Comprehensive Cardiac Magnetic Resonance to Detect Subacute Myocarditis

The Significance of Parametric Mapping in Advanced Cardiac Imaging

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging has witnessed a transformative shift with the integration of parametric mapping techniques, such as T1 and T2 mapping and extracellular volume fraction. These techniques play a crucial role in advancing our understanding of cardiac function and structure, providing unique insights into myocardial tissue properties. Native T1 mapping is particularly valuable, correlating with histopathological fibrosis and serving as a marker for various cardiac pathologies. Extracellular volume fraction, an early indicator of myocardial remodeling, predicts adverse outcomes in heart failure. Elevated T2 relaxation time in cardiac MRI indicates myocardial edema, enabling noninvasive and early detection in conditions like myocarditis. These techniques offer precise insights into myocardial properties, enhancing the accuracy of diagnosis and prognosis across a spectrum of cardiac conditions, including myocardial infarction, autoimmune diseases, myocarditis, and sarcoidosis. Emphasizing the significance of these techniques in myocardial tissue analysis, the review provides a comprehensive overview of their applications and contributions to our understanding of cardiac diseases.

Quantitative cardiac MRI parameters for assessment of myocarditis in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

To evaluate the role of quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) parameters in myocarditis, including acute and chronic myocarditis (AM and CM), for children and adolescents.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PRISMA principles were followed. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and grey literature were searched. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) checklist were utilised for quality assessment. Quantitative CMRI parameters were extracted and a meta-analysis was performed in comparison with healthy controls. The overall effect size was measured as the weighted mean difference (WMD).

RESULTS

Ten quantitative CMRI parameters of seven studies were analysed. Compared with the control group, the myocarditis group reported longer native T1 relaxation time (WMD=54.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 33.21,74.79, p<0.001), longer T2 relaxation time (WMD=2.13, 95% CI: 0.98, 3.28, p<0.001), increased extracellular volume (ECV; WMD=3.13, 95% CI: 1.34,4.91, p=0.001), elevated early gadolinium enhancement (EGE) ratio (WMD=1.47, 95% CI: 0.65,2.28, p<0.001), and increased T2-weighted ratio (WMD=0.43, 95% CI: 0.21,0.64, p<0.001). The AM group had longer native T1 relaxation times (WMD=72.02, 95% CI: 32.78,111.27, p<0.001), increased T2-weighted ratios (WMD=0.52, 95% CI: 0.21,0.84 p=0.001), and impaired left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEF; WMD=-5.84, 95% CI: -9.69, -1.99, p=0.003). Impaired LVEF (WMD=-2.24, 95% CI: -3.32, -1.17, p<0.001) was observed in the CM group.

CONCLUSION

Statistical differences can be observed in some CMRI parameters between patients with myocarditis and healthy controls; however, apart from native T1 mapping, there were no large differences in other parameters between two groups, which may reveal the limited benefit of CMRI in assessing myocarditis in children and adolescents.

T1 Mapping MOLLI 5(3)3 Acquisition Scheme Yields High Accuracy in 1.5 T Cardiac Magnetic Resonance

Objectives: To systematically compare two modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) T1 mapping sequences and their impact on (1) myocardial T1 values native, (2) post-contrast and (3) extracellular volume (ECV). Methods: 200 patients were prospectively included for 1.5 T CMR for work-up of ischemic or non-ischemic cardiomyopathies. To determine native and post-contrast T1 for ECV calculation, two different T1 mapping MOLLI acquisition schemes, 5(3)3 (designed for native scans with long T1) and 4(1)3(1)2 (designed for post-contrast scans with short T1), were acquired in identical mid-ventricular short-axis slices. Both schemes were acquired in native and post-contrast scans. Results: Datasets from 163 patients were evaluated (age 55 ± 17 years; 38% female). Myocardial T1 native for 5(3)3 was 1017 ± 42 ms vs. 956 ± 40 ms for 4(1)3(1)2, with mean intraindividual difference −61 ms (p < 0.0001). Post-contrast myocardial T1 in patients was similar for both acquisition schemes, with 494 ± 48 ms for 5(3)3 and 490 ± 45 ms for 4(1)3(1)2 and mean intraindividual difference −4 ms. Myocardial ECV for 5(3)3 was 27.6 ± 4% vs. 27 ± 4% for 4(1)3(1)2, with mean difference −0.6 percentage points (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: The T1 MOLLI 5(3)3 acquisition scheme provides a reliable estimation of myocardial T1 for the clinically relevant range of long and short T1 values native and post-contrast. In contrast, the T1 MOLLI 4(1)3(1)2 acquisition scheme may only be used for post-contrast scans according to its designed purpose.