Approaching Artificial Intelligence in Orthopaedics: Predictive Analytics and Machine Learning to Prognosticate Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Surgical Outcomes

Artificial Intelligence (AI): A Potential Game Changer in Regenerative Orthopedics-A Scoping Review

Background and Aims

Regenerative orthopedics involves approaches like stem cell therapy, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy, the use of biological scaffold implants, tissue engineering, etc. We aim to present a scoping review of the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in different treatment approaches of regenerative orthopedics.

Methods

Using the PRISMA guidelines, a search for articles for the last ten years (2013-2024) on PubMed was done, using several keywords. We have discussed the state-of-the-art, strengths/benefits, and limitations of the published research, and provide a useful resource for the way ahead in future for researchers working in this area.

Results

Using the eligibility criteria out of 82 initially screened publications, we included 18 studies for this review. We noticed that the treatment responses to regenerative treatments depend on several factors; hence, to facilitate better comprehensive and patient-specific treatments, AI technology is very useful. Machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) are a few of the most frequently used AI techniques. They use a data-driven approach for training models to make human-like decisions. Data are fed to the ML/DL algorithm and the trained model makes classifications or predictions based on its learning.

Conclusion

The area of regenerative orthopedics is highly sophisticated and significantly aids in providing cost-effective and non-invasive treatments to patients suffering from orthopedic ailments and injuries. Due to its promising future, the use of AI in regenerative orthopedics is an emerging and promising research field; however, its universal clinical applications are associated with some ethical considerations, which need addressing.

Graphical Abstract

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-024-01189-1.

Artificial intelligence in shoulder and elbow surgery: overview of current and future applications

Artificial intelligence (AI) is amongst the most rapidly growing technologies in orthopedic surgery. With the exponential growth in healthcare data, computing power, and complex predictive algorithms, this technology is poised to aid providers in data processing and clinical decision support throughout the continuum of orthopedic care. Understanding the utility and limitations of this technology is vital to practicing orthopedic surgeons, as these applications will become more common place in everyday practice. AI has already demonstrated its utility in shoulder and elbow surgery for imaging-based diagnosis, predictive modeling of clinical outcomes, implant identification, and automated image segmentation. The future integration of AI and robotic surgery represents the largest potential application of AI in shoulder and elbow surgery with the potential for significant clinical and financial impact. This editorial's purpose is to summarize common AI terms, provide a framework to understand and interpret AI model results, and discuss current applications and future directions within shoulder and elbow surgery.

Artificial Intelligence for Clinically Meaningful Outcome Prediction in Orthopedic Research: Current Applications and Limitations

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) play a critical role in evaluating the success of treatment interventions for musculoskeletal conditions. However, predicting which patients will benefit from treatment interventions is complex and influenced by a multitude of factors. Artificial intelligence (AI) may better anticipate the propensity to achieve clinically meaningful outcomes through leveraging complex predictive analytics that allow for personalized medicine. This article provides a contemporary review of current applications of AI developed to predict clinically significant outcome (CSO) achievement after musculoskeletal treatment interventions.

RECENT FINDINGS

The highest volume of literature exists in the subspecialties of total joint arthroplasty, spine, and sports medicine, with only three studies identified in the remaining orthopedic subspecialties combined. Performance is widely variable across models, with most studies only reporting discrimination as a performance metric. Given the complexity inherent in predictive modeling for this task, including data availability, data handling, model architecture, and outcome selection, studies vary widely in their methodology and results. Importantly, the majority of studies have not been externally validated or demonstrate important methodological limitations, precluding their implementation into clinical settings. A substantial body of literature has accumulated demonstrating variable internal validity, limited scope, and low potential for clinical deployment. The majority of studies attempt to predict the MCID-the lowest bar of clinical achievement. Though a small proportion of models demonstrate promise and highlight the utility of AI, important methodological limitations need to be addressed moving forward to leverage AI-based applications for clinical deployment.

Application of Artificial Intelligence in Shoulder Pathology

Artificial intelligence (AI) refers to the science and engineering of creating intelligent machines for imitating and expanding human intelligence. Given the ongoing evolution of the multidisciplinary integration trend in modern medicine, numerous studies have investigated the power of AI to address orthopedic-specific problems. One particular area of investigation focuses on shoulder pathology, which is a range of disorders or abnormalities of the shoulder joint, causing pain, inflammation, stiffness, weakness, and reduced range of motion. There has not yet been a comprehensive review of the recent advancements in this field. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to evaluate current AI applications in shoulder pathology. This review mainly summarizes several crucial stages of the clinical practice, including predictive models and prognosis, diagnosis, treatment, and physical therapy. In addition, the challenges and future development of AI technology are also discussed.

Preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Predict Postoperative Clinical Outcomes Following Rotator Cuff Repair

PURPOSE

To determine whether preoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs) predict postoperative PROs and satisfaction following rotator cuff repair.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified patients who underwent a primary rotator cuff repair at a single institution. A receiver operating characteristics analysis was used to reach a preoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score threshold predictive of postoperative ASES and satisfaction scores. We evaluated patients above and below the receiver operating characteristics threshold by comparing their final ASES scores, ASES change (Δ) from baseline, percent maximum outcome improvement, and achievement of minimum clinically important differences, substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS). Fischer exact tests were used to analyze categorical data, and continuous data were analyzed using t-test.

RESULTS

A total of 348 patients who underwent rotator cuff repair were included in this study. The preoperative ASES value predictive of achieving SCB was 63 (area under the curve, 0.75; 95% confidence interval: 58-67; P < .001). Patients with preoperative ASES less than 63 were significantly more likely to achieve MCID (odds ratio [OR]: 4.7, P < .001) and SCB (OR:6.1, P < .001) and had significantly higher percent maximum outcome improvement (63% vs 41%; P = 0.003) and Δ ASES scores (36 vs 12; P < .001). However, patients with preoperative ASES scores above 63 had significantly higher final ASES scores (86 vs 79; P = .003), were more likely to achieve PASS (59% vs 48%; P = .045), and had higher satisfaction scores (7.4 vs 6.7; P = .024).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with high preoperative ASES scores achieve less relative improvement; however, these patients may be more likely to achieve PASS and may have higher satisfaction scores postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative prognostic trial.

Rotator cuff tears

Rotator cuff tears are the most common upper extremity condition seen by primary care and orthopaedic surgeons, with a spectrum ranging from tendinopathy to full-thickness tears with arthritic change. Some tears are traumatic, but most rotator cuff problems are degenerative. Not all tears are symptomatic and not all progress, and many patients in whom tears become more extensive do not experience symptom worsening. Hence, a standard algorithm for managing patients is challenging. The pathophysiology of rotator cuff tears is complex and encompasses an interplay between the tendon, bone and muscle. Rotator cuff tears begin as degenerative changes within the tendon, with matrix disorganization and inflammatory changes. Subsequently, tears progress to partial-thickness and then full-thickness tears. Muscle quality, as evidenced by the overall size of the muscle and intramuscular fatty infiltration, also influences symptoms, tear progression and the outcomes of surgery. Treatment depends primarily on symptoms, with non-operative management sufficient for most patients with rotator cuff problems. Modern arthroscopic repair techniques have improved recovery, but outcomes are still limited by a lack of understanding of how to improve tendon to bone healing in many patients.

Advancements in the diagnosis and management of rotator cuff tears. The role of artificial intelligence

Background

This review examined the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in the diagnosis and management of rotator cuff tears (RCTs).

Methods

A literature search was conducted in October 2023 using PubMed (MEDLINE), SCOPUS, and EMBASE databases, included only peer-reviewed studies. Relevant articles on AI technology in RCTs. A critical analysis of the relevant literature was conducted.

Results

AI is transforming RCTs management through faster and more precise identification and assessment using algorithms that facilitate segmentation, quantification, and classification of the RCTs across various imaging modalities. Precise algorithms focusing on preoperative factors to assess RCTs reparability have been developed for personalized treatment planning and outcome prediction. AI also aids in exercise classification and promotes patient adherence during at-home physiotherapy. Despite promising advancements, challenges in data quality and symptom integration persist. Future research should include refining AI algorithms, expanding their integration into various imaging techniques, and exploring their roles in postoperative care and surgical decision-making.

Conclusions

AI-driven solutions improve diagnostic accuracy and have the potential to influence treatment planning and postoperative outcomes through the automated RCTs analysis of medical imaging. Integration of high-quality datasets and clinical symptoms into AI models can enhance their reliability. Current AI algorithms can also be refined, integrated into other imaging techniques, and explored further in surgical decision-making and postoperative care.

