Advances in the Clinical Application of Platelet-Rich Plasma in the Foot and Ankle: A Review

Platelet Rich Plasma Therapy in Achilles and Patellar Tendinopathies: Outcomes in Subjects with Diabetes (A Retrospective Case-Control Study)

Introduction: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with a high risk of chronic degenerative Achilles (AT) and Patellar (PT) tendinopathies and ruptures. Growth factors (GFs) synthesis in diabetics is substantially decreased in human connective tissues, including in tendons. Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP), which is enriched in GFs, might prove of great help in tendon healing. The aim of the study was to assess whether pre-existent DM or Impaired Glucose Tolerance (IGT) could influence the clinical outcome in subjects undergoing PRP treatment. Methods: Sixty subjects with diabetes/pre-diabetes and sixty euglycemic controls, matched for sex and age, were enrolled. Patients suffering from proximal insertional PT and mid-portion AT, treated with PRP therapy, were included in the study. To assess the basal status and the efficacy of the therapy after 3 and 6 months, the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment (VISA) questionnaire and the Ultrasound methodology study were used. Patient satisfaction was assessed by means of the Likert Scale. Results: In the population study at 6 months, the mean VISA-score increased (8.92 ± 0.67; p-value < 0.001). The improvement in the diabetic group was less evident compared to the controls (-2.76 ± 0.95; p-value = 0.003). Even though the improvement was poor, it was still significant. MCID analysis revealed that diabetics had higher risk of therapeutic unsuccess. Logistic regression analysis was applied to assess factors associated with unsatisfactory results (Likert-scale) of PRP treatment: AT (O.R.: 3.05; 95%CI: 1.40-6.64; p-value = 0.005), higher BMI values (O.R.: 1.02; 95%CI: 1.01-1.04; p-value = 0.01), and lower VISA score values at baseline (O.R.: 0.95; 95%CI: 0.90-0.99; p-value = 0.04). Conclusions: PRP treatment in AT and PT chronic tendinopathies resulted in less favorable results in subjects with diabetes compared with euglycemic subjects. Moreover, the subjects with PT showed better results than those with AT.

Platelet-Rich Plasma vs Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis at 3-6 Months: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Plantar fasciitis (PF) is a common foot disorder with variability in treatment strategy. Two effective management techniques include platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections and extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT). The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare the effectiveness of PRP vs ESWT in the management of PF.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed of PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar for randomized controlled trials comparing PRP to ESWT. Studies met inclusion criteria if mean and SDs for visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores and plantar fascia thickness (PFT) were reported. Mean differences were used to compare VAS pain score and PFT between PRP and ESWT.

RESULTS

Six randomized controlled trials, comparing a total of 214 subjects in the PRP group and 218 subjects in the ESWT group, were analyzed. A significantly greater statistical improvement was seen in the PRP group in VAS pain (mean difference = -0.67 [95% CI -1.16, -0.18], P = .007) and plantar fascia thickness (PFT) (mean difference = -0.56 [95% CI -0.77, -0.35], P < .001).

CONCLUSION

PRP had a statistically higher pain reduction than ESWT, but the difference does not reach clinical significance in this meta-analysis.

Platelet rich plasma therapy versus other modalities for treatment of plantar fasciitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Plantar fasciitis (PF) is the most common cause of heel pain in adults. There are numerous non-operative treatments available including platelet rich plasma (PRP) injections. PPR has demonstrated effectiveness for a range of musculoskeletal conditions including plantar fasciitis.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of PRP to other conservative treatment options for the management of PF.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed and Google Scholar was performed for randomized control trials (RCT) comparing PRP to other treatment modalities. Studies met inclusion criteria if mean and standard deviations for visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, plantar fascia thickness (PFT), Foot Function Index (FFI), or American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Score were reported. Mean differences (MD) were used to compare VAS pain, PFT, FFI, and AOFAS between PRP and other treatments.

RESULTS

Twenty-one RCTs which altogether included 1356 patients were included in the meta-analysis. PRP demonstrated significantly greater improvements in VAS pain scores compared to extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) (SMD: 0.86; CI: [0.30, 1.41]; p = 0.002), corticosteroid injections (CSI) (SMD: 1.08; CI: [0.05, 2.11]; p = 0.04), and placebo (SMD: 3.42; CI: [2.53, 4.31]; p < 0.00001). In terms of FFI, no significant differences existed among PRP, ESWT, CSI, dextrose prolotherapy (DPT), and meridian trigger points (MTP) in enhancing foot functionality. However, PRP demonstrated a marked advantage over phonophoresis, showing a substantial improvement in FFI scores (SMD: 3.07, 95% CI: 2.34-3.81). PRP did not demonstrate superiority over ESWT, CSI, or MTP for improving PFT, but it was notably more effective than phonophoresis (SMD: 3.18, 95% CI: 2.43-3.94). PRP demonstrated significantly greater improvements in AOFAS scores over CSI (SMD: 3.31, CI: [1.35, 5.27], p = 0.0009) and placebo (SMD: 3.75; CI: [2.81, 4.70]; p < 0.00001).

CONCLUSION

PRP is more effective than CSI, ESWT, and placebo in reducing VAS and more effective than CSI and placebo in improving AOFAS. PRP did not demonstrate a consistent advantage across all outcome measures, such as PFT and FFI. These findings underscore the complexity of PF treatment and call for a more standardized approach to PRP preparation and outcome measurement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I Meta-Analysis.

Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections in Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability: A Case Series

The platelet-rich plasma (PRP) approach may be an effective treatment for joint and cartilage pathologies. However, the rationale for its effectiveness on joint instability is limited. This study aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of PRP injections in patients with chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI). This retrospective study was performed at a single-center outpatient clinic between January 2015 and February 2023 and included pre-intervention assessment and short-term follow-up. Patients were excluded if they had received previous surgical treatment or had constitutional hyperlaxity, systemic diseases, or grade II or III osteoarthritis. The clinical and functional evaluation consisted of the Karlsson score, the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT), Good's grading system, the patient's subjective satisfaction level, and the time required to return to exercise. The entire PRP therapy regime consisted of three PRP administrations at 7-day intervals and follow-up appointments. PRP was administered both intraarticularly and into talofibular ligaments. A total of 47 consecutive patients with CLAI were included, 11 were female (23.4%), with a mean age at intervention of 31.19 ± 9.74 years. A statistically significant improvement was found in the CAIT and Karlsson scores at 3 months (27.74 ± 1.68 and 96.45 ± 4.28, respectively) relative to the pre-intervention status (10.26 ± 4.33 and 42.26 ± 14.9, respectively, p < 0.000). The mean follow-up of patients with CLAI was 17.94 ± 3.25 weeks. This study represents successful short-term functional and clinical outcomes in patients with CLAI after PRP treatment, with no adverse effects. It demonstrates the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial to further assess this therapy.