Endovascular Thrombectomy with or without Intravenous Thrombolysis for Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion in the Imperial College London Thrombectomy Registry

Efficacy and safety of intravenous tenecteplase compared to alteplase before mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The benefits and risks of tenecteplase (TNK) versus alteplase (ALT) have recently been assessed in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy (MT) with diverse results. Due to its high fibrin specificity and lack of excitotoxicity, TNK may have a higher efficacy and safety profile. This study aimed to evaluate the benefits and risks of TNK compared to ALT in AIS patients prior to thrombectomy.

METHODS

We systematically searched four key databases, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library until January 27, 2024 for clinical studies evaluating the effects of TNK versus ALT in patients with large vessel occlusion undergoing MT. A random-effect meta-analysis was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

RESULTS

Ten studies involving 3722 patients receiving TNK (1266 patients) or ALT (2456 patients) were included (age: 69.05 ± 14.95 years; 55.64% male). Compared to ALT-treated patients, TNK-treated patients demonstrated significantly higher rates of early recanalization (odds ratio 2.02, 95%-confidence interval 1.20-3.38, p = 0.008) without increased risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (1.06, 0.64-1.76, p = 0.82) or intracerebral hemorrhage (1.21, 0.66-2.25, p = 0.54). TNK-treated patients showed similar rates of functional independence at 90 days (1.13, 0.87-1.46, p = 0.37) as ALT-treated patients, but lower rates of mortality within 90 days (0.65, 0.44-0.96, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

TNK is superior to ALT in achieving early recanalization and is associated with lower mortality within 90 days in AIS patients undergoing MT. Compared with ALT, TNK does not significantly alter functional independence at 90 days, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage or intracerebral hemorrhage.

Acute and Chronic Kidney Dysfunction and Prognosis following Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke

INTRODUCTION

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have an increased risk of stroke, and CKD seems associated with worse outcome after a stroke. The main objective of our study RISOTTO was to evaluate the influence of CKD and acute kidney injury (AKI) on the clinical outcome and mortality of ischemic stroke patients after thrombolysis and/or thrombectomy.

METHODS

This multicenter cohort study included patients in the acute phase of ischemic stroke due to large artery occlusion managed by thrombectomy. Functional outcome at 3 months was assessed by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS).

RESULTS

280 patients were included in the analysis. Fifty-nine patients (22.6%) had CKD. At 3 months, CKD was associated with similar functional prognosis (mRS 3-6: 50.0% vs. 41.7%, p = 0.262) but higher mortality (24.2% versus 9.5%, p = 0.004). In univariate analysis, patients with CKD had a higher burden of white matter hyperintensities (Fazekas score: 1.7 ± 0.8 vs. 1.0 ± 0.8, p = 0.002), lower initial infarct volume with equivalent severity, and lower recanalization success (86.4% vs. 97.0%, p = 0.008) compared to non-CKD patients. Forty-seven patients (20.0%) developed AKI. AKI was associated with poorer 3-month functional outcome (mRS 3-6: 63.8% vs. 49.0%, p = 0.002) and mortality (23.4% versus 7.7%, p = 0.002). In multivariate analysis, AKI appeared as an independent risk factor for poor functional outcome (mRS 3-6: adjOR 2.79 [1.11-7.02], p = 0.029) and mortality (adjOR 2.52 [1.03-6.18], p = 0.043) at 3 months, while CKD was not independently associated with 3-month mortality and poor neurological outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

AKI is independently associated with poorer functional outcome and increased mortality at 3 months. CKD was not an independent risk factor for 3-month mortality or poor functional prognosis.

Outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy in acute stroke patients with atrial fibrillation detected after stroke versus known atrial fibrillation

We aim to compare the outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation detected after stroke (AFDAS) and their counterparts with known AF (KAF) presenting with large vessel occlusion (LVO) treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT). This observational, prospective study included consecutive patients with acute LVO ischemic stroke of the anterior circulation with AFDAS, KAF and without AF. The primary study outcome was functional independence at 90 days after stroke. The secondary study outcomes were variation of the NIHSS score at 24 h, rate of successful reperfusion, death at 90 days and rate of immediate complications post-procedure. Overall, our cohort included 518 patients with acute ischemic stroke and LVO treated with MT, with 289 (56.8%) without a diagnosis of AF; 107 (21%) with AFDAS; 122 (22.2%) with KAF. There was no significant difference in terms of functional independence at 90 days after stroke between the three groups. Regarding the secondary study outcome, the rate of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH) and/or parenchymal hematoma (PH) were significantly higher in the group of patients without AF (respectively, P = 0.030 and  < 0.010). Logistic regression analysis showed that the subtypes of AF were not statistically significantly associated with functional independence at 90 days after stroke and with the likelihood of any ICH. Our results suggest that the subtypes of AF are not associated with clinical and safety outcomes of MT in patients with acute stroke and LVO. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Safety and outcomes of different endovascular treatment techniques for anterior circulation ischaemic stroke in the elderly: data from the Imperial College Thrombectomy Registry

BACKGROUND

Although previous studies investigated the main predictors of outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in patients aged 80 years and older, less is known about the impact of the procedural features on outcomes in elderly patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of EVT technical procedures on the main 3-month outcomes in a population of patients aged 80 years and older.