Application of Machine Learning Algorithms for Prognostic Assessment in Rotator Cuff Pathologies: A Clinical Data-Based Approach

AIM

The overall aim of this proposal is to ameliorate the care of rotator cuff (RC) tear patients by applying an innovative machine learning approach for outcome prediction after arthroscopic repair.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We applied state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms to evaluate the best predictors of the outcome, and 100 RC patients were evaluated at baseline (T0), after 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2), 6 months (T3), and 1 year (T4) from surgical intervention. The outcome measure was the Costant-Murley Shoulder Score, whereas age, sex, BMI, the 36-Item Short-Form Survey, the Simple Shoulder Test, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score, the Oxford Shoulder Score, and the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index were considered as predictive factors. Support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbors (k-NN), naïve Bayes (NB), and random forest (RF) algorithms were employed.

RESULTS

Across all sessions, the classifiers demonstrated suboptimal performance when using both the complete and shrunken sets of features. Specifically, the logistic regression (LR) classifier achieved a mean accuracy of 46.5% ± 6%, while the random forest (RF) classifier achieved 51.25% ± 4%. For the shrunken set of features, LR obtained a mean accuracy of 48.5% ± 6%, and RF achieved 45.5% ± 4.5%. No statistical differences were found when comparing the performance metrics of ML algorithms.

CONCLUSIONS

This study underlines the importance of extending the application of AI methods to new predictors, such as neuroimaging and kinematic data, in order to better record significant shifts in RC patients' prognosis.

LIMITATIONS

The data quality within the cohort could represent a limitation, since certain variables, such as smoking, diabetes, and work injury, are known to have an impact on the outcome.

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Rotator Cuff Tears

Rotator cuff tears (RCTs) negatively impacts patient well-being. Artificial intelligence (AI) is emerging as a promising tool in medical decision-making. Within AI, deep learning allows to autonomously solve complex tasks. This review assesses the current and potential applications of AI in the management of RCT, focusing on diagnostic utility, challenges, and future perspectives. AI demonstrates promise in RCT diagnosis, aiding clinicians in interpreting complex imaging data. Deep learning frameworks, particularly convoluted neural networks architectures, exhibit remarkable diagnostic accuracy in detecting RCTs on magnetic resonance imaging. Advanced segmentation algorithms improve anatomic visualization and surgical planning. AI-assisted radiograph interpretation proves effective in ruling out full-thickness tears. Machine learning models predict RCT diagnosis and postoperative outcomes, enhancing personalized patient care. Challenges include small data sets and classification complexities, especially for partial thickness tears. Current applications of AI in RCT management are promising yet experimental. The potential of AI to revolutionize personalized, efficient, and accurate care for RCT patients is evident. The integration of AI with clinical expertise holds potential to redefine treatment strategies and optimize patient outcomes. Further research, larger data sets, and collaborative efforts are essential to unlock the transformative impact of AI in orthopedic surgery and RCT management.

Development and clinical validation of deep learning for auto-diagnosis of supraspinatus tears

BACKGROUND

Accurately diagnosing supraspinatus tears based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is challenging and time-combusting due to the experience level variability of the musculoskeletal radiologists and orthopedic surgeons. We developed a deep learning-based model for automatically diagnosing supraspinatus tears (STs) using shoulder MRI and validated its feasibility in clinical practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 701 shoulder MRI data (2804 images) were retrospectively collected for model training and internal test. An additional 69 shoulder MRIs (276 images) were collected from patients who underwent shoulder arthroplasty and constituted the surgery test set for clinical validation. Two advanced convolutional neural networks (CNN) based on Xception were trained and optimized to detect STs. The diagnostic performance of the CNN was evaluated according to its sensitivity, specificity, precision, accuracy, and F1 score. Subgroup analyses were performed to verify its robustness, and we also compared the CNN's performance with that of 4 radiologists and 4 orthopedic surgeons on the surgery and internal test sets.

RESULTS

Optimal diagnostic performance was achieved on the 2D model, from which F1-scores of 0.824 and 0.75, and areas under the ROC curves of 0.921 (95% confidence interval, 0.841-1.000) and 0.882 (0.817-0.947) were observed on the surgery and internal test sets. For the subgroup analysis, the 2D CNN model demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.33-1.000 and 0.625-1.000 for different degrees of tears on the surgery and internal test sets, and there was no significant performance difference between 1.5 and 3.0 T data. Compared with eight clinicians, the 2D CNN model exhibited better diagnostic performance than the junior clinicians and was equivalent to senior clinicians.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed 2D CNN model realized the adequate and efficient automatic diagnoses of STs, which achieved a comparable performance of junior musculoskeletal radiologists and orthopedic surgeons. It might be conducive to assisting poor-experienced radiologists, especially in community scenarios lacking consulting experts.