Safety and Efficacy of Ab Interno XEN 45 Gel Stent in Patients with Glaucoma and High Myopia

XEN45 gel stent in the treatment of pigmentary glaucoma: A two-year follow-up

PURPOSE

To investigate safety and efficacy of the XEN gel stent in patients with pigmentary glaucoma (PG).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 26 eyes of 19 patients with PG undergoing XEN gel stent implantation was performed. Best-corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), and number of antiglaucoma medications were analyzed preoperatively, and at 2 weeks and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Success, needling, and complications were analyzed. Complete success was defined as an IOP reduction of >20% and achieving a target IOP of ≤18, ≤15, or ≤12 mmHg without antiglaucoma medication. Qualified success was indicated if the IOP target was reached with or without medication.

RESULTS

Mean IOP decreased significantly from 27.6 ± 14.3 (standard deviation, SD) mmHg to 14.3 ± 4.6 mmHg after one year (p < 0.001) and 15.1 ± 2.7 mmHg (p < 0.001) after two years. The median number of hypotensive drugs declined significantly from 4 (range: 3-5) to 0 (0-2) and 0 (0-3) after one and two years, respectively. After two years, complete success with an IOP of ≤18 mmHg and ≤15 mmHg was achieved in 73.1% and 61.5%, respectively. Half of the eyes required needling after a median time of 8 months (0.5-34 months). No sight-threatening complications were observed.

CONCLUSION

The XEN gel stent is a safe and effective surgical treatment option for PG. Needling is an important part of the procedure and should be communicated preoperatively to the patients.

Complications of XEN gel stent implantation for the treatment of glaucoma: a systematic review

Aim

This study was aimed to summarize the complications and their management associated with XEN gel stent implantation.

Methods

A systematic review of literature was conducted using Medline (via PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library databases, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure, from their inception to February 1, 2024.

Results

A total of 48 studies published between 2017 and 2024 were identified and included in the systematic review, including 16 original studies (retrospective or prospective clinical studies), 28 case reports, and 4 case series, which followed patients for up to 5 years. Early postoperative complications of XEN gel stent implantation include hypotony maculopathy (1.9-4.6%), occlusion (3.9-8.8%), suprachoroidal hemorrhage (SCH), choroidal detachment (0-15%), conjunctival erosion, and exposure of the XEN gel stent (1.1-2.3%), wound and bleb leaks (2.1%) and malignant glaucoma (MG) (2.2%). Mid-postoperative complications of XEN gel stent implantation included migration of XEN (1.5%), ptosis (1.2%), endophthalmitis (0.4-3%), macular edema (1.5-4.3%), hypertrophic bleb (8.8%) and subconjunctival XEN gel stent fragmentation (reported in 2 cases). Late postoperative complications reported in cases included spontaneous dislocation and intraocular degradation.

Conclusion

XEN gel stent implantation is a minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) procedure for glaucoma, known for its potential to minimize tissue damage and reduce surgical duration. However, it is crucial to note that despite these advantages, there remains a risk of severe complications, including endophthalmitis, SCH, and MG. Therefore, postoperative follow-up and early recognition of severe complications are essential for surgical management.

Navigating hypotony challenges with XEN gel implantation

INTRODUCTION

The XEN Gel, a hydrophilic tube meticulously crafted to adhere to the principles of the Hagen - Poiseuille law, is designed to facilitate efficient aqueous shunting without inducing hypotony. Implantable ab interno or ab externo, with or without conjunctival opening, the device shows no significant outcome differences. Despite numerical hypotony signaling failure, patients may fare well below 6 mmHg.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides insights into device variability, challenges related to hypotony, associated risk factors, and hypotony management.

EXPERT OPINION

The progressive evolution of the XEN Gel constitutes a significant advancement in the field of glaucoma management. Comparative studies investigating diverse implantation methodologies, particularly the ab interno and closed conjunctival approaches, highlight the device versatility in addressing individual patient needs. Exploring hypotony from both statistical and clinical perspectives challenges the traditional view of intraocular pressure as a straightforward success or failure indicator. The incidence of hypotony-related issues varies between device models, emphasizes the need for an individualized approach during device selection. Overall, understanding the dynamics of hypotony is crucial for optimizing the outcomes of XEN Gel implantation.

Difficult decisions, filtration surgery, and the heartbreak of the numerator

A 70-year-old man had progressive and severe glaucoma in each eye. He was intolerant to dorzolamide, brimonidine, and netarsudil. Each eye had prior selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) as well as phacoemulsification plus minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) 6 years before current presentation (iStent [Glaukos Corp.] in the right eye and Cypass [Alcon Laboratories, Inc.] in the left eye). Postoperative acuities were 20/20 and 20/25 in the right and left eyes, respectively. When his left eye progressed with loss of central acuity despite peak intraocular pressures (IOPs) in the middle to upper teens, neuro-ophthalmology consultation was obtained (Figure 1JOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202401000-00017/figure1/v/2023-12-22T124801Z/r/image-tiff). That workup included magnetic resonance imaging scan and hematologic screening, but all results were negative, and the neuro-ophthalmic consultant concluded that the vision loss was likely on the basis of glaucoma. Accordingly, a trabeculectomy was performed in the left eye achieving consistent IOPs in the range of 7 to 10 mm Hg without medications, rending the left eye stable since the filtration surgery nearly 2 years previously. The right eye continued to progress both subjectively and objectively, and on recent examination, the IOP measured 20 mm Hg and 09 mm Hg in the right and left eyes, respectively (Figure 2JOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202401000-00017/figure2/v/2023-12-22T124801Z/r/image-tiff). Medications included timolol and latanoprostene bunod in the right eye only. Central corneal thickness was 526 μm and 527 μm in the right and left eyes, respectively. The visual acuity now measured 20/25 in the right eye and 20/250 in the left eye. The vertical cup-to-disc ratio was 0.9 in the right eye and 1.0 in the left eye. Gonioscopy revealed a wide open angle in each eye with a patent sclerostomy superiorly in the left eye. The conjunctiva and sclera were healthy and without scarring in the right eye. The bleb in the left eye was diffuse, lightly vascularized, and seidel negative. Axial length (AL) was 26.88 μm in the right eye and 26.77 μm in the left eye. The patient was in good health and was not anticoagulated. An extensive discussion ensued about the best course of action for the right eye. How would you proceed in managing definite progression in this individual's right eye, knowing that he had lost fixation in his left eye at similar pressures?

Effectiveness and Safety of Xen Gel Stent in Glaucoma Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Although topical medical therapy and selective-laser-trabeculoplasty represent the treatments of choice to reduce intraocular pressure, many patients do not achieve adequate glaucoma control; therefore, they require further options and eventually surgery. Trabeculectomy is still considered the gold standard, but the surgical management of glaucoma has undergone continuous advances in recent years, XEN-gel-stent has been introduced as a safer and less traumatic means of lowering intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG). This study aimed to review the effectiveness and safety of clinical data on XEN-stent in OAG patients with a Synthesis-Without-Meta-analysis (SWiM) methodology. A total of 339 studies were identified following a literature search adhering to PRISMA guidelines and, after evaluation, 96 studies are discussed. XEN63 and XEN45 device data were collected both short and long term. In addition, this document has evaluated different aspects related to the XEN implant, including: its role compared to trabeculectomy; the impact of mitomycin-C dose on clinical outcomes; postoperative management of the device; and the identification of potential factors that might predict its clinical outcomes. Finally, current challenges and future perspectives of XEN stent, such as its use in fragile or high myopia patients, were discussed.