METHODS

This observational, prospective, single-centre study included consecutive patients with acute LVO ischaemic stroke of the anterior circulation. The study outcomes were functional independence at 3 months after EVT (defined as a mRS score of 0-2), successful reperfusion (mTICI ≥ 2b), incidence of haeamorrhagic transformation, and 90-day all cause of mortality.

RESULTS

Our cohort included 497 patients with acute ischaemic stroke due to LVO treated with EVT. Among them, 105 (21.1%) patients were aged ≥ 80 years. In the elderly group, multivariable regression analysis showed that thromboaspiration technique vs stent-retriever was the single independent predictor of favourable post-procedural TICI score (OR = 7.65, 95%CI = 2.22-26.32, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that EVT for LVO stroke in the elderly could be safe. The use of thromboaspiration was associated with positive reperfusion outcome in this population. Further studies in larger series are warranted to confirm the present results and to evaluate the safety and efficacy of EVT in the elderly and oldest adults.

Meta-analysis of direct endovascular thrombectomy vs bridging therapy in the management of acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion

BACKGROUND

Debates persist when using intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) before mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large-vessel occlusion (LVO). This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesized evidence on outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO), comparing bridging therapy (BT) with MT alone.

METHOD

We conducted searches of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to July 2023 to identify pertinent clinical trials and observational studies.

RESULT

76 studies, involving 37,658 patients, revealed no significant difference in 90-day functional independence between DEVT and BT. However, a trend favoring BT for achieving functional independence with a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of 0-1 was observed, having Odds ratio (OR) of 0.75 (95% CI 0.66-0.86; p < 0.001). DEVT was associated with higher postprocedural mortality (OR 1.44;95% CI 1.25-1.65; p < 0.001), but a lower risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage compared to BT (OR 0.855; 95% CI 0.621-1.177; p = 0.327). Successful recanalization rates favored BT, emphasizing the importance of individualized treatment decisions (OR 0.759; 95% CI 0.594-0.969; p = 0.027). Sensitivity analyses were conducted to identify key contributors to heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis underscores the intricate equilibrium between functional efficacy and safety in the evaluation of DEVT and BT for ACS-LVO. Fundamentally, while BT appears more efficacious, concerns about safety arise due to the superior safety profile demonstrated by DEVT. Individualized treatment decisions are imperative, and further trials are warranted to enhance precision in clinical guidance.

Outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy in orally anticoagulated patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion: a propensity-matched analysis of the Imperial College Thrombectomy Registry

BACKGROUND

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) remains an effective treatment for patients with acute ischemic stroke receiving oral anticoagulation (OAC) and large vessel occlusion (LVO). However, to date, it remains unclear whether MT is safe in patients on treatment with OAC.

AIMS

In our study, we performed a propensity-matched analysis to investigate the safety and efficacy of MT in patients with acute ischemic stroke receiving anticoagulants. A propensity score method was used to target the causal inference of the observational study design.

METHODS

This observational, prospective, single-centre study included consecutive patients with acute LVO ischemic stroke of the anterior circulation. Demographic, neuro-imaging and clinical data were collected and compared according to the anticoagulation status at baseline, patients on OAC vs those not on OAC. The primary study outcomes were the occurrence of any intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) and symptomatic ICH. The secondary study outcomes were functional independence at 90 days after stroke (defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores of 0 through 2), mortality at 3 months and successful reperfusion rate according to the modified treatment in cerebral infarction (mTICI) score.

RESULTS

Overall, our cohort included 573 patients with acute ischemic stroke and LVO treated with MT. After propensity score matching, 495 patients were matched (99 OAC group vs 396 no OAC group). There were no differences in terms of clinical characteristics between the two groups, except for the rate of intravenous thrombolysis less frequently given in the OAC group. There was no significant difference in terms of the rate of any ICH and symptomatic ICH between the two groups. With regards to the secondary study outcome, there was no significant difference in terms of the rate of successful recanalization post-procedure and functional independence at 3 months between the two groups. Patients in the OAC group showed a reduced mortality rate at 90 days compared to the patients with no previous use of anticoagulation (20.2% vs 21.2%, p = 0.031). Logistic regression analysis did not reveal a statistically significant influence of the anticoagulation status on the likelihood of any ICH (OR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.46-1.97, p = 0.900) and symptomatic ICH (OR = 4.87, 95% CI = 0.64-37.1, p = 0.127). Our analysis showed also that pre-admission anticoagulant use was not associated with functional independence at 90 days after stroke (OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.39-1.48, p = 0.422) and rate of successful reperfusion (OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.38-1.72, p = 0.582).

CONCLUSION

According to our findings anticoagulation status at baseline did not raise any suggestion of safety and efficacy concerns when MT treatment is provided according to the standard guidelines. Confirmation of these results in larger controlled prospective cohorts is necessary.