (PA) and infarct-related coronary artery (IRA) were measured by ELISA. Flow cytometry and confocal microscopy assessed the level of HMGB1⁺ platelet derived microparticles (PMPs) and platelet activation. Flow cytometry and western blot evaluated the procoagulant activity (PCA) and the release of inflammatory factors of human microvascular endothelial cells (HCEMCs).

RESULTS

HMGB1 levels were significantly higher in the IRA in no-reflow patients. The levels of HMGB1⁺ PMPs were considerably higher in the IRA of patients with no reflow and were strongly associated with platelet activation. Moreover, our results show that HMGB1 interacts with human microvascular endothelial cells primarily through TLR4, inducing HCMEC proinflammatory, procoagulant phenotype, and monocyte recruitment, accelerating microvascular obstruction and facilitating the development of no reflow.

CONCLUSION

Our results illustrate a novel mechanism by which HMGB1, derived mainly from PMPs, plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of no-reflow, revealing a novel therapeutic target.